[4.A. PLAT-2025-00005: Request from Monte Anderson (owner) to create a new lot to construct a residential structure on real property located at 402 E. Wheatland Road legally described as Lot 1, Block A & Abandoned Alley, Wheatland Plaza Shopping Center on 7.501 acres in the City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas.]

BACK ON FOR A YES, SIR. SORRY. LET ME SCROLL BACK TO THE TOP. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSIONERS, THIS IS ITEM PLAT 202500005. A REPLANT REQUEST FROM MONTE ANDERSON, THE OWNER, TO

[00:05:07]

CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 402 EAST WHEATLAND ROAD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT ONE, BLOCK A AND ABANDONED ALLEY. WHEATLAND PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER ON 7.501 ACRES IN THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, DALLAS, TEXAS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST IS TO REPLAT TO CREATE TWO LOTS OUT OF THE CURRENT ONE LOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL OF A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE ON THE PARCEL. THE OVERVIEW OF THE REPLAT IS. THE CURRENT REPLAT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT, WHICH IS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 2535 OR PD 2535. THIS IS THE CURRENT ZONING MAP. THE PROPERTY THAT IS LABELED WITH THE STAR IS THE LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY ON YOUR IN YOUR PACKETS. AS YOU'LL SEE ON THE PLAT, YOU'LL SEE THE RECTANGULAR SHAPE THAT INDICATES WHERE THE STRUCTURE WOULD GO AND WHERE THE NEW LOT WOULD BE. LIKE I MENTIONED, THE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT IS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 2535. THE CURRENT SETBACK STANDARDS ARE NOT BEING MET AND SO THEY ARE CURRENTLY BEING AMENDED. AND ANOTHER THE AMENDMENT OF THE ENTIRE PD FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT, AND THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN THE APPROVED PLAN PLAN DEVELOPMENT ATTEND 0 TO 10 FOOT MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK AND THE FRONT IN PLACE OF A 25 FOOT, A MINIMUM FIVE FOOT 15 FOOT SIDE SETBACK IN PLACE OF THE REQUIRED 25 FOOT SIDE SETBACK AND A MINIMUM 20 FOOT SETBACK IN PLACE OF THE REQUIRED 25 FOOT REAR SETBACK. CURRENTLY, THE PLAT SHOWS A FIVE FOOT SIDE SETBACK AND A TEN FOOT REAR SETBACK, SO THE APPLICANT IS AMENDING THE PLAT OR AMENDING THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THIS STRUCTURE. THIS IS THE BUFFER MAP. SO IT'S I KNOW IT'S FAINT.

SO THE YELLOW LINE IS WHAT THE PROPERTIES THAT WERE CONTACTED WITHIN 200FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LABELED WITH THE BLUE STAR, JUST AN AERIAL OF THE PROPERTY. STAFF MAILED OUT 52 NOTICES. AND AS OF TODAY, WE RECEIVED THREE IN OPPOSITION, ZERO IN SUPPORT. STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL OF THE REPLAT AS IT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT, AND THESE ARE YOUR OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU, MISS POWELL. COLLEAGUES, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SEEING NONE? HEARING NONE. WE WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. FOR THIS PARTICULAR APPLICATION. IS THERE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVED SO WELL GIVEN THE FACT THAT THEY ARE BOTH AT THE SAME TIME? THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER SALAZAR, FOR THE MOTION. THANK YOU, VICE CHAIR NGUYEN, FOR FOR THE SECOND THE MOTION, ALL THOSE VOTING IN FAVOR TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLEASE DO SO.

ALL RIGHT. SIX, VOTING IN FAVOR OF THE PUBLIC HEARING STANDS OPEN AT THIS TIME. IS THERE ANYONE HERE I NOW I'M SORRY. OH, OKAY. YES YOU'RE RIGHT, I FORGOT. SO THE PUBLIC HEARING STANDS OPEN AT 717 IN, IN THE, IN THE EVENING. WHAT WAS I DOING? OH, YES. IS THERE ANYONE HERE DESIRING TO SPEAK. 0I0, I DO TAKE NOTICE THAT I DO HAVE SOME CARDS OF SPEAKER CARDS OF INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, AND I AND I DO HAVE THEM HERE. BUT FIRST I WANT TO SEE, IS THERE ANYONE DESIRING TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THIS REPLAT APPLICATION? IS THERE ANYONE HERE DESIRING TO SPEAK? I DIDN'T SAY AGAINST. I SAY ON THIS REPLAT APPLICATION.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE DESIRING TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS REPLAT APPLICATION? IF YOU PLEASE COME FORWARD AND IN ORDERLY FASHION AND GIVE US YOUR NAME, YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, AND YOU MAY BEGIN YOUR. TWO MINUTE COMMENT PERIOD. NOT THAT YOU HAVE TO TAKE ALL TWO MINUTES, BUT YOU HAVE TO YOU HAVE YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES. SO IF YOU COME, GIVE US YOUR NAME, YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, AND WE'LL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO HEAR YOUR YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS APPLICATION. MY NAME IS THERESA MONTGOMERY, 519 ALLEN AVENUE, DUNCANVILLE, TEXAS. I AM ADJACENT RIGHT BEHIND THIS WHEATLAND PLAZA. IT'S BEEN OVER 3 OR 4 YEARS NOW THAT I HAVE BEEN FIGHTING AGAINST THIS MULTI-DWELLING. AND IT WAS APPROVED AND IT HAD A TIMELINE THAT HAS EXPIRED NOW FOR THAT TO HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, THE ALLEYWAY THAT HE IS ASSUMING IS ABANDONED. IT'S NOT ABANDONED. IT BELONGS TO THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. YOU'RE AWARE THAT YOU HAVE IT BECAUSE WE GET CITATIONS WHEN WE DON'T MAINTAIN IT. IT IS A UTILITY

[00:10:03]

EASEMENT WHERE THE ELECTRIC TRUCKS CAN COME THROUGH. IT'S NOT AN ACCESS TO A BACK GARAGE, BUT IT'S NOT ABANDONED. IT'S NOT TRASH. IT'S BEEN MAINTAINED BY US. MR. ANDERSON HAS TRIED MANY TRICKS TO TRY TO OBTAIN THIS PROPERTY SO HE CAN CONTINUE TO DO HIS SHENANIGANS.

THE BUSINESSES ARE THRIVING THERE. THERE IS NOT GOING TO BE PARKING ENOUGH FOR A MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING. IT'S GOING TO OVERFLOW INTO OUR STREETS. THE BUSINESS THAT HE CURRENTLY HAS NOW, HE'S NOT ABIDING BY CITY ORDINANCES BECAUSE HE'S NOT EVEN PUTTING A BUFFER OR BARRIER UP. SO IN ORDER FOR US TO LIVE SAFELY, WE CANNOT ACCEPT HIM MOVING ANY FURTHER CLOSER TO OUR HOMES. YOU KNOW, UNFORTUNATELY, HE'S OUR TRUMP OF DUNCANVILLE. HE'S BEEN ABLE TO DO EXACTLY WHAT HE'S WANTING TO DO WITHOUT ABIDING BY ANY OF OUR ORDINANCES. THE ALLEY IS NOT ABANDONED. I LIVE BEHIND THIS ALLEY. I MOWED THIS ALLEY FOR 20 YEARS. I'M INVESTED IN DUNCANVILLE. I CARE ABOUT DUNCANVILLE. AND WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE OF THESE SHENANIGANS. YOU DON'T? THANK YOU, MR. MONTGOMERY. NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE. HI, I'M JULIE RIBBING. ADDRESS IS 515 ALLEN AVENUE. AND JUST LIKE MY NEIGHBOR THERESA, WE LIVE, I LIVE, MY HUSBAND AND I LIVE DIRECTLY BEHIND THIS PROPERTY. I HAVE SEVERAL ISSUES WITH MR. MOTEN. THIS PROPERTY, ONE IS BEING THE PRIVACY BARRIER THAT HE REFUSES TO PUT UP. HE'S PUT IT UP LONG ENOUGH TO GET, I GUESS PASS INSPECTION, LEAVES IT UP FOR DAYS, TAKES IT DOWN. I CAN'T HAVE PRIVACY IN MY OWN BACKYARD. I DON'T FEEL SAFE LETTING MY DAUGHTER STAY IN OUR BACKYARD AND PLAY. SHE CAN'T UTILIZE THIS BECAUSE IT'S JUST OPEN. HE REFUSES TO PUT THE PRIVACY BARRIERS UP. NOT ONLY THAT IS, I HAVE A 93 YEAR OLD GRANDMOTHER THAT LIVES ACROSS THE STREET FROM ME. MY DAUGHTER AND I ARE CONSTANTLY CROSSING THE STREET TO GO SEE HER. IF MR. MOAT PUTS THESE APARTMENTS, TOWNHOUSES, WHATEVER HE WANTS TO CALL THEM IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS PARKING LOT, THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE ANY PARKING. SO THAT OVERFLOW PARKING HAS TO GO SOMEWHERE. WELL, MY FEAR IS THEY'RE GOING TO START PARKING ON OUR STREET, AND IT'S GOING TO MAKE IT A WHOLE LOT MORE DANGEROUS FOR MY DAUGHTER AND I TO CROSS THE STREET. YOU KNOW, THAT'S THAT'S A BIG SAFETY CONCERN I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT. AM I GOING TO GET RAN OVER TRYING TO CROSS THE STREET? SO THERE'S AND I KNOW THERE'S IF HE PUTS HIS BUILDING IN, THERE'S NOT ENOUGH PARKING SPACES NOW, THEN THERE'S DEFINITELY NOT GOING TO BE ANY WHEN HE PUTS THIS APARTMENT IN. SO WE NEED TO LOOK AT THE SAFETY FACTORS GOING INTO THIS OF PUTTING THESE TOWNHOMES AND APARTMENTS IN. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MISS WIMBLEY. ARE THERE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS WISHING TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR REPLAT APPLICATION? IF YOU COME ON DOWN AND GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. I AM SUSAN COREY.

I LIVE 614 SOUTH ALEXANDER AVENUE, WHICH IS RIGHT BEHIND THE SHOPPING CENTER. I, I CURRENTLY GO AND SHOP AT THE SHOPPING CENTER AT THE DOLLAR GENERAL. YEAH, AND KIM AND JENNY'S AND MY DOCTOR'S OFFICE IS ALSO IN THAT SHOPPING CENTER. AND THEY'RE ALL HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THE PARKING AS IT IS NOW. WHEN THE DMV IS NOT OPEN, THEN YOU HAVE PLENTY OF PARKING, BUT THEY'RE OPEN FIVE DAYS A WEEK. THE DOCTOR'S OFFICE IS OPEN FIVE DAYS A WEEK. THERE'S NOT A PROBLEM WITH PARKING, BUT WHEN THEY'RE OPEN, YOU MIGHT HAVE TO PARK ACROSS THE STREET OVER BY THE DOLLAR STORE IN THE LAUNDRY CHAIR TO GET ANYWHERE. AND AS FAR AS THE ALLEY BEING ABANDONED, THE HOUSE AT 615 SOUTH ALEXANDER HAS A GARAGE THAT GOES OUT ONTO THE ALLEY, AND AS FAR AS I KNOW, IT'S THE ONLY HOUSE IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. SO IF THEY DO AWAY WITH THAT, SHE'S GOT STUFF IN HER GARAGE SHE CAN'T GET. SO. AND FROM THE TRAFFIC AND STUFF, THERE'S A

[00:15:02]

STREET THAT RUNS STRAIGHT THROUGH THAT SHOPPING CENTER. SO WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO ABOUT THAT? SO THAT'S MY $0.02. THANK YOU MISS COREY I APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE. SEEING NONE AND HEARING NONE I RECOGNIZE THAT IT'S 725 IN THE EVENING.

AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION TO CLOSE. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER SALAZAR, FOR YOUR MOTION. AND THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER ZARATE, FOR YOUR FOR YOUR SECOND, ALL THOSE VOTING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 725 IN THE EVENING.

PLEASE DO SO BY YOUR VOTING INDICATORS. MOTION PASSES. OUR PUBLIC HEARING STANDS CLOSED.

IS THERE COLLEAGUES MOTION FOR THIS ITEM? ITEM FOR A. I MOVE THAT WE DENY THIS REQUEST BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE GATHERED, THAT IT DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR TO BE REPLANTED AT THIS TIME. IS THERE A SECOND TO COMMISSIONER BAILEY? COMMISSIONER WYNNS MOTION TO DENY BASED ON THE THE FINDING OF FACT THAT THIS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS AS INDICATED IN STAFF BRIEFED US HERE AT THE PODIUM? IS THERE A SECOND SECOND? THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER SALAZAR, FOR THAT. SECOND, ALL THOSE VOTING IN FAVOR TO DENY THIS REPLAT APPLICATION, PLEASE DO SO WITH YOUR VOTING INDICATORS. SIX VOTING IN FAVOR TO DENY THIS APPLICATION. THE APPLICATION STANDS DENIED. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH. NEXT ITEM. REALLY

[4.B. PLAT-2026-00006: Request from Burns Surveying (applicant/agent) and Garry Bruner (owner) for a replat to divide the southern portion of the lot on real property located at 902 Fairlawn Drive legally described as Block A, E 54.1', Lot 9, Winona Gardens, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas.]

QUICK FOR THE ATTORNEY. IS IT A POSSIBLE TO LOOK AT THESE AT THE SAME TIME? SINCE THEY ARE THEY COMPLEMENT ONE ANOTHER. OKAY. THAT'S COOL OKAY. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER. THIS ITEM IS A-2026000006A REPLAT REQUEST FROM BYRNE, SURVEYING APPLICANT AGENT AND GARY BRUNER, OWNER FOR REPLAT, TO DIVIDE THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE LOT ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 902 FAIRLAWN DRIVE. LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS BLOCK A EAST 54.1FT, LOT NINE, WINONA GARDEN, CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO DIVIDE A PORTION OF THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THEIR LOT IN ORDER FOR THE CHURCH PROPERTY TO THE EAST TO PURCHASE IT. BY STATE LAW, THE LOT CANNOT BE PURCHASED BY METES AND BOUNDS, AND SO THE THE PROPERTY OWNER IS REPLATTING IT OUT FOR THE CHURCH TO BE ABLE TO PURCHASE IT AND THEN COMBINE IT INTO THEIR LOT. THE CURRENT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR SF TEN 10,000 FOR THE MINIMUM LOT AREA, MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 75FT. LOT DEPTH MINIMUM IS 100FT. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE LOT CURRENTLY IS EXCEEDING AND MEETING ALL OF THOSE REQUIREMENTS, EVEN WITH THAT PORTION BEING DIVIDED OFF. AND THERE IS AN EXISTING HOME ON THE STRUCTURE OR AN EXISTING HOME ON THE LOT. HERE'S THE THE CURRENT ZONING MAP. SO THE PROPERTY IN YELLOW. SO THIS THE LONG THIS PORTION AT THE BACK IS WHAT THEY ARE DIVIDING OFF. LIKE I MENTIONED IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED SF TEN. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL. AND SO THE REPLAT DOES NOT CHANGE THE THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD BY ANY MEANS. HERE'S THE BUFFER MAP. SO THE YELLOW INDICATES THE 200 FOOT BUFFER OF WHO I RECEIVED A NOTICE, AND THEN JUST THE AERIAL OF THE PROPERTY. AND THIS IS THE PROPOSED REPLAT.

AND SO THIS WILL BE LOT ONE A WITH A PORTION OF LOT NINE A BLOCK A. AND SO I KNOW IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO SEE ON THIS, BUT THIS PORTION DOWN HERE IS WHAT WILL BE COMBINED INTO THIS LARGER PORTION. 1010 MAILERS WERE SENT OUT, ZERO WERE RECEIVED IN SUPPORT AND ZERO RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION. AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT AS PRESENTED AND YOUR OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION. ALL RIGHT. I KNOW WE WANT TO DISTINGUISH FOR THE RECORD THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO CASES. YES, SIR. BUT I DO HAVE A QUICK NEW QUESTION THAT I DIDN'T HAVE PRIOR TO. IF YOU COULD GO BACK TO. YEP, TO THE REPLAT MAP. SO IN THE NEXT ITEM IN IN FOR WHAT IS IT GOING TO BE. SEE, SEE WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT WHAT IS NOW ONE A, BECAUSE NINE A WOULD BE THE PORTION THE SUBJECT PORTION WOULD BE PLATTED INTO BASED ON THE REQUEST. RIGHT? CORRECT. WELL, WHAT DOES AFTER SHOULD THIS PLAT BE APPROVED? WHAT DOES THE LOT NINE A DOES IT NOW COMPLY ON ITS OWN WITH THE OTHER LOT STANDARDS IN THE THE

[00:20:08]

LOT PATTERN WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ANY OF THE STANDARDS THAT EXIST NOW THAT THAT PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY WILL BE GONE? YES. OKAY. SO. THERE WOULDN'T BE AN ISSUE IN TERMS OF CONFORMITY WITH THAT. NINE A BECAUSE THERE'S THAT. WHAT IS IT BECAUSE OF THE REMAINDER, AS I LOOKED A LOT, LOT EIGHT I'M JUST TRYING TO LOOK AT AS I GO ON AROUND THAT STREET FACE BECAUSE I KNOW THEY'RE SELLING OFF. YOU KNOW, IDEALLY THEY'D BE REPLATTING THE REAR PORTION OF THAT. THAT'S WHAT THE APPLICATION IS FOR. I'M JUST WONDERING ABOUT THE WHAT WILL IT DO TO THE LOT PATTERN ONCE THAT'S GONE, AS, AS IT RELATES TO THE OTHER RESIDENTIAL USES THAT ARE ALONG WHAT I GUESS THAT WOULD BE FAIR, FAIR FAIR LAWN. YES, SIR. SO IT'S STILL CONFORMS EVEN WITH THAT PORTION BEING GONE. SO IT DOESN'T CHANGE ANYTHING FOR THE REST OF THE LOT PATTERN IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. LIKE I MENTIONED IN OUR BRIEFING, THAT BACK PORTION WILL BE ESSENTIALLY A DEAD LOT IF IT HAD BEEN PLATTED ON ITS OWN. AND SO WE WOULD COULDN'T ALLOW THAT BY STATE LAW. AND SO NOW IT'LL JUST IT'LL PROBABLY BE A FENCE IN BETWEEN MR. BRUNER'S PROPERTY AND THE CHURCH'S PROPERTY TO DELINEATE TO DELINEATE THE TWO.

RIGHT. YEAH. AND I TRACKED IN THE BRIEFING YOUR YOUR COMMENT ABOUT ACCESS. I JUST WANTED TO KNOW THAT ONCE, IF WE WERE TO LOP OFF THAT REAR PORTION OF THE LOT, WHAT DID IT WHAT WOULD IT DO TO THE EXISTING LOT PATTERN? BUT I THINK YOU'VE ANSWERED MY QUESTION. THANK YOU, MISS POWELL. NO PROBLEM. COLLEAGUES, ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS POWELL ON THIS? VICE CHAIR? WINN, I HAVE A QUESTION. I'M JUST WONDERING WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE TOTAL LOT HERE FOR LOT NINE A OR THE NEW LOT LOT ONE A THE WHOLE PART THAT'S IN THERE. THIS. YEAH. THE PART THAT'S BEING SPLIT OFF THE WHOLE OR THIS PART, I WANT TO SEE THE PART WHERE YOU HAVE LOT NINE A BLOCK A. AND SO FROM THE STREET TO THE THAT TIP THAT'S BEING CUT OFF, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THAT. BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT THE A LOT THAT'S ADJACENT TO IT ON THE LEFT. AND I'M SEEING, YOU KNOW, A VERY LARGE SIZE LOT HERE. SO I'M JUST WONDERING WHAT IS THE SIZE WHAT'S THE LOT SIZE. JUST GENERAL INFORMATION. LET'S SEE IF I CAN READ. THIS IS TINY. ALL RIGHT. SO CURRENTLY IT IS. OH THAT'S SMALL 14,000. OH WAIT I, I TYPED IT UP HERE. SO THE 14,614FT■!S. SO THAT'S LESS THAN AN ACRE. AND A LOT OF THE LOTS TO THE WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT ON THE LEFT WERE PLATTED PRIOR TO. AND SO THEY ARE A LITTLE I WON'T SAY LOPSIDED, BUT SOME ARE SKINNIER. SOME ARE SLIMMER. MR. BRUNER'S PROPERTY IS ONE THAT I'M NOT GOING TO SAY HE GOT LUCKY, BUT HE HAS A LARGER LOT IN COMPARISON TO THE REST OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU.

YES, MA'AM. SO WHAT WOULD BE THE NEW TOTAL LOT AREA POST PLAT? REPLATTING. SO THIS THE 14,000 IS THAT LOT AREA POST REPLAT THE 14,614FT■!S. WHAT IST PRE? HOLD ON. LET ME SEE. OH, MAN, I CAN'T SEE THAT AT ALL. I JUST 20. OH THEY HAVE LOBBY ON. WELL THIS WAS A PREVIOUS ITERATION BUT 20,000 SQUARE. THIS IS THE PORTION THAT WOULD GO AWAY THE 20,000FT■!S. SO IF M DOING THIS QUICK MATH IN MY HEAD A LITTLE BIT OVER 34,000FT. OKAY, I'M JUST DOING A QUICK MATH, SO DON'T HOLD ME TO THAT EXACT. SO THE WHOLE THING ABOUT 34,000FT■!S. SO ALL OF IT TOGET.

IS CLOSER ABOUT AN ACRE AND SOME CHANGE. OKAY. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MISS POWELL COLLEAGUES? ALL RIGHT. HEARING NONE. SEEING NONE. I RECOGNIZE. MISS POWELL AT 733 IN THE EVENING HERE. 733. SO WE WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER SALAZAR, FOR YOUR MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER O'BRIEN, FOR YOUR SECOND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 733. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS REPLAT APPLICATION? SEEING NONE. HEARING NONE. IT IS 734 IN THE EVENING AND I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVED. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. WHEN? THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER SALAZAR,

[00:25:03]

FOR YOUR SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL THOSE VOTING IN FAVOR TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLEASE DO SO WITH YOUR VOTE. ALL THOSE VOTING IN FAVOR. I SEE THE THE PUBLIC HEARING STANDS CLOSED AT 734. COLLEAGUES, IS THERE A MOTION FOR ITEM FOUR B AS READ INTO THE RECORD? I MOVE FOR APPROVAL. THANK YOU, VICE CHAIR NGUYEN, FOR YOUR MOTION TO APPROVE. IS THERE A SECOND TO THAT MOTION? SECOND. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER SALAZAR, FOR YOUR SECOND TO THAT, TO THAT MOTION, ALL THOSE VOTING IN FAVOR TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER FOUR B, PLEASE DO SO. SIX VOTING IN FAVOR. MOTION PASSES. WE'RE NOW ON TO ITEM LETTER C4C. SO THIS

[4.C.PLAT-2026-00007: Request from Burns Surveying (applicant/agent) and Centro Familiar Cristiano (owner) for a replat to include a portion of the lot at 902 Fairlawn Drive on real property located at 901 Westridqe Drive, legally described as Block A, Lot 1 on 7.767 acres, Centro Familiar Cristiano, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas.]

IS THE COMPANION ITEM TO ITEM FOUR B PLAT DASH 202600007. REPORT REQUEST AGAIN FROM BURN SURVEY. THE APPLICANT AND AGENT AND CENTRAL FAMILIAR CRISTIANO, THE OWNER TO CREATE A NEW LOT ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 901 WEST WESTWOOD DRIVE. LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS BLOCK A LOT, ONE ON 7.767 ACRES. CENTRO. FAMILIAR. CRISTIANO. CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. ALL RIGHT. APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO ACQUIRE A PORTION OF THE LOT AT 902 FAIR LAWN TO CREATE A NEW LOT. LOT ONE A THE CURRENT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AGAIN, FOR SF TEN, THE MINIMUM LOT AREA IS 10,000FT■!S. AND WIH THIS NEW PORTION, THAT LOT WILL BE 358,003, 358,500FT■!S. AND THERE ARE EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE LOT THAT YOU CAN SEE ON THE REPLAY IN YOUR PACKET. AND ON THE NEXT SLIDE. THE CHURCH DOES HAVE ITS CHURCH AND A COUPLE OF BUILDINGS ON THAT LOT.

CURRENTLY. THIS IS THE CURRENT ZONING MAP. AND SO AGAIN, AS YOU CAN TELL, THESE SHAPES ARE THE STRUCTURES THAT ARE CURRENTLY EXISTING ON THAT LOT. IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED SF TEN.

FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL. AGAIN THE BUFFER MAP JUST MOVED A LITTLE BIT OVER TO THE RIGHT. AND SO THAT YELLOW AGAIN INDICATES ALL THE PROPERTIES THAT WERE NOTIFIED WITHIN 200FT AND JUST AN AERIAL. SO YOU CAN GET A BETTER IDEA.

AND THIS IS THE THE PLAT FOR CENTRAL FAMILIAR. SO THE NEW LOT IS LOT ONE A. AND SO THIS IS NOW COMBINED THE PORTION FROM THE PLOT TO FAIRLAWN CREATING THIS NEW LOT. 35 MAILERS WERE SENT OUT. ZERO RESPONDED IN SUPPORT AND ZERO RESPONDED IN OPPOSITION. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT AS PRESENTED AND THESE ARE YOUR OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU, MISS POWELL. YES, SIR. COLLEAGUES, ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS COMPANION CASE? SEEING NONE. HEARING NONE I RECOGNIZE THAT IT'S 737 IN THE EVENING AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE THE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION TO APPROVE. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS, FOR YOUR MOTION TO APPROVE OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE A SECOND TO COMMISSIONER ZARATE'S MOTION SECOND. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER O'BRIEN, FOR YOUR SECOND. IS THERE ANYONE THE PUBLIC HEARING HEREBY STANDS OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO DESIRING TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS REPLAT APPLICATION? IF THERE IS, IF YOU COME ON DOWN, I SEE YOU COMING. IF YOU GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR FOR THE RECORD. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS SANDRA TORRES, AND I LIVE IN 826 VERNON DRIVE. DUNCANVILLE, TEXAS. AND WE ARE NEXT TO THE PLAT THAT IS ASKING TO BE NAMED AS A LOT, I BELIEVE BACK IN 2014 IT WAS DIVIDED, SO I'M NOT SURE WHY THEY WHY THEY WANTED TO PUT IT BACK, BUT WE HAVING A LOT OF ISSUES BECAUSE THE CHURCH IS LEASING THE FIELDS TO A SCHOOL AND I DON'T KNOW IF THEY'RE OUT TO CODE, BUT WE HAVING ISSUES WITH THE FENCE THAT IS DIVIDING THE FIELD AND OUR HOME. THEY PUT UP NET. SO THE BALLS THAT THEY'RE USING WON'T GO THROUGH OUR FENCE, BUT THEY'RE STILL GOING THROUGH OUR FENCE AND HITTING OUR AC UNIT, OUR ROOF, OUR VEHICLES AND ANY ANYTHING THAT IS ON OUR PROPERTY. SO I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING TO BE HOW IT'S GOING TO AFFECT THIS TO US.

YES. THANK YOU FOR YOUR QUESTION, MISS TORRES. WHAT'S BEFORE US TODAY? AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M AS, AS AS AS CLEAR AS I POSSIBLY CAN. RIGHT. SO, MR. WHAT'S BEFORE US TODAY IS AN APPLICATION FOR A REPLAT. I DIDN'T RECALL READING IN THE HISTORY OR THE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY. ANY PAST REPLAT APPLICATIONS ON THIS LOT. IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN OR IT DID HAPPEN. I JUST DIDN'T TAKE NOTICE OF IT. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE MUST

[00:30:06]

CONSIDER, AND THE ONLY THING THAT WE REALLY CAN CONSIDER, IS, DOES A LOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS? IN OTHER WORDS, YOU KNOW, IS IT ENOUGH SIZE? THAT'S WHAT MY QUESTION WAS AROUND, YOU KNOW, WHAT WOULD BE THE LOT PATTERN BEFORE AND AFTER? DOES IT HAVE THE NECESSARY FOR SETBACKS, REAR SIDE, WHATEVER SETBACKS ARE REQUIRED? I THINK YOU HEARD IN A PREVIOUS CASE, THIS BODY JUST DENIED A CASE BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T MEET THOSE MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS. SO IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE, THOSE ARE THE THOSE ARE KIND OF THE PARAMETERS OF WHAT WE CAN CONSIDER AS IT RELATES TO A REPLAT. WHAT I HEAR YOU TALKING ABOUT, AND PERHAPS SOME OF YOUR NEIGHBORS TALKING ABOUT IN TERMS OF USES AND AND PERMITTED USES, I'M GOING TO ENCOURAGE YOU TO REALLY VISIT WITH ONE OF OUR PNC MEMBERS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND HOW YOU CAN HAVE THOSE CONCERNS ADDRESSED, PARTICULARLY IF THERE ARE SOME USES THAT YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT A WHETHER THEY'RE PERMITTED B ANY NUISANCE TO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, YOU KNOW, TO YOUR AS A NEIGHBOR TO AVAIL YOURSELF TO B, TO ENSURE THAT YOU'RE HAVING YOUR CONCERNS ADDRESSED AND YOU HAVE THE TRUE AND CLEAR FACTS ON THAT. BUT UNFORTUNATELY, WE'RE UNABLE TO TAKE ANY OF THAT INTO CONSIDERATION BECAUSE WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS VERY NARROW. DOES IT FIT? IS IT LARGE ENOUGH, YOU KNOW, IS IT ACCESS ONTO IT? AND SO THOSE ARE REALLY THE PARAMETERS OF WHAT WE'D BE ABLE TO CONSIDER NOW, IN THE FUTURE, IF THE CHURCH WAS TO COME AND SAY, HEY, I WANT A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN ORDER TO OPERATE A, B, OR C, THEN WE COULD GET INTO, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE THINGS THAT YOU, YOU DESCRIBE HERE AT THE PODIUM. BUT UNFORTUNATELY TONIGHT IN THE DISCHARGE OF OUR OF THIS PLAT, WE CAN'T CONSIDER ANY OF THAT. I HOPE THAT HELPS. YEAH. IT HELPS. I AND I UNDERSTAND I ALREADY REACHED TO MRS. POWELL. OKAY. TO GET MORE INFORMATION ON WHO I NEED TO CONTACT ABOUT THE ISSUES THAT WE'RE HAVING. SO. YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. MR. IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE IN THE YOU'RE IN THE RIGHT HANDS, TALKING TO THE RIGHT PEOPLE TO GET THE RIGHT ANSWER YOU NEED. SO THANK YOU FOR THAT. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE SPEAK WANTING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST. ALRIGHT. I TAKE NOTICE OF THE 742 IN THE EVENING AND I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SEEING NO MORE SPEAKERS. MOTION TO CLOSE. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER SALAZAR, FOR YOUR MOTION TO CLOSE. SECOND. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER O'BRIEN, FOR YOUR SECOND TO THAT. ALL THOSE VOTING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SIX VOTING IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION. THE HEARING STANDS CLOSED. COLLEAGUES, IS THERE A MOTION ON THIS PARTICULAR REPLAT APPLICATION? I MOVE TO APPROVE THIS PARTICULAR REPLAT APPLICATION. THANK YOU. VICE CHAIR NGUYEN, IS THERE A SECOND TO THAT? REPLAT I SECOND, THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER, FOR YOUR SECOND TO TO. THE MOTION TO APPROVE THIS REPLAT APPLICATION IS READ INTO THE RECORD. ALL THOSE VOTING IN FAVOR, PLEASE DO SO WITH YOUR VOTING INDICATORS. SIX VOTING IN FAVOR.

[4.D. ZONE-2025-00007: Request from Yasmine Leal (applicant/owner) for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) to allow for Short-Term Rental (STR) in a residential neighborhood on real property located at 314 E. Center Street, legally described as Block 1, Lot 3, Freeman Addition, on 0.262 acres, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas]

MOTION CARRIES. MISS POWELL. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER, THIS IS OUR LAST ITEM FOR CASE ZONE.

DASH 205. DASH 1200007. I REQUEST REQUEST FROM YASMIN LEAL, APPLICANT AND OWNER, FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A SHORT TERM RENTAL OR STR, AND A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 314 EAST CENTER STREET. LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS BLOCK ONE, LOT THREE FREEMAN ADDITION ON 0.262 ACRES, CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST IS THE APPLICANT IS WANTING TO USE HER HOME TO OPERATE A SHORT TERM RENTAL, SIMILAR TO AN AIRBNB IN A SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD. THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO DO SO IS BY ACQUIRING AN SUP OR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. THE CURRENT ZONING IS SF7 OR SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN. CURRENTLY, IT MEETS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO OPERATE IN A SINGLE FAMILY HOME ZONING DISTRICT. THE MAIN THINGS THAT WE HAVE IS IF IT'S IN AN HOA, HOW MANY ROOMS ARE GOING TO BE USED, EXCESSIVE ACCOMMODATING. THE PARKING STAFF HAS FOUND THAT IT DOES NOT DETER FROM THE CHARACTER OF THE SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD. FUNCTIONALITY WISE. THE HOME ALSO HAS THREE BEDROOMS AND TWO BATHROOMS, AS WELL AS FOUR PARKING SPACES. SO TWO ON THE DRIVEWAY, TWO IN THE GARAGE. THIS IS CURRENT ZONING MAP OF THAT PROPERTY JUST SO YOU CAN SEE IT AGAIN. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL. SO

[00:35:01]

AGAIN, STAYING IN LINE WITH THAT, THE CHARACTER OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE USE OF THE HOME, THIS IS THE BUFFER MAP. SO AGAIN I KNOW THE THE YELLOW LINE IS KIND OF FAINT, BUT EVERYONE WITHIN THAT IS WHO IS WHO IS NOTIFIED WITHIN 200FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND JUST AN AERIAL OF THE PROPERTY. AND WE JUST WANTED TO PUT THE KEY, THE KEY FEATURES FOR SUP ON THIS SLIDE. SO JUST KIND OF BEING EVERYBODY CAN SEE IT. SO THESE ARE THE NINE THINGS THAT STAFF LOOK AT FOR ANY SUP STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE CURRENT APPLICATION IS MEETING ALL OF THESE KEY FEATURES. AND THESE ARE JUST IMAGES OF THE HOW THE HOME IS LAID OUT AS WELL AS THE SURVEY. SO YOU CAN SEE THE DRIVEWAY AND THEN WHERE THE BEDROOMS ARE AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. 21 MAILINGS WERE SENT OUT, ONE WAS, ONE WAS RECEIVED IN IN SUPPORT AND ZERO RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION. AS OF TODAY, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE SUP REQUEST AS PRESENTED AND THESE ARE YOUR OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MISS POWELL. I HAVE A CURIOUS QUESTION. SO SURE, WHEN WE I KNOW WE REQUIRE FOR OFF STREET PARKING, RIGHT? YES, SIR.

AND THAT'S TO ENSURE THAT WE WE WE'RE MAXIMIZING AS MUCH OFF STREET PARKING AS WE POSSIBLY CAN. HOW DO WE CONFIRM THAT THE GARAGE OR HOW DO WE HAVE AFFIRMATIVE KNOWLEDGE THAT THE GARAGE IS ACTUALLY A GARAGE? YEAH. AND NOT CONVERTED. NOT A STORAGE ROOM. GARAGE. CORRECT.

JUST SO WE WE DO GO OUT THERE, OBVIOUSLY WE CAN'T ASK THEM TO OPEN THE GARAGE, BUT WE HAVE MET WITH MISS LEAL AND CONFIRMED IT. SO THE BEST THAT WE CAN GO OFF OF IS HER HONESTY.

BUT WE CAN. OBVIOUSLY PEOPLE DO CONVERT GARAGES ALL THE TIME WITHOUT PERMITS. AND SO UP UNTIL NOW WE HAVE SEEN THE PROPERTY PRETTY. IT LOOKS LIKE THEY'RE BEING USED AS GARAGE PREVIOUSLY. AND TO YOUR SORRY, I WANTED TO CORRECT MYSELF. FOR SINGLE FAMILY THE REQUIRED PARKING IS TWO SPACES AND SO THAT DRIVEWAY AND THEN THAT'S THE MINIMUM. SO IF THEY WANTED TO USE THE GARAGE THEY DO STILL HAVE ENOUGH ROOM. WE OBVIOUSLY DON'T WANT TO OVERFLOW THE OFF STREET PARKING ON THE STREET. SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE TRYING TO ALLEVIATE LIKE A PARTY HOUSE, SO TO SPEAK, BECAUSE SEVEN CARS AT ONE HOUSE MAY BE A FAMILY GATHERING, MAY BE A PARTY. BUT AS OF NOW, WE BELIEVE THAT THE GARAGE IS FUNCTIONING AS A GARAGE THAT CARS CAN BE STORED IN. OKAY. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. JUST JUST A CURIOSITY POINT FOR ME. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, COLLEAGUES, ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? YES, I HAVE A QUESTION. I OFTEN BRING THIS UP WHEN THERE ARE SUBS FOR THE SHORT TERM HOUSING. AND MY QUESTION ALWAYS IS EVEN WITHIN THE BUFFER AREA AND SAY MAYBE. SOMETIME OUTSIDE OF THAT, IS THERE ANY WAY FOR US TO KNOW WHETHER OR NOT THERE ARE OTHER? THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. WE ARE WE ARE CURRENTLY OTHER SHORT TERM RENTALS, SO WE ARE CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING A SOFTWARE THAT WILL HELP US FIND WHERE THEY ARE, WHERE THEY ARE IN THE CITY AS A WHOLE. I CAN SAY FOR CERTAIN THERE IS ANOTHER ONE THAT GOT APPROVED LAST SUMMER ON 209 NORTH ROYAL OAK, AND SO WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF FIGURING OUT WHERE THEY ARE, WHERE THEY'RE LOCATED, AND IF THAT BECOMES TOO MANY IN ONE AREA, THAT MAY BE SOMETHING FOR STAFF TO LOOK AT AS FAR AS A BUFFER, LIKE A DISTANCE REQUIREMENT. BUT AS OF NOW, I JUST KNOW THAT ONE THAT HAS ACTUALLY GONE THROUGH THE PROCESS. BUT WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING WITH A COMPANY THAT CAN HELP US IDENTIFY THOSE. I'LL BE WAITING. I KNOW WHAT ONE OTHER QUESTION AND I'LL LET OTHER STAFF. I JUST REMEMBERED SOMETHING I WROTE IN MY NOTES IN OUR LAST IN OUT OF THE SAKE OF CONSISTENCY, WE'VE NORMALLY TAKEN A LOOK AT SHORT TERM RENTALS AND SOME OCCUPATIONAL HOUSING. I FORGET WHAT WE CALL IT IN OUR CODE OF ORDINANCES WORKFORCE HOUSING. IT'S WHAT WE CALL IT FOR ABOUT A TEN YEAR PERIOD, YOU KNOW, IN ORDER TO EVALUATE. CORRECT? YES, SIR.