[1. Call to order and confirm a quorum]
          [00:00:09]
          WELCOMING YOU TO THE AUGUST THE 10TH PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. IT'S NOW 703. ARE YOU MISSING SOMETHING? IT'S IT'S NOW 703. AND WE DO WE WE DO HAVE A QUORUM. DO WE HAVE TO CALL EVERYBODY TO VOTE ON THAT ONE? I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT EACH PERSON DIDN'T HAVE TO SAY THEY WERE PRESENT FOR THE QUORUM. OKAY. ON THE AGENDA RIGHT NOW, WE'RE ASKING, IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT HAS A THAT WANTS TO COMMENT ON SOMETHING THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA? IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WANTS TO COMMENT ON SOMETHING THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA? HEARING NONE, I WILL GO TO THE REGULAR PART OF THE AGENDA. STARTING WITH THE. THE 
          [3. Consent Agenda Item]
THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. IS THERE ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS OR. ANY POSSIBLE ANY CHANGES TO THE AGENDA? THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING. NONE. IN THAT CASE, IF I COULD HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE JULY 13TH, 2026 MEETING. SECOND. IT'S BEEN MOVED. AND SECOND, PLEASE VOTE. 
          [4.A. PLAT-2026-00031: Consider a public hearing and request from Robert Manaois (applicant/agent) for a replat on real property located at 206 Woodhaven Boulevard, legally described as lot 3A, block 4 in Woodhaven Replat on 2.177 acres, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas.]
THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME, WE'LL TURN IT OVER TO STAFF. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS DESIREE POWELL, CITY PLANNER. OUR FIRST CASE TONIGHT IS PLATT DASH 2026-00031. CONSIDER A PUBLIC HEARING AND REQUEST FOR A REPLAT FROM. I DON'T WANT TO MISPRONOUNCE HIS LAST NAME, SO MR. ROBERT, THE APPLICANT AGENT FOR REPLAT ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 206 WOODHAVEN BOULEVARD. LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT THREE A BLOCK FOUR AND WOODHAVEN REPLAT ON 2.177 ACRES. 
          CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, DALLAS, TEXAS, OR DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. THE PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST? THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE REPLAT TO PROVIDE EASEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THIS LOT. THESE RECOMMENDATIONS CAME FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OF WHAT WAS REQUIRED IN ORDER FOR THEM TO ACCOMMODATE WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING HERE. THE CURRENT LOT SIZE IS 2.114 ACRES. CURRENT ZONING OF THE PROPERTY IS COMMERCIAL MORE ALONG WITH HEAVY COMMERCIAL AND. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT. HERE IS THE CURRENT ZONING MAP WHERE THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS GATEWAY CORRIDOR, SO OUR STAFF STAFF ANALYSIS. THE CURRENT LOT DOES MEET THE MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL. THE REQUIREMENTS BY PUBLIC WORKS OR THE REQUIRED EASEMENTS BY PUBLIC WORK HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS ADEQUATE TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. 
          THIS IS THE PROPOSED REPLAT. SO THIS WILL LOOK DIFFERENT THAN WHAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR PACKET. 
          WE GOT THIS LATE FRIDAY AFTERNOON. THE ONLY MAJOR DIFFERENCE IS HE ADDED, THE DESIGNATIONS CLEARLY FOR THE EASEMENTS OPPOSED TO. ON THE PREVIOUS ONE IN YOUR PACKET. 
          THEY WERE NOT SHOWN ON THERE, JUST THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY, PROPERTY OWNER BUFFER MAP. SO STAFF MAILED OUT 23 MAILERS, ZERO RESPONDED IN SUPPORT. ONE RESPONDED IN. OPPOSITION STAFF DID RECOMMEND THE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PLAT ON A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS SIGNED OFF ON THE EASEMENTS. WE DID GET THE REVISED PLAT AGAIN LATE FRIDAY AFTERNOON, SO ONCE PUBLIC WORKS SIGNS OFF ON IT, WE'LL BE GOOD TO GO. EVERYTHING IS MEETING ON OUR END AS FAR AS MINIMUM LOT SIZE, THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, JUST WAITING. WE WERE JUST WAITING TO GET THAT SIGN OFF FROM PUBLIC WORKS. AND THEN THESE ARE YOUR OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION APPROVE APPROVAL CONDITIONS OR DENY. OH, SORRY. AND IS THE APPLICANT HERE TODAY? YES. GOOD EVENING. I'M BOB ELLIS WITH CE740 NORTH WATERS ROAD, ALLEN, TEXAS. AND I'M 
          [00:05:10]
HERE TO REPRESENT THE OWNER IN THIS REQUEST. I THINK IT'S FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD. WE'RE JUST TRYING TO PLANT SOME ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS SO THAT WE CAN PROVIDE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY. SO WITH THAT I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. COULD YOU GO BACK OVER TO THAT SLIDE THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE? DO DO WE NEED TO OPEN IT FIRST PUBLIC HEARING OR DO CAN I ANSWER THIS QUESTION? OH, YEAH. OKAY. RIGHT NOW WE'RE JUST OKAY PUBLIC HEARING AND THEY'LL COME BACK UP. OKAY. SO DO YOU WANT ME TO WAIT TO ANSWER MR. BROWN'S QUESTION? OKAY. IT IS NOW 709. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE HEARING FOR THE PUBLIC? MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND. I'LL VOTE. PLEASE. THANK YOU. AT 709, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN. TO YOUR YOUR QUESTION, MISS O'BRIEN. SO THIS IS IN YOUR PACKET. IT'S JUST NOT THE MOST. 
          SORRY. OH, SO MAYBE YOU'LL COME BACK. OKAY. DID DID YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS, SIR? NO, I DO NOT. SO NOW THAT THE PUBLIC HEARINGS OPEN, DID YOU DOES THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? YES, I. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR ITEM? IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR ITEM ON THE AGENDA? OH. HEARING. COULD I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? MOTION TO CLOSE. 
          PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND. ALL RIGHT. IT'S BEEN MOVED. AND COULD I HAVE A VOTE, PLEASE? THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER. SIR, YOU MAY CONTINUE. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS FOR THIS APPLICANT. YES. I HAVE A QUESTION. GOING BACK TO THE SLIDE THAT WE DIDN'T GET IN OUR PACKET. I WAS REQUESTING A REVIEW FROM THE REPRESENTATIVE AS FAR AS EXPLAINING THE OUTLINE OF YOUR PLAT REQUEST, I SEE I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION AS FAR AS THE REQUEST OR THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE. YES. THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE, THE CHANGES WERE MADE WERE BASICALLY NOMENCLATURE. WE WENT FROM UTILITY EASEMENTS TO WATER EASEMENTS. WE ADDED AN ADDITIONAL WATER EASEMENT AT THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY AT THE REQUEST OF PUBLIC WORKS. THOSE THOSE WERE BASICALLY THE CHANGES. AND THEN WE CLEARLY OUTLINED WHAT THE COMMERCIAL USES AND THE RESTRICTIONS WERE ON THE PROPERTY. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU. SO IF I UNDERSTAND YOU CLEARLY WITH RESPECT TO THE EASEMENTS, THERE WAS ONLY ONE ADDED AND THAT WAS TO THE BACK. IS THAT WHAT YOU STATED THAT THAT WAS ONLY ONE ADDITIONAL ONE THEN, OTHER THAN WHAT WE WERE PROPOSING BEFORE LOOKING AT THIS DIAGRAM, COULD YOU POINT OUT WHICH WHAT ARE THE EASEMENTS? THERE'S A FIRE LANE AND WATER AND ACCESS EASEMENT THAT'S GOING THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY, GOING FROM THE NORTH TO THE SOUTH. PARDON. OH I CAN YES. OKAY. OKAY. YEAH. THIS THIS IS THE FIRE LANE EASEMENT. IT'S FIRE LANE ACCESS AND WATER EASEMENT. AND THEN THERE ARE FOUR SMALLER WATER EASEMENTS HERE FOR FOR WATER METERS AND FIRE HYDRANTS. AND THEN IN ADDITION TO THAT, WHAT PUBLIC WORKS REQUESTED WAS TO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL WATER EASEMENT HERE AT THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY. 
          THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, COMMISSIONERS? I JUST JUST TO KIND OF JUST FINALIZE THIS THING. I UNDERSTAND THE WHOLE PROCESS, BUT I GUESS PUBLIC WORKS HAS ALREADY LOOKED AT THIS, RIGHT? YES, YES WE HAVE. SO I, I GUESS WHAT CREATED THIS EASEMENT ISSUE? I MEAN, THE EASEMENT, THE REPLAT WAS YOU WANTED TO GET TO DEVELOP THIS AREA, YOU NEEDED THESE EASEMENTS IN ORDER TO GET TO THAT POINT. RIGHT? THAT'S 
          [00:10:01]
CORRECT. AND THESE EASEMENTS ARE A RESULT OF PUBLIC WORKS REVIEWING THIS. SO STAFF WE'RE JUST WAITING ON PUBLIC WORKS TO SIGN OFF. YEAH. SO FOR THE THE REVISED THE PLAT THAT'S IN YOUR PACKET. HE DIDN'T HAVE THE EASEMENT SHOWN ON THERE. SO WE WERE JUST WAITING ON PUBLIC WORKS TO LOOK AT THAT. LIKE I SAID, THEY DIDN'T GET IT UNTIL LATE FRIDAY AFTERNOON. SO JOEL IS DIDN'T GET A CHANCE TO LOOK AT IT. BUT ONCE HE SIGNS OFF ON IT, BASED ON THE PLACEMENT, THE PLACEMENT WAS CORRECT. IT JUST WASN'T SHOWN ON THEIR FIRST ITERATION. THEN WE'LL BE GOOD TO GO. SO YOU GOT A GOOD FEELING THAT PUBLIC WORKS IS GOING THAT DIRECTION. SIGN OFF ON EVERYTHING THAT THAT THEY ASKED FOR. HE JUST IT JUST WASN'T INCLUDED IN THE FIRST ORIGINAL PLAT THEY SUBMITTED. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. I JUST HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION. COULD YOU REMIND ME, IS THIS LIKE A AUTO DEALER PLACE OR WHAT IS THIS? NO, IT'S FOR LIKE MINOR AUTO REPAIR AND THINGS LIKE THAT. SUCH AS LIKE CAR WASH TIRES, THINGS LIKE THAT. AS OF AT THIS POINT. OKAY, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. GIVEN THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE FOR AUTOMOBILE SERVICING IN SOME CAPACITY, IS THERE SOME SORT OF SITUATION TO WHERE WE CAN MITIGATE ANY SORT OF OFF SPILL FROM CHEMICALS OR OILS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? WHAT KIND OF THINGS DO WE HAVE IN PLACE FOR THAT? SO BASED ON THIS PARTICULAR, THIS REQUEST ABOUT THE ABOUT THE PLAT, WE'RE ONLY LOOKING AT THE PLAT ITSELF. AS HE STATED, THE APPLICANT OR THE OWNER HAS BEEN IN CONVERSATION THAT IT WILL BE POTENTIALLY THREE DIFFERENT AUTO RELATED USES. AND SO THAT'S PART OF THEIR CLEANLINESS WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT. AND SO RIGHT NOW. 
          WE HAVEN'T GONE INTO FULL DETAIL ABOUT THE SPILLAGE, BUT IT IS PART OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SANITATION THAT THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE FOR SPILLAGE. OR IF THEY HAVE OIL PANS, THINGS OF THAT NATURE FROM SPILLING OVER INTO THE WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM. OH, OKAY. YEAH, NO, I WAS I WAS JUST WONDERING JUST FOR LIKE THE FUTURE, BECAUSE I'M SURE YOU'LL BE BACK BECAUSE IS HE GOING TO NEED AN SUP FOR THAT? NO, IT WAS PERMITTED BY RIGHT. PERMITTED BY RIGHT BASED ON THE USAGE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED OR THE OWNER PROPOSED. PREVIOUSLY WHEN WE MET WITH HIM FOR PRE-DEVELOPMENT, ALL THREE USES OR ALL THREE INTENTIONS ARE PERMITTED BY RIGHT. IF HE DOES CHANGE ANYTHING, THEN THAT MAY TRIGGER AN SUP. AS FAR AS THE AUTO RELATED BUSINESS. BUT OF COURSE, RIGHT NOW WE'RE JUST DEALING WITH THE REPLAY. YES, MA'AM. ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER, DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. HEARING NONE. COULD I HAVE A MOTION? THIS PUBLIC HEARING. I MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CLOSED. SORRY. IS IT? YEAH. ALL RIGHT. THIS PARTICULAR ITEM ON THE AGENDA. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE PLAT NUMBER 2026-00031. AS STAFF REQUESTED. I SECOND AND IS THAT ON THE CONDITION THAT IT SIGNED OFF BY PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS. THAT'S CORRECT. AND THE SECOND WAS I SECOND. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. HAVE A COMMISSIONERS. THANK YOU. THE MOTION IS PASSED. STAFF. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. OUR NEXT CASE IS PLAT DASH 2026-00033. CONSIDER A PUBLIC HEARING AND REQUEST 
          [4.B. PLAT-2026-00033: Consider a public hearing and request from Burns Surveying (applicant/agent) for a final plat on real property located at 1014 S. Main Street, legally described as Anderson Slayback Abstract 1299, Page 132, Tract 20 on 0.402 acres, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas.]
FROM BURN SERVING APPLICANT AGENT FOR A FINAL PLAT ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1014 SOUTH MAIN STREET. LEGALLY. LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS ANDERSON SLAYBACK. ABSTRACT 1299. PAGE 132. TRACK 20 ON 0.40402 ACRES. CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A FINAL PLAT TO RECORD IT AS A. BECAUSE IT IS AN UNPLATTED PROCESSOR RIGHT NOW, THERE IS AN EXISTING BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY, AND SO THE APPLICANT, BY LAW, HAS TO HAVE IT RECORDED IN ORDER TO OCCUPY THE BUILDING AND TO DO ANY WORK. THE CURRENT ZONING IS LOCAL OFFICE, RETAIL, AND THEN THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL SETBACKS ARE BELOW. AGAIN, THE BUILDING IS ALREADY EXISTING. THIS IS JUST FOR A CLEAN LOT OF RECORD. THIS CURRENT ZONING MAP TO SHOW YOU WHERE THE PROPERTY IS AND THEN WHAT IT'S ZONED. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS MAIN STREET, AND THEN THE PROPERTY OWNER BUFFER MAP. THESE ARE THE THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR LOR, JUST AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY WHERE IT'S LOCATED. 
          AND THEN THIS IS THE PROPOSED FINAL PLAT STAFF STAFF'S ANALYSIS. THE FINAL PLAT MEETS ALL THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR LOR DUE TO THE LOT NEVER BEING RECORDED. THIS IS WHAT TRIGGERED THE FINAL PROCESS TO BE REQUIRED, AS I STATED, TO OCCUPY THE BUILDING AND OR DO ANY STRUCTURAL OR COMMERCIAL WORK TO. 14 MAILERS WERE SENT OUT, ZERO RESPONDED 
          [00:15:06]
IN SUPPORT AND ONE RESPONDED IN OPPOSITION AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT AS PRESENTED AND THEN YOUR OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION. I HAVE A QUESTION ON THE PLAT. IS THERE A REASON WHY THERE WOULD BE A PROPERTY THAT'S WITHIN A PARTICULAR LOR THAT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ALREADY REPLATTED? ARE YOU ASKING IF IT'S A POSSIBILITY THAT SOME OF THEM ARE STILL IN AN ABSTRACT? YES, ACTUALLY, MOST OF THEM ON THE EASTERN NO WESTERN SIDE OF THE STREET HAVE NOT BEEN PLATTED. BUT BY STATE LAW YOU CAN'T SELL BY METES AND BOUNDS. AND SO THIS ONE TECHNICALLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN PLATTED BEFORE IT WAS SOLD. BUT IT IS A GOOD CHANCE THAT THEY ARE STILL IN THE ABSTRACT. THANK YOU. I JUST WONDERED ABOUT THAT. NO PROBLEM. 
          AT AT THIS TIME WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 719. SO COULD I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLEASE? I MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE VOTE. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR ITEM ON THE AGENDA? IS THERE ANYONE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR ITEM ON THE AGENDA SEEING THERE ARE NONE. 720 HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND, ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE VOTE. SEVEN 2720 THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. I ASSUME THE APPLICANT IS NOT HERE. NO, MA'AM, NO MA'AM. COULD I HAVE A VOTE FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR ITEM ON THE AGENDA? MOTION TO APPROVE. OH, GOD. I DIDN'T SEE THE PLAT NUMBER. IS IT? PLOT NUMBER 2026 00033. CONTINGENT BASED ON PUBLIC WORKS. APPROVED IT. NOT IN THIS ONE. SO THIS ONE WAS JUST STRAIGHT OUT. SO THERE WAS NO CONDITIONS ON THIS ONE. YEAH. 
          OR THIS WAS A FINAL PLAT A FINAL PLAT. YES. OKAY. YEAH. CAN WE HAVE A SECOND ON THE MOTION. I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. COMMISSIONERS YOUR VOTE PLEASE. ALL RIGHT. THAT MOTION HAS PASSED. ADDITIONAL ON THE. NO, MA'AM. OKAY. SEEING THAT THERE ARE NO OTHER ITEMS ON THE AGENDA, WE WE WILL HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION TO ADJOURN, I SECOND. WE ARE NOW
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.