[1. Call to order and confirm a quorum]
[00:00:09]
CALL TO ORDER THE MEETING. THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO ORDER. THE DAY IS SEPTEMBER 14TH, 2026 AT 701. CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE MEETING? I'LL MAKE A MOTION SECOND. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN MEETING FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
SECOND. THAT MOTION A SECOND. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. THE MEETING OF OFFICIALLY OPEN FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AT 701. CAN WE HAVE A ROLL CALL, PLEASE? COMMISSIONER ZORATTI HERE. COMMISSIONER. CHAMPAGNE PRESENT. COMMISSIONER O'BRIEN HERE. COMMISSIONER RODRIGUEZ HERE. OKAY, WE HAVE A QUORUM. I LIKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ROLL CALL. MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND. THE NEXT THING ON THE AGENDA IS PUBLIC COMMENTS. DO WE HAVE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS ANYTHING THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA? OKAY. SEEING THAT THERE'S NONE, WE WILL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA.
SO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS PUBLIC HEARING. OKAY. PUBLIC HEARING. I'M SORRY. SO IT LOOKS
[3. Consent Agenda Item ]
LIKE WE'RE ON ITEM THREE, THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM ITEM THREE. AND THAT IS TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL. OKAY. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HELD ON AUGUST 10TH, TWO, 2026. CAN I GET A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE ITEM NUMBER THREE. CAN I GET A SECOND? SECOND, THE MOTION. NOW THAT THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES HAVE BEEN. APPROVED, WILL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA. AND THAT IS ITEM NUMBER FOUR FOR A VOTE. OH YES, WE NEED TO. I'M SORRY. OKAY. WE NEED TO VOTE ON THE MINUTES. I'M GOING TO VOTE ON THE MOTION.RIGHT. SO WE USE THE BUTTON OR DO WE JUST RAISE OUR HANDS. YOU CAN USE THE BUTTON. OKAY. LET'S VOTE ON THE MINUTES. THE MINUTES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY ALL BY UNANIMOUS A UNANIMOUS
[4.A. TEXT-2026-00001: Conduct public hearing and consider a zoning text amendment and amendment to the land use chart to allow HUD-code manufactured home as a permitted land use in the Estate Single-Family Residential District (SF-43) zoning district.]
VOTE. NOW WE CAN MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER FOUR. OKAY. VERY GOOD. OKAY, SO WE'RE MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER FOUR, WHICH IS THE ACTION ITEM OF PUBLIC HEARING. OKAY. WE OPEN THIS JUST FOR THE RECORD. WE'RE ON ITEM FOUR A, ITEM FOUR A. OKAY, SO THE ITEM TEXT ITEM FOR A 2026 0001 CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A ZONING TEXT, AMENDMENT AND AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE CHART TO ALLOW HUD CODE MANUFACTURE HOMES AS A PERMIT. LAND USE IN THE ESTATE.SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. SF DASH FOUR THREE ZONING DISTRICT. COULD YOU STATE YOUR. MEMBERS? MY NAME IS MARK THRASHER OF THE ASSISTANT MANAGER, COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE CITY. AND TONIGHT WE'RE GOING TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATED TO A TEXT
[00:05:05]
AMENDMENT TO UPDATE THE CITY'S LANGUAGE CHARTS, ALLOW MANUFACTURED HOMES BY RIGHT OR CHANGES IN THE OR FAMILY DISTRICT. SORRY. START OVER. I GUESS REAL QUICK FOR THE PEOPLE THAT MIGHT BE ONLINE. MY NAME IS MARK RAUSCHER. I'M THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER HERE AT CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. I'M HERE TONIGHT TO BASICALLY CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A PROPOSED ZONING TEXT, AMENDMENT AND AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE CHART TO ALLOW HUD CODE MANUFACTURED HOUSING BY RIGHT AS A PERMITTED LAND USE IN THE ESTATE. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT KNOWN AS SF 43. SO THE TEXAS SENATE LAST YEAR ACTUALLY PASSED A BILL KNOWN AS SB 785, SB 785 REQUIRES THAT ALL CITIES IN THE STATE OF TEXAS ALLOW BY RIGHT. THE HUD MANUFACTURED HOUSING WITHIN AT LEAST ONE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.CITIES CANNOT HAVE SPECIAL USE REQUIREMENTS OR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUIREMENT THAT. THIS TYPE OF HOUSING NEEDS TO. NEEDS TO FIRST GO THROUGH THE NEW STATE LAW BASICALLY REQUIRES THAT, AS I SAID EARLIER, THAT YOU ALLOW BY RIGHT HUD CODE MANUFACTURED HOUSING IN AT LEAST ONE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. IT'S STILL, THOUGH, ALLOWS FOR LOCAL AUTHORITY IN THE SENSE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE GET TO DETERMINE, YOU KNOW, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT GETS TO DETERMINE WHERE THIS TYPE OF HOUSING USE IS ALLOWED. BUT AGAIN, YOU KNOW, WE WE CAN'T EXCLUDE THIS HOUSING TYPE. AND THIS LAW ACTUALLY WENT INTO EFFECT EARLIER THIS MONTH ON SEPTEMBER 1ST. SO JUST A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND, THE, THE, THE DEFINITIONS THAT YOU SEE HERE. SO A HUD CODE MANUFACTURED HOME IS, IS ESSENTIALLY A TYPE OF FACTORY BUILT HOUSE, RESIDENTIAL HOUSE. THAT'S, THAT'S BASICALLY CONSTRUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL HUD CONSTRUCTION AND SAFETY STANDARDS. THESE STANDARDS INCLUDE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION, FOUNDATION AND ANCHORING OF THE HOUSING STRUCTURE. YOUR TYPICAL MOBILE HOME IS A IS A TYPE OF OF FACTORY BUILT DWELLING THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE INTRODUCTION OF THE FEDERAL HUD CODE BACK IN JUNE OF 1976. NOW, TO KIND OF GO BACK UP THE HUD CO MANUFACTURED HOMES, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF MOBILE HOMES ARE STILL COVERED UNDER HUD CODE MANUFACTURED HOUSING. AND I'LL SHOW YOU ALL IN A LITTLE BIT. YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE TO HAVE A CERTIFIED LABEL ON THE, ON THE SIDE OF THE HOUSING UNIT, BUT THERE ARE A WIDE VARIETY OF HUD CODE MANUFACTURED HOUSES THAT ARE AVAILABLE. AND I'LL GO THROUGH THAT HERE SHORTLY. SO OUR CURRENT ORDINANCE ACTUALLY ALLOWS HUD CODE MANUFACTURED HOMES IN THE SF 43 ZONING DISTRICT, BUT YOU HAVE TO GET AN SUP FIRST. AND SENATE BILL 785 SAYS THAT CITIES CAN NO LONGER REQUIRE AN S, U, P, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF HURDLES TO JUMP THROUGH IN ORDER TO PUT HUD CODE MANUFACTURED HOMES IN PLACE. SO THAT'S THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE TONIGHT. SO AS I SAID, THERE ARE VARIOUS EXAMPLES OF HUD CODE MANUFACTURED HOUSES. YOU CAN SEE THOSE HERE, YOU KNOW, THE TOP TWO AS WELL AS THE BOTTOM LEFT, YOU KNOW, LOOK, LOOK PRETTY SIMILAR TO TO A REGULAR HOUSE. THE ONE ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT LOOKS TO BE PROBABLY A DOUBLE WIDE WITH A, WITH A TWO CAR GARAGE THAT WAS BUILT EITHER ATTACHED OR IN FRONT OF THE, THE, THE DOUBLE WIDE UNIT. BUT IN ALL OF THESE CASES, YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE THAT RED LABEL THAT YOU SEE IN THE IN THE TOP MIDDLE THERE THAT SIGNIFIES THAT THESE ARE HUD CERTIFIED MANUFACTURED HOMES, WHICH WHICH HAVE A FEDERAL REQUIREMENT, AGAIN, THAT STIPULATES, YOU KNOW, THE THE CONSTRUCTION, THE INSTALLATION, HOW THEY'RE ANCHORED AND SO FORTH ON A, ON A FOUNDATION. SO IN DUNCANVILLE, OUR ā SOLUTION, WE BELIEVE, IS TO ALLOW BY RIGHT THIS TYPE OF HOUSING USE IN THE SF 43 ZONING DISTRICT ON THIS MAP, THE LIGHT GREEN AREAS, WHICH ARE MAINLY IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE CITY, THOSE ARE THE CURRENT SF 43 ZONED AREAS. AND WHAT WE'D BE ASKING TONIGHT WITH THIS ACTION IS TO IN THE LAND USE TABLE, ALLOW BY RIGHT THIS HOUSING TYPE IN JUST THAT SF 43 ZONING DISTRICT. THE HOUSES THAT WOULD
[00:10:02]
BE ALLOWED IN THIS ZONING DISTRICT WOULD STILL HAVE REQUIREMENTS THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO ADHERE TO, FOR EXAMPLE, TYING INTO THE MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM. THEY COULDN'T THEY COULDN'T OPERATE ON SEPTIC TANKS, FOR EXAMPLE. THESE HOUSING, THIS THESE HOUSES WOULD ALSO NEED TO HAVE A PERMANENT FOUNDATION THAT MEETS ALL THE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR, FOR THE, THE, THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNIT, YOU KNOW, THE BODY AND FRAME, THE, THE THERMAL PROTECTION, YOU KNOW, THAT HELPS TO INSULATE THE HOME AS WELL AS ALL THE PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. THE THE HOMES WOULD ALSO HAVE TO BE INSTALLED USING APPROVED ENGINEERING STANDARDS. AND THEY WOULD ALSO HAVE TO ADHERE TO OUR OUR SETBACKS FOR FOR FRONT AND SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS, JUST LIKE YOUR YOUR TYPICAL BRICK AND MORTAR HOUSE THAT WOULD WOULD HAVE TO ADHERE TO. AND THEN LASTLY, THESE HOMES WOULD ALSO HAVE TO PROVIDE FOR FOR OFF STREET PARKING, MEANING YOU WOULD HAVE TO HAVE GARAGES THAT ARE, THAT ARE EITHER ATTACHED OR, OR ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOUSING UNIT IN TERMS OF TIME FRAME. WE ARE WE ARE HERE TONIGHT, YOU KNOW, ASKING FOR FOR CITY FOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVAL FOR THIS TEXT AMENDMENT CHANGE TO, TO ESSENTIALLY UPDATE THE LAND USE TABLE TO ALLOW THIS HOUSING TYPE BY RIGHT AND SF 43 INSTEAD OF BY SVP. AND THIS WILL THEN GO TO CITY COUNCIL. RIGHT NOW IT'S SCHEDULED FOR TOMORROW NIGHT ACTUALLY, INSTEAD OF OCTOBER. IT'S IT IS SCHEDULED TOMORROW NIGHT FOR CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING AS WELL, SO THAT WE CAN MEET THE TIMELINE THAT WAS SET OUT BY THE BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE. SO AGAIN, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS LAND USE CHARTER AMENDMENT TONIGHT. AND WE WOULD, YOU KNOW, BE HAPPY TO TAKE ANY ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE REGARDING THIS PROPOSED ACTION TONIGHT. DOES ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I THINK ESSENTIALLY WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS COVER THE. SO WE'RE GONNA. BEFORE WE HAVE QUESTIONS, PUBLIC HEARING.CORRECT. SO WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND THEN WE'LL GO TO THE QUESTIONS. OKAY.
CORRECT. OKAY. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. SO I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING NOW. OKAY.
OKAY. AT THIS TIME WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? FOR THE PORTION OF THIS MEETING. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I SECOND THAT MOTION. OKAY. THE THE MEETING IS OFFICIALLY OPEN AT 7:13 P.M. AT THIS TIME, DO WE HAVE. WELL, THEY'LL VOTE ON THE MOTION. THEY'LL VOTE. OKAY.
OKAY, SO WE'LL VOTE. SEEING THAT IS UNANIMOUS. IT IS APPROVED. AND SECOND. SO AT THIS TIME OKAY. SO AT THIS TIME DO WE HAVE ANYONE WHO HAS OFFICIALLY OPENED. OKAY. SO THE THE PUBLIC HEARING IS OFFICIALLY OPENED AS AT 7:14 P.M. OKAY. AT THIS TIME, DO WE HAVE. ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO RESPOND TO THE COMMENTS OF THE STAFF? OKAY, SO THERE IS NO ONE TO THAT HAS ANY COMMENTS. FOR STAFF. OKAY. AS THERE IS NO FURTHER QUESTIONS, I WILL MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. WITH A SECOND. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE IT. AND DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. OKAY. AT 7:15 P.M. WE'LL VOTE ON THAT. WE HAVE CLOSED THE PORTION OF THIS MEETING. OH, WE HAVE TO VOTE.
OKAY, HERE WE GO. LET'S VOTE. OKAY. SEEING THAT THE VOTE IS UNANIMOUS, IT IS A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE THE MEETING. THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING AT 7:15 P.M. OKAY. WE DID THAT.
[00:15:07]
YEAH. ALL THOSE. OKAY. WE VOTED, SO WE DON'T HAVE TO DO THAT. OKAY. SO WE'RE MOVING ON TO ITEM. SO NOW YOU'RE ALL IN THE QUESTION PORTION OF THE OF THIS ITEM. THE QUESTION PORTION.OKAY. OKAY. SO DOES SO IS THIS FOR THE COMMISSION OR FOR THIS IS FOR THE COMMISSION. OKAY. SO DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR STAFF REGARDING THE HUD HOMES AND PLACEMENT. WELL I THINK IT'S MORE OF A COMMENT ON MY END OF IT. I MEAN, WE'RE JUST BASICALLY ALLOWING THE. HUD APPROVED HOMES IN SF 43 BY RIGHT. AS OPPOSED TO SUP, WHICH PREVIOUS TO THIS, THAT'S WHAT WE HAD TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS. AND I THINK ESSENTIALLY FROM AN EDUCATIONAL STANDPOINT. THESE THINGS STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH BUILDING CODES IN ORDER TO GET A PERMIT ISSUED FOR FOUNDATION OR, YOU KNOW, VERIFICATION THAT THIS IS A HUD APPROVED HOME. SO ESSENTIALLY THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DOING. I THINK WE'RE STILL ON THE ERC 2021 THROUGH BUILDING CODES. IS THAT WHAT WE ARE? WE ARE. YEAH. AS OF LAST YEAR WE MOVED TO THE 2021. SO YEAH. SO THESE HUD APPROVED HOMES. I'M THE REASON I'M MAKING THESE COMMENTS BECAUSE I'VE GONE THROUGH THIS PROCESS AND SOME OTHER JURISDICTIONS AND IT'S THESE THINGS ARE THEY GOT TO GO THROUGH BUILDING CODES. THEY GOT TO GO THROUGH THE ENERGY CODE. THEY GO THROUGH MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL. IT'S JUST LIKE GOING THROUGH A REGULAR REVIEW. AND WE'RE JUST HAVING TO ALLOW THESE THINGS BY RIGHT IN SF 43. AS LONG AS THEY STILL ADHERE TO, YOU KNOW, SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AND, YOU KNOW, INSTALLATION AND ANCHORING AND EVERYTHING. SO. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OKAY.
SEEING THAT THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS, I WILL HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE QUESTION.
PART OF THE PORTION OF YOU JUST MAKE A MOTION. SO NOW YOU CAN TAKE ACTION. YEAH. OKAY. SO WE CAN MAKE A MOTION. I DIDN'T HEAR TO APPROVE OR TO APPROVE. YES. OKAY. ALRIGHTY. SO AT THIS TIME WE'RE GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE OR DENY TABLE OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS WITH WHAT THE STAFF HAS PRESENTED FOR THE HUD HOMES. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH NO CONDITIONS BASED UPON STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS TO MOVE FORWARD. OKAY. DO WE HAVE SO WE HAVE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO CONSIDER APPROVAL AS WELL. WILL THERE BE A SECOND? I SECOND THAT MOTION. I THINK IT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. YEAH. SO I THINK SO TOO. MOTION TO APPROVE AS WELL. OKAY. OKAY. SO AT THIS TIME DO WE VOTE? YES. OKAY. SO LET'S ALL VOTE. OKAY.
SEEING THAT THE VOTE IS UNANIMOUS, THE AND HAS BEEN MOTION. AND SECOND, THE COMMISSION HAS APPROVED THE HUD APPLICATION FOR SF43 HOMES.
NEXT THING UNDER THE AGENDA. OKAY. OKAY. THE WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE
[4.B. TEXT-2026-00002: Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to amend the Code of Ordinances, Appendix B Subdivision Regulations and Section 5.02, Planning and Zoning Commission of the Zoning Ordinance to delegate the Planning and Zoning Director/Assistant Director or designee the authority to administratively approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove all simple plats as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. ]
AGENDA. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA WILL BE TEXT 2026 0002. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.DESIREE POWELL, CITY PLANNER. THIS ITEM IS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, APPENDIX B SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND SECTION 5.02 OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO DELEGATE THE PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR OR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OR OR THEIR DESIGNEE. THE
[00:20:02]
AUTHORITY TO ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DISAPPROVE ALL SIMPLE PLANS AS DEFINED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. SO THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST PLANNING STAFF IS REQUESTING THE ABILITY TO APPROVE MINOR OR SIMPLE PLATS IN HOUSE, ESSENTIALLY TO BE SIGNED OFF BY THE DIRECTOR OR THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. WE HAVE ESSENTIALLY KIND OF PROPOSED THIS TO HELP REDUCE COSTS FOR PUBLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS. AND SO WHEN WE HAVE PLATS, WHETHER THEY'RE MINOR, MORE COMPLEX, WE DO HAVE NOTICE IT AT THE NEWSPAPER WITH THE RAMBLER, AS WELL AS OUR PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY OWNER NOTICES WITHIN THE 200 FOOT BUFFER. AND SO POSTAGE ESSENTIALLY ADDS UP. AND THEN NOTICING IN THE NEWSPAPER. AND ADDITIONALLY, THIS ALLOWS ALLOWS FOR US TO APPROVE MINOR PLATS WITH STILL MEETING THE 30 DAY SHOT CLOCK STATE REQUIREMENT WITHOUT HAVING TO BE ROUTED TO PLANNING AND ZONING. SO ESSENTIALLY THIS IS TO CREATE A MECHANISM WHEN THERE ARE SIMPLE OR MINOR PLOTS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE ANY MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE OR ANY MAJOR CHANGES. SO OUR CURRENT PROCESS, WE HAVE AN APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE, CERTAIN DAYS OF THE MONTH. THOSE ARE IN ALIGNMENT WITH OUR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETINGS, AS WELL AS THE TIMING TO NOTICE THE PAPER AND NOTICE PROPERTY OWNERS STAFF DOES THEIR REVIEW AND REVISIONS. WE HAVE TO NOTICE PROPERTY. NOTICE THE NEWSPAPER 15 DAYS BEFORE THE ACTUAL MEETING. AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE TO NOTIFY THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT ARE SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE MEETING. SO WE WE REVIEW REVISIONS, WE GO BACK AND FORTH WITH THE APPLICANT AS NEEDED, AND WE PREPARE FOR P AND Z, WHICH AS YOU KNOW, IS ONCE A MONTH, SECOND MONDAY OF THE MONTH. ALL OF THIS WITHIN THAT 30 DAY TIME FRAME. AND SO BY THAT TIME, YOU ALL MAKE A DECISION. IF THE PLAT IS APPROVED, THE APPLICANT WILL MOVE FORWARD TO RECORD IT AT DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT OR DCAD. AND THEN THEY PROVIDE THE RECORDED PLAT AND THEN APPLY FOR PERMITS. AND SO WITH ALL OF THAT HAS TO HAPPEN ESSENTIALLY WITHIN THAT 30 DAY TIMELINE, MAINLY THE APPROVAL PROCESS. SO THIS IS THE AMENDED REVIEW PROCESS THAT WE ARE PROPOSING. SO THEY WOULD STILL SUBMIT ON THAT THAT SET DATE THAT WE HAVE SET UP IN OUR SUBMITTAL CALENDAR. STAFF WOULD STILL REVIEW LIKE NORMAL. SO STILL PLANNING, ENGINEERING, BUILDING ALL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF STILL PROVIDE REVISIONS TO THE APPLICANT. GO BACK AND FORTH. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS WE WOULD NOT WE WOULD NOT NOTICE IN THE PAPER AND THEN WE WOULDN'T SEND OUT. WE WOULD NEED TO SEND OUT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICES TO THE SURROUNDING 200FT OR TO THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200FT. AGAIN, AFTER ALL OF THOSE COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED AND THEY ARE SUFFICIENT AND ADEQUATE AS DETERMINED BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, THEY WOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE THAT DETERMINATION OF APPROVE APPROVAL CONDITIONS OR NOT APPROVED. AND THEN AFTER THAT ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL, EVERYTHING ELSE WOULD BE THE SAME. SIGN IT LIKE WE NORMALLY DO. THEY GET IT, RECORD IT, BRING IT BACK, AND THEN THEY CAN START THE, THE, THE PERMIT PROCESS AND OR THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PROCESS OR SITE PLAN PROCESS. SO WE ARE STILL WORKING ON THE DEFINITION OF THE A MINOR OR A SIMPLE PLAT, BUT THESE ARE THE BASICS OF WHAT WE WOULD CONSIDER IT. SO THEY WOULD MEET ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA. SO PLANNING A PROPERTY OR RECORDING A PROPERTY THAT HAS NEVER BEEN PLANTED WITH DCAD THAT MAY OR THAT HAS AN EXISTING PROPERTY EXISTING. BUILDING ON IT TO CORRECT MINOR TECHNICAL ERRORS OR SCRIVENER ERRORS. MISSPELLINGS. MISSING MINOR INFORMATION ON THE PLAT.THINGS LIKE THAT. PROPERTY HAS AN EXISTING STRUCTURE. AS MENTIONED, THERE WOULD BE NO MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE CHANGES, NO DEDICATION, NO EASEMENTS, ANY OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE THAT REQUIRED ESSENTIALLY MAJOR CHANGES TO THE THE BOUNDARIES AND THE LAYOUT OF THE PROPERTY, AND THEN MINOR CHANGE OF BOUNDARY LINES. THE DEFINITION OF MINOR AND SIMPLE PLAT WILL BE REVISED FOR A CLEARER UNDERSTANDING. SO WE CAN UPDATE THAT IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AS WELL AS SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND THE PROCEDURAL PROCESSES FOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. SO STAFF ANALYSIS, WE DID CHECK OUR RESEARCH SURROUNDING CITIES AND THE REST OF THE SOUTHWEST. THEY ALL HAVE A MECHANISM OF SOME SORT TO APPROVE MINOR PLATS ADMINISTRATIVELY OR THROUGH CONSENT AGENDA. AND SO WE THAT'S KIND OF HOW WE CAME TO THIS CONCLUSION OF IF THIS CAN HELP EXPEDITE SOME OF THAT PIPELINE COG OF GETTING BUILDING PERMITS, GOING TO CIVILS, GOING TO SITE PLAN AND REDUCE SOME OF THE COST THAT COMES WITH PUBLIC NOTIFICATION, WE COULD ESSENTIALLY GET MORE THINGS OFF OF OUR PLATE. AGAIN, THIS AMENDMENT WILL ALSO CREATE AN APPROVAL PROCESS FOR UNIQUE CASES. SO THOSE ARE MORE CASE BY CASE SCENARIOS WHERE A PARCEL IS BOUNDED BY OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE IN THEIR CONTROL. THEN STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AS PRESENTED.
DOES STAFF HAVE DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF AT THIS TIME? SO WE'LL.
[00:25:09]
SO WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO AFTER WE HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING, THEN WE'LL DO THE QUESTIONS. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. SO WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS AT 7:26 P.M.I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND. OKAY. AT 7:26 P.M. IT HAS BEEN A MOTION AND APPROVED TO. FOR STAFF TO HAVE A PUBLIC. THE THIS PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO JUST MAKE SURE YOU VOTE ON THE MOTION. YEAH. OKAY. SO WE'RE GOING TO VOTE AT THIS TIME. SEEING THAT IT IS 100% UNANIMOUS. WE'RE GOING TO. AND AND IT HAS BEEN MOTION AND APPROVED. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE THIS PORTION OF THE COMMENTS BY STAFF AT 2726. MY QUESTION IS BECAUSE THE. IS THERE ANYONE IN FAVOR TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE ITEM. OH, OKAY. AT THIS TIME, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA? SEEING THAT THERE'S NONE. WE'LL WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME AND WE'LL VOTE. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND, AND WE VOTE YES. OKAY.
ALRIGHTY. SEEING THAT THE VOTE IS UNANIMOUS, WE WILL AND HAVE BEEN MOTION AND APPROVED. WE WILL CLOSE THIS PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT 726 AT 7:27 P.M. OKAY. SO WE WILL GO AHEAD AND AT THIS TIME VOTE ON THE. AND WE JUST SEE IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS OR ANY QUESTIONS OR SO OF THE STAFF. YEAH. OKAY. SO ANY OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I THINK STAFF HAS DONE A GOOD JOB IN DEMONSTRATING THAT THERE HAS TO BE A MECHANISM CREATED IN ORDER FOR US TO BE ABLE TO CREATE THIS, THIS MECHANISM, IN ORDER TO KIND OF JUST MAKE IT A LOT EASIER. YEAH. AND YEAH, I'M 100% BEHIND IT. I THINK IT'S SOMETHING WE DON'T HAVE NOW.
THE ONLY THING I QUESTION I HAD WAS THE DEFINITIONS ON ON RIGHT NOW WE'RE CURRENTLY WE'RE PROPOSING THE DEFINITIONS. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE DEFINITIONS ON. SO THIS IS WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING. AND IT COULD CHANGE. BUT I THINK FOR THE MOST PART IT'S GOING TO HELP EXPEDITE ANY ANYTHING THAT WE HAVE PENDING THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO ADDRESS IN THE FUTURE. YES, I, I AGREE, BECAUSE WHAT I REALLY NEED AT THIS POINT IS BECAUSE THE DEFINITIONS ARE NOT THEY'RE STILL IN, THEY'RE STILL WORKING ON DEFINING IT AND REFINING WHAT THE DEFINITION IS. AND UNTIL THAT HAPPENS, I THINK THAT WE NEED TO, YOU KNOW, UNDERSTAND EXACTLY, EXACTLY WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT MINOR AND BREAKING THAT DOWN BECAUSE YOURSELF, YOU'RE SAYING THAT YOU'RE STILL WORKING ON IT, BUT IT'S NOT 100% SET YET. SO THAT'S AN ISSUE FOR ME. YEAH.
SO WITH THAT, BECAUSE WE ARE CURRENTLY CURRENTLY GOING THROUGH UPDATING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE LAND USE CHART, THAT'S WHY IT'S IN THAT WE ARE WORKING ON IT STAGE.
WHAT YOU SEE IN FRONT OF YOU IS PRETTY MUCH IT. AND I DEFINITELY UNDERSTAND THAT OF LIKE, IS THAT GOING TO CHANGE? BUT THE MAIN THING TO MR. RODRIGUEZ, COMMISSIONER RODRIGUEZ'S POINT OF ANYTHING THAT WOULD REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT INFRASTRUCTURE IS SOMETHING THAT OBVIOUSLY WOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED MINOR. LIKE THAT'S WHERE WE ARE, WHERE WE'RE TRYING TO GO WITH THIS. SO WHAT WE HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU IS ESSENTIALLY WHAT WE ARE DEFINING AS MINOR AND SIMPLE. BUT BECAUSE WE'RE GOING THROUGH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND UPDATING ALL AT ONCE, WE WERE KIND OF RECOMMENDED TO DO IT ALL IN THAT SWOOP INSTEAD OF TAKING IT PIECE BY PIECE. BUT I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND THAT. THANK YOU. OKAY. SO WHAT WE SEE HERE IS THE DEFINITION OF MINOR AND SIMPLE. THERE MIGHT BE SOME TWEAKS TO IT, TO THE VERBIAGE, BUT ESSENTIALLY THIS IS THIS IS IT. YES, MA'AM. OKAY. YEAH, I MEAN, I AGREE, I THINK IT'S A PRETTY, A GREAT WAY TO EXPEDITE THE PROCESS AND MAKES IT MORE EFFICIENT. OTHER CITIES HAVE ALREADY ADOPTED THIS AND IT SEEMS TO BE WORKING WELL. SO I, I AGREE WITH THEM NOTION AS WELL. I THINK I THINK STAFF HAS DONE A GREAT JOB IN, IN DEFINING THIS. SO. OKAY, ANY
[00:30:12]
MORE QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSIONERS FOR STAFF? OKAY. SEEING THAT THERE'S NONE.SEEING THAT THERE'S NONE. WE WILL. WE WILL VOTE. ON EITHER APPROVING APPROVAL CONDITIONS DENY OR TABLE. DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. ITEM NUMBER 2026 00002 WITH NO CONDITIONS AND APPROVE. SECOND. OKAY. SEEING THAT THE ITEM HAS BEEN MOTIONED AND SECOND WILL VOTE. SEEING THAT THE VOTE IS UNANIMOUS, IT HAS. IT HAS BEEN APPROVED. WE'LL CLOSE. WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER. GO AHEAD. OKAY. SO WE'LL MOVE ON
[4.C. ZONE-2026-00017: Conduct a public hearing and consider a request by the City of Duncanville to rezone by revocation of a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a hotel located on real property owned by Empire Hotel Group LLC (dba Capital O Hotel) at Lot 1, Block 3, Central Business Area, 1st Section, an addition to the City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas, more commonly known as 711 East Camp Wisdom Road, Duncanville, Texas.]
TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA. ITEM. THAT'S A C ZONE 2026 00017. I'M GONNA. STEP IN FOR SUSAN CITY MANAGER MR. RAUSCHER. HE'S PRESENTING THIS CASE, BUT HE'S I THINK IN THE TALKING TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DO YOU NEED A RECESS? YOU KNOW, I'VE NEVER DONE ONE OF THOSE. I DON'T KNOW AS LONG AS THE COMMISSION. IF Y'ALL ARE. WOULD YOU LIKE TO GO INTO RECESS UNTIL THE APPLICANT. I THINK HE'S COMING. IS HE COMING? SO THE CITY MANAGER'S GOING TO PRESENT THIS CASE BECAUSE IT'S. OKAY. GOOD EVENING. AGAIN, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEMBERS. SORRY, WE HAVE A EMERGENCY SITUATION THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH THERE ON THE LAW ENFORCEMENT FRONT. SO I APOLOGIZE FOR HAVING TO STEP OUT. SO SO AGAIN, MARK RAUSCHER, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER HERE AT CITY DUNCANVILLE. SO THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING TONIGHT TO DISCUSS THE REVOCATION OF THE SUP4711 EAST CAMP WISDOM ROAD, WHICH IS WHERE THE CAPITOL MOTEL, FORMERLY THE RODEWAY INN PROPERTY, IS LOCATED. THIS IS JUST AN AERIAL PHOTO SHOWING THE LOCATION ON CAMP WISDOM ROAD, JUST EAST OF I-20 AND JUST TO THE WEST OF COCKRELL HILL ROAD. SO THE REASON WE'RE HERE TONIGHT TO DISCUSS THE THE PROPOSED REVOCATION OF THE SEP FOR THIS FOR THIS PROPERTY IS IS DUE TO SEVERAL REASONS. NUMBER ONE, YOU KNOW, THE CITY CAUGHT WIND A FEW MONTHS BACK OF OF TWO ADDITIONAL TWO, TWO BUSINESSES OPERATING ON THE PROPERTY THAT WERE NOT PART OF THE SEP11 WAS AN ILLEGAL U-HAUL RENTAL BUSINESS. AND THEN THE SECOND ONE WAS A TRUCK PARKING OPERATION THAT WAS BEING ADVERTISED ON THE INTERNET.WHEN THE CITY FOUND OUT BOTH OF THESE BUSINESSES WERE OPERATING ON THE PROPERTY, WE NOTIFIED THE PROPERTY OWNER AND MANAGEMENT AND, AND THEY, THEY WORK TO, TO CEASE THE OPERATIONS OF THOSE TWO ILLEGAL BUSINESSES ON THE PROPERTY. THOSE TYPES OF BUSINESSES CAN ONLY BE OPERATED IN, IN OR PERMITTED BY RIGHT IN INDUSTRIAL ZONING OR WITH AN S, U, P AND COMMERCIAL ZONING. BUT YOU KNOW, THIS THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS NEITHER INDUSTRIAL ZONING OR COMMERCIAL. IT'S GOT AN SUP ON IT SPECIFICALLY FOR A HOTEL MOTEL USE. AND THAT'S U P HAS BEEN IN PLACE SINCE NOVEMBER 4TH, 2014 WHEN SUP ORDINANCE NUMBER 2232 WAS WAS APPROVED FOR THIS PROPERTY. THE SECOND REASON THE CITY IS IS CONSIDERING REVOCATION OF THE SUP IS RELATED TO JUST ONGOING ISSUES WITH THE PROPERTY. FROM A CODE ENFORCEMENT AND BUILDING ENFORCEMENT PERSPECTIVE. YOU KNOW, THERE MANY, MANY TIMES WHERE THE CITY GOES OUT, DOES AN INSPECTION AND FLAGS, YOU KNOW, CODE RELATED ITEMS, WHETHER IT'S, YOU KNOW, JUNK THAT'S, THAT'S STORED OUTSIDE OF THE HOTEL LIKE OLD APPLIANCES, FOR EXAMPLE, OR OTHER TRASH AND DEBRIS. THERE HAVE ALSO BEEN MANY CASES WHERE, WHERE THERE ARE DOWNED TREES OR
[00:35:01]
BUSHES OR JUST, YOU KNOW, THINGS THAT ARE JUST KIND OF SCATTERED ABOUT THE PROPERTY.AND SO CODE ENFORCEMENT HAS HAD TO GO OUT MULTIPLE TIMES, YOU KNOW, NOTIFY THROUGH A NOV NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF, OF THESE ISSUES. AND THEN ALSO SECONDARILY, JUST ISSUES WITH THE STRUCTURE ITSELF, YOU KNOW, IN FAILING TO MAINTAIN SOME OF THE EXTERIOR SURFACES, DOORS, WINDOWS AND SO FORTH IN GOOD CONDITION. NOW, YOU KNOW, UPON THE CITY NOTIFYING THE PROPERTY OWNER OF, OF NOTICES OF VIOLATION, YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE BEEN PRETTY GOOD ABOUT, YOU KNOW, GOING AHEAD AND RECTIFYING, YOU KNOW, THE SITUATION. BUT IT'S, BUT IT'S, IT'S THE CITY HAVING TO CONTINUOUSLY GO OUT THERE, DO INSPECTIONS. YOU KNOW, WE FIND ISSUES, WE NOTIFY THEM. YES, THEY FIX IT. BUT, BUT IT'S, IT'S KIND OF THAT ONGOING PROCESS. BUT AT THIS TIME, YOU KNOW, THESE ISSUES HAVE BEEN HAVE BEEN BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE, JUST LIKE WITH THE ILLEGAL BUSINESSES. WE WE TOLD THEM ABOUT IT AND THEY DID CEASE THOSE OPERATIONS. THE THIRD AND I WOULD SAY MOST MOST IMPORTANT REASON WHY WE'RE WHY WHY THE CITY IS PURSUING REVOKING THE S P FOR THIS PROPERTY IS DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF OF 911 CALLS FOR SERVICE TO THIS PROPERTY, YOU KNOW, BETWEEN JANUARY 1ST, 2020 THROUGH APRIL 30TH OF 2025, THERE WERE ALMOST 2300 CALLS FOR SERVICE. THAT'S BOTH FOR WHETHER IT'S POLICE, FIRE, EMS. AND I WANT TO EMPHASIZE THESE ARE CALLS FOR SERVICE. SOMEBODY ACTUALLY PICKED UP THE PHONE AND SAID, HEY, I NEED HELP. OR, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER THE ISSUE IS, THESE NUMBERS DO NOT, AND I REPEAT, DO NOT INCLUDE ROUTINE PATROLS THROUGH THE PROPERTY. NOW, GRANTED, POLICE DOES OCCASIONALLY THEY THEY DO DRIVE THROUGH THE PROPERTY, BUT THOSE THOSE AREN'T LOGGED AS CALLS FOR 911 SERVICE POLICE IS JUST SIMPLY CIRCULATING THE PROPERTY, JUST LIKE THEY DO OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OR, OR OR OR DRIVING DOWN AND PATROLLING MAJOR THOROUGHFARES IN THE CITY. WE ALSO LOOKED AT THE NUMBER OF CALLS BETWEEN MAY 1ST OF 2025 THROUGH MAY 1ST OF 2026, AND DURING THAT TIME FRAME, THERE WERE 313 CALLS FOR, FOR FOR SERVICE, ALMOST, ALMOST ONE ONE PER DAY AT TIMES. SOME OF THIS CRIMINAL CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IS ALSO SPILLED INTO SOME OF THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. AND WE'VE HAD COMPLAINTS FROM FROM THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS. I ALSO WANT TO MENTION, I MEAN, I KNOW, I KNOW YOU ALL GOT A FLIER HERE TONIGHT AND IT TALKS ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THIS PROPERTY HAVING PAID ABOUT $150,000 IN TAXES TO THE CITY OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS.
WELL, IF YOU JUST LOOK AT THOSE 313 CALLS FOR SERVICE IN JUST IN JUST THE ONE YEAR WITH PD AND FD, AND YOU USE INDUSTRY STANDARDS FOR THE FOR THE AVERAGE COST OF A FIRE EMS CALL, OR THE AVERAGE COST OF A PD CALL, JUST THOSE 313 CALLS IN IN THAT ONE YEAR ALONE COST THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE ABOUT $86,000 IN ONE YEAR. SO IF YOU WANT TO, IF YOU WANT TO GO BACK AND EXTRAPOLATE THAT OVER THE PREVIOUS FIVE YEAR PERIOD, WELL, THEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT ABOUT, YOU KNOW, SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 450 TO $500,000 IN COSTS FOR JUST DUNCANVILLE PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL TO RESPOND TO THE CALLS AT THIS PROPERTY. SO, YEAH, YOU KNOW, THEY BRING IN $150,000 IN HOTEL TAXES AND PROPERTY TAXES OVER A FIVE YEAR PERIOD. BUT THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE IS SPENDING AT LEAST THREE TIMES THAT MUCH JUST IN PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL COSTS ALONE, RESPONDING TO NONUNION CALLS AT THAT PROPERTY. THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE OUR CODE ENFORCEMENT GOING OUT THERE. THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE OUR BUILDING ENFORCEMENT GOING OUT THERE. SO I JUST WANT TO, YOU KNOW, CLARIFY THAT AFTER SEEING THIS FLIER. SO WITH THAT, THE PROCESS FOR REVOKING AN SCP IS ILLUSTRATED FOR YOU HERE TONIGHT. THE CITY HAD TO HAD TO GET AUTHORIZATION. CITY STAFF HAD TO GET AUTHORIZATION, OBVIOUSLY FROM OUR CITY COUNCIL TO DO THIS. AND SO THERE WAS A CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING BACK IN JUNE, JUNE 16TH, WHERE CITY COUNCIL WAS BRIEFED ON THIS ISSUE. THEY'RE THEY'RE ALL VERY FAMILIAR WITH THIS THIS PROPERTY. THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT'S JUST BEEN A ONE YEAR THING OR A TWO YEAR THING OR A FIVE YEAR THING. AND SO ON JULY 7TH, CITY COUNCIL VOTED VIA RESOLUTION TO GO AHEAD AND PROCEED WITH THE REVOCATION OF THE SEP. SO AT THAT POINT, CITY STAFF THEN INITIATES THE PROCESS. AND SO TONIGHT OBVIOUSLY IS THAT FIRST STEP. WE'RE HERE BEFORE THE P AND Z.
AND THEN THE NEXT STEP WILL BE GOING TO CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR OCTOBER 20TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THEY ONLY HAVE CURRENTLY ONE ONE COUNCIL MEETING ON THE BOOKS FOR THE
[00:40:02]
MONTH OF OCTOBER. AND SO THAT WOULD LIKELY BE OCTOBER 20TH. SO WITH THAT, I KNOW WE HAVE OTHER FOLKS HERE IN THE ROOM FROM THE CITY SIDE THAT CAN HELP WITH ANY QUESTIONS, BUT I KNOW WE HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS THAT WE NEED TO GO GO THROUGH. SO I WILL GO AHEAD AND PAUSE AND ALLOW THAT PROCESS TO HAPPEN. SO NOW WE'LL GIVE THE THE OWNER A CHANCE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION AS WELL. SO. IF THERE'S ANYONE ON THEIR BEHALF TO COME SPEAK TO PRESENT, THEY CAN THEY HAVE THAT TIME NOW. HI, MY NAME IS VICTOR AND OPERATE THE HOTEL MOTEL FOR FIVE YEARS.HALF OF THE STUFF IS NOT TRUE. SO LET ME START OUT BY SAYING, UNTIL THREE MONTHS AGO, WE'VE NEVER HEARD FROM ANY CODE, INCLUDING. COULD YOU GIVE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS? YEAH, SORRY. VICTOR PATEL 4024. VIRGINIA PINE, CARROLLTON, TEXAS 75007. NOW, LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING. FOR FIVE YEARS, I OPERATED THAT PLACE NOT ONCE. FIRST OF ALL, LET ME TELL YOU, THREE MONTHS AGO, YES, I DID OPEN A U-HAUL BECAUSE THE HOTEL BUSINESS, JUST LIKE ANY OTHER BUSINESS, IS VERY SLOW. WE HAVE A HUGE PARKING LOT. YOU COULD FIT ABOUT 125 CARS IN THERE. SO I SAID TO MYSELF, HEY, WE HAVE PARKING SPACE. WE DON'T NEED TO DO ANYTHING ELSE, BUT JUST ASK U-HAUL, CAN THEY PARK THEIR TRUCKS HERE? OKAY, I WAS WRONG, I ADMIT IT, BUT WITHIN A MONTH AND A HALF, AS SOON AS I GOT A LETTER FROM THE CITY, I REMOVED THE U-HAULS. WE DID NOT. WE QUIT THAT BUSINESS RIGHT AWAY. AND I WAS JUST THINKING, BECAUSE BUSINESS IS SLOW AND ECONOMY IS SLOW FOR EVERY OTHER BUSINESS IN DUNCANVILLE, I THOUGHT I'D TRY IT, BUT AS SOON AS CITY SAID, HEY, YOU CAN'T DO THIS, I GOT RID OF IT. NOW ALL THESE CODE THINGS FIND ME ONE PLACE WHERE IN LAST FIVE YEARS, THE CITY HAS SENT SOMETHING, A LEGAL DOCUMENTATION WHERE I DID SOMETHING ILLEGAL, BROKE THE LAW, OR DID ANYTHING WRONG. WE IN THAT PACKET YOU HAVE, I'VE HIGHLIGHTED. I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU A MINUTE BECAUSE I ONLY HAVE CERTAIN TIME. GO AHEAD AND LOOK AT THE HIGHLIGHTED PARTS OF THAT PACKET. IF YOU DON'T MIND, PLEASE. AND THOSE ARE FACTS.
YOU JUST READ THE HIGHLIGHTED PART. IT'S TOO LONG OF A PACKET. YOU COULD READ IT LATER. IT'S EVERYTHING IS HIGHLIGHTED. OKAY. REFERENCING ALL THAT. OKAY. ANOTHER THING.
THIS 150,000 IS INCLUDING PROPERTY TAX AND OCCUPANCY TAX PER YEAR. SO MULTIPLY THAT TIMES FIVE. IT'S NOT FOR FIVE YEARS TOTAL. NOW. YES, UNTIL THREE MONTHS AGO I DID MESS UP.
I'M NOT YOU KNOW. BUT AGAIN, ALL I DID IS PUT SOME U-HAUL TRUCKS AND THEN NOTHING ELSE. I DIDN'T BUILD AN OFFICE OR DO SOME PLANNING, ZONING, CONSTRUCTION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. SOMEBODY RENTED ON THE ONLINE. THEY PICK UP THE KEY FROM THE FRONT DESK. THAT'S ALL THEY DO. IT WAS, I AGREE AS FAR AS ZONING, I WAS JUST TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE PARKING LOT.
NOTHING CRAZY OUT THERE, THAT'S ALL I DID. TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE PARKING LOT. NOW, WHAT I DO PROPOSE AS FAR AS THESE CALLS, THEY INCLUDE EMERGENCY CALLS. THEY INCLUDE OTHER CALLS. AND NOW IF YOU NOTICE ON THAT PACKET, WE ARE AT THE BORDER OF COCKRELL HILL AND CAMP WISDOM.
YOU GUYS LIVE HERE. YOU KNOW HOW THAT COCKRELL HILL IS. EVERY BUSINESS UP AND DOWN THAT STREET HAS ISSUES WITH CRIME, OKAY? WE DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO PREVENT CRIME, HE SAID. THE FORD DEALERSHIP, I MEAN, THE FREEDOM DEALERSHIP. I WENT AND VISITED THE MANAGER. HE'S GOT THE LONGEST AREA ON COCKRELL HILL. HE'S GOT ALMOST A HALF A CITY BLOCK ON THAT AREA. HE HAS CRIME ON COCKRELL HILL ALSO. SO BLAMING US FOR THE COCKRELL HILL DALLAS PART, THAT'S COMPLETELY WRONG. I'VE ACTUALLY TALKED TO THE MANAGER. AND THE OTHER THING IS IF YOU LOOK AT THERE'S A CRIME RATING FOR CITY OF DALLAS AND CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. PRECINCT SEVEN IS THE HIGHEST CRIMINAL CRIME CITY IN DUNCANVILLE, WHICH CROSSES DALLAS. THAT'S WHY KILLING THEIR COPPER AND EVERYTHING GOT STOLEN HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH US. EVERY BUSINESS. SO ANYWAYS, WHAT I PROPOSE IS FOR FIVE YEARS I GOT NO LETTERS, ANYTHING, NO CODE VIOLATIONS.
WE PASSED FIRE INSPECTION. WE PASSED LAST YEAR. WE PASSED THE CITY INSPECTION AND THERE IS
[00:45:05]
THE A C O CERTIFICATE FROM BUILDING FIRE CITY AND CODE. THEY ALL PASSED THIS LAST YEAR AT THIS TIME, SO THERE'S NO VIOLATIONS, HE SAID. OTHER DEPARTMENTS NOW FOR FIVE YEARS, NO DEPARTMENTS OR ANYBODY CONTACTED US ABOUT ANYTHING. BUT HERE'S WHAT I PROPOSE BECAUSE IT'S A HIGHLY CRIMINAL AREA, PRECINCT SEVEN, THAT BORDERS DALLAS. WHY DON'T THE CITY, THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, WE GET TOGETHER AND HAVE SOME KIND OF A A BUSINESS MEETING EVERY MONTH AMONG THE BUSINESSES, BECAUSE I VISITED THE MANAGER, I VISITED THE OLIVE GARDEN MANAGER, I VISITED THE FREEDOM DEALERSHIP MANAGER. WE ALL FEEL LIKE IF THE CITY REALLY WANTS TO HELP, LET'S DO SOMETHING WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND ALL THE BUSINESSES SO WE CAN BUILD A COMMUNITY AGAINST DALLAS ON THE COCKRELL HILL, WHICH IS THE HIGHEST CRIMINAL ZIP CODE IN DALLAS. WE BORDERED AT THIS TIME. WE HAVE HEARD YOUR COMPLAINT AND WE WILL MOVE ON. SO THE NEXT THING WILL BE TO. SO THIS IS PART OF HIS PRESENTATION. SO JUST BEFORE WE MOVE ON, ARE YOU ARE YOU DONE OR. WELL, NO I AM, BUT THERE'S OTHERS WHO WANT TO SPEAK. OKAY.YES. ALL RIGHT. SO WE CAN PROCEED WITH OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING. YES. OKAY. SO WE WILL PROCEED WITH OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE HAVE OTHER SPEAKERS FROM THE. YEAH, YEAH. OH, IS THAT PART OF YOUR PRESENTATION? OH YEAH. WE GOT OTHER. OKAY. WE SIGNED UP TO IT. EXCUSE ME.
OKAY. SO ARE YOU ARE Y'ALL A PART OF THE PRESENTATION OR ARE Y'ALL WANT TO HAVE A COMMENT? COMMENT? I COULD LET YOU KNOW. I WASN'T AWARE THAT WE WERE ALLOWED TO MAKE AN PRESENTATION FOR THAT COMPANY A FEW TIMES IN THE PAST YEARS. AND WE HAVE 42. CORRECT? I REPRESENT THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF THE HOTEL. MR. VICTOR IS THE TENANT OF THE HOTEL. OKAY. SO HOW MANY REPRESENTATIVES DO WE HAVE RIGHT NOW? OKAY. AND THAT IS OUR ATTORNEY. OKAY. SO WE HAVE SPEAK DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING BECAUSE WE'RE ABOUT TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO THEY'LL HAVE THEIR TIME. YEAH, YEAH. SO LET'S MAKE A MOTION. YES. OKAY. SO AT THIS TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND.
OKAY. SO THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE OPENED. SO WE'RE GOING TO VOTE. ARE WE GOING TO VOTE? THEN THAT THE VOTE IS UNANIMOUS. THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL OPEN AT 7:48 P.M. OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WILL WHO WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE THE ISSUE WITH THE. THE SGP AT THIS TIME, THE REVOKING THE SGP AT THIS TIME. OKAY. COME FORWARD, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS. MY NAME IS JOSEPH SHIRAZI WITH 7-ELEVEN EAST CAMP, WISDOM ROAD, AND I RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT YOU DENY THIS PROPOSAL FOR TO REVOKE. WHAT CITY DO YOU LIVE IN, SIR? OH, PERSONALLY.
YES. FROM LOS ANGELES, 141 NORTH WILLIAM IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90211. OKAY. MR. RAUSCHER'S PRESENTATION CONTAINS SEVERAL MISLEADING STATEMENTS. I'VE BEEN HERE.
I'VE FLOWN THREE TIMES IN THE LAST THREE STATEMENTS. EVERY TIME. IT'S CHANGED A BIT SINCE THE LAST ONE IN WHICH HE MAKES CLAIMS. BUT FINALLY, THIS TIME, HE'S ACKNOWLEDGED THAT EVERY TIME THAT THERE HAS BEEN ANY KIND OF NOTE ABOUT OUR PROPERTY, WE HAVE REPAIRED IT WITHIN THE SAME DAY OR IMMEDIATELY. UNFORTUNATELY, I WAS NEVER AWARE OF THAT. HE HAD CREATED A U-HAUL STORAGE FACILITY. THE SECOND THAT THEY INFORMED ME THAT DAY, IT WAS SHUT DOWN. I UNDERSTAND WHERE HE'S COMING FROM. BUSINESS HAS BEEN HARD, SO BUT IT WAS NOT WITH OUR APPROVAL OR OUR KNOWLEDGE. AND WE IMMEDIATELY HAD THAT RECTIFIED. MR. RAUSCHER STATES THAT THERE ARE ISSUES WITH THE LANDSCAPING OR OTHER OTHER CONDITIONS. I HAVEN'T SEEN ONE PICTURE OR WE'VE NEVER GOTTEN ONE CITATION. WE'VE ACTUALLY ALSO HAD HIM PROVIDE SOME PHOTOS OF HOW MANICURED THE LANDSCAPING IS AND EVERYTHING WE DO. OBVIOUSLY BUILDINGS HAVE ISSUES, BUT ANY TIME ANYTHING HAS EVER BEEN BROUGHT UP PRIOR TO A VIOLATION OR CITATION, WE HAVE REPAIRED IT. WHEN IT COMES TO THE POLICE CALLS, THE NUMBERS THAT THAT THAT SLIDE HAS CHANGED A BIT SINCE WE BROUGHT IT. I'VE DONE A FOIA REQUEST WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. I HAVEN'T COUNTED NEARLY AS MANY AS HE CLAIMED. COMBINED WITH EVERYTHING THAT WE'VE HAD, STILL DIDN'T GET TO THAT NUMBER. I DID A FOIA REQUEST TO THE CITY TO PROVIDE ME VIOLATIONS AND CODE ANY ANY CITATIONS. I DIDN'T GET ONE FROM THE CITY. I'M NOT SAYING THAT THE PLACE WAS PERFECT, BUT WE'VE DONE EVERYTHING WE CAN. WE HAVE SPENT OVER $3 MILLION
[00:50:05]
ON THIS PROPERTY WHEN IT COMES TO SECURITY CAMERAS, UPGRADES TO LIGHTING, ROOFING, AIR CONDITIONING. WE'VE HIRED OFF DUTY SECURITY. THAT WAS DUNCANVILLE POLICE, AND WE'VE ALREADY SPOKEN ABOUT THE FACT THAT WE HAD 150,000 A YEAR NOT COMBINED. THEIR CALCULATION WAS OFF THE CUFF, STATING THAT THEY COST $80,000 FOR CALLS, WHICH WERE NOT RELATED TO US PER SE.OKAY, I APOLOGIZE, I KNOW IT'S ONLY TWO MINUTES. YES, I AM THE OWNER AND I WAS PART OF THAT. I UNDERSTAND, BUT EVERYONE HAS TWO MINUTES, SO IT'S JUST REALLY IMPORTANT TO KNOW INSTEAD OF IT'S NOT MY DECISION. IT'S YEAH, IT'S I UNDERSTAND I FLEW HERE FOR THREE TIMES FOR THREE HOURS. IF I COULD GET ONE MINUTE. THERE'S AN IMPORTANT POINT I NEED TO MAKE. IS THAT OKAY? YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. OKAY. THANK YOU. I HAVE ATTEMPTED WITH THE CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY.
I'VE TRIED TO TALK TO THEM IN OPEN COMMUNICATIONS. WITH WHATEVER I COULD DO TO HELP. I HAVE GONE UNANSWERED. INITIALLY, THEY PROMISED THEY WOULD TALK TO ME. THEY HAVEN'T YET. IF THEY CAN. IF YOU GUYS REJECT THE SUP, WE WILL HAVE TO HAVE FILE A LAWSUIT FOR INVERSE CONDEMNATION. IT'S GOING TO COST TENS OF MILLIONS IN LOSSES FOR ME AND THAT I WOULD HAVE TO RECOUP. I'M HERE TO WORK WITH THE CITY AND DO WHATEVER THEY WANT, BUT THIS ISN'T THE WAY TO DO IT. I WOULD LIKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HELP AND DO WHATEVER YOU WOULD LIKE. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. OKAY. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE SUP BEING REVOKED? PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS. YES, MADAM CHAIR, MY NAME IS CHRIS BOWERS. I'M WITH THE LAW GROUP, 1316 VILLAGE CREEK PARKWAY, PLANO, TEXAS. I REPRESENT THE OWNERS OF THE HOTEL AND THEY BOUGHT IT IN OCTOBER OF 2023. AND I THINK YOU'VE HEARD TESTIMONY FROM BOTH THE LOCAL MANAGER AS WELL AS THE OWNER REPRESENTATIVE, THAT THEY HAVE WORKED WITH THE CITY OFFICIALS AND FIRE AND CODE AND POLICE. AND YET, WHEN THIS WAS RAISED A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, THEY DIDN'T GET NOTICE FROM ANYBODY. ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY HAD A SIGN POSTED ON THEIR PROPERTY. YOU'VE GOT THIS HEARING TO REVOKE YOUR SUP.
AND I REACHED OUT TO MR. HAGER. I'VE KNOWN YOUR CITY ATTORNEY FOR DECADES, HEARD NOTHING.
CITY STAFF WON'T EVEN LOOK US IN THE EYE AND HAVE A MEETING TO DISCUSS WHAT THE PROBLEMS ARE. AND SO I ASK, IS THE FIX IN AND THE FIX IS IN HERE? YOUR CITY COUNCIL HAS FOLLOWED YOUR CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION TO HAVE THIS PROCESS. IT'S BEING SENT TO YOU TO BE A RUBBER STAMP. AND MR. RAUSCH RAUSCHER GOT EIGHT MINUTES PLUS AN EARLIER STAFF BRIEFING, PLUS BRIEFINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. I GET TWO MINUTES. IT'S NOT FAIR. THE OWNER, EXCUSE ME, BUT THE OWNER DID GET FAR MORE THAN EIGHT MINUTES. SO THAT TIME WENT TO HIM. THE MANAGER OF THE PROPERTY THAT THAT IS TRUE. I HOPE I GET A LITTLE BIT OF EXTRA TIME DUE TO NOT BEING ABLE TO SPEAK, BUT THE FIX APPEARS TO BE IN. THE COUNCIL MEETING IS ALREADY SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 20TH. IT'S ASSUMING THAT YOU WILL VOTE TO MOVE THIS FORWARD. WILL IT? IF YOU REVOKE THE SUP, WILL THAT SHUT DOWN THE HOTEL? NO, IT WILL BECOME A NON-CONFORMING USE AND NON-CONFORMING USES ARE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE INDEFINITELY UNDER TEXAS LAW, AND THE LEGISLATURE IN 2023 REQUIRES CITIES TO PAY TO SHUT DOWN NON-CONFORMING USES. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE SUP BEING REVOKED? STATE YOUR NAME AND WHERE YOU'RE FROM AND YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I THINK THE INFORMATION THAT'S BEEN GIVEN. WHAT IS YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE, MA'AM. WHAT IS YOUR NAME AND WHAT IS YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE? MY NAME IS TONY HILLEY. I'M AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS MANAGER FOR THE HOTEL. IS IN QUESTION FOR THE SUP. I THINK THE INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN GIVEN HAS BEEN MISLEADING AND SOME OF IT VERY INCORRECT. FOR US TO HAVE ALL THESE VIOLATIONS. AND ONLY 3 IN 7 YEARS WE'VE HAD THREE COMPLAINTS. THAT'S ON RECORD, THREE COMPLAINTS. FIRE AND CODE HAS COME OUT MANY TIMES TO DO INSPECTIONS PASSED EVERY TIME WITH NO PROBLEMS. SO ALL THIS, WE HAD ALL THIS STUFF HERE. WHERE'S IT AT? BECAUSE I HAVEN'T SEEN ANY WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION OTHER THAN THREE COMPLAINTS. 911 CALLS. WE CAN'T
[00:55:02]
CONTROL WHO CALLS. 911. THAT'D BE A FELONY. WE CAN'T STOP 911 CALLS. WE'RE A MOTEL. WE HAVE ALL DIFFERENT TYPE OF PEOPLE COME IN ALL DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES, YOU KNOW, DIFFERENT THINGS. SOMETIMES, YOU KNOW, THEY HAD TO CALL 911. WE CAN'T STOP THAT. PEOPLE HAVE MEDICAL ISSUES. WE CAN'T STOP THAT. SO BUT WE DO HAVE ON SITE SECURITY AND MYSELF STAFF, WE TRY TO PREVENT AS MANY NINE, 11 CALLS AS WE CAN, YOU KNOW, TO WORK IT OUT WHICHEVER WAY WE CAN WORK IT OUT. BUT SOMETIMES IT'S NECESSARY. AND I THINK THE NUMBERS THAT SHOWED UP UP THERE EARLIER SHOW FOR THEMSELVES. ONE YEAR, 313 FIRE, EMS AND POLICE. THAT COULD BE 200 EMS AND 100 POLICE CALLS. IT COULD BE 50 POLICE CALLS. AND NONE OF OUR NOT ALL OUR CALLS ARE CRIMINAL CALLS. MOST OF THEM ARE JUST DISPUTES BETWEEN THE DESK CLERK OVER THE THE AGREEMENT OR THE COUPLE COMES IN, THEY GO OUT AND HAVE A PARTY AND GET DRINKING A LITTLE TOO MUCH, WHATEVER. AND THEY HAVE A LITTLE ARGUMENT. THAT'S NOT SOMETHING WE CAN CONTROL, BUT IT'S NOT LIKE IT'S LIKE CRIMINAL ELEMENTS DOWN THERE. Y'ALL HAVEN'T CAME IN AND RAIDED THIS FOR PROSTITUTION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. SO THAT'S ALL I WANTED TO SAY ABOUT IT.THANK YOU, THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST HAVING THE SUP REVOKED? HOW Y'ALL DOING? I'M INTERIM POLICE CHIEF RON WILCOX. SHE'S GOING TO PASS YOU ALL OUT SOME INFORMATION, AND I'M GOING TO GO THROUGH IT REAL QUICK. SO I KNOW HE SAID THE FIX IS IN, BUT THE FIX IS IN IS THE FIX IS NOT IN ON THESE NUMBERS. AND I'M GOING TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THESE NUMBERS. AND I'M TALKING TO YOU FROM EXPERIENCE. I'VE BEEN HERE 27 YEARS. THAT HOTEL HAS BEEN A PROBLEM FOR A LONG TIME. IT USES UP MY RESOURCES, THE CITY'S RESOURCES, RESOURCES THAT COULD GO TO OTHER PLACES. SO LET'S JUST TAKE A LOOK REAL QUICK. LET'S LOOK FROM JANUARY 2020 TO MAY 2026, AND WE'LL STOP RIGHT THERE. AND THESE ARE JUST THE SERIOUS CAUSE. MAJOR DISTURBANCES 199. VERBAL DISTURBANCE DISTURBANCES 718.
ASSAULT REPORTS 39. SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 203. TRESPASSING 47. THEFT 52. STOLEN VEHICLE REPORTS 33 SHOTS FIRED, TEN SHOOTINGS WITH INJURY, TWO STABBINGS WITH INJURY, TWO ROBBERY, THREE THREATS 12. I DON'T HAVE THESE ISSUES AT OTHER HOTELS IN THIS CITY. YOU GET SOME CALLS, BUT WE DON'T GET NEARLY THE VOLUME OF CALLS THAT WE GET AT THIS LOCATION.
HE MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT HIRING A POLICE OFFICER TO WORK UP THERE. OUR OFFICERS DON'T WORK UP THERE. THEY DON'T WANT TO WORK UP THERE. YEAH. THERE ARE INSTANCES WHERE OUR OFFICERS DRIVE THROUGH. THEY HAVE TO DRIVE THROUGH. IF THEY DON'T MAKE PATROLS AND DRIVE THROUGH THERE, SOMETHING'S GOING TO HAPPEN. THEY DRIVE THROUGH TO BE SEEN TO PREVENT ANYTHING FROM HAPPENING. THEY DON'T WANT PEOPLE OUT SELLING DRUGS OR DOING DRUGS. THEY DON'T WANT PEOPLE OUT DOING PROSTITUTION. SO THEY MAKE ROUNDS THROUGH THERE A LOT. THE BAD. WHAT YOU NEED TO ASK YOURSELF IS, WHY DO WE HAVE TO DO THIS AT THAT LOCATION? THERE ARE SEVERAL HOTELS IN THE CITY THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO SHOW THAT MUCH ATTENTION TO. BUT THIS, THIS ONE, WE HAVE TO SHOW THAT MUCH ATTENTION. AND HERE RECENTLY, I SAY ABOUT A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, WE DEALT WITH HE SAID, THERE'S NOTHING ABOUT PROSTITUTION. WE JUST DEALT WITH TWO JUVENILES BEING TRAFFICKED. ONE WAS, I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO ANY DETAILS. I WON'T SAY THAT. BUT FROM UP NORTH, SOMEWHERE IN ANOTHER STATE. SO THAT THAT WHOLE IDEA THAT HE'S TRYING TO SELL Y'ALL, THAT NOTHING IS GOING ON THERE, THERE ARE THINGS GOING ON THERE, SERIOUS THINGS. PLEASE TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE SUV AND REVOKED? PLEASE COME UP, STATE YOUR NAME WHERE YOU'RE FROM AND BE AWARE YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES. GOOD EVENING. I AM VICTOR PIZARRO, CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPERINTENDENT. AND JUST TO KIND OF PROVIDE SOME LIGHT ON SOME OF THE COMPLAINTS THAT WE HAVE RECEIVED SINCE JANUARY, WE'VE RECEIVED COMPLAINTS FOR BROKEN DOORS, DOORS WITHOUT DOOR KNOBS. AND I DO WANT TO CLARIFY BEFORE I FINISH ALL THIS, ALL THESE COMPLAINTS HAVE BEEN TAKEN CARE OF AND CLOSED, BUT JUST KIND OF PROVIDE SOME CLARITY AS TO SOME OF THE THINGS THAT HAVE HAPPENED. SOME OF THE
[01:00:01]
COMPLAINTS ALSO HAVE BEEN FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE. WE'VE GOTTEN COMPLAINTS ABOUT FURNITURE BEING THROWN OUT OF WINDOWS OUT INTO THE PARKING LOT. ALSO, WE RECEIVED COMPLAINTS. WE'RE DOING A PROACTIVE INSPECTION. WE ALSO SAW FOR TRASH BRUSH, DISCARDED ITEMS, CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, THINGS, THINGS OF THAT NATURE. WHEN IT COMES TO THAT, I'M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO CURT. I'M CURT KASTEN, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. AND THE FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE DID GO OUT ABOUT THREE WEEKS AGO AND NOTICED THAT THERE WAS ACTIVITY IN THE OLD SECTION CALLED THE TEXAS T. I THINK IT WAS A BAR OR SOMETHING AT ONE TIME. SO THERE'S BEEN SOME CONSTRUCTION WORK AND ACTIVITY IN THERE THAT HAS NOT BEEN PERMITTED. I GUESS THEY DID GO BACK AND CLEAN UP BECAUSE I'VE SEEN THE PICTURES OF IT FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL, BUT WE HAVE WE HAVE A FEW ISSUES THERE AS WELL. THANK YOU.AT THIS TIME, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE SUP BEING REVOKED? OKAY. SEEING THAT THERE'S NONE, WE WILL HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PORTION OF THIS MEETING. AND SO WE'LL START OFF WITH A MOTION AND A SECOND. A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE MEETING. I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION. AND SO WE'LL VOTE. SEEING THAT THE VOTE IS UNANIMOUS, WE WILL CLOSE THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING AT 8:02 P.M. SO AT THIS TIME, WE WILL YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? YEAH. HAVE ANY OR THE OWNER. YES. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONER OF THE OWNERS. I'VE GOT SOME CONCERNS. MORE THAN A QUESTION IS THAT FIVE YEARS DOWN THE ROAD WE'RE DEALING WITH THIS WHEN IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIVE YEARS LATER. YOU TALKED ABOUT MEETING WITH SOME OF THE CITY OFFICIALS, AS WELL AS MEETING SOME OF YOUR NEIGHBORS, BEING A GOOD NEIGHBOR. I'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR A LONG TIME, AND I THINK I WOULD HAVE REACHED OUT FIVE YEARS AGO BEFORE IT GOT TO THIS POINT, THESE NUMBER OF CALLS. I MEAN, HOW DO YOU DEFEND YOURSELF WITH A NUMBER OF CALLS THAT OUR POLICE HAS TO RESPOND TO, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY'RE PASSING THROUGH OR WHATEVER THEY'RE DOING? WE'VE GOT A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF ASSETS IN THIS CITY, AND WE HAVE TO PROTECT THOSE ASSETS. AND I UNDERSTAND YOUR BUSINESS. YOU'VE GOT A HOTEL, YOU'VE GOT A BUSINESS TO RUN, YOU'VE GOT EMPLOYEES. BUT IF YOU START LOOKING AT THESE NUMBERS AND LOOKING AT THE NUMBERS AND GOING BACK AND FORTH AND HOW SERIOUS THEY CAN BE, I MEAN, WHAT ARE WE GOING TO WAIT TILL THERE'S A MURDER OUT THERE AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO BACK AND, AND KIND OF TRY TO SORT THIS OUT. AND THAT'S, THAT'S A LITTLE BIT CONCERNING TO ME FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE. AND, YOU KNOW, I APOLOGIZE AND, AND THAT WE'RE IN THIS SITUATION, BUT IT IS WHAT IT IS. AND I THINK THAT THIS HAS GOTTEN TOTALLY OUT OF CONTROL. I AM TOTALLY AGAINST IT. I WILL RECOMMEND REVOKING THE SUP TO MY COLLEAGUES. AND BASED UPON THE INFORMATION THAT STAFF HAS PROVIDED AND BASED ON THE EVIDENCE THAT WE'VE SEEN IN THE NUMBER OF PHONE CALLS AND POLICE AND FIRE HAVE GONE OUT TO THERE, AS WELL AS OPERATING BUSINESSES WITHOUT PERMITS, AND THEN AS WELL AS DOING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT PERMITS. I MEAN, IT'S ALL HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE. AND THAT'S WHAT IT COMES DOWN TO. AND WE HAVE TO PROTECT THE CITY. WE HAVE TO PROTECT OUR CITIZENS AND OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIREFIGHTERS. SO, I MEAN, YOU CAN TAKE IT WHEREVER YOU WANT TO GO. YOU KNOW, COUNCIL, YOU YOU TALKED ABOUT SUING THE CITY. YOU KNOW, YOU'RE ENTITLED TO DO WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO. YOU KNOW, GOD BLESS YOUR HEART. YOU CAN MOVE FORWARD, WHATEVER IT IS YOU DO. BUT FROM MY PERSPECTIVE AND, AND I THINK IF YOU WERE SITTING HERE IN MY CHAIR AND LOOKING AT THIS EVIDENCE RIGHT HERE AS AN ATTORNEY FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, YOU WOULD AGREE THAT THIS IS A LITTLE BIT OVERBOARD. THERE'S HOW DO YOU DEFEND THIS? I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. IS THERE CAN YOU PROVIDE ANY EXPLANATION FOR THE DISCREPANCIES AS FAR AS WHEN THEY'RE SAYING IN THEIR MATERIALS THAT THERE WERE NO CITATIONS GIVEN? AND THEN, YOU KNOW, OF COURSE, WHEN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND YOU WERE
[01:05:03]
SAYING ABOUT THE THE, YOU KNOW, THE CITATIONS AND THE CALLS, IS THERE ANY CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE AT ALL? SURE. SO AS FAR AS THE 911 CALLS ARE CONCERNED, YOU KNOW, WE WENT INTO OUR 911 SYSTEM AND WE PULLED ALL THE CALLS RELATED TO THIS PROPERTY ADDRESS, 711 EAST CAMP, WISDOM ROAD. AND IN THERE IT LIKE THE DATA THAT INTERIM CHIEF WILCOX JUST GAVE YOU. IT SPELLS OUT THE NATURE OF THE CALL. YOU KNOW, WHETHER IT'S A CIVIL DISTURBANCE OR A A STABBING OR WHATEVER IT IS. AND THEN SAME THING ON THE FIRE AND EMS, YOU KNOW, HEART TROUBLE, YOU KNOW, FALL CAN'T GET UP, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER THE ITEM IS. AND SO WE PULLED ALL THAT DATA AND THAT'S WHAT'S ON THIS SLIDE RIGHT HERE IS A SUMMARY OF ALL OF THOSE 911 CALLS. AGAIN, IT'S NOT PD DRIVING THROUGH ON WEDNESDAY EVENING AT 8:00. AND THEN OH, HERE'S A HERE'S A CALL.THAT'S NOT THE WAY IT WORKS ON A 911 DATABASE. IT HAS TO BE A CALL TO 911. AND THAT'S THE DATA THAT YOU HAVE RIGHT HERE. AND IF ANYBODY WANTS THAT, WE'RE HAPPY TO PROVIDE THAT.
WE'RE OPEN BOOK TRANSPARENT ON THE CODE AND VEGETATION ISSUES. YOU KNOW, VIC, IF YOU IF YOU'D LIKE TO COME UP, YOU'RE WELCOME TO. BUT, YOU KNOW, WITH ANY PROPERTY, IF WE SEE AN ISSUE TALL GRASS, YOU KNOW, JUNK LAYING IN THE ROAD, YOU KNOW, CARS UP ON CINDER BLOCKS OR WHAT HAVE YOU, WE, WE INITIATE THE PROCESS BY ISSUING A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOV AND THEN THAT PROPERTY OWNER HAS SO MANY DAYS TO CORRECT THE ISSUE. AND IF THEY DON'T CORRECT THE ISSUE, THEN THAT'S WHEN THEY GET A CITATION. SO AS I SAID EARLIER IN MY PRESENTATION, I MEAN, IN A LOT OF CASES, WHEN WE FLAG THINGS, YOU KNOW, YEAH, THEY THEY DO CORRECT IT, BUT WE'RE GOING OUT THERE REGULARLY AND, AND WE FIND THIS OR WE FIND THAT. AND YES, THEY DO CORRECT IT, BUT IT'S, IT'S A DRAIN ON, ON CODE AND, AND BUILDING INSPECTION RESOURCES TO, YOU KNOW, WITH HAVING TO GO OUT THERE AND YOU CORRECTLY, YOU'RE SAYING IF THERE IS NO CITATION GIVEN, THAT'S THAT WASN'T BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T GO OUT THERE, IT'S BECAUSE IT WAS CORRECTED.
BUT THE EFFORT WAS STILL MADE BY THE CITY TO GO TO THE PROPERTY. CORRECT. THERE WOULD BE A NOTICE OF VIOLATION, YOU KNOW, HEY, YOUR GRASS IS TOO TALL. AND THEN IF THEY GO AND CORRECT IT THE NEXT DAY OR WITHIN, I THINK IT'S TEN DAYS, THEN THERE'S NO CITATION BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, OUR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WILL GO AND DO A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION TEN DAYS LATER, MAKE SURE IT WAS HANDLED. AND IF IT WAS OKAY, GREAT. YOU KNOW, CASE, CASE CLOSED. I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS. IS IT VICTOR? HAS IT BEEN YOUR EXPERIENCE? HOW DOES THIS HOTEL COMPARE WITH THE OTHER HOTELS AS FAR AS YOUR YOU NOTIFYING THEM OF POTENTIAL CODE VIOLATIONS? I MEAN, FROM MY EXPERIENCE, IT HASN'T BEEN WE HAVEN'T HAD THAT MANY CALLS. SO I WISH I HAD LIKE A LARGE HISTORY FOR IT. AS OF RIGHT NOW, I CAN ONLY GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR FOR, FOR THE CALLS THAT I'VE HAD. I'VE ALSO ONLY BEEN HERE FOR ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF. SO AS FAR AS BEING ABLE TO COMPARE AND GIVE YOU AN ACTUAL EXAMPLE, UNFORTUNATELY I CAN'T WHEN IT COMES TO THAT. IT HASN'T BEEN ANYTHING TO THE POINT OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TYPE OF THING. FOR US, IT HAS BEEN VIOLATIONS. WE HAVE GOTTEN A LOT OF COMPLAINTS. I DO GET A LOT OF THOSE COMPLAINTS THROUGH OUR ONLINE COMPLAINT SYSTEM, BUT A LOT OF THAT STUFF GOES TO POLICE A LOT. A LOT OF THINGS COME DOWN TO LIKE COMPLAINTS ABOUT DRUG USE AND THINGS LIKE THAT. BUT AS FAR AS THE CODE SIDE OF THINGS, IT'S JUST BEEN THOSE THREE COMPLAINTS THAT I GOT ON FOR FURNITURE BEING THROWN OUT OF A WINDOW, LANDING ON THE PARKING SPACE, BRUSH APPLIANCES IN THE BACK, THINGS LIKE THAT. THAT'S KIND OF THE ONLY THINGS THAT I'VE ACTUALLY GOTTEN. SO TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION MORE DIRECTLY, I COULD NOT COMPARE IT BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH HISTORY TO SAY, YES, THIS IS A REAL BAD ONE. ON THE CODE SIDE OF THINGS. I JUST HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION FOR YOU. THERE WAS SOME MENTION LIKE, IF THIS IS REVOKED, THEN WHAT WOULD BE THIS? THE IMMEDIATE STATUS OF THE PROPERTY? WOULD THEY BE ABLE TO CONTINUE? THE, YOU KNOW, OPERATING AS A HOTEL, OR WOULD IT BE LIKE SOME OTHER USE LIKE RETAIL OR SOMETHING TO THAT NATURE? SO INITIALLY, IF THIS PROCESS GOES, GOES THROUGH AS, AS LAID OUT HERE. AND, AND I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT, I MEAN, IT'S NOT A GUARANTEE THIS, THIS ENDS UP ON THE OCTOBER 20TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING. BUT, YOU KNOW, WE PRESUME THAT THAT'S THAT'S WHEN IT COULD BE HEARD AT CITY COUNCIL. AND WE WERE JUST TRYING TO BE TRANSPARENT WITH THE SCHEDULE. BUT IF IT DOES HAPPEN THERE AND CITY COUNCIL VOTES TO REVOKE SUP, THEN THEN THE S P FOR THIS USE GOES AWAY. AND I I'M GOING TO DEFER TO, TO, TO KELLY AND TESSA WITH, WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ON WHAT THAT NEXT STEP IS. BECAUSE I KNOW IN TALKING TO ATTORNEY HAGER, THERE ARE SOME SOME EXTRA ITEMS THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH. SO I WOULD I WOULD DEFER TO, TO ONE OF YOU TO KIND OF PROVIDE THE DETAILS ON THAT.
[01:10:06]
DO THEY NEED TO RECESS? DO THEY NEED TO RECESS AT THIS POINT? OKAY. SO IF Y'ALL, IF Y'ALL WOULD LIKE LEGAL ADVICE, MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO JUST TO TAKE A BRIEF RECESS. SO IF THERE'S ANY LEGAL QUESTIONS THAT YOU NEED TO CONFER WITH US ABOUT, THEN YOU CAN DO SO. SO WE WOULD HAVE A MOTION TO RECESS. OKAY. SO AT THIS TIME WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A MOTION.AND HOW, HOW, HOW LONG WOULD YOU LIKE THE RECESS TO BE? ABOUT TEN MINUTES. YEAH, ABOUT TEN MINUTES. OKAY. A TEN MINUTE RECESS. AT THIS TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MOTION MADE TO RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. SECOND. OKAY. IT HAS BEEN SECOND AND LET'S VOTE ON IT. YOUR RECESS IT INTO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO TO SEEK COUNSEL FROM AN ATTORNEY. YES. WE'LL RECESS IN AT THIS TIME AT 11 A.M. AT 11 P.M. TO SEEK 0811. OKAY. OKAY. AT THIS TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO RECONVENE OUR MEETING. CAN I HAVE A MOTION, PLEASE? MOTION TO RECONVENE AND A SECOND.
SECOND. OKAY. AT 8:23 P.M. THE MEETING FOR PLANNING AND ZONING WILL CONTINUE. MAKE SURE YOU VOTE ON IT. LET'S VOTE. SEEING THAT IT'S A UNANIMOUS VOTE AT THIS AT 8:23 P.M. WE WILL CONTINUE TO CONVENE THE MEETING. SO AT THIS TIME, WE ARE. WE HAVE TO DECIDE IF WE'RE GOING TO APPROVE BELIEVE LAST Y'ALL WERE ON QUESTIONS. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR FOR STAFF, THE COMMISSION FOR THE STAFF OR THE OWNER, FOR THE STAFF OR THE OWNER? I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. THE CORRESPONDENCE GIVEN TO THE OWNER AND MANAGER OR MANAGEMENT. HOW IS THAT GIVEN AND HOW IS IT ACKNOWLEDGED BY THEM? JUST SO THAT THERE'S NO CONFUSION? AS HE SAID, HE SAID THAT, YOU KNOW, I DIDN'T RECEIVE THIS OR HOW IS THAT CORRESPONDENCE ARTICULATED WITH REGARDS TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTICES? THEY ARE MAILED TO THE DEQ AT THE DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, OWNER OF RECORD. THEY'RE MAILED TO THAT TO THAT ADDRESS. OKAY. AND WHAT ARE THE TOP YOU HAD? DO YOU KNOW WHAT ADDRESS THAT IS? IS IT TO THE ADDRESS? I DO NOT KNOW. AT THE TOP OF MY HEAD.
I WILL HAVE TO GO BACK AND LOOK. OKAY. THANK YOU. I'M SORRY. IF YOU GO LOOK AT DCAD, IT IS MAILED TO THE ADDRESS 711 EAST CAMP, WISDOM ROAD. AND THE NAME IS EMPIRE HOTEL GROUP, LLC.
OKAY. YEAH. I HAVE ONE. ONE QUESTION FOR THE BUILDING OFFICIAL ON NOTICE VIOLATIONS AND AS WELL AS CODE ENFORCEMENT, ARE THEY ISSUED AT SITE? VICTOR. I'M SORRY. ON THE NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS TO THE HOTEL AND ANY KIND OF BUILDING CODE VIOLATIONS, WERE THERE ANY STOP WORK ORDERS OR NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOTICES ISSUED? I HAVE NOT ISSUED I HAVE NOT ISSUED ANY AS OF TO DATE. OKAY. WE WE HAVE ISSUED NOTICES FOR EVERY, EVERY NOT EVERY COMPLAINT, BUT TWO OUT OF THE THREE COMPLAINTS THAT WE THAT WE HAD. YES. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR VICTOR. EARLIER YOU SAID THAT YOU DID NOT. YOU CAN ONLY SPEAK TO WHAT YOU HAVE ISSUED IN THE LAST YEAR. IS THERE A RECORDS THAT YOU CAN GO BACK TO OR LOOK UP TO SEE BEFORE YOU CAME ON BOARD? THE NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS THAT WERE ISSUED BEFORE? I WILL HAVE TO HAVE MY STAFF ACTUALLY GO THROUGH A PAPER SYSTEM THAT WE HAD AT THE TIME, IN 2025.
ANYTHING PRIOR TO THAT, WE DO HAVE THE DATA. WE'RE WORKING TO RECOVER THAT DATA, BUT AS TO GET ANYTHING PAST THIS YEAR, I WOULD HAVE TO HAVE THE STAFF LOOK INTO IT AND ACTUALLY GO IN A PAPER TRAIL TO BE ABLE. SO IF YOUR REQUEST THAT CAN BE DONE, BUT IT WILL TAKE SOME TIME.
OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SO ARE THERE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR FOR THE OWNERS? OKAY. SEEING THAT THERE'S NONE. I MAKE A MOTION TO. WE HAVE TO VOTE ON IT TO
[01:15:10]
VOTE ON APPROVAL. YOU CAN REQUEST A MOTION TO TO ACT BASED ON THE OPTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. THEY YOU ALREADY HAD YOUR QUESTIONS. YEAH. THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY. OKAY. SO AT THIS TIME WE CAN MAKE A MOTION. OH, LOOK AT A MOTION TO EITHER. HELLO. I WAS TRYING TO GO TO THE LAST SLIDE WHERE IT HAD THE THE ACTIONS. OKAY. YEAH. BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE IT ON OUR SCREEN. GO AHEAD AND PULL IT UP. OKAY. SO AT THIS TIME WE OOPS. AT THIS TIME THE OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION IS TO APPROVE, TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS TO DENY OR TO TABLE. SO DO I HAVE A ANY MOTIONS AT THIS TIME. I MOTION TO APPROVE THE REVOCATION OF THE SUP. AND I JUST WANT TO ARTICULATE MY REASONING BEHIND THIS. THEY'RE IN VIOLATION OF MULTIPLE FEATURES OF AN SUP AS LAID OUT BY CITY STAFF AND THE STAFF. RECOMMENDATION ONE THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY OWNED UP TO IS ESSENTIALLY THE ILLEGAL U-HAUL BUSINESS. BUT THERE ARE MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS THAT THIS BUSINESS HAS OCCURRED WITHIN THE THE USE OF AN SUP. SO FOR THAT REASON I APPROVE I MOTION TO APPROVE THE REVOCATION OF THE SUP. ANY OTHER THINGS FROM COMMISSIONERS? I'D LIKE TO ECHO MY COLLEAGUES CONCERNS REGARDING THIS SPECIFIC SUP IT'S BEEN GOING ON FOR A WHILE, AND I THINK IT'S TIME TO PUT IT INTO IT BASED UPON THE VIOLATIONS THAT THE OWNERSHIP HAS ADMITTED, AS WELL AS A NUMBER OF POLICE. I'M JUST TAKEN BACK WITH A NUMBER OF POLICE AND FIRE CALLS, AND IT'S IRRELEVANT WHETHER THEY WERE CALLED BY THE SOMEBODY THAT RENTED A ROOM OR SOMEBODY WALKING BY. THAT'S JUST OUR RESOURCES ARE BETTER USED SOMEPLACE ELSE. AND, YOU KNOW, ACTION SHOULD HAVE BEEN TAKEN FIVE YEARS AGO, YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU ACTUALLY TOOK OWNERSHIP OF THE OF THE PROPERTY, THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE CONSIDERATION WITH THE NEIGHBORS, WITH THE JURISDICTION. AND I THINK EVEN MEETING WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT, CODE ENFORCEMENT AND BUILDING OFFICIALS, IF YOU WANTED TO DO SOMETHING ON THAT PROPERTY, EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU HAVE A PERMITTED USE AND YOU'RE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING ELSE, WE'RE ALL GOING THROUGH A TOUGH TIME. I AM TOO, BUT I'M GOING TO GO OUT AND PULL A C O OR MAKE AN ADJUSTMENT, OR GET A BUILDING PERMIT TO BE ABLE TO OPERATE LEGITIMATELY IN THAT, IN THAT JURISDICTION. SO BASED UPON THAT, AND I'M GOING TO REQUEST A REVOCATION OF THE SUP. SO WE DO HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR. OR DO WE HAVE A SECOND BY YOU, MR. RODRIGUEZ. I HAVE A SECOND.OKAY, OKAY. IT HAS BEEN MOTIONED. AND SECOND, AND WE WILL VOTE ON REVOKING THE SUP.
IT HAS BEEN MOTIONED. AND SECOND AND UNANIMOUS VOTE BY COMMISSIONERS THAT THE SUP HAS A RECOMMENDATION FOR REVOKING THE SUP. OKAY. AT THIS TIME, IF THERE'S. WE WILL MOVE TO THE LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA, WHICH IS ADJOURNING THE MEETING. OKAY. AND WE WILL HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. I'LL MAKE A MOTION MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. SECOND THAT MOTION.
OKAY. LET IT BE NOTED. THE MOTION WAS SECOND TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:31 P.M. DIDN'T Y'ALL VOTE? VOTE AND LET'S VOTE ON IT. ALRIGHTY. IT HAS BEEN A UNANIMOUS DECISION TO END THE MEETING. YOU GUYS HAVE A GOOD EVENING. GREAT JOB. AT
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.