[1. Call to order and Confirm a Quorum]
[00:00:06]
I'D LIKE TO CALL THE. MONDAY, AUGUST 11TH, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER. SECRETARY, CAN WE PLEASE HAVE ROLL CALL? PRESIDENT. WINDOW BLINDS. HERE.
SIERRA DAVIS, PRESENT. STEPHANIE. CHAMPAGNE HERE. I GUESS ABSENT. OKAY. OKAY, NOW WE
[2. Consent Agenda]
WILL. ITEM NUMBER TWO IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. MADAM CHAIR, YOU MIGHT WANT TO MOVE YOUR MICROPHONE A LITTLE BIT CLOSER SO THE PUBLIC CAN HEAR YOU. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. ITEM NUMBER TWO IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. WE WILL DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND TAKE ANY NECESSARY ACTION REGARDING APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING, WHICH WAS HELD JUNE 9TH, 2025. ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS REGARDING THOSE MINUTES? I DID NOTICE THAT MY NAME WAS MISSPELLED A COUPLE OF TIMES. SO ON PAGE TWO OF THOSE MINUTES, JUST AFTER ITEM C, IT SHOULD SAY COMMISSIONER BROWNING, AS WELL AS ON. IN THE 7:53 P.M. NOTE. AND I BELIEVE THERE'S A TYPO RIGHT BELOW THAT. IT SAYS IMPROVE THESE TYPES OF STEPS AND I BELIEVE IT SHOULD SAY APPROVE. ARE THERE ANY OTHER COMMENTS? OKAY. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES AS AMENDED. I MOVE TO ACCEPT. ALL IN FAVOR. WILL WE BE USING THAT? OKAY.MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. OUR NEXT ITEM IS A PUBLIC COMMENT. WE WILL RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS THAT ARE NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA. A LIMIT OF TWO MINUTES PER INDIVIDUAL SPEAKER WILL BE IMPOSED. DO WE HAVE ANY OF THE PUBLIC HERE TO. I DID NOT RECEIVE ANY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.
[4. Draft Comprehensive Plan Update (Part 1 of 2)]
SEEING NONE, WE WILL MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER FOUR A DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIRMAN. COUNCIL MEMBERS. STAFF. I'M GOING TO DO A QUICK TURNOVER HERE. WE HAVE MATT HORNE FROM THE MRB GROUP THAT WILL BE HERE THIS EVENING TO PROVIDE A BRIEF PRESENTATION TO YOU ALL REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT WILL BE ON YOUR SCREEN. SO WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO MATT, WHO IS PRESENTING VIRTUALLY THIS EVENING. GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I HOPE EVERYONE CAN SEE THE PRESENTATION ON THE SCREEN.I, I DO RECALL SEEING AND MEETING MANY OF YOU AT THE AT THE OPEN HOUSE, SO I APPRECIATE YOUR ATTENDANCE THERE. I, I'M SURE GIVEN THE GRAVITY OF YOUR OF YOUR AGENDA TONIGHT, YOU'LL BE HAPPY TO LEARN I WON'T BE RUNNING THROUGH THAT ENTIRE PRESENTATION AGAIN. I KNOW YOU, YOU ALL SAW THAT PREVIOUSLY, AND YOU'VE HAD A COPY OF THE DRAFT FOR SOME TIME, SO I JUST REALLY WANTED TO TOUCH ON SOME HIGH POINTS OF THE OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN A BRIEF PRESENTATION TONIGHT, AND THEN GIVE THE GIVE THE COMMISSION AN OPPORTUNITY TO, TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS AND, AND TO AGAIN JUST ENGAGE IN A DISCUSSION ABOUT ABOUT POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS
[00:05:06]
TO CITY COUNCIL. I WOULD JUST OPEN BY BY THANKING EVERYONE WHO PARTICIPATED IN THIS PROCESS. AT THE OPEN HOUSE, I HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO JUST HAVE FOLKS KIND OF RAISE THEIR HANDS. THEY ACKNOWLEDGE PARTICIPATION IN VARIOUS PIECES OF THE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT THROUGHOUT THIS PROCESS. THE BACKBONE OF THE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY WAS A STEERING COMMITTEE AND THE PNC WAS WAS REPRESENTED APTLY BY JARED WHO WHO PARTICIPATED EXTENSIVELY IN AND OFFERED REALLY SOLID INPUT AND FEEDBACK AND SO REPRESENTED THE COMMISSION REALLY WELL. WE'RE THANKFUL FOR HIS PARTICIPATION AND REALLY FOR THE PARTICIPATION OF THE HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF FOLKS FROM DUNCANVILLE WHO OFFERED INSIGHT AND FEEDBACK. SO JUST A QUICK KIND OF RUNDOWN ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLAN. YOU KNOW, WE STARTED THIS JOURNEY WAY BACK JUST OVER A YEAR AGO TODAY. WE WERE SELECTED MRB GROUP WAS SELECTED BY CITY COUNCIL TO PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY THAT JULY. IN AUGUST, THE COMMITTEE WAS FORMED AND THEN IN THE EARLY FALL, WE STARTED WORK. OUR FIRST COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTS WERE HELD IN DECEMBER OF THAT YEAR. WE DID MEET JOINTLY WITH THE EDC AND THE CITY COUNCIL IN JANUARY OF 25. AND THAT'S WHERE WE GOT TO WHAT WE CALLED CONFIRMATION OF DIRECTION. SO TONIGHT, YOU'LL SEE SOME FOUNDATIONAL ELEMENTS OF THE COMP PLAN. YOU'LL RECOGNIZE THEM AS SUCH. WE BELIEVE PRETTY FIRMLY IN WE HAVE TO ESTABLISH THESE FOUNDATIONAL ELEMENTS BEFORE WE CAN REALLY GET INTO THE NITTY GRITTY OF THE PLAN. AND SO THROUGH THOSE JOINT MEETINGS WITH CITY COUNCIL AND WITH THE EDC, WE WERE ABLE TO GENERATE SOME CONSENSUS AROUND THE VISION STATEMENT, AROUND OUR PLANNING PRINCIPLES AND OUR OUR PRIORITY POLICY AREAS. SO IN THE SPRING, WE CAME BACK OUT TO THE PUBLIC AND SHARED SOME OF THE FRUITS OF THAT WORK AND ENGAGED THE PUBLIC ON BOTH THE VISION STATEMENT, THE PLAN FOUNDATIONS AND SOME VISUAL PREFERENCE SURVEYING TO SO THAT THEY COULD UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE URBAN DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT IN JUNE. WE PROVIDED THE COMMUNITY WITH THE FIRST DRAFT OF THAT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND IN JULY, THE WE, OF COURSE, HAD A REALLY SUCCESSFUL EVENT TO SHARE THE, THE PRODUCT WITH, WITH THE COMMUNITY, THE COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AT A PUBLIC HEARING, RECEIVED MANY GREAT COMMENTS THROUGH THAT PROCESS. AND THOSE ARE ALL BEING COMPILED AS PART OF OUR AS PART OF OUR PLAN FORWARD. SO WE TALKED ABOUT THIS. YOU KNOW, WE WORKED CLOSELY WITH THE STEERING COMMITTEE. AND JUST ANOTHER BRIEF KIND OF NOTE ON THAT PROCESS. THE RECOMMENDATIONS YOU SEE HERE, THE IDEAS THAT WERE GENERATED LARGELY CAME THROUGH DISCUSSIONS IN THAT STEERING COMMITTEE. YOU KNOW, OUR ROLE AS FACILITATORS WAS JUST THAT, TO ASK THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO GENERATE FEEDBACK FROM THAT GROUP OF FOLKS, TO GENERATE FEEDBACK FROM THE I WANT TO SAY WE HAD CLOSE TO A THOUSAND OVER 800. ANYWAY, SURVEYS FROM COMMUNITY MEMBERS. SO THE RECOMMENDATIONS YOU SEE HERE TONIGHT ARE ARE LARGELY DRIVEN BY THAT. THE WE SEE DUNCANVILLE AND THE COMMUNITY REALLY SEES DUNCANVILLE AS A COMMUNITY WITH ALL OF THESE AMAZING ASSETS.THERE'S NO ARGUING HOW STRATEGIC YOUR LOCATION IS AS IT RELATES TO THE TO THE METROPLEX. YOU'RE IN AN AMAZING POSITION TO ACCESS CRITICAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES LIKE DFW AIRPORT, LIKE JUST THE DALLAS MARKET GENERALLY, AND ALL THE HORSEPOWER THAT THAT BRINGS FROM FROM AN ECONOMIC STANDPOINT, DUNCANVILLE IS AN INCREDIBLY DIVERSE COMMUNITY, AND WE SEE THAT AS ONE OF YOUR GREATEST STRENGTHS IN THE COMMUNITY SEES IT THAT WAY AS WELL. IT'S A IT'S A PLACE THAT'S VERY THAT'S BEEN VERY INCLUSIVE IN THAT HAS BEEN HOME TO SUCH A WIDE, A WIDE RANGE OF, OF BACKGROUNDS AND ETHNICITIES. AND, AND IT'S JUST BEEN THAT THAT'S BROUGHT TREMENDOUS VALUE TO THE PLANNING PROCESS AND TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS HERE TONIGHT.
IT'S ALSO A FULL SERVICE CITY. I KNOW THAT SOUNDS, YOU KNOW, PARTICULARLY GIVEN WHAT YOU WHAT YOU'VE COME UP WITH, IF YOU'VE BEEN AROUND DUNCANVILLE FOR A WHILE, THAT SOUNDS LIKE. WELL, OF COURSE IT IS. THAT'S WHAT IT'S WHAT A CITY IS. BUT I PROMISE YOU, YOU KNOW, THE FURTHER OUT ON THE RANGE YOU GET, THE, YOU KNOW, YOU GET INTO SOME OF THESE SMALLER COMMUNITIES AND, AND MORE RURAL PLACES AND THEY JUST CAN'T AFFORD AND, AND DON'T HAVE THE
[00:10:06]
RESOURCES TO DELIVER THE TYPES OF SERVICES, THE PROGRAMS, THE FACILITIES, THE FIELDHOUSE AND THE GREAT PARK AMENITIES AND TRAILS, THINGS THAT THAT A LOT IN A LOT OF WAYS YOU CAN START TO TAKE FOR GRANTED. IF YOU DON'T TAKE A STEP BACK AND REALIZE THAT THE TRICKY PART IS JUST CAPITALIZING ON IT, RIGHT? YOU KNOW, YOU'RE YOU'VE GOT THIS WEALTH OF ASSETS. BUT REALLY OVER THE LAST TEN, 20 YEARS, DUNCANVILLE HAS STRUGGLED TO PACKAGE THAT TOGETHER AND CREATE A REAL DESTINATION FOR INVESTMENTS AND NEW RESIDENTS NOT GROWING REALLY AS FAST AS YOUR NEIGHBORS, EVEN IN THE BEST SOUTHWEST. AND WE HAD THIS GREAT QUESTION DURING THE PLANNING PROCESS WHO CARES? WHY DO WE NEED TO GROW? WHY IS EVERYBODY SO WORRIED ABOUT GROWTH? YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE BROUGHT FORWARD TO THE STEERING COMMITTEE WAS, YOU KNOW, EVEN IF WE FREEZE WHAT WE'RE DOING RIGHT NOW AND WE JUST KEEP DELIVERING THE EXACT SAME SET OF SERVICES WE HAVE TODAY, WE DON'T ADD ANOTHER POLICE OFFICER, WE DON'T ADD ANY MORE GREAT PARK PROPERTIES, OR WE DON'T ENHANCE OUR PARKS OR OTHER PUBLIC ASSETS IN ANY WAY.THE COST TO DELIVER THOSE SERVICES ARE ONLY GOING TO GO UP. YOU KNOW, WE TOOK THIS BIG BROAD LOOK AND SAID, ALL RIGHT, THIS IS WHAT THE NATIONAL DOLLAR DID. THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED TO THE NATIONAL DOLLAR IN 2010, A DOLLAR, A DOLLAR'S WORTH OF GOODS COST A DOLLAR, RIGHT? BY 2025, THAT SAME BASKET OF GOODS WENT UP BY 47%. SO THE DOLLAR BASKET OF GOODS IN 2020 OR 2010 IS NOW $1.47 AND $1.47. DOESN'T SOUND TOO BAD, EXCEPT FOR NOTHING COSTS A DOLLAR. RIGHT? SO THE IMPACT LOCALLY TO DUNCANVILLE, WE WERE ABLE TO PULL BUDGETS FROM 2014 TO 2024.
SO JUST LOOKING AT THE LAST TEN YEARS AND WE SAW THAT THE PROPERTY TAX LEVY, WHICH IS THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY, WHICH IS THE AMOUNT OF RESOURCES GENERATED JUST FROM THE PROPERTY TAX, IT WENT FROM 13.1 MILLION IN 2014, NEARLY DOUBLE TO 23.8 MILLION IN 2024. NOW, THERE WERE A LOT. WE TALKED TO STAFF ABOUT THIS. WHAT HAPPENED HERE? WE CERTAINLY ARE PROVIDING MUCH MORE THAN WE WERE IN 2014, A BIT MORE ROBUST OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPARATUS, SOME NEW PARK AMENITIES AND FACILITIES. BUT GENERALLY THAT GROWTH WE KNOW TO BE UNSUSTAINABLE. WE KNOW THAT WE CAN'T CONTINUE TO APPROACH GROWTH IN THAT WAY WITH THE SAME SET OF RESIDENTS THAT WE HAVE TODAY. IF WE ONLY PACE WITH INFLATION, IF WE JUST LOOK AT WHAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SAYS THE INFLATION IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE BETWEEN 2025 AND 2040, WE'D HAVE TO GENERATE ANOTHER $11 MILLION JUST TO KEEP WHAT WE HAVE TODAY. AND WITH THE EXISTING SET OF RESIDENTS ON THE EXISTING SET OF PROPERTIES AS THEY'RE LAID OUT TODAY, WE WOULD HAVE TO WE WOULD SEE A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. THE EXISTING RESIDENTS WOULD END UP PAYING MORE FOR THE EXACT SAME SET OF SERVICES. IF WE CAN'T FIND A WAY TO INFUSE SOME GROWTH. SO THE QUESTION QUICKLY MOVED APPROPRIATELY FROM NOT FROM WHETHER WE SHOULD GROW OR WHETHER WHETHER WE SHOULD STAY THE SAME TO HOW WE SHOULD GROW. WHEN PEOPLE SAW THAT THEY THEY OF COURSE, I DON'T WANT TO PAY AN ADDITIONAL 45% IN PROPERTY TAXES. OF COURSE, I RECOGNIZE THE NEED TO GENERATE INVESTMENT AND ATTRACT NEW RESIDENTS. BUT I DON'T WANT TO LOSE WHAT DUNCANVILLE HAS. I DON'T WANT TO LOSE THOSE REALLY SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT DUNCANVILLE HAS. SO WE HAD TO START THINKING CREATIVELY ABOUT HOW WE COULD PRESERVE THOSE ASSETS AND GENERATE NEW GROWTH. SO IT ALL STARTS WITH A VISION. THE DUNCAN, THE FUTURE OF DUNCANVILLE 15 TO 20 YEARS FROM TODAY. IF WE EXECUTE ON THE PLAN AS IT'S DESIGNED, WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO BUILD ON OUR UNIQUE POSITION IN THE METROPLEX. THIS IDEA AND WHAT WE HEARD A LOT WAS WE FEEL CONNECTED TO OUR NEIGHBORS. IT'S IT FEELS LIKE A SMALL TOWN IN THE SHADOW OF THIS REALLY ACCESSIBLE METRO, WHERE WE CAN GO IN AND GET SOME OF THE BIGGER CITY THINGS THAT WE'RE NOT READY TO HAVE HERE IN OUR COMMUNITY, OR THAT CAN'T BE SUPPORTED HERE LOCALLY. IT'S GOING TO CONTINUE TO BE A PLACE WHERE YOU CAN FIND A DIVERSE, HIGH QUALITY HOUSING STOCK, THRIVING NEIGHBORHOODS, EXPANSIVE RECREATIONAL AMENITIES, AND A WORLD CLASS, WORLD CLASS EDUCATION SYSTEM.
ACCESS TO ROBUST HEALTH CARE. THIS IS WHAT CREATES QUALITY OF LIVING, AND THE STEERING COMMITTEE AND THE COMMUNITY FELT VERY STRONGLY THAT THAT THIS IS WHAT DUNCANVILLE SHOULD LOOK LIKE 15 TO 20 YEARS FROM TODAY. SO BACK TO HOW THE VISION CONTINUES TO TALK ABOUT DOWNTOWN
[00:15:02]
AS THIS CIVIC AND CULTURAL AND COMMERCIAL HUB, VERY WALKABLE, A DISTINCT MIX OF LOCAL BUSINESSES RIGHT LOCALLY OWNED, UNIQUE TO DUNCANVILLE BUSINESSES. NOBODY TRAVELS TWO TOWNS OVER TO GO TO THE REALLY COOL WALMART. THEY READ ABOUT US. THEY THEY COME TO PLACES THAT ARE UNIQUE. THEY COME TO PLACES THAT THAT CAN OFFER THEM SOMETHING THAT OTHER PLACES CANNOT. DOWNTOWN IS ALSO KIND OF RIPE WITH STRONG URBAN DESIGN. AND WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT, BECAUSE THAT WORD URBAN GRABBED PEOPLE IN A CERTAIN WAY. AND, AND WE HAD SOME PUBLIC FEEDBACK I THOUGHT WAS REALLY INSIGHTFUL. IT WAS LIKE, YOU TALK ABOUT SMALL TOWN CHARM, BUT THEN YOU'RE SAYING URBAN, LIKE WE'RE HAVING A HARD TIME RECONCILING THAT. SO WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT CREATIVE PLACEMAKING, THAT THIS IDEA OF THIS ARTS AND CULTURE DISTRICT IN DOWNTOWN IS CRITICAL. IT'S A IT'S A UNIQUE ASSET THAT FOLKS WOULD TRAVEL TO DUNCANVILLE TO SEE. AND THAT SHOWS UP IN THE VISION CORRIDORS. I CAN'T SAY THIS ENOUGH. THE CORRIDORS ARE YOUR FRONT DOORS AND THE STEERING COMMITTEE AND THE COMMUNITY RECOGNIZED THAT OUR FRONT DOORS AREN'T LOOKING GREAT TODAY. AND SO THE DUNCANVILLE THE FUTURE IS GOING TO PAY REAL SPECIFIC ATTENTION TO THOSE CORRIDORS. STRONG URBAN DESIGN. AGAIN, THIS IDEA OF DUNCANVILLE URBAN, SMALL TOWN URBAN. IF YOU IF YOU REALLY WANT TO GET INTO A WEIRD JUXTAPOSITION, INFILL DEVELOPMENT, HIGH QUALITY REDEVELOPMENT, TAKING SOME OF THOSE STRETCHED OUT 1970S AND 80S SHOPPING CENTERS AND REALLY CONVERTING THEM INTO SOMETHING THAT IS POWERFUL VISUALLY BUT ALSO POWERFUL ECONOMICALLY AND CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE CITY IN WAYS THAT IT'S NOT CURRENTLY HAPPENING. AND THEN IT'S MY FAVORITE IS THIS LAST LINE, THIS. IT'S THE PERFECT BLEND OF INNOVATION AND TRADITION, THIS IDEA THAT WE'VE BUILT SOMETHING SPECIAL HERE OVER THE YEARS. WE DON'T WANT TO LOSE THAT, BUT WE KNOW STAYING THE SAME IS NOT IS NOT REALITY. BEING STAYING THE SAME IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE MORE AND MORE EXPENSIVE. IT'S CERTAINLY GOING TO BE MORE AND MORE EXPENSIVE OVER TIME. SO WE HAVE TO INNOVATE. WE HAVE TO EMBRACE DIVERSITY. WE HAVE TO BE INCLUSIVE IN OUR DECISION MAKING. AND THAT'S THAT WILL GENERATE PROSPERITY. AND AMONGST OUR RESIDENTS. SO THE SECOND PIECE OF THAT FOUNDATION OF THE FOUNDATIONAL ELEMENTS ARE THESE PLANNING PRINCIPLES. AND WE TALK ABOUT PLANNING PRINCIPLES FROM A STANDPOINT OF IF ONCE WHEN THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTS THIS PLAN THE NEXT DAY, OR MAYBE THAT SAME MEETING, SOMEBODY'S GOING TO COME UP TO THE PODIUM AND COME UP WITH AN IDEA THAT NOBODY THOUGHT OF IN THE PLAN. WE CAN'T BE EXHAUSTIVE IN PLANNING. IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE WHEN IT COMES TO THINGS LIKE A TO DO LIST OR AN ACTION PLAN. THERE ARE GOING TO BE NEW IDEAS AND WE NEED TO EMBRACE THOSE NEW IDEAS. BUT WE ALSO HAVE TO FOCUS. AND SO WHAT WHAT THE PLAN CALLS ON US TO DO IS WHEN WE HEAR A NEW IDEA, WHEN WE HAVE A NEW PROGRAM SUGGESTED, OR A POLICY OR A CAPITAL INVESTMENT, WE'RE GOING TO LOOK AT IT ACROSS THESE FOUR ELEMENTS. HOW DID IT HOW DOES IT IMPROVE DUNCANVILLE FISCAL POSITION? IS THIS AN INVESTMENT WE'RE MAKING FOR THE LONG RUN, OR IS THIS GOING TO EVAPORATE? IS THIS JUST GOING TO BE A ONE OFF, OR IS THIS GOING TO BE CATALYTIC AND LEAD TO OTHER INVESTMENT. THAT'S FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY. WHAT FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IS NOT IS ALWAYS BEING THE CHEAPEST ALWAYS BEING THE LOWEST PRICE ALTERNATIVE. IT MEANS REALLY INVESTING IN CATALYTIC THINGS, INNOVATION. THE WORD INNOVATION GETS THROWN AROUND A LOT. AND IT FRUSTRATES ME BECAUSE I WAS IN A STORE A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO AND I SAW A BOX FAN THAT SAID WITH INNOVATIVE COOLING TECHNOLOGY, AND I WAS TRYING TO IMAGINE HOW INNOVATIVE WE COULD GET WITH A BOX FAN. THE MARKET OF BOX FANS MUST HAVE DRIED UP YEARS AGO. THE MARKET FOR INNOVATION.CERTAINLY INNOVATION IS COURSE CHANGING. IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO TAKE DUNCANVILLE FROM ONE LINE ON THE CHART TO THE NEXT LINE ON THE CHART, RIGHT. REALLY ELEVATE US. AND SO WE'RE GOING TO WE'RE GOING TO REALLY EVALUATE IDEAS TO ASK ARE THEY, ARE THEY REALLY COURSE CHANGING.
ARE THEY REALLY INNOVATIVE. RESILIENCY. RESILIENCY JUST MEANS CAN WE BOUNCE BACK FROM CHALLENGING THINGS. AND WE TALK ABOUT RESILIENCY ACROSS A SPECTRUM OF THINGS. CERTAINLY FINANCIAL RESILIENCY. DO WE HAVE ENOUGH MONEY IN THE TANK. DO WE HAVE ENOUGH RESOURCES TO WITHSTAND ECONOMIC SHOCKS. ARE IS OUR INFRASTRUCTURE SIZED AND BUILT AND DESIGNED TO HANDLE CLIMATE AND NATURAL DISASTERS, THINGS THAT WE NEED TO BE RESILIENT TO BECAUSE WE ARE SEEING MORE STORM ACTIVITY AND OUR OUR THINGS LIKE OUR STORM DRAINS ARE BEING TESTED. AND THEN SOCIAL RESILIENCY AND HEALTH RESILIENCY, THINGS LIKE FORBID, ANOTHER PANIC, ANOTHER PANDEMIC COMES ALONG. CAN WE BOUNCE BACK FROM THAT? CAN PEOPLE, HEALTH WISE BOUNCE BACK FROM THAT? CAN CAN WE RECONNECT WITH OUR NEIGHBORS QUICKLY AND STAY A STRONG COMMUNITY IN THE
[00:20:01]
FACE OF THOSE TYPES OF CHALLENGES? THAT'S REALLY WHAT RESILIENCY MEANS. AND THEN INCLUSION JUST MEANS WE'RE GOING TO HEAR LOTS OF IDEAS FROM LOTS OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE. WE'RE GOING TO WELCOME PEOPLE TO THE TABLE AS WE'RE MAKING THOSE DECISIONS. AND THAT'S REALLY INCLUSIVE POLICYMAKING, WHICH IS WHAT THE PLAN CALLS FOR. THE PRIORITY POLICY AREAS. THE LAST PIECE OF THE FOUNDATIONAL ELEMENTS, THESE ARE THOSE BIG CHUNKY ACTIVITIES, THOSE BIG CHUNKY AREAS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS THAT ARE GOING TO GET US CLOSEST TO OUR VISION, FASTEST AND MOST EFFICIENTLY. AND IT'S THINGS LIKE HEALTHY, ACTIVE AND CREATIVE COMMUNITIES. RATHER THAN WALK THROUGH IT ON THIS CLOCK, I'LL WALK THROUGH IT HERE, YOU KNOW, FROM A HEALTHY, ACTIVE AND CREATIVE COMMUNITIES STANDPOINT, WE TALK ABOUT BEING AN INVITING AND BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITY, HAVING A STRONG PARKS AND REC SYSTEM, CONNECTIVITY TO REGIONAL AMENITIES. WHO CARES IF YOU'RE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THIS METROPLEX WITH ALL THESE GREAT THINGS? IF YOU CAN'T READILY ACCESS IT AND BE CONNECTED TO IT? SUPPORT FOR THE ARTS. THAT CAME UP TIME AND TIME AGAIN AS AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY AND THEN COLLABORATION, BOTH EXTERNALLY TO OUR NEIGHBORS AND TO THE COUNTY AND TO THE STATE, BUT ALSO INTERNALLY WITH LOCAL AGENCIES AND LOCAL NON-FOR-PROFITS AND LOCAL NEIGHBORHOOD FOLKS COMING TOGETHER TO REALLY MAKE THE DOLLAR GO A LOT FARTHER. LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOODS. NEIGHBORHOODS ARE THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF ANY GREAT CITY. AND WHEN WE TALK ABOUT LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOODS IN DUNCANVILLE, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A DIVERSITY OF HOUSING STOCK. IF WE'RE GOING TO BE INCLUSIVE, IF WE'RE GOING TO GROW, WE'VE GOT LIMITED LAND RESOURCES TO DO THAT. AND SO WE'VE GOT TO WE'VE GOT TO THINK DIFFERENTLY ABOUT THE WAY WE'VE WE'VE DEVELOPED HOUSING UPGRADES TO EXISTING HOMES. THERE ARE LOTS OF HOMES OUT THERE. DUNCANVILLE WAS DEVELOPED DURING DURING AN ERA WHERE A LOT OF THE HOUSING IS GETTING TO 50 AND 60 YEARS OLD, AND THAT'S BRINGING SOME STRAIN ON THE ON THE HOUSING STOCK.RESIDENTS ARE GETTING A BIT OLDER, RESOURCES ARE GETTING TIGHTER. THE COST TO IMPROVE OUR HOMES IS GETTING HIGHER. AND SO WE GOT TO FIND WAYS TO HELP OUR NEIGHBORS UPDATE THEIR EXISTING HOMES, UPDATING REGULATIONS. YOU KNOW WHAT WE WHAT WE HEARD, WE INTERVIEWED AS PART OF THIS AND A PRIOR ENGAGEMENT, WE INTERVIEWED DOZENS AND DOZENS OF BUSINESS OWNERS AND INVESTORS.
AND WHAT THEY SAID WAS DUNCANVILLE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK IS OLDER AND IT'S A BIT COBBLED TOGETHER. AND SO THAT MAKES NAVIGATING IT MORE DIFFICULT. IT'S ALSO NOT PRODUCING WHAT WE WANT IT TO PRODUCE. AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE TALK ABOUT REGULATION FROM A STANDPOINT OF CLEAR AND PRODUCTIVE, AND SO IS IT SOMETHING THAT THE AVERAGE PERSON CAN READ, AND IS IT GENERATING THE KIND OF PRODUCT WE'RE LOOKING FOR? AND IN THIS CASE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HOUSING PRODUCT. WE WANT TO THINK ABOUT ADDRESSING THINGS THAT AFFECT NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH, CRIME AND TRAFFIC AND OTHER AND OTHER THINGS THAT CAN BE NUISANCES. HOW DO WE ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES PROACTIVELY AND THEN MULTIMODAL ACCESS AGAIN, IF WE'RE GOING TO BE INCLUSIVE, IF WE'RE GOING TO BE HEALTHY, IF WE'RE GOING TO REDUCE TRAFFIC, WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO ACCESS AMENITIES IN THE CITY IN WAYS OTHER THAN BY CAR. AND THAT'S NOT SAYING THAT WE'RE GOING TO ELIMINATE CARS OR OR DRAMATICALLY REDUCE THEM, BUT IT'S SAYING WE'RE GOING TO GIVE PEOPLE OPTIONS TO GET TO WHERE THEY NEED TO GET RESILIENT ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. WE NEED TO ATTRACT AND FOSTER INVESTMENT. WE NEED TO IMPROVE OUR REGIONAL IMAGE. YOU KNOW, THE OTHER THING WE HEARD A LOT WHEN WE INTERVIEWED STAKEHOLDERS WAS, MAN, DUNCANVILLE IS JUST A TOUGH PLACE TO DO BUSINESS. YOU KNOW, WHETHER WHETHER IT'S THE AGAIN, THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK WHICH IS A LITTLE BIT JAGGED, WHETHER IT'S THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES WHICH PEOPLE FELT WERE MAYBE A LITTLE BIT LAYERED IT THE WORD AROUND THE CAMPFIRE WAS DUNCANVILLE CAN BE A HARD PLACE TO DO BUSINESS. WE NEED TO FOSTER LOCAL BUSINESS GROWTH AGAIN. WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO, HOW YOU'RE GOING TO ATTRACT PEOPLE TO COME INTO DUNCANVILLE, EVEN VISITORS, WHICH ARE MY FAVORITE BECAUSE WE CAN GRAB THEM, PICK THEIR POCKETS AND SEND THEM HOME. THE THOSE FOLKS COME TO VISIT LOCAL UNIQUE BUSINESSES, AND WE NEED TO FIND A WAY TO FOSTER THAT STRATEGIC INFILL.
AGAIN. YOU ALL HAVE HEARD ME SAY THIS, PROBABLY SOME OF YOU, MANY MORE TIMES THAN ONCE, BUT THIS IDEA THAT DUNCANVILLE IS BUILT OUT OR THAT IT'S LANDLOCKED, THOSE ARE MY LEAST FAVORITE PHRASES IN MY CONVERSATIONS IN DUNCANVILLE, I TEASE THAT EVERY CITY IS LANDLOCKED. THAT'S THE NATURE OF MUNICIPALITIES. WE HAVE BOUNDARIES AND BUILT OUT IS SIMPLY JUST A FACTOR OF YOUR REGULATION AND YOUR AND YOUR AND YOUR VISION FOR COMMUNITY CHARACTER. AND SO IF YOU CAN, IF YOU CAN VISUALIZE A MORE DENSITY IN DIFFERENT PLACES AROUND DUNCANVILLE, IF YOU CAN
[00:25:04]
VISUALIZE TIGHTER DEVELOPMENT ALONG SOME OF THOSE BIG COMMERCIAL STRETCHES, THEN YOU KNOW THAT STRATEGIC INFILL IS POSSIBLE. AND WHAT WE'RE WATCHING HAPPEN IN PLACES LIKE WHEATLAND PLAZA IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE. INCLUSIONARY GROWTH. INCLUSIONARY GROWTH REALLY MEANS IF YOU WANT TO LIVE IN DUNCANVILLE, YOU WANT TO DO BUSINESS IN DUNCANVILLE, AND YOU SHARE OUR VALUES, WE'RE GOING TO WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO FIND SOMETHING THAT WORKS FOR YOU.AND SO WHAT WE DON'T WANT TO DO IS GENTRIFY OR GROW TO A POINT WHERE OUR DIVERSITY IS THREATENED, PARTICULARLY OUR DIVERSITY OF INCOME, IF THAT. IF THAT GETS THREATENED, WE START TO LOSE SOME OF THE FABRIC. AND SO INCLUSIONARY GROWTH AND A DIVERSE BASE REALLY MEANS THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO RELY ON ANY ONE BIG TRICK PONY HERE TO GET US THROUGH THIS AND THEN STREAMLINE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES, WHICH WE'VE TALKED ABOUT INTEGRATED, NATURAL AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT. THERE'S A LOT OF REALLY BEAUTIFUL PLACES IN IN DUNCANVILLE. THERE'S A LOT OF REALLY IMPRESSIVE NATURAL ASSETS. AND WHAT WHAT WE HEARD TIME AND TIME AGAIN IS HOW DO WE GROW, HOW DO WE DEVELOP, AND HOW DO WE DO THAT WITHOUT IMPACTING SOME OF THESE REALLY GREAT NATURAL ASSETS. AND SO THE WE WOULD LOOK AT THINGS LIKE IMPROVING REGULATIONS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE, WE'RE GROWING AWAY FROM THOSE NATURAL ASSETS AND THAT SOME OF THE CLEANUP WE'RE DOING IN TERMS OF SOME, MAYBE SOME SOME DATED DEVELOPMENT AND SOME BLIGHT THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE REMEDIATED, PARTICULARLY AROUND THOSE NATURAL ASSETS MITIGATING SPRAWL. THIS WAS ANOTHER SPRAWL IS ANOTHER WORD THAT GRABS PEOPLE. AND WHEN WE TALK ABOUT SPRAWL, WHAT WE'RE REALLY TALKING ABOUT IS LAND THAT'S NOT BEING USED TO ITS HIGHEST AND BEST POTENTIAL. RIGHT. I, I TALKED ABOUT THERE'S A GREAT, EVEN A GREAT LOCAL PLANNING FIRM WHO'S PLUGGED INTO THIS CONCEPT OF NET REVENUE PER ACRE. AND THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT SHOWED UP IN THIS IN THIS PLAN, NET REVENUE PER ACRE MEANS CAN THE CITY SERVE THE PROPERTY FOR LESS THAN IT GENERATES IN PROPERTY TAXES? RIGHT. AND SO THAT WE CAN TAKE PROPERTY TAXES, PARTICULARLY FROM DENSE INFILL DEVELOPMENT, AND CREATE AMENITIES THAT WILL THAT WILL CONTINUE TO ATTRACT INVESTMENT. SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT SPRAWL, WE JUST MEAN OPTIMIZING THE VALUE POTENTIAL OF EVERY PROPERTY IN DUNCANVILLE. WE NEED TO THINK ABOUT EXTREME WEATHER. I KNOW YOU ALL HAVE WEATHERED SOME. WELL. THAT'S A GREAT WAY OF SAYING THAT. I KNOW YOU GUYS HAVE BEEN THROUGH SOME TOUGH STORMS THE PAST COUPLE OF SEASONS. WHETHER IT'S ICE OR OR THUNDERSTORMS HERE IN THE SUMMERTIME, IT'S GETTING MORE FREQUENT, IT'S GETTING MORE SEVERE. AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT AS WE'RE INVESTING IN OUR INFRASTRUCTURE, WE'RE THINKING ABOUT THAT. AND THAT INCLUDES USING THINGS LIKE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE. AND AGAIN, THIS DOESN'T HAVE TO BE ANY BROAD SWEEPING CITY OF RAIN GARDENS. BUT IT MEANS WHEN WE'RE DEVELOPING OUT OUR ROAD PROFILES, WE'RE THINKING ABOUT WHERE'S THE WATER GOING TO GO, HOW'S IT GOING TO BE CLEAN WHEN IT WHEN IT REENTERS THE NATURAL CYCLE. THESE ARE SOME OF THOSE URBAN DESIGN ELEMENTS I TALKED ABOUT. WE STARTED THINKING ABOUT PLACES PARTICULARLY AROUND AROUND DUNCANVILLE AND BEYOND, BUT CLOSE BY. SO YOU COULD SEE WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT DALLAS OR FORT WORTH. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT URBAN DESIGN, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT REALLY STRONG FORM THAT THAT PEOPLE CONNECT WITH. AND SO HERE'S A PIECE FROM DOWNTOWN LANCASTER, WHICH IS, WHICH IS GORGEOUS. SOME OUTDOOR DINING. YOU CAN SEE THE STREET TREES THERE, WALKABILITY. THOSE ARE ALL THOSE ARE ALL MARKS OF GOOD URBAN DESIGN. THIS IS BISHOP ARTS AND I TEASED DURING MY DURING MY TIME ON THIS PROJECT, AT LEAST 2 OR 3 TIMES EVERY MEETING SOMEONE SAID, HEY, YOU GOT TO GO CHECK OUT BISHOP ARTS. AND WHILE YOU KNOW, THIS IS CERTAINLY IN A MORE URBAN AREA, THE ELEMENTS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE, THIS BUILDING HERE COULD EASILY BE IN DOWNTOWN DUNCANVILLE. AND YOU'D NEVER KNOW THE DIFFERENCE, RIGHT? WE'RE TALKING ABOUT BUILDINGS A BIT UP TO THE STREET. OPPORTUNITY FOR OUTDOOR DINING. GREAT STREET TREES, GREAT EXTERIOR LIGHTING THAT TELLS VISITORS AND PASSERS BY IF YOU WERE DRIVING DOWN THE STREET PAST THIS BUILDING, YOU'D SLOW DOWN AND LOOK AT IT AND TRY TO SEE WHAT IT WAS AND WHETHER YOU HAD AN INTEREST IN IT RIGHT HERE IN YOUR BACKYARD MAIN STATION. THIS WAS DEVELOPED WITH THAT PRINCIPLE IN MIND, RIGHT? MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, UPSTAIRS LIVING AND DOWNSTAIRS COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL, A MIX OF OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL. RIGHT HUG AND RIGHT UP ON THE STREET AND REALLY KIND OF ADDRESSING THE PEDESTRIAN WHO COMES BY. DOWNTOWN VITALITY. WE FELT STRONGLY TO PULL APART ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND DOWNTOWN VITALITY, NOT BECAUSE THEY'RE DIFFERENT THINGS. WE THINK THEY'RE WE THINK ONE FEEDS THE OTHER. BUT TO JUST TO SAY HOW IMPORTANT DOWNTOWN REALLY IS
[00:30:05]
TO DUNCANVILLE FUTURE, WE HAVE TO PICK UP. WE HAVE TO PICK JUST A COUPLE OF PLACES TO GROW AND CERTAINLY DOWNTOWN IN THE CORRIDORS, BOTH WEIGHED HEAVY ON THE MINDS OF THE PUBLIC AND OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE. AND SO WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DOWNTOWN DUNCANVILLE, WE'RE TALKING AGAIN ABOUT SMALL BUSINESS. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT INFILL, GOOD URBAN DESIGN, PUBLIC ART, DOWNTOWN HUGS AROUND ARMSTRONG PARK, WHERE THIS OR THIS GREAT ARTS AND CULTURE DISTRICT IS, IS PLANNED. HOW DO WE INTEGRATE THAT AND MAKE THIS MAKE THIS WHOLE THING FEEL LIKE IT'S CONNECTED, AND THEN JUST COLLABORATION WITH A WHOLE HOST OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR GREAT EVENTS AND GREAT PROGRAMS THAT JUST KEEP PEOPLE COMING BACK WEEK AFTER WEEK. EQUITABLE TRANSPORTATION. THIS REALLY JUST MEANS, AGAIN, THAT IF YOU IF YOU CHOOSE NOT TO USE A CAR OR GOD FORBID, YOU DON'T, YOU DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO A VEHICLE THAT WE CAN GET YOU WHERE YOU NEED TO GO. AND SO THAT MEANS THINGS LIKE MULTI-MODAL ACCESS AND WALKABILITY CITYWIDE, REALLY JUST MAKING SURE THAT AND WE HEARD SOME FEEDBACK AT THE AT THE PUBLIC HEARING THAT, HEY, RIGHT UP NEXT TO MY KIDS SCHOOL, I CAN'T I CAN'T GET THEM THERE. THERE'S NO SIDEWALK THAT GETS THEM THERE. AND SO WE FIND OURSELVES HAVING TO DRIVE EVEN A VERY SHORT DISTANCE RIGHTSIZING ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE. WHAT THIS REALLY JUST MEANS IS MAKING SURE THAT THERE ARE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEDESTRIANS TO GET WHERE THEY NEED TO GET WITHOUT, WITHOUT HAVING TO, OR EVEN WHEN CROSSING MULTIPLE LANES OF TRAFFIC, MULTIPLE LANES OF TRAFFIC. SO WE HAD AN IMAGE OF A WOMAN PUSHING A BABY CARRIAGE, AND SHE WAS TRYING TO GET ACROSS FIVE LANES OF TRAFFIC AND TRYING TO BEAT THAT LITTLE BLINKING PEDESTRIAN LIGHT. AND THAT'S DUNCANVILLE. YOU KNOW, WE CONTINUE TO TALK ABOUT COMPACT AND WALKABLE AND SMALL TOWN. WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO HOW TO ADDRESS THAT WHEN WE'RE BUILDING TRANSPORTATION OR WHEN WE'RE FITTING TRANSPORTATION. WE'RE THINKING ABOUT ALL ELEMENTS OF TRANSPORTATION, NOT JUST CARS. HOW ARE CYCLISTS GETTING THROUGH HERE? HOW ARE PEDESTRIANS GETTING THROUGH HERE, MOTHERS AND BABIES? HOW IS THAT HAPPENING ALL IN THE SAME ROADBED? AND THEN STREETSCAPING IS PLACEMAKING AGAIN, COMING INTO THE COMMUNITY AND FEELING LIKE YOU'RE SOMEWHERE. RIGHT? WE'VE BEEN WE'VE ALL BEEN TO THESE PLACES THAT ARE JUST ANYTOWN, USA, WITH FIVE LANES THAT JUST STRETCH OUT FOR MILES, AND EVERY BIG BOX RETAILER YOU CAN THINK OF, THAT'S THAT'S NOT WHAT PEOPLE TOLD US THEY WANTED FOR DUNCANVILLE. WHAT PEOPLE SAID THEY WANTED FOR DUNCANVILLE WAS A UNIQUE PLACE. AND SO STREETSCAPING IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS EVERYTHING. WE JUST TALKED ABOUT THE MULTI-MODAL, THE SAFETY FOR PEDESTRIANS AND TO CREATE A REAL VISUAL IMPACT ABOUT THE KIND OF COMMUNITY DUNCANVILLE IS. AND THEN FINALLY, YOU KNOW, STRETCHING OUR RESOURCES WITH FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY. SO IT'S A BIG CITY. IT'S A BIG PLACE GEOGRAPHICALLY, AND THERE'S LOTS AND LOTS OF PIPES AND STORM SEWER AND ALL OF THESE, ALL OF THIS INFRASTRUCTURE, SIDEWALKS AND PAVEMENT, WE CAN'T REPLACE IT ALL TODAY. AND IT DEVELOPED OUT OVER A RELATIVELY TIGHT PERIOD OF TIME IN TERMS OF HOW CITIES DEVELOP OUT, WHICH MEANS IT'S GOING TO ALL AGE AROUND THE SAME TIME IT WAS BUILT WITH A CERTAIN GROWTH PROFILE IN MIND. WE'VE ACCELERATED BEYOND THAT IN A LOT OF PLACES. SO IF YOU TALK TO THE PUBLIC WORKS FOLKS, THEY TALK ABOUT CHOKE POINTS AND IN WATER AND SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE. SO WE CAN'T FIX IT ALL. AND I PROMISE YOU, WHERE YOU HAVE CAPACITY IS WHERE YOU WILL HAVE DEVELOPMENT. SO FOCUS YOUR INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT IN PLACES WHERE YOU WANT DEVELOPMENT OR WHERE YOU WANT GROWTH. THINK ABOUT THE LONG TERM OPERATIONAL COST OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLAN FOR THAT. YOU KNOW IT. IT COSTS.BELIEVE IT OR NOT, IT COST. I'M SURE YOU ALL BELIEVE IT. IT COSTS WAY MORE MONEY TO OPEN UP THE GROUND THAN IT DOES TO PUT ANOTHER INCH OR TWO OF A PIECE OF PIPE IN THE GROUND. SO IF YOU IF YOU THINK ABOUT YOUR LONG TERM OPERATIONAL NEEDS WITH RESPECT TO INFRASTRUCTURE, OPEN THE TRENCH ONCE AND PUT THE RIGHT PIECE OF PIPE IN THERE AND YOU WON'T OPEN IT AGAIN FOR 30 OR 40 YEARS IF IT'S DONE RIGHT. SO THINK ABOUT THAT. DON'T CHEAP IT OUT UP FRONT NEAR TERM NEAR TERM GAIN FOR LONG TERM PAIN RIGHT. REVERSE IT. TAKE THE PAIN UP FRONT AND THEN YOU'LL GET LONG TERM RETURN OUT OF IT. THINK ABOUT INNOVATIVE OR SUSTAINABLE APPROACHES. AGAIN INNOVATIVE MEANING COURSE CHANGING. LOOKING AT COMMUNITY ASSETS IN A RADICALLY DIFFERENT WAY. LOOKING AT THE WAY WE OPERATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN A DIFFERENT WAY. AND THAT COMES WITH THINGS LIKE PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES TO EITHER STRENGTHEN WHAT WE HAVE, TAKING A SERVICE THAT WE LOVE AND WE WANT TO KEEP. BUT WE'RE HAVING A HARD TIME FIGURING OUT HOW TO PAY AND EVOLVE IT, OR ADDING NEW SERVICES AND TAKING ON NEW OR BRINGING NEW AMENITIES
[00:35:05]
TO OUR TO OUR RESIDENTS. DOING THAT IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PRIVATE SECTOR TO REDUCE COSTS AND EXTEND THE LIFE OF THE ASSET. ONE. ONE MOMENT, PLEASE. POINT OF ORDER, MADAM CHAIR.YES? MAY I ASK MR. HORN A QUICK QUESTION, AND THEN I MAY HAVE. I CAN GET TO MY POINT OF ORDER, IF THAT'S OKAY. MR. HORN, ABOUT HOW MANY MORE SLIDES DO YOU HAVE TO GO BEFORE WE KIND OF GET TO A BREAKING POINT? AND THE REASON I ASK THIS, BECAUSE WE HAVE ABOUT NINE OTHER AGENDA ITEMS HERE IN THE ROOM THAT WE, THAT WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO GET TO. SO I'M WONDERING IF WE CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO HOLD ITEM NUMBER FOUR IN ABEYANCE. ALLOW US TO PICK THE AGENDA UP AND PERHAPS COME BACK TO YOU AT THE VERY END, BECAUSE I KNOW THAT YOU'RE AWAITING ACTION FROM THIS BODY.
SO BACK TO MY ORIGINAL QUESTION, JUST ROUGHLY, MR. HORN, ABOUT HOW MANY MORE SLIDES DO YOU HAVE TO GO? SO THAT WAS THE LAST THE LAST OF THE POLICY AREAS SO PREPARED FOR INPUT FROM FROM THE COMMITTEE AT THIS POINT. OKAY. WELL WITH THAT THANK YOU, MR. HORN. I DON'T KNOW. I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK FOR THE COMMITTEE, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF WE'RE QUITE PREPARED AND READY TO GO INTO ANY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FROM THAT. BUT, MADAM CHAIR, IF YOU'D LIKE, I'D LIKE TO, IF IT'S PROPER WITH OUR LEGAL COUNSEL TO HOLD THIS ITEM IN ABEYANCE AND LET US GET TO FIVE A AND WORK OUR WAY THROUGH, AND THEN COME BACK TO ITEM NUMBER FOUR AT THE CONCLUSION OF OUR MEETING TO TALK ABOUT NEXT STEPS IN ANY INPUT AND ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IT'S NOT TO KEEP OUR OUR OUR RESIDENTS WAITING. SINCE HE'S FINISHED WITH THE SLIDES, IF WE THINK THAT WE HAVE A LOT OF DISCUSSION, THEN I'M DEFINITELY IN FAVOR OF THAT. OKAY, I DON'T KNOW. I KNOW HE'S FINISHED WITH THE WITH THE PRESENTATION, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW IF WE WANTED TO GET INTO PARTICULAR POLICY AREAS OR THAT ARE. BUT IF IT'S THE WILL OF THE BODY, I WILL PUT FORTH A MOTION TO HOLD ITEM NUMBER FOUR IN ABEYANCE UNTIL WE GET TO MOVE IT DOWN TO AFTER ITEM NUMBER SIX. SEE, GO AHEAD AND PRESENT YOUR MOTION. THAT'S THE MOTION. I SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION TO HOLD UNTIL ITEM SIX AFTER SIX C.
MOTION PASSES. SO, MR. HORN, WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK TO YOU. IF YOU WANT TO HANG OUT OR WE CONTACT YOU WHEN WE GET CLOSER TO THE TO THE END OR HOWEVER YOU WANT TO DO THAT. BUT I THINK WITH THAT MOTION, I'LL DEFER TO MADAM CHAIR ABOUT WHAT ITEM WE'RE ON. WE WILL MOVE TO ITEM
[5.A. Case #2025-00008: Request of Elizabeth Aarcos, Applicant, for a Specific Use Permit to allow for the use of “Animal Services”, on Block 8 & Part of Block 7 ACS 3.347, more commonly known as 202 W. Center Street, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas.]
FIVE A, WHICH WOULD BE CASE NUMBER 2020 5-8. DO WE HAVE A STAFF REPORT? ONE SECOND AS I GET THE COMPUTER UP AND GOING HERE. I CONFIRM YOU GUYS ARE SEEING MY SCREEN. OKAY. AWESOME.THERE WE GO. CORRECT. ALL RIGHT. WELL GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIRMAN. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS, THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU THIS EVENING IS FOR 202 WEST CENTER STREET, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. THE PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST THIS EVENING IS FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR TO ALLOW FOR ANIMAL SERVICES. NO. AS A NO. OUTSIDE PENS USE IN THE DOWNTOWN DUNCANVILLE ZONING DISTRICT. ACCORDING TO SECTION 3.03, ANY TYPE OF ANIMAL SERVICES, WHETHER IT'S GROOMING, WHETHER IT'S BATHING, WHETHER IT'S ANY OF THOSE OTHER TYPES OF SERVICES, DO REQUIRE THAT ARE ACCESSORY AND INCIDENTAL, DO REQUIRE SPECIFIC USE. PERMIT WITHIN THE DDA OR DOWNTOWN DUNCANVILLE DISTRICT, YOUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FOR THIS PROPERTY IS DOWNTOWN, AND I WANT TO CONFIRM THIS EVENING FOR ALL PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS, WE ARE STILL UTILIZING YOUR CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT IS THE MAP THAT WE'RE CURRENTLY USING, NOT THE ONE THAT WAS JUST PRESENTED THAT HAS NOT BEEN OFFICIALLY ADOPTED YET. CURRENT ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY IS DOWNTOWN DUNCANVILLE. AND AGAIN, AS YOU CAN SEE IN YOUR SCREEN, ANIMAL SERVICES. NO OUTSIDE PENS. WHAT IT MEANS IS THE FACILITY ENTIRELY INDOORS. DOGS, CATS AND OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS ARE ACCEPTED FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT, GROOMING, BATHING, BOARDING OR OTHER TREATMENT FOR PAYMENT IS RECEIVED ON YOUR
[00:40:04]
SCREEN, YOU WILL SEE THE PROPERTY THAT'S LOCATED WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN DUNCANVILLE AREA.IT'S GOING TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AN EXISTING STRIP CENTER THAT IS ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CENTER STREET AND SANTA FE TRAIL. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. WE DID SEND OUT 33 MAILINGS FOR 33 MAILINGS FOR THIS APPLICATION FOR EVERYONE WITHIN 200FT. TO DATE, WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY RESPONSES IN SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION OF THE APPLICATION. YOUR OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION ARE TO APPROVE, APPROVE A CONDITIONS, DENY OR TABLE THE APPLICATION TO A FUTURE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. ITEM NUMBER ONE OR. THANK YOU. DO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I DO, MADAM CHAIR. SIR, DO IN THIS PARTICULAR REQUEST FOR AN SNP, HAS STAFF MADE A RECOMMENDATION ON THE TIME PERIOD FOR THIS SNP? YOU RESTATE YOUR QUESTION ON THIS PARTICULAR SNP, HAS STAFF MADE A RECOMMENDATION ON THE TIME PERIOD FOR THE DURATION OF THIS SNP? WE HAVE NOT MADE A RECOMMENDATION ON THE TIME PERIOD. AGAIN, THE TIME PERIODS ARE TYPICALLY ON FOR ONLY FOR INCIDENTAL THINGS IN NATURE, OR WE'RE NOT MAKING SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENTS INTO THE PROPERTY. I'M SORRY, COULD YOU REPEAT THAT AGAIN? I LOST YOU. TIME PERIODS ARE TYPICALLY ONLY APPLIED TO WHEN THERE. YOU KNOW THERE'S POTENTIALLY CONCERN. OTHERWISE THIS WOULD BE A STANDARD SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. WELL I'M GOING TO DISAGREE WITH THAT BECAUSE A TIME PERIOD IN AN SNP GIVES THIS BODY THE ABILITY TO REVISIT THE SUBJECT AND TO CHANGE AN SNP WITHOUT ANY TIME FRAME IS TO, IN FACT, CHANGE THE ZONING ON THE GROUND. OTHERWISE IT'S AN INDEFINITE SNP, WHICH IS IN FACT A CHANGING OF ZONING. BUT THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I HAVE A QUESTION. I'M THINKING ON MAIN STREET. ISN'T THERE ALREADY A DOG WASH PLACE? SO I'M WONDERING HOW FAR AWAY FROM THAT PLACE IS? RIGHT THERE ON THE CORNER OF MAIN STREET TO THIS NEW PLACE THAT'S RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER. I COULDN'T TELL ON THE MAP. WE DID NOT MEASURE DISTANCES TO OTHER TYPES OF FACILITIES THAT MAY BE SIMILAR IN NATURE FOR THIS, FOR THIS APPLICATION. OKAY, WELL, I WASN'T WONDERING ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THERE WAS MEASUREMENT. I'M JUST WONDERING, IS THIS PARTICULAR BUSINESS IN THIS SAME. SORT OF LIKE BECAUSE THAT'S A SQUARE AND ONE'S ON THE CORNER. AND SINCE THIS IS CENTER STREET, WHEN I DROVE BY, I DIDN'T EXACTLY I WASN'T ABLE TO REALLY TELL WHERE THIS WAS. THE PROPOSED, THE PROPOSED APPLICATION OR THE PROPOSED ONE. RIGHT. THE PROPOSED ONE THERE.
THERE'S AN EXISTING STRIP CENTER THAT'S OUT THERE, AND THEY'RE GOING TO BE GOING WITHIN ONE OF THE EXISTING TENANT SPACES THAT ARE WITHIN THE STRIP CENTER. QUESTION FOR STAFF. CAN YOU CONFIRM FOR US TO COMMISSIONERS, QUESTION TO COMMISSIONER WYNNE'S QUESTION ABOUT I'M NOT NECESSARILY CONCERNED ABOUT DISTANCE AS AS OPPOSED TO THE WHAT'S AT THE CORE OF HER QUESTION IS ABOUT WHERE'S THE LOCATION OF THE OTHER IN PROXIMITY? IT'S ABOUT TWO BLOCKS AWAY. STAFF TO CONFIRM. I APPRECIATE THAT, COMMISSIONER, AND I BELIEVE THAT THE BUBBLY TUB IS JUST A PLACE WHERE YOU CAN WASH YOUR DOG. IT'S WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. AND THIS PLACE IS DIFFERENT BECAUSE THEY'LL ACTUALLY BOARD YOUR DOG JUST FOR THE DAY, AND THEY'LL ALSO PROVIDE SOME SORT OF VET SERVICES. SO THEY'RE NOT ENTIRELY THE EXACT SAME THING, EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE IN THE SAME AREA. I THINK ON HERE IT SAYS THAT THEY WILL WASH THE DOGS, THE DOG WILL BE WASHED, WHICH IS THE SAME SERVICE. YEAH. THEY JUST OFFER WAY MORE THINGS THAN THE BUBBLY TUB DOES. AND IT'S A SELF-SERVICE WASH, NOT LIKE A GROOMER. SO IT'S A ENTIRELY DIFFERENT. THANK YOU. LET'S LET'S KEEP OUR QUESTIONS TO THE STAFF. SO STAFF, CAN YOU ALL CONFIRM BACK TO MY QUESTION THAT I THINK THAT WAS ON THE FLOOR, THE LOCATION SO WE CAN DETERMINE PROXIMITY? I DON'T HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE USE. I HAVE A QUESTION MORE SO IN ALIGNMENT WITH COMMISSIONER WYNN'S QUESTION ABOUT ITS ACTUAL LOCATION IN RELATION TO THIS STRIP CENTER. THE APPLICANT IS HERE, AND THEY CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION SPECIFICALLY. THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. STAFF. SO AT THIS TIME, DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION?
[00:45:13]
APPLICANT IS NOT HERE.HI. THANK YOU. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. SORRY, I'M JUST GOING TO BE HELPING. I'M GOING TO BE HELPING TRANSLATING FOR HER. SHE'S THE ONE WHO'S GOING TO GET THE BUSINESS. ELIZABETH I'M SYLVIA, BY THE WAY. OKAY. IF SHE COULD PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. MY NAME IS ELIZABETH RUIZ. OKAY. AND. OKAY, SO WHAT DO WE HAVE TO DO? SORRY. IF YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION ABOUT THE BUSINESS, WE WOULD LIKE TO HEAR IT AT THIS TIME. OKAY.
IN SPANISH. IT'S OKAY. AND THEN ARE YOU. AS LONG AS SHE TRANSLATES, THAT'S FINE. OKAY, OKAY. THE. DOG GROOMING IS PRECISAMENTE A EL JOVEN A. EL. ES SOLO AUTO SERVICIO DE TO MISMO PERRO. EL PROPOSITO DE NEGOCIO LAS PERSONAS NO NECESITAN EL SERVICIO DE ELLOS MISMOS. ACUDEN CONMIGO A DE GROOMING. ES POR ESO. LE. PROXIMIDAD DE LOCAL THE SELF SERVE. OKAY. CAN CAN YOU HAVE YOUR YOUR TRANSLATOR. SORRY I FORGOT IT THIS TIME. JUST KIDDING. NO. THE PURPOSE OF HER BUSINESS. SHE'S AWARE ABOUT THE DISTANCE BECAUSE I MEAN SHE SHE'S MOVING THERE IN THE BUBBLE WASH IS JUST MORE LIKE SELF-SERVE. THEY DON'T OFFER GROOMING. THEY DON'T OFFER ANYTHING. I'VE BEEN THERE FOR MY DOG, TOO. SO SHE'S OPENED HER OWN BUSINESS, WHICH IS GONNA OFFER NOT ONLY SHE'S GOING TO BATHE THE DOG, SHE'S GOING TO GROOM HER. SHE'S NOT GOING TO HAVE NO SELF SERVICE. AND ALSO SHE'S GOING TO HAVE LIKE A DOG CARE TOO. AND SHE'S GOING TO OFFER A LOT OF MORE SERVICES TO. CUIDADO DIARIO. NO, NO EN LA NOCHE, CUIDADO. DIARIO DE LA MASCOTA. Y TAMBIÉN OFRECER. SERVICIO DE TRANSPORT DE DOMICILIO. CUANDO LA PERSONA TIEMPO DE SU SERVICIO DE GROOMING. ENTONCES EL PROPOSITO EN REALIDAD ES PUES HACER MAS COMO DE LA VIDA DE TODAS LAS PERSONAS. TENEMOS UNA MASCOTA OKAY. SHE ALSO WANT TO ADD MORE SERVICES LIKE PICKING UP THE DOGS STAY MORE AT NIGHT. I MEAN OF COURSE THEY'RE NOT GOING TO STAY IN THE FACILITY. SHE'S GOING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. AND ALSO, YOU KNOW, SHE JUST WANT TO FACILITATE EVERYTHING FOR THE COMMUNITY. OKAY. I PERSONAS EN ESTOS MOMENTOS LUGARES FUERA A MASCOTA SERVICIO DE GROOMING. ENTONCES YO ESPECIFICAMENTE LA LUGAR PRECISAMENTE PORQUE ES DONDE ESTA CONCENTRADO. PUES MAYORIA DE PERSONAS. NO SIEMPRE TIENEN ELLOS EL TIEMPO DE ELLOS MISMOS A HACER EL SERVICIO DE LAVADO OKAY. SHE ALSO NOTICED THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE TAKE THEIR DOGS SOMEWHERE ELSE, LIKE AROUND OAK CLIFF, GRANDE PRAIRIE, BECAUSE THERE IS ENOUGH DOG SERVICES AROUND THIS AREA. SO THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY SHE CHOOSE AND PICK THAT LOCATION, BECAUSE SHE SAW THE NEED OF THE OF THE DUNCANVILLE COMMUNITY. OKAY. DO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I HAVE A QUESTION. I NOTICED ALSO, THERE'S A LISTING THAT SAYS ELIZABETH R ON MAIN STREET. SO IS THIS THE SAME? WHERE. OKAY, YOU SPECIFY THAT FOR ME PLEASE. THIS IS 100.
[00:50:17]
WHERE? WHERE BOOK MAIN STREET. AND IT SAYS DOG GROOMING BY ELIZABETH R. OKAY. WELL OKAY.WELL SHE IT'S RENTING THERE IN BUBBLE WASH. SHE JUST DO GROOMING THERE. BUT SHE'S SHE'S MOVING. YEAH. SHE NEEDS MORE SPACE. IT'S GETTING REAL PACKED IN THERE. AND ALSO THEY IT'S THAT'S A REALLY LIKE SMALL BUSINESS. ONLY HAVE LIKE FOUR TUBS FOR DOGS. SO THAT'S WHY SHE EXPANDED HERSELF ALSO THAT'S WHERE SHE SAW THE OPPORTUNITY FOR MORE BUSINESS AND EVERYTHING FOR THAT COMMUNITY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING OF THIS MEETING? SO MOVED. SECOND. SECOND. ALL RIGHT. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN. OH, WE HAVE TO. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLEASE INDICATE. ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION. CAN. CAN WE DO THE ROLL CALL? THANK YOU. THAT WOULD BE EASIER. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. SO WAS THERE ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHED TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR AGAINST? FOR THIS? IS THERE ANYBODY THAT SIGNED UP? OKAY. THEN WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO I HAVE A MOTION? SO MOVED SECOND. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. ARE THERE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR WOULD SOMEONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? WOULD. MADAM CHAIR, I MOVE TO APPROVE THIS APPLICATION FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS? I WOULD LIKE TO NOTE THAT ON PAGE TWO OF THEIR ZONING APPLICATION. I'M SORRY. CAN WE DISPENSE OF THE MOTION IF THERE'S A SECOND OR NOT? WELL, I WOULD LIKE TO ADD A MODIFICATION. OKAY. I'M LISTENING ON PAGE TWO OF THE ZONING APPLICATION. IT WASN'T COMPLETED. AND SO MY ONLY MODIFICATION WOULD BE THAT THE APPLICATION IS ACTUALLY COMPLETED. OH WELL, MADAM CHAIR, IF, IF, IF YOU HAVE A FINDING OF FACT THAT THE APPLICATION IS NOT PERFECTED, THEN I WILL WITHDRAW THE MOTION, BECAUSE IF THE APPLICATION ISN'T PERFECTED, THEN PERHAPS THE APPLICATION SHOULDN'T BE BEFORE US. POINT. FOR THE STAFF FOR ANY CLARIFICATION ON THAT. IF YOU TAKE NOTE THAT THE APPLICATION IS IMPERFECTED, THAT'S MORE MATERIAL, I THINK THAN THAN THAN THE MOTION. BECAUSE IF THE APPLICATION IS IMPERFECT, THEN PERHAPS IT SHOULDN'T BE BEFORE US TODAY. BUT BUT THAT'S MY MOTION. AT ANY RATE. IS MY UNDERSTANDING INCORRECT? ARE YOU REFERRING TO THE SIGNATURE OF THE PROPERTY OWNER? YES. AND CONFIRM THAT AS PART OF IT WITHIN YOUR PACKET. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THAT SIGNATURE PAGE IS THERE, BUT WE CAN CONFIRM IT. WELL, I WILL REVISE MY MOTION, MADAM CHAIR, TO HOLD THIS MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT UNTIL OUR NEXT TO OUR NEXT SCHEDULED PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO ALLOW FOR THE PERFECTION OF THE APPLICATION. COUNSEL, CAN WE PUT A MODIFICATION IF THEY GET IT DONE WITHIN 24 HOURS? OR DO I HAVE TO SAY WE STILL HAVE TO HAVE A MOTION THAT WAY? SO THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE AND WE NEED TO EITHER SECOND IT OR. I SECOND THE MOTION. YEAH.
[00:55:03]
MADAM CHAIR, I DON'T MEAN TO HOLD THIS APPLICANT UP. MY MOTION IS REFLECTIVE OF THE FINDING THAT AND STAFF'S CONFIRMATION. THAT IS NOT A PERFECTED APPLICATION BEFORE US.I DON'T WANT TO WORK THE ZONING CASE. WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, MR. SALAZAR, AT THE HORSESHOE OR AT THE PODIUM, I JUST RATHER HOLD IT UNDER ADVISEMENT, ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO WORK WITH STAFF TO PERFECT THEIR APPLICATION, AND THEN WE TAKE THAT UNDER WE HOLD THAT UNDER ADVISEMENT AND TAKE IT BACK UP UNDER CONSIDERATION AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. OKAY. SO THAT THERE WAS A MOTION AND A SECOND SO WE CAN VOTE ON THIS UNLESS THERE'S FURTHER DISCUSSION, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO GIVE THEM 24 HOURS TO GET THIS HANDLED SO THAT WE DON'T HOLD THEM UP ANOTHER MONTH. I BELIEVE YOU CAN MAKE IF, IF IT'S OWN IN IN CHOOSING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT WE CAN CONFIRM AND THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER SIGNS US BEFORE IT GOES IN FRONT OF THE CITY COUNCIL, THIS APPLICANT HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THE WITH THE DEPARTMENT FOR A COUPLE OF MONTHS. I THINK I APPRECIATE THAT ILLUMINATION. I DON'T THINK IT CHANGES MY MOTION BECAUSE APPLICATION TECHNICALLY SHOULD NOT APPEAR BEFORE US AND IT NOT BE PERFECTED. AND I DON'T MEAN TO HOLD THIS AGAINST THE APPLICANT OR THE TIME THEY SPENT WORKING WITH STAFF, BUT THE FACT IS THAT THIS APPLICATION TECHNICALLY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ON OUR DOCKET TONIGHT. IF IT WAS NOT A PERFECTED APPLICATION BY STAFF, UNFORTUNATELY. SO THAT'S NOT PERSUASIVE ENOUGH TO FOR ME TO CHANGE THE CONTOURS OF THE MOTION I PRESENTED AND GOTTEN A SECOND FOR, I THINK THAT WE SHOULD TAKE SOME SORT OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE FACT THAT IT WASN'T COMPLETED BEFORE US, AND KIND OF GIVE SOME SORT OF GRACE TO THEM AND ALLOW THEM TO HAVE IT PROCESSED AND DONE BEFORE CITY COUNCIL, BECAUSE WE HAVE A LOT OF PIECES MOVING WITHIN OUR INTERNAL STRUCTURE WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING.
AND OLSON. SO THINGS HAVE BEEN GETTING LOST IN THE CRACKS, AND I'M SURE THEY'VE BEEN WAITING LONGER THAN LIKE, HOW LONG HAVE YOU GUYS BEEN WAITING? CAN I EVEN ASK THEM THAT QUESTION? I CAN'T ASK THEM THAT QUESTION. SORRY, BUT I'M SURE THEY'VE BEEN WAITING A WHILE. I MEAN, SHE'S LOSING MONEY ON A MONTHLY BASIS AND A SECOND, AND WE NEED TO VOTE ON THAT. AND IF YOU ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THAT MOTION, I BELIEVE THE COMMISSIONERS CAN VOTE AGAINST, IF THAT'S THEIR WISH. SO LET'S VOTE. THE MOTION WAS TO HOLD THIS UNDER ADVISEMENT. WE'RE TABLING IT UNTIL THE APPLICATION IS COMPLETE. THAT WAS THE MOTION TO TABLE IT. OKAY. YES. TABLE NO TO. OKAY. PLEASE VOTE. OKAY. SO IT'S 4 TO 3. WE'RE WE'RE TABLING THIS. EMPTY 4 TO 3. BY SHOW OF HANDS. OH THERE YOU GO. THANK YOU. 42 TO TABLE. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MR. MISS O'BRIEN HAS. NO, NO, I WAS JUST RAISING MY HAND TO TABLE. OKAY, MADAM CHAIR, COULD YOU REPEAT WHAT THE. IT WAS 4 TO 2 TO TABLE. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. MOVING TO. SORRY. MOVING
[5.B. Case #2025-00009: Request of Brian Neal, Owner and James Cartright, Agent, for a zoning change from Local Office/Retail (LOR) district to a Single Family Residential (SF-13) district, on Eckerd Griffith Green, Lot 2 ACS 1.0844, more commonly known as 810 Wheatland Road, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas. ]
TO ITEM FIVE B CASE NUMBER 2020 5-9. MADAM CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THE NEXT PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT OF YOU THIS THIS EVENING IS FOR 810 WEST WHEATLAND ROAD WITHIN THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM LOCAL OFFICE, RETAIL OR TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, WHICH IS SF 13. THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THIS PROPERTY IS IDENTIFIED AS OPPORTUNITY AREA NUMBER FOUR, WITH THE RETAIL COMPONENT. THE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT IS LOCAL AREA OR LOCAL OFFICE SLASH RETAIL. AS YOU CAN SEE ON YOUR CURRENT ZONING MAP HERE, THE PROPERTY'S HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE FOR REFERENCE. THE REASON FOR THIS APPLICATION IN FRONT OF YOU IS AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO SPEAK ON AS IT RELATES TO THIS APPLICATION AS WELL. THERE ARE SOME CURRENT ASSESSMENT. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ASSESSED AS COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. AND RIGHT NOW THE LANDOWNER DOES NOT DESIRE TO BE[01:00:06]
TO MOVE ON THE PROPERTY AND WOULD LIKE TO TRY TO REDUCE THEIR ASSESSMENT ON THE PROPERTY, BECAUSE RIGHT NOW IT IS BEING ASSESSED AS RETAIL OR OFFICE COMMERCIAL ON THE PROPERTY. 13 MAILINGS WERE SENT OUT FOR THE PROPERTY. WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY IN OPPOSITION OR SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION THIS EVENING. OUR RECOMMENDATION IS FOR YOU. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MUST DETERMINE WHETHER THE PROPOSED REZONE AND DOWN ZONING OF THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WILL HAVE A POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE EFFECT ON THE CITY'S FUTURE COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT EFFORTS ON OR NEAR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. PLANT PLANNING STANDARDS WOULD BE NOT TO DOWN ZONED PROPERTIES THAT ARE CURRENTLY, YOU KNOW, GOING FROM A HIGHER INTENSITY USE LIKE A COMMERCIAL DOWN TO A SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT. WE UNDERSTAND THE APPLICANT AND THE OWNERS CONCERNS AND WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO ACHIEVE WITH THIS REZONING APPLICATION IN REDUCING THEIR ASSESSMENT ON THE PROPERTY. WE, YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE GONE TO THE TAX ASSESSOR'S OFFICE AND LOOKED AT DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES TO TRY TO REDUCE THEIR ASSESSMENT ON THE PROPERTY. THEY WOULD LIKE TO TRY TO PROCEED WITH REZONING THE PROPERTY TO HAVE THE THEIR PROPERTY REFLECTED WITHIN THE TAX ASSESSOR'S OFFICE AS RESIDENTIAL AND NOT COMMERCIAL. OPTIONS FOR YOU TO CONSIDER THIS REZONE WOULD BE TO APPROVE, DENY OR TABLE THE APPLICATION. ANY QUESTIONS? I DO, MADAM CHAIR SIR. SO LET ME JUST MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR ON STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. SO YOU ALL DON'T HAVE A RECOMMENDATION. YOU RECOMMEND THAT WE MAKE THE ZONING DETERMINATION, RIGHT. WE ARE MAKING WE ARE MAKING THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MUST DETERMINE WHAT IS THE PROPER PROCESS OR PROPER ZONING OF THE PROPERTY. CORRECT. DOES THIS PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY. I THINK IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME RIGHT, THEY CURRENTLY OPERATE WITH AN SUP. CORRECT? THEY DO NOT. OKAY. IT IS CURRENTLY A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE THAT IS MAINTAINED AS A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE. IT IS ADJACENT AND WEST OF A CURRENT CVS PHARMACY. OKAY. HOW DID THIS ZONING DESIGNATION GET APPLIED OR DO WE HAVE ANY OF THE OF THE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY ON HOW A SINGLE FAMILY USE BECAME. BECAUSE IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME CORRECT, IT'S RIGHT FACING THAT.IT'S A SINGLE FAMILY HOME, RIGHT JUST ACROSS THE ALLEYWAY THERE IS THERE MAY BE AN ALLEYWAY BETWEEN. CORRECT. BETWEEN. RIGHT. SO HOW HOW DID COMMERCIAL DID COMMERCIAL ZONING GET APPLIED TO THE SINGLE FAMILY USE? I CANNOT MAKE THAT DETERMINATION. FROM OUR RESEARCH OF THE HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY, THE APPLICANT MAY BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY THAT. BUT WITHIN YOUR LAND USE PLAN IT IDENTIFIES THIS PROPERTY AS COMMERCIAL. SO MORE THAN LIKELY WITH THE LAND USE PLAN WAS APPLIED IN THE ZONING WAS AMENDED OR ADOPTED. WHEN THE NEW ZONING CODE WAS PUT IN PLACE. MORE THAN LIKELY, THEY WERE TRYING TO MATCH THE TWO DIFFERENT PROPERTIES, BUT I CANNOT CONFIRM THAT. OR TO THE WEST OF THIS PROPERTY ON EATON CIRCLE, I SEE TWO PARCELS OF LAND IN YELLOW. ARE THOSE RESIDENTIAL USES AS WELL? THOSE ARE RESIDENTIAL USES, CORRECT? OKAY. AND IN THE IN THE HASH MARK TO THE REAR, I GUESS THAT'S SANTA FE TRAIL. SO THAT WOULD BE THE SUP USES THAT I'M THINKING ABOUT THAT I LOOK AT COMING LEFT AND THEN YOU MAKE THE HARD LEFT ONTO WHEATLAND. OKAY I SEE THE BUFFER. THERE ARE TWO. THERE ARE TWO SPECIFIC USE PERMITS SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY. YES, CHILD CARE USE AND PROBABLY SOME OTHER THINGS I THINK I'M FAMILIAR WITH THE USES THERE. OKAY. I DON'T THINK I HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? THANK YOU. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. BRIAN. NEIL, GO AHEAD AND TELL ME AT 810 WEST WHEATLAND ROAD. YEAH. MY NAME IS JAMES CARTWRIGHT. I'M REPRESENTING MR. NEIL. I JUST WANT TO SAY GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU. PLEASE SPEAK INTO THE MIC. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS JAMES CARD. I'M REPRESENTING MR. NEIL. I WANTED TO SAY GOOD EVENING TO MADAM CHAIR AND TO THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS. I AM A PROPERTY TAX CONSULTANT. AND IN SPEAKING WITH MR. NEIL, WHAT I WAS ABLE TO LOCATE IS HIM AND HIS WIFE HAVE PURCHASED HIM AND HIS WIFE HAVE PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY IN 2005.
AND WHEN THEY PURCHASED THE PROPERTY IN 2005, IT WAS ZONED RETAIL TWO. SO AT THAT POINT, HE'S BEEN ACTUALLY PAYING FOR 20 YEARS PRICE PER SQUARE FOOT AS OPPOSED TO FLAT FEE. IF WE WERE
[01:05:07]
TO LOOK AT THE CHART RIGHT ABOVE THE TWO ADJACENT LOTS ARE BOTH A HALF ACRE, RIGHT? WHEREAS HIS LOT IS A FULL ACRE. THEY'RE BEING ASSESSED 80,000 FOR THEIR LAND. RIGHT. WHEREAS MR. NEIL IS BEING ASSESSED 245,000 FOR HIS LAND. SO WHEN THE PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED BACK IN 2005, WHOEVER THE REALTOR WAS THAT PUT THE CONTRACT TOGETHER, THEY DID NOT CHANGE THE ZONING. SO FOR 20 YEARS HE'S BEEN PAYING PROPERTY TAX PER SQUARE FOOT. SO WHEN I MET MR. NEIL, HE HAD THAT HALF ACRE BEHIND HIM AND I WAS LOOKING TO TRY AND DO SOME CONSTRUCTION BACK THERE. AND AS A PROPERTY TAX CONSULTANT, I STARTED LOOKING INTO DCAD. I STARTED LOOKING INTO HIS ACCOUNT TO SEE WHAT'S GOING ON AND WHAT'S THE PROBLEM. WHY IS HE BEING OVER ASSESSED AS WE'RE SETTING UP THIS DATE? IT WAS COMING TIME FOR DCAD DEADLINE. SO I DID FILE A PROTEST FOR MR. NEIL. AND WHEN I WENT TO DCAD, IF YOU MIND. DO YOU MIND IF I PASS THESE? ONE OF THE THINGS, MADAM CHAIR, IF I CAN, YOU KNOW, WE CAN AS A BODY TAKE INTO ANY FINANCIAL CONSIDERATION. SO I THINK WHAT WOULD BE MOST HELPFUL FOR US IN YOUR COMMENTS IS TO TALK ABOUT THE ZONING ASPECT.AND YOU KNOW HOW IT IS THE SAME OR SIMILAR TO PROPERTY TO THE EAST OR WEST OF IT, OR NORTH OR SOUTH OF IT? SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU HAVE PREPARED FOR THE COMMISSION, BUT I'M GOING TO LET YOU KNOW WE CAN'T CONSIDERATIONS INTO IN. 160,080 FLAT, WHEREAS HIS IS 245,000. SO WHAT I'M DOING IS I'M COMING UP IN FRONT OF PLANNING AND ZONING NOW TO SEE IF THEY CAN TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT HIS LOT BE ASSESSED AS A RESIDENTIAL AS OPPOSED TO RETAIL TO. MADAM CHAIR, I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE IS TO THE. I GUESS THAT WOULD BE EAST OF YOUR PROPERTY LINE. SO BETWEEN YOU AND THE CVS, IS THERE A AN IMPROVED ALLEY. SO A PAVED ALLEYWAY BETWEEN YOUR PROPERTY AND THE NEXT. IS THERE AN ALLEYWAY BETWEEN THE TWO? NO IT'S NOT. WHAT'S BETWEEN YOUR PROPERTY LINE AND THE CVS PROPERTY LINE. ARE TWO ADJACENT BUSINESSES. REMEMBER YOU HAVE 80 AT&T AND CVS. THEN IT'S A DRIVE THAT COMES STRAIGHT THROUGH.
IT'S A DRIVE RIGHT. THERE'S A THERE'S A THERE'S AN ALLEY THAT'S BETWEEN YOUR PROPERTY AND THE CVS PROPERTY. I WOULDN'T NECESSARILY CALL IT AN ALLEY. IS IT A PAVED DRIVEWAY SIR? YES.
OKAY. THERE IS AN THERE IS AN ENTRANCE POINT THAT SEPARATES YOUR PROPERTY FROM THE OTHER PROPERTY THAT'S PAVED. YES. OKAY. AND THAT AND I WOULD ASSUME THAT THAT THAT TERMINATES AT THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE AT&T COMING ALL THE WAY DOWN FROM WHEATLAND. RIGHT. AND IT WOULD TERMINATE AT THAT PROPERTY LINE. CORRECT. RIGHT. OKAY. THANK YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION. GO AHEAD. SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT WHEN YOU INITIALLY BOUGHT THE HOUSE IT WAS ZONED AS R-2. IS THAT WHAT YOU STATED EARLIER? YES WHEN I ORIGINALLY PURCHASED IT. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WE DON'T KNOW.
AND WHEN HE PURCHASED THE LOT BACK IN 2005, HE WAS GOING OFF OF THE REALTORS AND WHOEVER PUT THE PACKAGE TOGETHER. SO THEREFORE, MOVING FORWARD FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS, HE'S ACTUALLY BEEN PAYING HIS PROPERTY TAX, NOT REALLY KNOWING HOW TO READ THE DCAD PROPERTY TAX BILL, WHICH BASICALLY STATES ON THEIR R-2. SO AS I WAS WORKING. SO IT WAS JUST MISINFORMATION FROM THE REALTOR, BUT IT WAS ALWAYS ZONED AS THIS WHAT IS THIS LAW? IT WAS ALWAYS ZONED AS LAW. SINCE 2005, THERE HASN'T BEEN A ZONING CHANGE SINCE YOU MOVED. NO. OKAY. THAT WAS MY COOL. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. AND WHEN YOU PURCHASED IT, THERE WAS ALREADY ALREADY A HOUSE ON THE LOT. SO THEREFORE IT WAS NEVER CHANGED. SO HIM AND HIS WIFE PURCHASED IT. AND NOW I'M COMING IN TO SEE WHAT I CAN DO TO TRY AND HELP HIM. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE IS THERE ANYONE. IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS, I CAN OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVED.
[01:10:02]
WOULD ANYONE SECOND TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? I SECOND ALL RIGHT.THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IF THERE'S ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST, YOU MAY PLEASE HAVE YOUR SEAT UNTIL. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVED. SECOND VOTE. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR STAFF? I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MADAM CHAIR, I MOVE TO IN CASE NUMBER. 2020 5-00009. I MOVE TO APPROVE THIS APPLICATION AS REQUESTED AND I HAVE COMMENTS IF I HAVE A SECOND. I SECOND. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER O'BRIAN.
THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, I'M GOING TO I MY MOTION IS TO APPROVE THIS MOTION. THERE IS WE'VE SEEN IN SO MANY OTHER INSTANCES WITH SUPS AND WITH ZONING CASES THAT AT DIFFERENT PERIODS OF TIME AND JUST AS WE HEARD FROM MR. HORN TALKING ABOUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND HOW THINGS CHANGE ON ON THE GROUND AND MY EXPERIENCE IN ZONING, PERHAPS PRIOR TO 2005, WE DECIDED AS A CITY THAT IF WE LOOK TO THE NORTH, THERE'S RETAIL IN THAT CORNER, WHICH WE'VE ALL FAMILIAR WITH, AND THERE'S A HARD SET OF THAT OR LAW THAT'S WITHIN THIS QUADRANT, BUT THERE IS A NATURAL BREAK THAT EASES THIS BACK INTO THE RESIDENTIAL USE BY AN IMPROVED ALLEY. MR. NEIL DOESN'T DESCRIBE IT THAT WAY, BUT THE REASON I WAS ASKING THAT IS BECAUSE I WANTED TO KNOW, WAS THERE A NATURAL BREAK THAT WOULD EASE THIS BACK INTO THE RESIDENTIAL USE? AND I SUPPORT THIS BECAUSE THE CONVERSE OF THIS WOULD BE TO HAVE ANOTHER ZONING APPLICATION COME TO THIS BODY, AND ANOTHER WAY ASKING TO REPLAT AND TO MAKE ONE HUGE PIECE OF LAW OR RETAIL ACROSS THIS WHOLE QUADRANT THAT WOULD THEN PUT THOSE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES THAT FACE EATON TO THE WEST IN, IN, IN A WORSE SITUATION. AND SO I REALLY THINK MR. NEIL, PRIOR TO HIM PURCHASING THE HOME AND THE PRIOR OWNER GOT SLAPPED WITH AN OVERLAY THAT WAS A LAW THAT WAS INTENDED TO CREATE SOME CONFORMITY ON THIS HARD CORNER. AND I DON'T THINK THAT'S THE REALITY. AND THAT'S NOT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT ANY OF THE FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS OR EVEN DISCOUNTING WHATEVER INFORMATION MR. NEIL SHOULD HAVE KNOWN AND DISCLOSURE AND BUYING. BUT I THINK IF THERE WAS NOT AN IMPROVED ALLEY AND I'M FAMILIAR WITH, YOU KNOW, HOW YOU GO DOWN THERE, THERE'S NO U-TURN, THERE'S NO LEFT TURN, THERE'S A SIGN THERE THAT PREVENTS INDIVIDUALS FROM GETTING ON THE BACKSIDE OF THAT CVS DRIVE THROUGH THAT'S RELATED TO THAT ALLEYWAY. AND WITH THE ABSENCE OF THAT, I THINK MY MOTION WOULD BE DIFFERENT. BUT I THINK THIS TRUES UP AND MAKES HIM A BETTER NEIGHBOR TO EATING, TO HIS EATING NEIGHBORS TO THE WEST, AND ALSO REALIZING THAT WHATEVER DREAMS, HOPES AND ASPIRATION HE HAS FOR THE REMAINING HALF ACRE THAT'S AT THE AT THAT'S AT THE I GUESS THAT WOULD BE THE WHAT WHAT SOUTH SOUTHERN PORTION OF THAT LOT WOULD HAVE TO ALSO CONFORM WITH RESIDENTIAL. AND I THINK THAT'S IN BETTER PART OF KEEPING WITH BEING A GOOD NEIGHBOR. SO THAT'S THE BACKGROUND TO MY MOTION AND HOPEFULLY THIS COMMISSION CAN SUPPORT IT IN THE MAJORITY. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER COMMENTS DISCUSSION. ALL RIGHT. PLEASE VOTE. THE MOTION IS TO APPROVE. MOTION PASSES. WE WILL
[5.C. Case #2025-00010: Request of Briana Baugh, Applicant and Martha Fermin, Owner, for a zoning change from Neighborhood Office/Retail (NOR) to Downtown District (DD) Urban Living (UL on Block 1, Part of Lot 15 of Original Town Duncanville, an addition to the City of Duncanville, more commonly known as, 314 N. Hastings Street, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas.]
NOW PROCEED TO ITEM FIVE C CASE NUMBER 2020 5-00010. DO WE HAVE A STAFF REPORT ON THIS ITEM? MADAM CHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PUBLIC HEARING IS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 314 NORTH HASTINGS STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE RETAIL TO DOWNTOWN DISTRICT URBAN LIVING.SO THERE IS A DOWNTOWN DISTRICT, AND THEN THERE'S A SUBDISTRICT CALLED URBAN LIVING. FUTURE LAND
[01:15:02]
USE MAP DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIES THIS AREA AS THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. CURRENT ZONING, AS I MENTIONED, IS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE AND RETAIL, AND THE PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT WOULD BE A DOWNTOWN DUNCANVILLE URBAN LIVING. ON YOUR MAP. HERE YOU CAN SEE THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION. THE APPLICANT IS HERE AND WILL BE ABLE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION, BUT THERE IS AN EXISTING BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY THAT THE APPLICANT IS ACTUALLY LOOKING TO REMOVE AND TO PROVIDE AND BUILD A DUPLEX ON THIS PROPERTY. IT DOES FALL IN LINE WITH, I THINK, SOME OF THE MORE RECENT CONVERSATIONS AS IT RELATES TO YOUR FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROVIDING ATTAINABLE AND OTHER HOUSING OPTIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. THE REASON WHY WE ARE RECOMMENDING IT GO TO THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT URBAN LIVING, IS THAT DISTRICT SPECIFICALLY ALLOWS FOR TOWN TOWNHOME FAMILY TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE AREA, AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE MAP AS WELL, THE SURROUNDING AREAS, PREDOMINANTLY DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. THERE IS, YOU KNOW, THIS LITTLE POCKET OF THAT BLOCK THAT IS NEIGHBORHOOD OR NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE RETAIL. BUT WE FEEL THAT IT'S IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN. THIS IS JUST A CONCEPT THAT THE APPLICANT IS WORKING THROUGH RIGHT NOW. IT STILL NEEDS TO BE FINALIZED. THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN IN FRONT OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TO PROPOSE THEIR PROJECT TO US. AND THEY ARE, YOU KNOW, UPON APPROVAL FROM A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH BUILDING. A DUPLEX ON THE PROPERTY FOR THE PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. WE DID SEND OUT 24 MAILINGS. WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY IN RESPONSE, IN SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION OF THE APPLICATION. OUR RECOMMENDATION IS FOR APPROVAL OF THE REZONING FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE RETAIL TO DOWNTOWN DUNCANVILLE DISTRICT. URBAN LIVING, AS I DO NOT SEE UP HERE, BUT THANK YOU. DO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SORRY.STAFF QUESTION ARE THERE DESIGN STANDARDS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DOWNTOWN DUNCANVILLE DISTRICT AS IT RELATES TO MULTIFAMILY OR, YOU KNOW, ANYTHING AROUND THERE? IT'S BEEN A LONG TIME SINCE I'VE SEEN ANYTHING IN THE EXISTING IN THE EXISTING CODE, THE ZONING, THE THERE ARE DESIGN SYSTEMS FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA. AND AS THE APPLICANT, IF RECEIVING APPROVAL FROM THIS BODY AND THE CITY COUNCIL WOULD NEED TO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THE DRC AND PERMITTING TO ABIDE BY THOSE REQUIREMENTS FOR IF THERE ARE ANY SPECIFICALLY FOR TOWNHOMES OR DUPLEXES. RIGHT, BECAUSE THERE SHOULD BE SOME TYPE OF STANDARD AS TO FORM IN TERMS OF WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE, AND THOSE KINDS OF THINGS IN THAT PARTICULAR DISTRICT. IS MY MEMORY CORRECT THERE? THAT IS MORE IN LINE WITH COMMERCIAL RETAIL TYPE OF BUSINESSES THAT ARE THERE. WE CAN CONFIRM IF THERE ARE IF THERE ARE ANYTHING FOR THE DUPLEXES. BUT AGAIN, THAT'S WHY WE, THE URBAN LIVING IS WHY WE BECAUSE IT DOES ALLOW TWO FAMILY WITHIN THERE. RIGHT? IT GIVES US THE DENSITY. I KNOW THAT IT DOES THAT IN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT, BUT I'M WONDERING ABOUT WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE IN TERMS OF THE, THE, THE, THE DESIGN STANDARDS. I BELIEVE MOST OF YOUR DESIGN STANDARDS ARE MORE APPLIED TO LARGER BUILDINGS, LARGER MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WHERE YOU'D HAVE RETAIL COMMERCIAL ON THE BOTTOM AND RESIDENTIAL TOP, MORE OF THE MIXED USES. OKAY. THANK YOU. AM I CORRECT THAT THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR HAS A SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON IT CURRENTLY? YES, I BELIEVE YOU ARE CORRECT. THERE IS A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE ADJACENT TO IT RIGHT NOW. YES. RIGHT. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS BRIANNA BOER AND THE ADDRESS IS 31 FOUR NORTH HASTINGS. SO YES, THIS IS A PROPERTY THAT MY CLIENT HAS HAD FOR QUITE SOME TIME. I KNOW AT ONE POINT IT WAS, I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS A COURT OFFICE OR WHAT WAS IT FOR DUNCANVILLE, BUT OUR GOAL IS TO HOPEFULLY BRING MORE OF THAT WALKABLE, LIVABLE OPPORTUNITY TO DUNCANVILLE. THAT WAY WE'RE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE TRYING TO MAXIMIZE THAT SPACE, GIVE IT THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE, AND ALLOW FOR SOMEBODY HOPEFULLY TO GO AND SIP SOME COFFEE IN WALKING DISTANCE. DO YOU HAVE ANY DESIGN? WE DON'T HAVE ANY RENDERINGS RIGHT NOW. AT THIS MOMENT, WE'RE JUST WORKING ON THAT CONCEPT. WANTED TO SEE LIKE, OKAY, IS THIS SOMETHING THAT YOU GUYS WOULD BE IN SUPPORT OF? AND THEN WE COULD HAVE THE ARCHITECTS GO AHEAD AND DRAFT UP THOSE RENDERINGS. DO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I DO MISS BALL. JUST REALLY QUICKLY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. QUICK QUESTION FOR YOU. WHAT EXISTS NOW AT THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY. SO RIGHT NOW IT'S A 400 SQUARE
[01:20:02]
FOOT BUILDING JUST BEEN USED LIKE MOST RECENTLY WE HAD A HAIRSTYLIST THAT WAS RENTING OUT THE UNIT. PRIOR TO THAT IT WAS SOMEBODY THAT WAS DOING NAILS. SO IT WAS JUST A STANDARD COMMERCIAL SPACE. SO IS IT YOU AND YOUR CLIENT'S PLAN OR INTENTION TO KIND OF RAISE THAT 400 AND BUILD A BRAND NEW STRUCTURE THERE? YES. SO WE'RE GOING TO DEMO THAT BUILDING COMPLETELY AND THEN HAVE THE UNITS MORE TOWARDS THE BACK END, BECAUSE I KNOW ON BEHIND WHERE IT'S WE'RE ON DAVIS DAVIS HAS LIKE A BUNCH OF APARTMENTS. SO WE WOULD BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO RANDOMLY PUT THESE TWO UNITS NEXT TO THE SINGLE FAMILY. WE WANT TO KIND OF HAVE IT BLEND IN AS BEST AS POSSIBLE. SO HAVING THEM BE MORE TOWARDS THE REAR FACING OR REAR SIDE OF THE. SO YOU'RE GONNA YEAH, I NOTICE HOW YOU SET BACK QUITE A WAYS. AND I THINK YOU EVEN FROM AN ORIENTATION PERSPECTIVE YOU TURN EAST. I THINK FROM WHAT I SAW THAT WAS JUST BEFORE US IN A IN THE CONCEPT. OKAY. THAT'S HELPFUL. THANK YOU, MISS BALL. OKAY, I HAVE A QUESTION. YES, MA'AM. SINCE YOU MENTIONED THE BUILDING THERE RIGHT NOW WAS 400FT■!S. THE COMPLETED DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE THAT Y'ALL ARE TRYING, TOWNHOUSES THAT YOU WANTED TO PUT IN THAT SPOT. WHAT DO YOU ANTICIPATE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE WOULD BE FOR THAT? SO THEY WOULD BE TWO STORIES, AND WE'RE LEANING ANYWHERE FROM 1200 TO ABOUT 1400 SQUARE FEET. THANK YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION. SO I'M LOOKING AT YOUR SITE PLAN HERE. AND ARE YOU GUYS TRYING TO KEEP THAT SLAB OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY RIGHT THERE AT THE FRONT? ARE YOU TRYING TO INCORPORATE THAT INTO SOME SORT OF DRIVE IN SITUATION? I'M KIND OF CONFUSED WITH THE WEIGHT LINES HERE. ARE YOU SAYING WHERE THE BUILDING IS CURRENTLY RIGHT NOW? WELL, NOT THE BUILDING STRUCTURE. THERE'S LIKE AN EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO REMAIN. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S THAT'S NOT UP THERE, BUT IT MAKES KIND OF LIKE A SQUARE SHAPE. AND THEN THEN THERE'S A SMALLER SQUARE ON TOP OF THAT. IT COULD BE MAYBE WHERE THE CURRENT PARKING IS. MAYBE. YEAH, IT IS THE CURRENT PARKING, THE EXISTING. SO IDEALLY, YEAH, WE WOULD JUST HAVE IT MANEUVER IN THAT WAY. SO YOU WILL BE KEEPING IT. YOU WOULDN'T DEMO THE WHOLE THING AND THEN CREATE A NEW DRIVE. UNLESS THAT'S WHAT YOU GUYS WOULD PREFER. I MEAN I THINK IT WOULD LOOK A LITTLE MORE TIDY. OKAY. IF YOU WERE TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT. YEAH.YEAH, WE'RE WE'RE OPEN TO THE IDEA. WHATEVER'S GOING TO BE, YOU KNOW, MOST APPEALING TO YOU GUYS. OKAY. AND YOU DON'T HAVE LIKE A CALCULATION OF THE FLAT WORK THAT YOU'RE PROPOSING, LIKE THE SIDEWALK, THE DRIVEWAYS, THE LANES. NOT YET. NOT IN THIS MOMENT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. DO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ZONING? ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVED. PLEASE VOTE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, GUYS. THANK YOU. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES, WISHES TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVED. PLEASE VOTE.
ALL RIGHT. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION OR DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'M FAMILIAR WITH THIS. WITH THIS PROPERTY. I DRIVE BY IT EVERY DAY. AND THE BUSINESSES THAT HAVE BEEN IN THERE HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO STAY IN BUSINESS. AND I THINK REZONING THIS WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. I RECOMMEND APPROVAL MOTION, MADAM CHAIR.
ANY DISCUSSION? MY CONCERN IS THERE WERE NO RENDERINGS THAT WE COULD SEE IN MORE DETAIL OF WHAT THE DESIGN WAS GOING TO BE. SO THERE WAS THE SCHEMATICS. THAT WILL GIVE ME A BETTER IDEA OF HOW THIS IS GOING TO WORK OUT. I'M NOT SURE THAT'S OUR PURVIEW, BUT IF I'M WRONG, PLEASE CORRECT ME. THE ACTUAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND SITE PLAN WOULD BE THROUGH THE DRC AND THROUGH THE PERMITTING PROCESS. PLANNING COMMISSION TYPICALLY DOES NOT REVIEW BUILDING ELEVATIONS OR SITE PLANS AS PART OF IT. MY CONCERN WAS THE ACTUAL LAYOUT. AS FAR AS THE. HOW IS IT GOING
[01:25:03]
TO AFFECT THE STREET, HOW FAR THE HOUSE IS FROM THE STREET, MAKING SURE THAT THEY ARE IN THE PROPER ORDINANCES TO BUILD THESE THINGS, AND TO MR. DAVIS'S PREVIOUS REQUEST, THERE ARE THERE ARE NO SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL. THERE ARE BUILD TWO LINES AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD NEED TO BE, WHICH AGAIN, PROPERTIES WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AREA TYPICALLY ARE GOING TO WANT TO BE A LITTLE BIT CLOSER TO THE ROADWAY THAN A LITTLE BIT FURTHER BACK. WE DID TALK WITH THE APPLICANT ABOUT THAT AND PREVIOUS DRC MEETING ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF REORIENTATING THEIR BUILDING LOCATION TO BE A LITTLE BIT CLOSER TO THE ROAD, WITH MAYBE SOME PARKING IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY. SO THEY'RE OPEN TO THAT CONSIDERATION AS PART OF IT. FURTHER DISCUSSION. STEPH, JUST JUST SO I'M CALIBRATED NOW, DRC IS THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE, RIGHT? YEAH, IT IS THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. CORRECT. AND FOR THE SAKE OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION THAT THAT GROUP REVIEWS EVERY SINGLE ZONING APPLICATION BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TO ENSURE IT CONFORMS WITH THE RIGHT DRIVE APPROACH TO SETBACKS AND ALL OF THOSE THINGS. RIGHT? THAT IS CORRECT. THE WAY THAT YOUR CITY ORDINANCES ARE SET UP, ANY TYPE OF SITE PLAN APPROVALS ARE RUN THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE AND THEN GOES THROUGH BUILDING AND PERMITTING FOR THAT PROCESS. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE IS COMPRISED OF MEMBERS OF STAFF, FIRE DEPARTMENT, POLICE DEPARTMENT, ENGINEERING. SO ALL THE REQUIREMENTS ARE OUTLINED WITHIN THE ORDINANCES OF WHAT APPLICANTS WOULD NEED TO MEET ONCE THEY GET THE TYPE OF ZONING APPROVAL THAT THIS BODY RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION. AND THE DRC. AND I HATE TO GO THROUGH THIS, BUT THE DRC IS GOING TO TAKE A LOOK AT HOW THE ORIENTATION OF OTHER PROPERTIES, WHAT THE SETBACKS ARE, THE ORIENTATION OF WHERE THE BUILDING LINES SHOULD BE, AND ALL OF THAT. RIGHT, 100%. THAT'S CORRECT. THANK YOU. I WILL SAY SOMETHING IF I CAN. SO THESE TYPE OF SUBMISSIONS KINDA MAKE ME FEEL A LITTLE BIT, YOU KNOW, WEARY, ESPECIALLY BECAUSE OF THE FACT WE DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT WE'RE APPROVING. YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? WE'RE JUST APPROVING A BUNCH OF BLOCKS ON A PIECE OF PAPER AND THEY WANT TO BUILD A TOWNHOME, BUT WE'RE NOT SEEING THE DESIGN STANDARDS. SO I THINK IT'D BE BENEFICIAL IF WE DO COME TOGETHER AS A COMMITTEE AND REDO THESE ZONINGS SO THAT WE HAVE THE, YOU KNOW, SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS IN PLACE. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE CURBS, WE HAVE PARKING LOTS NOT LEADING TO SIDEWALKS LEADING TO ASPHALT. WE HAVE SOME GREENERY AND STUFF IN THERE. BUT OF COURSE WE CAN'T DO ANY OF THAT RIGHT NOW. HOWEVER, I JUST WANTED TO STATE THAT AND SAY THAT, YEAH, I MEAN, I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE APPROVING HERE, BUT I HOPE THAT YOU GUYS COME UP WITH A VERY GOOD DEVELOPMENT AND I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING IT. ALL RIGHT. IF THERE ARE NO FURTHER COMMENTS, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. AND A SECOND, SO LET'S VOTE. I THINK WE NEED TO JUST DO THE ROLL CALL BECAUSE MISS NGUYEN IS NOT ABLE TO. OKAY. OKAY. DOING A ROLL CALL VOTE MR. SALAZAR. YES, MISS O'BRIEN? YES, MISS? YES, MISS BROWNING? YES, MISS. CHAMPAGNE? YES, MR. DAVIS? YES, MA'AM. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THE MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON TO ITEM. FIVE, D, CASE NUMBER 2025, DASH[5.D. Case #2025-00015: Request of Alma M. Cartwright, Applicant and Owner, for a zoning change from Planned Development (PD) to Duplex Residential District (TF-7) on land conveyed to the City of Duncanville in the A.M.G. Merrill Survey, Abstract No. 884, more commonly known as 400 E. Center, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas. ]
15. THANK YOU, MADAM. MADAM CHAIRWOMAN AND COMMISSION MEMBERS, THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400 EAST CENTER STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A ZONING CHANGE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, WITH THE TWO DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, OR TF7. THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO CONVERT THE EXISTING OFFICE COMMERCIAL BUILDING INTO TWO RESIDENTIAL UNITS. YOUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IDENTIFIES AS PROPERTY AS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. AS I MENTIONED, THE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT IS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WHICH THE UNDERLYING DISTRICT IS, NOR, WHICH IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND OFFICE RETAIL ZONING DISTRICT. AND AGAIN, THE PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT THEY ARE REQUESTING IS FOR DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE ON THE MAP, THE. THIS IS A PROPERTY THAT IS LOCATED ON THE ON THE CORNER OF CENTER STREET AND ALSO GOLDMAN STREET. THIS PROPERTY DOES HAVE AND WITHIN YOUR AS YOU'VE SEEN IN YOUR PACKET DOES HAVE I'LL SAY SOME CONSIDERABLE HISTORY GOING BACK IN TIME AS IT RELATES TO WHAT HAS OCCURRED ON THIS PROPERTY, WHAT THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN ZONED PREVIOUSLY AS WELL. YOU KNOW, THIS WHOLE AREA IS[01:30:02]
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY. THE APPLICANT OR EXCUSE ME, THE PREVIOUS LANDOWNER OR LANDOWNERS AT ONE TIME DID RECEIVE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO CONSTRUCT SOME FORM OF A NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE OR RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT ON THIS PROPERTY. AGAIN, AS YOUR ZONING HAS COME FORWARD AND EVERYTHING ELSE, THERE HAVE BEEN SOME PROPERTY OWNER CHANGES FOR THE PAST. I'D SAY ABOUT TEN YEARS THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN ACTUALLY OWNED BY A CHURCH ON THE PROPERTY AS WELL. THROUGH THE HISTORY. AGAIN, WE ARE AT WHERE WE ARE THIS EVENING. IT IS THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN WORKING WITH STAFF TO TRY TO REPURPOSE THE PROPERTY AGAIN. THEIR CURRENT IDEA IS TO CONVERT THE BUILDING TO A TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. WE DID SEND OUT 23 MAILINGS FOR THE PROPERTY. WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY RESPONSES IN SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION OF THE APPLICATION. WE ARE RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE PROPOSED ZONING REZONING REQUEST AS THE REZONING PROPERTY IS NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND PERMITTING THE REZONE WOULD BE A VIOLATION OF STATE LAW GOVERNING ZONING. THE REASON WHY WE ARE RECOMMENDING DENIAL IS THE APPLICANT. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO GO TO A TWO FAMILY DUPLEX, WHICH WOULD BE WHAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED A SPOT ZONING, WHICH IS ILLEGAL FOR ZONING PRACTICES. ALTHOUGH THIS IS PREDOMINANTLY A RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY AREA AND THERE MAY OR MAY NOT BE OTHER DUPLEXES THAT MAY BE OPERATING RIGHT NOW WITHIN THE AREA, WHETHER THEY ARE LEGAL OR LEGAL, NONCONFORMING WITHIN THE AREA TO REZONE THIS INDIVIDUAL PIECE OF PROPERTY TO TWO FAMILY WOULD BE A STATE VIOLATION AND CONSIDERED A SPOT ZONE. WE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT IF THE APPLICANT WERE TO, YOU KNOW, CONSIDER LOOKING AT THE PROPERTY. THIS IS CLOSE TO THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT AREA AND MAYBE IN THE FUTURE, LOOK AT DOING MORE OF A PROACTIVE REZONE OF ADJACENT OR SIMILAR PROPERTIES IN THE AREA TO CONSIDER MORE OF A COHESIVE REZONE INSTEAD OF THE INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY THAT IS BEING PROPOSED THIS EVENING. WITH THAT, I'LL ASK FOR ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION. I DO HAVE A QUESTION. SO MY UNDERSTANDING IS THIS IS AGAINST STATE LAW TO GO AHEAD AND REZONE THIS THE WAY IT'S BEING REQUESTED. SO I'M JUST CURIOUS WHY IT'S BEFORE US. IS THAT NORMAL? THE APPLICANT STILL HAS THE RIGHT TO MAKE AN APPLICATION TO THE TO THE COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION. AGAIN, PLANNING COMMISSION CAN MAKE THAT DETERMINATION ALONG WITH THE CITY COUNCIL. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I DO REALLY MY QUESTION IS FOR OUR LEGAL COUNSEL AS IT RELATES TO THE REFERENCE TO SPOT ZONING. WHAT COULD YOU DEFINE FOR ME? SPOT ZONING. SO THAT WOULD BE. SO THAT WOULD BE EXCUSE ME. CAN YOU HEAR ME? SO THAT WOULD BE A LEGAL QUESTION. IF YOU WANTED ME TO RESEARCH THAT OKAY I AM MORE THAN HAPPY TO DO THAT. OKAY. YES. OKAY. I GUESS MY QUESTION FOR STAFF IS BACK TO THE ZONING MAP. I THINK A SLIDE BEFORE YOUR RECOMMENDATION. ONE OF THEM ARE ALL OF THESE FOR THE LACK OF A BETTER COLOR. MANILA ZONINGS BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IT IS. MANILA ARE THEY ARE THEY ZONED CURRENTLY? AS THIS LEGEND SUGGESTS, SOMEWHERE BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY 13 AND SEVEN OR I.THAT IS CORRECT SIR. SO ALL OF THESE AROUND ARE ARE SINGLE FAMILY. IS IT STAFF'S PERSPECTIVE THAT THAT THIS IS CONSIDERED QUOTE UNQUOTE SPOT ZONING BECAUSE HELP ME FILL IN THE BLANK. RESTATE YOUR LAST YES WITH ALL THE OTHER SINGLE FAMILY USES AROUND. IS THIS CONSIDERED THIS IS CONSIDERED QUOTE UNQUOTE, SPOT ZONING BECAUSE WHY? IT'S A SINGLE TRACK OF LAND THAT IS BEING REZONED TO A DIFFERENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION THAT IS NOT IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE WITH THE SURROUNDING ZONING AREA. IF YOU IF YOU DO LOOK AT YOUR PACKET AS WELL, WE DID PROVIDE INFORMATION FROM THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, WHICH WAS A LEGAL OPINION THAT WAS PROVIDED ON SPOT ZONING AND THE DEFINITION THAT THEY PROVIDED WITHIN THERE WAS SPOT ZONING IS THE ILLEGAL PRACTICE OF ZONING A SINGLE TRACT OF LAND IN A MANNER THAT IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREAS, AND IN A MANNER THAT IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO IS IT THE CITY'S PERSPECTIVE THAT, BASED ON THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, HTML'S DEFINITION, NOTWITHSTANDING YOURS, MADAM LEGAL COUNSEL, THAT THAT WE COULD AWAIT THAT THIS ZONING REQUEST IS UNCHARACTERISTIC WITH ANY OF THE OTHER USES. IT IS OUR
[01:35:03]
PROFESSIONAL OPINION, LOOKING AT THAT, THAT THIS IS A ZONING OF A SINGLE TRACT OF LAND THAT IS NOT IN RELATIONSHIP OR COMPATIBLE TO THE EXISTING ZONING THAT IS OUT THERE TODAY OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. SO, IN ESSENCE, A DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, A TF WITHIN OUR ZONING CODE OR CODE OF ORDINANCES. AND YOU ALL'S PROFESSIONAL OPINION IS, IS CHARACTERISTICALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE OTHER SINGLE FAMILY USES AND SINGLES OUT THIS ONE TRACT. THAT IS HOW YOUR YOUR ZONING ORDINANCE IS CURRENTLY DEFINED. YES. SO YES. YES. THANK YOU SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO SPEAK? THANK YOU. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD JAMES CARTWRIGHT. I WOULD LIKE. JAMES CARTWRIGHT. I WOULD LIKE TO STATE WITH THE PROPERTY THAT WE HAVE, I HAVE SITE PLANS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW THAT I WOULD LIKE TO PASS AS FAR AS THE LOOKING OF IT. OKAY. I SORRY, I DON'T BELIEVE YOU STATED YOUR ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, JAMES CARTWRIGHT. YOUR ADDRESS PLEASE.400 EAST CENTER. AS I WAS LOOKING AT THE DOCUMENTATION, IT HAS ALMA CARTWRIGHT ON THERE. IF YOU ALL WOULD LIKE, I COULD TURN IN TO WHERE WE DID HAVE A DEED TRANSFER FROM HOUSE OF REFUGE CHRISTIAN CENTER TO JC HOLDING. IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE. OKAY. NOW. AS YOU ALL FLIP THROUGH THE PRESENTATION THAT I, THAT I PUT TOGETHER, THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED PD NOR NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE RETAIL MIXED USE. NOW IN THE MIXED USE. ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WE'VE HAD WITH THE PROPERTY WITH THE UPDATED ZONING IS PARKING WITH NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE RETAIL. IT'S ONE PARKING SPOT PER 300FT■!S. E BUILDING EQUATES TO 4200FT■!S, WHICH THERE IS NOT 14 PARKING SPOTS ON THE LOT. SO THEREFORE, AS A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, IT IS A NON ASSET PRODUCING PROPERTY. WE'VE HAD SEVERAL POTENTIAL PURCHASERS OR BUYERS, BUT WHEN THEY CAME BACK TO DUNCANVILLE THEY SAID THERE'S NOTHING THAT WE CAN DO WITH THIS COMMERCIAL PROPERTY BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH PARKING. WHEN WE GO TO DUNCANVILLE AND THEY ASK, WHAT IS YOUR TOTAL OCCUPANCY? THE TOTAL OCCUPANCY FOR THE BUILDING WOULD BE MORE THAN NINE PARKING SPOTS. SO FROM THAT SO FROM THAT INSTANCE, I SAID, OKAY, WHAT IS IT THAT WE CAN DO WITH THIS PROPERTY THAT IS SITTING THAT WE CANNOT HAVE AS A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY? BECAUSE ANYONE THAT WE TRY TO SELL IT TO, THEY WOULD WALK AWAY BECAUSE THERE WOULD NOT BE AMPLE PARKING. SO AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE PACKET THAT I'VE SENT, I PERSONALLY WENT TO ALL THE NEIGHBORS ACROSS THE STREET AROUND THE CORNER ASKING THEM HOW WOULD THEY FEEL IF THIS BUILDING, 4200 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING THAT HAS BEEN SITTING DORMANT SINCE COVID WOULD BE CONVERTED INTO A DUPLEX, AND I GOT A UNANIMOUS SIGNATURES THAT ARE STATED ON THERE THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT MORE AS A DUPLEX THAN AS A COMMERCIAL, WHICH WOULD BRING A HIGHER DENSITY, HIGHER PARKING. IN ADDITION TO THAT, IF YOU ALSO LOOK ON THE PACKET THAT I SENT PRIOR TO 2007, THE BUILDING WAS AN OFFICE DUPLEX. IT WAS BASED, AND IT HAS TWO TWO AIR CONDITIONERS IN THE TWO AC IN THE BACK. IT HAS TWO HVACS. IT HAS TWO KITCHENS, IT HAS THE FIREWALL. SO IT'S ACTUALLY PRIOR TO THE ZONING CHANGE, PRIOR TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS, IT WAS A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX. COMMERCIAL DUPLEX. SO WHAT I'M TRYING TO DO, BEING THAT DUNCANVILLE HAS CHANGED THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS PER NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE RETAIL, THERE'S NO WAY THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE 50% RETAIL, 50% OFFICE WITH ONLY NINE PARKING SPOTS. IT WOULD NOT PASS. SO THE NEXT THING TO DO IS WHAT IS IT THAT I CAN DO WITH THIS PROPERTY TO BE ABLE TO BRING REVENUE, PROPERTY TAX, SOMETHING THAT THE NEIGHBORS ACROSS THE STREET WOULD LIKE AND THAT WOULD BE A
[01:40:03]
DUPLEX. SO WHAT I'VE DONE ON THERE IS I'VE DONE A BREAKDOWN OF THE ZONING OF WHAT THE TF7 REQUIREMENTS ARE AND THE REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY ON THE BUILDING. IT MEETS ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A DUPLEX. IF YOU WERE TO LOOK ALSO ON THERE, YOU CAN SEE THAT AT ONE POINT, THE WAY THAT THE BUILDING WAS STRUCTURED, IT WAS STRUCTURED FOR A OFFICE DUPLEX.NOW WITH THE ZONING, I'M JUST TRYING TO HAVE IT MOVED INTO A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX. SO THEREFORE WE CAN HAVE THE FIRE BEARING WALL WHICH IS ALREADY THERE. YOU SEE THE LAYOUT THAT WE'VE ALREADY PUT TOGETHER, WHICH IS A THREE BEDROOM, TWO BATH, TWO AND A HALF BATHS WITH AMPLE PARKING.
CURRENTLY, THAT IS THE ONLY THING THAT WE CAN TECHNICALLY DO WITH THE PROPERTY DUE TO THE ZONING PARKING. ARE THERE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? MR. CARTER, BASED ON YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY? I HEAR WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. YOU CAN'T PARK IT AS IT IS, AS YOU CAN'T PARK THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION ACCORDING TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS, WITH THE USE THAT IT'S CURRENTLY WITHIN THE APPROVED PD. CORRECT. OUTSIDE OF AND I THINK MY NOTES SAID NOR IS THE CURRENT ALLOWED USE PURSUANT TO THE PD NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE RETAIL. ARE THERE ANY OTHER USES THAT THIS PARTICULAR PD ALLOWS FOR THAT YOU'RE AWARE OF? NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF. I JUST KNOW THAT AS FAR AS THE RETAIL AND AS FAR AS THE OFFICE, IT ALL COMES BACK, SIR, TO THE. I'M LISTENING. ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY OTHER USES? NO, I AM NOT. OKAY. YOU'RE NOT AWARE OF ANY OTHER USES. SO THIS PD CALLS OUT AND SPECIFIES THE ONLY USE IN THIS RESIDENTIAL AREA IS A NOR PURSUANT TO THE PD. CORRECT. OKAY. DO YOU KNOW ROUGHLY OFF THE TOP OF YOUR HEAD? I'M JUST TRYING TO SAVE STAFF. ANOTHER QUESTION. THEY MAY NOT HAVE THE ANSWER TO MY.
MY QUESTION FOR YOU IS DO YOU KNOW WHEN THIS PD WENT INTO EFFECT, ARE YOU AWARE OR DO YOU HAVE ANY OF THAT HISTORY I JUST WHILE I HAVE YOU. ORDINANCE NUMBER 2425R2425R IS ORDINANCE NUMBER OKAY WAS SIGNED BY BARRY L LOGAN MAYOR ON FEBRUARY 2022. AND I DO HAVE THE DOCUMENTATION 2022. YES, SIR. SO NOT LONG AGO THIS BODY AND THEN EVENTUALLY COUNCIL APPROVED THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT THAT ALLOWED FOR THIS ONE USE OF NOR. YES. ANY PREVIOUS OCCUPANTS OPERATED IN THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY TO YOUR KNOWLEDGE UNDER THE DESIGNATION NO. IF WE WANT TO GET THE ABOUT THIS CHURCH I SEE IN THE PICTURES AND THE MATERIAL YOU PROVIDED US. YES.
SO MY FATHER WAS THE PASTOR, RIGHT? AND SO MY PARENTS OWNED THE PROPERTY FOR 15 YEARS. HE PASSED PRIOR TO COVID. SO AFTER PASSING, PRIOR TO COVID, WE WERE HAVING PROBLEMS SELLING THE PROPERTY. MY MOM WAS HAVING PROBLEMS SELLING THE PROPERTY BECAUSE ANYTIME WE WOULD HAVE SOMEONE THAT WOULD COME TO PURCHASE IT, THEY WOULD COME TO DUNCANVILLE AND THEY WOULD BE LIKE, I CAN'T RUN A BUSINESS OUT OF THAT BECAUSE OF THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. SO FROM THAT POINT, I WENT TO MY MOM AND I SAID, LISTEN, LET ME LET'S DO A DEED TRANSFER OVER TO MY COMPANY. AND WHAT I'LL DO IS I'LL DO THE AS MUCH DUE DILIGENCE AS I CAN TO SEE WHAT IS IT THAT WE CAN DO WITH THIS PROPERTY. SO THEREFORE IT CAN BE UTILIZED IN DUNCANVILLE, CAN BENEFIT FROM IT. AND FROM THAT I WANTED TO GO TO THE NEIGHBORS THAT ARE ACROSS THE STREET AND THAT ARE CLOSEST TO THE PROPERTY AND ASK THEM, WHAT IS IT THAT YOU WOULD LIKE? HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS BEING CONVERTED INTO A DUPLEX? AND ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I TALKED TO, THEY SAID THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT. THEY WOULD RATHER SEE IT STAYING CONSISTENT WITH ALL OF THE HOUSES AND THE HOMES AROUND IT, AS OPPOSED TO IT BEING MOVED OVER TO A COMMERCIAL THEY WERE IN. THEY WERE IN UNISON. THEN WHEN I SHOWED THEM THE LAYOUT OF WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE, THEY EVEN LIKED THAT EVEN MORE. SO THAT IS WHERE WE ARE AT NOW, BECAUSE IF WE'RE NOT ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH TURNING THIS INTO A DUPLEX, THERE'S REALLY NOT MUCH WE CAN DO WITH THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WHERE IT NOW STANDS AS FAR AS NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE, RETAIL, MULTI-USE, ONE PARKING SPOT PER 300FT■!S. THATS WHERE WE ARE AT. THANK YOU, MR. CLARK. IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME, I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? PLEASE VOTE. OH, WE NEED TO DO THE ROLL CALL. YES, YES, YES. ALL RIGHT. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IF ANYBODY IS HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST, PLEASE TAKE THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. HI, MY NAME IS LOIS VARENKAMP AND I LIVE AT 403 EAST CENTER
[01:45:01]
STREET, JUST ACROSS THE STREET AND EAST BY ONE HOUSE. AND I SPOKE WITH MR. CARTWRIGHT EARLIER TODAY. WHEN I FIRST HEARD ABOUT THIS HEARING, I WAS CONCERNED THAT IT WAS A CHANGE FROM RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL. AND I NOW I UNDERSTAND IT TO BE ACTUALLY THE OPPOSITE AND DENSITY ISSUE. I HAVEN'T DONE THIS BEFORE AND I DON'T KNOW VERY MUCH ABOUT THIS, SO I'LL PROBABLY USE THE WRONG WORDS. BUT MY HUSBAND AND I HAVE LIVED AT OUR HOME SINCE 2018, AND THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN PRETTY MUCH EMPTY THE WHOLE TIME, AND IT'S OBVIOUSLY EMPTY. IT'S HIGHER ABOVE THE STREET. SO IT IT'S THE FIRST THING THAT PEOPLE SEE DRIVING THROUGH. THERE'S A LOT OF IT'S EASY FOR WEEDS TO GROW UP IF NOBODY'S THERE. PEOPLE AREN'T AROUND TO WATER THE PLANTS. THERE'S BEEN AN EFFORT MADE TO MAKE IT LOOK NICE, BUT IT'S VERY OBVIOUSLY EMPTY. AND IT'S ALSO VERY OBVIOUSLY A DUPLEX. IT'S NOT A SINGLE PLACE. I KEEP THINKING IT WOULD BE SOMETHING FOR A MAYBE A DOCTOR'S OFFICE OR SOMETHING, BUT THERE I DON'T THINK THERE IS ENOUGH PARKING. BUT AS A NEIGHBOR LOOKING AROUND, IT IS ALL RESIDENTIAL THERE. IT WOULD BE GREAT TO HAVE PEOPLE WHO CAN ENJOY THAT AND ENJOY THE AMENITIES OF LIVING NEAR CITY CENTER, WHICH WE LOVE. AND IT'S A GREAT RESIDENTIAL AREA WITH GOOD PEOPLE RENTING, GOOD PEOPLE OWNING ALONG THAT STREET. SO ONE QUESTION I HAVE, I UNDERSTAND THAT THESE ARE LEGAL ISSUES I DON'T KNOW ABOUT, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE THIS WAS A SPOT ZONING EARLIER, RIGHT? I MEAN, IT'S A DIFFERENT ZONING THAN THE REST OF THE AREA, RIGHT? UNFORTUNATELY, WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO ANSWER. BUT OKAY, YOU CAN, BUT MY QUESTION IS, IF IT ALREADY IS DIFFERENT, IS IT A IS IT STILL ILLEGAL TO CHANGE A ZONING FOR THIS SINGLE UNIQUE ISLAND WHEN AND THIS COULD BE A CASE STUDY. LISTENING TO THE VERY INTERESTING PRESENTATION EARLIER OF MAKING DUNCANVILLE EASY TO WORK WITH. SO THAT'S JUST WHAT I HAVE TO SAY. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING, AND I REALLY APPRECIATE THE GENTLEMAN WHO SAT BEHIND ME AND RETURNED MY DRIVER'S LICENSE, WHICH I DROPPED. SO. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY ARE THERE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, I WILL ACCEPT A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVED SECOND. SECRETARY. YES. CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE PUBLIC HEARING I VOTE YES. YES. OKAY.THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY. DISCUSSION OR. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I HAVE A DISCUSSION. THE STAFF HAD PRESENTED EARLIER THAT THE. THE LEGALITY, THOSE PARTICULAR ISSUES AS FAR AS RESOLVING THAT AND MAKING IT WHERE THE LEGAL ASPECT OF THIS PARTICULAR REQUEST CAN GO FORWARD. HOW DOES THAT MOVE FORWARD? GOOD QUESTION. YOU WOULD NEED TO SEEK A LEGAL OPINION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY ON THEIR INTERPRETATION OF THE REQUEST THAT'S IN FRONT OF YOU TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT, AGAIN, WHAT WE'RE PRESENTING IS WHAT IS OUR PROFESSIONAL OPINION ON IT. BUT THE CITY'S LEGAL ATTORNEY WOULD CAN PROVIDE A LEGAL OPINION. IF THERE ARE STILL QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION, WOULD IT BE APPROPRIATE TO REQUEST THAT AND TABLE THIS MOTION UNTIL WE HAVE THAT ANSWER? ALL RIGHT. IN A SHAKING OF THE HEAD. SO YES. I JUST HAVE A COMMENT IF, IF WHEN WE GET TO THAT POINT. I JUST WANT TO GO ON THE RECORD TO SAY, I THINK THAT IT WOULD BE PARTICULARLY HELPFUL, YOU KNOW, FOR THIS BODY THAT AS WE GET STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION, IF THERE'S A LEGAL CONSIDERATION THAT, YOU KNOW, WE SOMEHOW FLAG THAT BEFORE WE GET TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO IF WE NEED TO HAVE THAT IN OUR WORK SESSION AND HAVE AN EXECUTIVE SESSION IN CONJUNCTION WITH THAT WORK SESSION TO PROPERLY OBTAIN THAT LEGAL ADVICE SO WE COULD BE ABLE TO ADEQUATELY DISPENSE THE MOTION OUT HERE TODAY AS OPPOSED TO GETTING HERE, HAVING STAFF MAKE A RECOMMENDATION THAT WOULD OTHERWISE SUGGEST THAT OUR ACTION WOULD BE VIOLATIVE OF A
[01:50:07]
STATE LAW, AND NOT HAVING THE PRIVILEGE AND THE OPPORTUNITY TO SEEK LEGAL COUNSEL BEFORE GETTING TO THIS STAGE, I THINK, WOULD BE PROFESSIONALLY APPRECIATED. AND THE BETTER USE OF TIME, EFFORT AND ENERGY. SO I JUST WANT TO PUT THAT ON THE RECORD AS IT RELATES TO THIS PARTICULAR CASE, AS FEEDBACK TO STAFF. I WILL MAKE A MOTION, A MOTION. SO WITH THAT, I MOVE THAT WE HOLD THIS UNDER ADVISEMENT, UNDERSTANDING THAT WE WILL HAVE FORTHCOMING LEGAL OPINION ON THIS, BUT WE HOLD THIS UNDER ADVISEMENT UNTIL OUR NEXT PAZ MEETING. REGULAR SCHEDULED PRNS MEETING. I'LL SECOND. CAN WE VOTE? YES. YES. SO WE HAVE VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO TABLE THIS UNTIL WE CAN GET LEGAL ADVICE. THE NEXT. PIECE IS NUMBER. SORRY FIVE E NUMBER 20[5.E. Case #2025-00016: Request of Omar Martinez, Applicant, for a Specific Use Permit to allow for the use of “Auto Dealership, Used Only” on Lot 9, Block 2 of Woodhaven Addition, an addition to the City of Duncanville more commonly known as, 510 E. Red Bird Lane, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas.]
2516. MADAM. MADAM CHAIRMAN, COMMISSION MEMBERS, THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 510 EAST RED BIRD LANE WITHIN THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AN APPROVAL FOR AN SCP FOR AN AUTO DEALERSHIP FOR USED ONLY VEHICLES WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IDENTIFIES THIS PROPERTY AS RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL. THE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT IS COMMERCIAL, AND AGAIN ACCORDING TO SECTION 3.03, ANY TYPE OF AUTOMOTIVE USES WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REQUIRE A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT ON THE MAP. HERE YOU'LL SEE THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS IN QUESTION RIGHT NOW.YOU CAN SEE ALL THE PROPERTIES ALONG RED BIRD LANE ARE ZONED COMMERCIAL. AND THESE PROPERTY AND THIS PROPERTY DOES BACK UP TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH. THIS IS AN EXISTING VACANT PROPERTY ALONG EAST RED BIRD LANE. AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE AERIAL MAP. I UNDERSTAND THAT IS A LITTLE BIT CHALLENGING ON THE GRAPHIC TO SEE HERE, BUT THE APPLICANT IS FOCUSED ON CONSTRUCTING APPROXIMATELY A 400 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY AND PAVING MOST OF THE PROPERTY FOR THE SALE OF USED VEHICLES ON THE PROPERTY. AGAIN, WE ARE HERE TO TALK ABOUT THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT THIS EVENING ON WHETHER OR NOT TO PERMIT THE USE ON THE PROPERTY.
WE DID MAIL OUT 16 MAILINGS. WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY IN IN RESPONSE, IN SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION OF THE APPLICATION. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS. AGAIN, WE FIND THAT THE APPLICATION IN FRONT OF YOU FOR AN AUTO DEALERSHIP USE CAN BE ALLOWED ON THE SITE, BUT AGAIN, IT DOES NEED TO GO THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. IT DOES STILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED FOR SITE CIVIL DESIGN. IT DOES STILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED FOR SCREENING AND BUFFERING TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AS WELL. SO WE ARE MAKING THE APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDE THAT AND GO THROUGH THE ACTUAL PERMITTING PROCESS FOR THE PROPERTY. WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED A FULL SITE PLAN TO DATE THAT THAT TAKES INTO CONSIDERATION ALL THOSE ELEMENTS, AND THEN THE APPLICANT DOES NEED TO MEET ALL BUILDING AND FIRE CODES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE ORDINANCES. WITH THAT, I'LL OPEN IT UP FOR ANY QUESTIONS. JUST TO CONFIRM, WILL THE APPLICANT HAVE TO SUBMIT A SITE PLAN BEFORE THIS MOVES TO COUNCIL? THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED TO DO THAT AGAIN. YOURS. YOU WERE FOCUSED ON THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. I KNOW MY FOCUS. I'M ASKING, WILL THEY HAVE TO SUBMIT A SITE PLAN BEFORE THEY GO TO COUNCIL? NOT NOT PRIOR TO. OKAY. THANK YOU. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS OMAR MARTINEZ. I'M THE ONE THAT FILED AND I'M HERE MORE THAN ANYTHING.
REPRESENTING MY FATHER'S BEEN WHAT? REALLY? OUR FAMILY BUSINESS. AND MORE THAN REALLY.
I MEAN, WE'RE AT THE POINT WHERE WE'RE WILLING TO MODIFY ANYTHING. I MEAN, BY THE WAY, WE
[01:55:01]
HAVE ALREADY MODIFIED THE PLANS THAT WE THAT WE TURN TO THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. AND I MEAN, REALLY, WE'RE JUST TRYING TO SEE IF IT MEETS ALL THE REGULATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS. YOU GUYS, I GUESS, GO BASED OFF. AND THEN FROM THERE ON, I MEAN, CONTINUE. AND HOW DO YOU SAY IT? PROCEED WITH ANYTHING THAT IS REQUIRED. MADAM CHAIR. MR. MARTINEZ, JUST REALLY QUICKLY DO DOES YOUR FAMILY. INTEND TO HAVE ANY TYPE OF LIGHTS AT THIS, AT THIS LOCATION? YOU KNOW HOW ON A ON A CAR LOT YOU HAVE, YOU KNOW, LIGHTS. ARE YOU ALL PLANNING TO ON YOUR PARKING LOT ON YOUR SALES? YES, I BELIEVE SO. MORE THAN ANYTHING FOR LIKE THE LIKE SECURITY WISE, LIKE FOR THE NIGHT. SO MAKE SURE LIKE WE CAN SEE OR THE NEIGHBORS CAN SEE IF ANYBODY'S TRYING TO BREAK IN OR ANYTHING FOR SURE. OKAY. THANK YOU. YES. I HAVE A QUESTION. YES. ARE Y'ALL PRESENTLY DOING ANY TYPE OF BUSINESS LIKE THIS IN DUNCANVILLE, OR IS THIS THE FIRST? NO, THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST. WE ARE CURRENTLY OPERATING IN DALLAS, BUT MY FATHER BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY BACK IN AUGUST 2018, AND EVER SINCE HE PURCHASED IT, THAT'S BEEN HIS DREAM TO ACTUALLY BECAUSE WE ARE CURRENTLY RENTING OVER THERE AND HE WANTS TO HAVE HIS OWN DEALER. AND AGAIN, I REPEAT, THIS FAMILY OWNED, FAMILY OPERATED. AND REALLY, I MEAN, JUST TO OFFER THE DUNCANVILLE CITIZENS AN OPPORTUNITY TO GET PRE-OWNED NICE VEHICLES. THANK YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION. YES, I SEE THAT THE PROPOSED AUTO DEALERSHIP IS BACKING UP TO RESIDENTIAL AREAS, HOMES. CORRECT. WHAT DO YOU MEAN BEHIND YOUR. OH, LIKE IN THE BACK. IN THE BACK ARE HOMES. YES. CORRECT. OKAY. IS THERE A ALLEY OR ANYTHING THAT SEPARATES THE HOUSES FROM YOUR PROPOSED BUSINESS? YES. I BELIEVE THERE IS AN ALLEY IN THE BACK. OKAY. TO THE RIGHT AND TO THE LEFT OF YOU. WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESSES ARE CURRENTLY THERE? IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE PROPERTY TO THE RIGHT SIDE, IT WOULD BE A BODY SHOP AND LIKE OTHER TYPE OF LIKE WAREHOUSE. AND THEN TO THE LEFT IT WOULD BE A RESIDENTIAL. AND THEN ON THE OTHER SIDE IS EMPTY LOT AND THEN A TIRE SHOP. AND THEN IF YOU GO TO THE RIGHT, THERE'S MORE LIKE AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES AND THEN LIKE FIVE DOORS DOWN TO THE RIGHT, THERE'S ALREADY A AUTO LIKE A AUTO DEALERSHIP. OKAY. THANK YOU. YEAH. YOU'RE WELCOME. ARE THERE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. I DO HAVE ONE OTHER QUESTION FOR STAFF. WHAT WHAT IS IT CURRENTLY ZONED. WHAT IS IT CURRENTLY ZONED.CURRENTLY ZONED IS COMMERCIAL. ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME WE CAN OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVED. A VOTE FOR. YES. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, I WILL ACCEPT A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH ENTERTAIN A MOTION AT THIS TIME? I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THIS REQUEST. I, I, I WOULD LIKE TO SECOND IF THE MOVEMENT WOULD BE WILLING TO ENTERTAIN A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO HER MOTION WITH THE WITH WITH THE MOVEMENT, BE WILLING TO ENTERTAIN A TEN YEAR PERIOD. FOR THE MOTION. AND THEN WITHIN TEN YEARS, YOU KNOW, THE APPLICANT CAN COME BACK IN AND TALK ABOUT HOW THAT AREA IS PERFORMING. AND I THINK MY MOTION IS IN KEEPING WITH OTHER SIMILAR MOTIONS WE'VE MADE IN THE SAME BLOCK FACE. IF I'M NOTHING ELSE, I TRY TO BE CONSISTENT. AND SO I THINK THAT THIS WOULD BE IN KEEPING WITH MAKING SURE THEY'RE GOOD NEIGHBORS TO THEIR RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORS TO THE SOUTH OF THEM. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO THE MOTION IS TO APPROVE WITH A TEN YEAR PERIOD. AND THERE WAS A SECOND. YES YES, YES. UNANIMOUS
[5.F. Public hearing to hear public concerns pertaining to Moore Supply located on Crestview, Block C LT 20R ACS 0.9677, 3A, more commonly known as 626 Crestside Drive, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas. ]
[02:00:10]
APPROVAL. MOVING ON TO THE NEXT CASE. THANK YOU. MADAM, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS FOR SIX, TWO, SIX CREST DRIVE WITHIN THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, THE CITY. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST. THE CITY HAS RECEIVED CONCERNS FROM ADJACENT AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS PERTAINING TO THE OPERATION OF THE BUSINESS. THIS WAS ALSO KNOWN AS MORE SUPPLY. THEY HAVE THEIR MORE RECENT. BUILDING THAT'S MOVED IN WITHIN THE LAST CONSTRUCT, WITHIN THE LAST YEAR OR YEAR AND A HALF FOR THE PROPERTY, THERE HAVE BEEN SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS THAT HAVE. MADE CONCERNS TO THE CITY COUNCIL ABOUT TRUCK DELIVERY AND LATE HOUR DISTURBANCES IN AND AROUND THE AREA. THIS, THIS APPLICANT OR THIS. EXCUSE ME. THIS REQUEST WAS MADE TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY LEADERSHIP AND DIRECTION OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, A REQUEST WAS MADE FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO HEAR CONCERNS ON RECORD FROM THE PROPERTY OWNERS PERTAINING TO THE OPERATION OF MORE SUPPLY. AGAIN THIS EVENING. WE ARE HERE JUST TO TAKE IN ANY COMMENTS CONCERNS THAT MAY BE FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER OR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AS WELL. WE DID MAIL OUT EXCUSE ME, I'M WAY BEHIND. WE DID MAIL OUT NOTIFICATIONS FOR THIS MEETING.AGAIN, WE'RE NOT SEEKING AN OPPOSITION. WE'RE NOT SEEKING AGAINST ON THIS ONE. WE'RE HERE TO REALLY JUST HEAR CONCERNS THAT MAY THAT MAY BE OF THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER AND THEIR OPERATION OF THEIR BUSINESS ON THE PROPERTY AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY COUNCIL. INFORMATION THAT IS THAT IS RECEIVED THIS EVENING WILL BE BROUGHT BACK FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION OF WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS A NEED OR REQUEST TO REOPEN THE SCP THAT IS CURRENTLY ON THE PROPERTY. TO ADD ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO THE SCP FOR MORE SUPPLY. WITH THAT, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE FROM THE COMMISSION? YES, MA'AM. YES. SO I NOTICED ON ON THE PAGE THAT HAS ALL OF THE WHERE THE NOTICES WERE SENT, THERE'S ONLY ONE THAT WAS ACTUALLY. THE MAILING ADDRESS WAS 615 CREST DRIVE. THAT'S THE ONLY ONE THAT WAS ACTUALLY IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. SO I'M WONDERING IF THE OTHER RESIDENTS WERE ABLE TO BE NOTIFIED, EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE PROPERTY OWNER. I BELIEVE THIS WAS FOR THE PROPERTY OWNERS. CAN YOU STATE THAT AGAIN? IF YOU LOOK AT THE BACK OF THE PAGE THAT HAS THE MAILING ADDRESS, MAILING CITY, MAILING, ZIP MAILING STATE, I'M ASSUMING THAT'S WHERE THE NOTICES WERE MAILED TO. AND THERE IS ONLY ONE THAT IS ON CREST SIDE DRIVE. SEE WHAT I'M REFERRING TO? I'M LOOKING AT THE YES, I'M LOOKING IN YOUR PACKET. THERE ARE ABOUT 15 OR 20 NAMES. THERE'S MULTIPLE PROPERTIES ON CREST SIDE DRIVE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE MAILING LIST. SEEING THIS, THERE'S ALSO A MAP WITHIN YOUR PACKET THAT SHOWS ALL THE PROPERTIES THAT WERE NOTIFIED. THAT'S REGARDING THE ACTUAL PROPERTY, BUT WHERE THEY WERE MAILED TO IS ALL OF THESE. YEAH, THEY WERE ONLY ON THE NEXT PAGE FROM THE ONE YOU'RE LOOKING AT. YES, THERE'S YES MA'AM. THERE'S ONLY ONE. THERE'S ONLY 1 OR 2 THAT ARE CREST SIDE DRIVE. WE SENT IT TO THE ADDRESS FOR THAT IS THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY ADDRESS. THEY MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL THEY MAY HAVE A DIFFERENT MAILING NAME. BUT WE DID SEND IT OUT TO THE PROPERTY ADDRESS THAT'S ON FILE. OKAY. FOR THE PROPERTY I SEE I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, THAT THERE ARE A BUNCH OF THEM THAT HAVE OTHER MAILING ADDRESSES. BUT WHEN WE SENT IT OUT, THEY WERE NO, THEY WERE MAILED OUT TO THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES. OKAY. THANK YOU. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THE ACTUAL RESIDENTS WERE THE ONES THAT GOT THE NOTICE. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? I HAVE A QUESTION. SO HOW LONG IS THE SCP GRANTED FOR THERE? I DO NOT BELIEVE THERE WAS A TIME LIMIT PUT ON THAT SCP WERE WHAT WERE THE CONDITIONS OF THE PREVIOUS SUP? WHEN WAS THAT SUP PASSED? I'M LOOKING RIGHT NOW. I DO NOT SEE ANY SPECIFIC
[02:05:04]
REQUIREMENTS AS IT RELATES TO ADDITIONAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS OR ANYTHING ELSE. SO THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT WAS THE OPERATION FOR THE BUSINESS ON THE PROPERTY. BECAUSE OF, BECAUSE OF THE PROPOSED USE, WHICH WAS MOST LIKELY SOME FORM OF AUTO SALES ON THE PROPERTY REQUIRED. THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS THAT THE USE CORRECT AUTO SALES MORE SUPPLY. IT IS FOR IT IS FOR SALES, I BELIEVE. YES, SALES ARE AUTO SALES, NOT AUTO SALES. THE APPLICANT IS HERE AND THEY CAN. BUT BUT STAFF IS ALSO PRESENTING A CASE. SO I GUESS WHEN WAS THIS SUP APPROVED. 2024 I THOUGHT SO BY THIS BODY RIGHT. YES. YEAH I THINK I REMEMBER IT. YEAH.THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING. THANK YOU. WITH THE APPLICANT LIKE TO GIVE A PRESENTATION OR IS THAT GOING TO BE PRESENTED. THEY CAN IF YOU'D LIKE. THEY CAN EITHER SPEAK DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
OH OKAY. ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVED. STEPHANIE.
SECONDED. OH. SHE SECOND. OH, OKAY. OKAY. BUT MR. SALAZAR. YES YES YES YES. ALL RIGHT. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS FOR OR AGAINST. I MEAN, THIS ISN'T WE'RE NOT HEARING A CASE THAT'S GOING TO BE DECIDED ON. BUT IF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS REGARDING THIS, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. HELLO, MY NAME IS COREY BUGAY. I'M AT 626 CREST SIDE OPERATOR OF MORE SUPPLY. IN THE PACKET HERE. DID YOU GUYS HAVE THE DESIGNATIONS OF WHO WERE FOR AND WHO WERE AGAINST BY CHANCE? BECAUSE I PERSONALLY WALKED THE BLOCK AND GOT SIGNATURES FROM EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE PEOPLE IN THE AREA THAT WERE ALL FOR IT. IS THAT PART OF THE PACKET NOT SPEAKING FOR THE CHAIR, BUT OUR OUR PACKET CONSISTS OF WHO WAS IN THE NOTICE AREA AND WHERE THOSE NOTICES WENT. GOTCHA. I DON'T THINK THAT WE ARE INTELLIGENT TO THE NATURE OF THE OPPOSITION OR COMPLAINTS OR CONCERN, OR HOW THAT LAYS OUT WITH WHO YOUR NEIGHBORS ARE IN AND AROUND YOU. WE'RE KIND OF HEARING THIS FOR THE FIRST. UNDERSTOOD. SO MY UNDERSTANDING OF THIS FROM JEREMY KUNTZ, WHO'S THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBER FOR OUR DISTRICT, WAS THAT THERE WAS ONE INDIVIDUAL HOUSE ACROSS THE STREET FROM US THAT WAS LODGING COMPLAINTS DUE TO IDLING TRUCKS OVERNIGHT ON THE STREET. WE DO NOT OPERATE OVERNIGHT. WE'RE ONLY OPEN FROM 7 TO 5 MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. SO ANY OF THE DISTURBANCES FROM A TRUCK TRAFFIC STANDPOINT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN US. WE'VE ADHERED TO THE SCP THAT WAS PRESENTED BY THIS BOARD AND THE CITY COUNCIL, AND WENT THROUGH THIS PHASE WITH YOU GUYS. IN THE PAST, WE'VE BEEN GOOD NEIGHBORS TO THE AREA. YOU KNOW, WHEN WE WERE TALKING EARLIER ABOUT LOOKING FOR HOW WE GO FORWARD IN DUNCANVILLE OF INFILLING BUILDINGS, ATTRACTING AND FOSTERING BUSINESS, WE PRODUCE ABOUT $18 MILLION OF TAX REVENUE FOR THE CITY A YEAR, AND ON TOP OF THAT IS HOLDING FEES. AND FOR ACTUAL INVENTORY WITHIN THE BUILDING THAT WE PAY TO THE CITY AS WELL, AND THEN ALSO PROPERTY VALUES AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. WE JUST BUILT THAT BUILDING, WHICH WAS ROUGHLY $3.5 MILLION OF IMPROVEMENT TO THE CITY. WE WERE ALSO SUPPORTED BY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD, WHICH SUPPORTED THIS AND HELPED FUND OUR BUILDING OF THIS ESTABLISHMENT. THE ONE HOUSE THAT I'M AWARE OF THAT HAS COMPLAINED ABOUT THIS IN THE PAST, HASN'T PROVIDED ANY EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THIS CASE. SO IN MY MIND, INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. WE HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG. AND TO FURTHER THAT POINT, THE PERSON THAT HAD THAT HOUSE HAD NOT LIVED THERE FOR SOME TIME. THEY ADMITTED THAT TO ME THEMSELVES, AND THEY'VE SINCE PUT THAT HOUSE ON THE MARKET AND IT IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONTRACT. SO THEY ARE NOT EVEN LIVING THERE. THEY'RE LIVING IN ARLINGTON. AND I DID WALK THE BLOCK OF WHATEVER THE PROPOSED AREAS WERE, WHERE ALL OF THE MAILERS WENT OUT AND PROVIDED THAT. BACK TO DOCTOR JONES, THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, WITH ALL POSITIVE COMMENTS ABOUT HOW WE'VE BEEN GOOD NEIGHBORS AND SUPPORTIVE OF THE ENVIRONMENT. GO AHEAD. YOU WERE MENTIONING THE PERSON THAT
[02:10:01]
HAD THE COMPLAINT BECAUSE I READ THAT LETTER AND THEY WERE SAYING THAT THERE WERE ONLY TWO PEOPLE IN THE AREA WHERE I GUESS THIS HOUSE IS. HAVE YOU EVER HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO THAT NEIGHBOR? THAT WAS THE NEIGHBOR THAT I REFERRED TO. I WENT ACROSS THE STREET AND SPOKE WITH HIM AND ASKED IF THERE WAS ANYTHING THAT WE COULD DO TO HELP TO BE A BETTER NEIGHBOR.THEY SAID, YOU KNOW, THE TRUCK TRAFFIC, OVERNIGHT IDLING, THINGS OF THAT NATURE, WHICH WE DON'T OPERATE OVERNIGHT. SO I'M NOT SURE WHO THAT WAS. MY RECOMMENDATION TO THAT NEIGHBOR AT THE TIME WAS, IF SOMEBODY'S SITTING OUT ON THE STREET, CALL THE POLICE. THAT'S A CIVIL MATTER THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH OUR BUSINESS BECAUSE WE DON'T OPERATE OVERNIGHT. I HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THE CITY STREETS. THEY HAD CONCERN THAT THEY WANTED THE CITY TO MAKE CURBS ALONG THAT STREET PATH, TO MAKE IT SAFER FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND THEN POTENTIALLY SIGNS SAYING NO OVERNIGHT PARKING. BUT IN MY OPINION, THOSE DIDN'T APPLY TO MY BUSINESS. SO I DIDN'T HAVE ANY DIRECT RESOLUTION FOR THAT NEIGHBOR. SO WHERE YOUR WAREHOUSE IS, THERE'S NO WHEN THE BUSINESS IS CLOSED, THERE'S NO WAY FOR OTHER TRUCKS TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE BUILDING COMPLETELY GATED AND LOCKED. OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION. YES. SO HOW OFTEN ARE YOU ALL GETTING SHIPMENTS TO YOUR WAREHOUSE IN OUR NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS FROM 7 TO 5? YEAH, I WOULD SAY WE PROBABLY GET ABOUT 518 WHEELERS A DAY. 518 WHEELERS A DAY. YEAH. OKAY. AND WE HAVE A DESIGNATED 18 WHEELER UNLOADING DOCK THAT THEY ALL LEAVE THE MAIN STREET AND COME ONTO OUR PROPERTY FOR UNLOADING. OKAY. AND WHERE ARE YOU GETTING ALL OF THIS SUPPLIES FROM LIKE OUT OF STATE. SO WE'RE A PLUMBING WHOLESALER. SO WE BUY FROM MANUFACTURERS ACROSS THE UNITED STATES. RHEEM WATER HEATERS, KOHLER TOILETS. YOU KNOW, ANYTHING THAT YOU NEED TO USE FOR BUILDING A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE FOR COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES? WE THEN BREAK THOSE DOWN INTO SMALLER QUANTITIES, PACKAGE THEM FOR THE PLUMBERS, AND THEN SEND THOSE OUT TO JOBSITES FOR. SO WHENEVER YOU ALL GET YOUR SUPPLIES, ARE YOU WORKING WITH JUST ONE FREIGHT COMPANY, OR ARE YOU GETTING THE TRUCKS FROM THE COMPANIES THAT YOU BUY FROM? SO WE DON'T ACTUALLY SET UP ANY OF THE FREIGHT BROKERING. IT'S WE WILL PLACE A PURCHASE ORDER WITH, SAY, KOHLER OR RHEEM, AND THEN THEY DISPATCH A TRUCK AND I'M NOT SURE, YOU KNOW, EACH INDIVIDUAL INSTANCE, IF IT'S THEIR OWN INDIVIDUAL TRUCK OR IF THEY'RE USING A BROKER COMPANY AND YOU'VE NEVER HAD ANY TRUCKS WAITING IDLY FOR YOU GUYS TO OPEN IN ORDER TO DROP OFF A SHIPMENT. NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE. OUR RECEIVING HOURS AREN'T EVEN WITHIN OUR NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS. SO WE OPERATE FROM 7 TO 5, AND THEN OUR ACTUAL RECEIVING HOURS ARE FROM 8 TO 4. OKAY. AND YOU GIVE INSTRUCTIONS TO THEM SAYING THAT THEY CAN'T STAY IDLY OUTSIDE YOUR HOUSE BEFORE OR AFTER YOUR DELIVERY HOURS. I'VE NEVER PERSONALLY GIVEN THAT, AND I'VE NEVER PERSONALLY SEEN IT, SO THERE HASN'T BEEN A NEED. OKAY, SO THERE'S LIKE NO SYSTEM IN PLACE ESSENTIALLY JUST HERE'S WHAT I NEED, GUYS. GIVE IT TO ME DURING THESE HOURS. AND THEY KIND OF JUST GIVE IT TO YOU BETWEEN THOSE HOURS, BUT YOU DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT'S GOING AROUND OR GOING ON AROUND. SAME AS A WALMART OR. RIGHT, RIGHT, RIGHT, RIGHT. BUT THEY HAVE LIKE A HUGE PARKING LOT IN ORDER TO HAVE LIKE IDLING SEMIS AND STUFF LIKE THAT. IF THEY ALLOW THE SEMI TO BE THERE, I WOULD SAY YES. RIGHT? OKAY. NO, JUST JUST ASKING. THANK YOU. YEAH. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS EDNA RODRIGUEZ AND I LIVE ON 615 CRESCENT DRIVE. JUST FOR THE RECORD, I AM THE PERSON WHO LIVES RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM WATER SUPPLY. I HAVE BEEN COMPLAINING MY NEIGHBOR TO THE TO THE RIGHT HAS ACTUALLY SOLD HER HOUSE. SHE LEFT AND WHY NOT? SHE HAS HAD SOME COMPLAINTS AS WELL, BUT MY COMPLAINTS ARE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT FROM HER.
AND IF YOU BEAR WITH ME, I WILL GIVE YOU THE ISSUES IN A VERY SHORT SUMMARY, SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE CONSTRUCTION, WE'VE EXPERIENCED SEVERAL SEVERAL DISTURBANCES FROM LATE NIGHT CONSTRUCTION EARLY IN DATE. SO 24 HOURS THERE WERE I MEAN, IT WAS AN EVERY DAY, BUT IT WAS VERY CONSTANT, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THEY WERE TRYING TO GET THAT BUILDING MOVED UP OR WHATEVER. MY MAIN CONCERN WAS WHEN THEY WERE CONSTRUCTING THE BUILDING, THEY BROKE A PIPE THAT INTERRUPTED MY WATER FOR THREE DAYS. THAT CAUSED ME $3,000 FOR THE WATER TO FOR MY WATER BILL.
UP UNTIL THIS DAY, I'M STILL FIGHTING WITH THE CITY TO GET THAT RESOLVED. THE CITY TOOK NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE INCIDENT BECAUSE THEY'RE SAYING THAT WHATEVER HAPPENED, HAPPENED IN
[02:15:01]
MY HOME. I CONTACTED A PLUMBER, THEIR PLUMBING COMPANY. SO I CONTACTED A PLUMBING COMPANY TO COME IN AND REVIEW MY HOME TO SEE IF THERE WAS A $3,000 LEAK IN MY HOME. THERE WAS NO LEAK.THE CITY DID NOT DID NOT APPROVE THE STATEMENT FOR FROM THIS PLUMBING COMPANY. MORE SUPPLY HAS NEVER SPOKEN TO ME ANY TIME OF THIS WHOLE ENTIRE PROCESS. THERE HAS BEEN 18 WHEELERS PARKED IN FRONT OF MY HOME, WHICH IS WHICH IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEM. THEY DO WAIT FOR THEM TO OPEN OR TO OR WHENEVER THEY'RE CLOSED. THEY THEY COME IN AND THEY'RE LATE. THEN THEY THEY IDLE. THEY'RE RIGHT IN FRONT OF MY HOME, RIGHT IN FRONT OF MY ROOM. I UNDERSTAND IT'S A CIVIL MATTER, BUT I FIND IT SO SAD THAT HE'S THAT THEY'RE NOT TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE BUSINESS THAT THEY BROUGHT IN. SO WHEN THIS CONSTRUCTION WAS APPROVED, WE WERE NOT TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION. I MEAN, I'M THE ONLY RESIDENT LEFT IN THAT PROPERTY. SO THE WHOLE STREET IS, IS BUSINESSES. THERE'S NO ONE ELSE BUT ME. SO WHAT DO I DO NOW? LIKE, DO I RUN AWAY JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE A MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR COMPANY THAT YOU'RE BASICALLY SAYING THAT YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT MY FAMILY? I MEAN, I'VE BEEN IN THIS HOME FOR 25 YEARS, SO. YEAH, I DO. I'M SORRY AGAIN. I DID NOT CATCH YOUR LAST NAME. I'M SO SORRY. EDNA RODRIGUEZ. RODRIGUEZ. OKAY. I THOUGHT THAT'S WHAT I CAUGHT, MISS RODRIGUEZ. MORE SUPPLY HAS BEEN HERE FOR A LITTLE BIT, HASN'T THEY? HAVEN'T THEY? THEY STARTED ABOUT A YEAR AGO. ABOUT A YEAR AGO. OR DID THEY EXPAND? I CAN'T REMEMBER. SO THEY'RE OKAY. SO. SO I THOUGHT IT WAS AN EXTENSION. SO BECAUSE I ALSO WAS ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION. SO I MY, MY RECORD GOES BACK A LITTLE WAYS. I THOUGHT THEY EXTENDED TO A BACK PARCEL. I DON'T HAVE ANY KNOWLEDGE OF THAT. OKAY. BUT WHAT I SAW FOR THOSE 25 YEARS, THERE WAS A BIG EMPTY LOT RIGHT FROM MY HOUSE FOR AS LONG AS AS I'VE BEEN THERE. RIGHT? RIGHT. THERE WAS AN EMPTY LOT THERE. I DON'T KNOW IF THEY EXPANDED.
OKAY. YOU'RE NOT SURE. SO THE LOT WENT FROM EMPTY TO BEING TO BEING TO BEING BUILT. AND SO SINCE THEN, YOU'VE HAD THAT. THIS HAS BEEN YOUR EXPERIENCE. I JUST WANTED TO UNDERSTAND BECAUSE I DON'T I DIDN'T KNOW THEM TO BE A BRAND NEW, NEW NEIGHBOR, I THINK. BUT THEY'RE NEWER NEIGHBOR TO YOU DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF YOU. OKAY, I'M CLEAR NOW. THANK YOU, MISS RODRIGUEZ.
SO AGAIN, YOU KNOW, MY COMPLAINT WITH THEM HAS NEVER BEEN ANYTHING ELSE, BUT I WAS DISAPPOINTED IN THE CITY AND THE BUILDING THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY COURTESY TO AT LEAST. TAKE CARE OF THAT WHEN THEY BROKE, WHEN THEIR CONSTRUCTION, AND I BELIEVE IT WAS IN THEM, IT WAS WHOEVER THEY CONTRACTED, THEY BROKE THE PIPE AND THEY LEFT IT ALONE. THEY LEFT UNTIL I CAME HOME AND IT WAS THERE WAS NO WATER. THEN I CALLED THE CITY, AND THE CITY SAYS, WELL, YOU NEED TO GET WITH THEM. AND THEN HOW AM I GOING TO CONTACT THEM? YOU KNOW, IT IS NOT MY FAULT. I AM NOT HERE TO FIGHT WITH THEM. I AM NOT HERE TO FIGHT WITH ANYBODY. I'M NOT LOOKING FOR YOU TO TEAR DOWN OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. I'M JUST LOOKING FOR A GOOD FAITH FROM THE CITY AND FROM THEM. BE. BE CONSIDERATE, YOU KNOW? YES. YOU CAN CONTACT YOUR VENDORS. YES, YOU CAN LET THEM KNOW. HEY, I OPENED IT THIS TIME AND I CLOSED IT THIS TIME. WE RECOMMEND THAT YOUR TRUCKS DO NOT PASS THROUGH HERE BECAUSE THERE'S GOING TO BE NOBODY THERE. LIKE, LITERALLY THE PARK RIGHT IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE. AND YOU CAN BARELY PASS THROUGH. SO IF THEY PARK IN THAT STREET, WHETHER IT'S THEIR PROBLEM OR CITY PROBLEM, I DON'T KNOW. BUT IF THE TRUCK PARKS THERE, THEN TWO CARS CANNOT PASS BY. AND THEN ON TOP OF THAT, THEY PARK RIGHT BY MY WATER METER AND THEN THE ENGINE IS ON, MY ROOM IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEM. AND IS IT FAIR FOR ME TO CALL DUNCANVILLE POLICE FOR THAT, SINCE I ALREADY CALLED THEM FOR OTHER ISSUES THAT WE HAVE IN THE STREET? I MEAN, DUNCANVILLE POLICE IS ALREADY LIKE, THEY'RE LIKE, WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THE STREET? YOU KNOW, LIKE WE NEVER HAVE ISSUES HERE. BUT THEN NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN WE HAVE ISSUES, YOU KNOW? BUT IT'S SO. I'M SO ANGRY THAT NEITHER THE CITY OR THEM ARE TAKING CONSIDERATION OF THE ONLY RESIDENT THAT'S THERE. YOU KNOW, I DO UNDERSTAND MY NEIGHBOR HAD OTHER ISSUES. I'M NOT HERE TO SPEAK ON HER. I'M HERE TO SPEAK ON ME. THAT'S IT. AND I'M SORRY FOR MY FRUSTRATION, BUT THINGS THAT HE SAID, YOU KNOW, I HAVE NEVER MET THIS MAN. I HAVE NEVER MET ANYBODY THERE. AND IT'S ONLY MY MOTHER, MYSELF AND MY DAUGHTER THERE. SO AS YOU CAN UNDERSTAND, IT'S VERY FRUSTRATING. THANK YOU FOR SPEAKING. ANY QUESTIONS? THANKS. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO HAS A COMMENT? ALL RIGHT. SEEING THAT WE WILL CLOSE THE OKAY. HELLO GUYS. MY NAME IS SONIA
[02:20:11]
COLBERT. NEXT DOOR TO MORE SUPPLY YOUR ADDRESS PLEASE. OH 620 CREST I DRIVE. OKAY. IT'S RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO MORE SUPPLIES. I'M THE PROPERTY MANAGER. THIS IS ONE OF MY TENANTS. I JUST WANT TO EXPRESS THAT WE DON'T HAVE A COMPLAINT. IT IS LIKE HOW MANY INCHES? LIKE, LITERALLY LIKE TWO. LIKE TWO INCHES BY THE BUILDING. IT DOESN'T AFFECT HIS OPERATION OR BUSINESS. IT DOESN'T THE BUILDING. THE BUILDING DIDN'T AFFECT US AT ALL. WE DID HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE FIRE. THE WAY THEY BUILD IT ON THE GROUND. OUR COMPANY DID, AND WE WERE A LITTLE BIT OVER ON THEIR SIDE, BUT WE CAME TO AGREEMENT. SO I MEAN, THEIR BUILDING IS GOOD.NOTHING HAPPENED. NO BREAKS IN THE LINES. SO I JUST WANT TO I'M HERE TO SUPPORT MORE SUPPLIES AND LET YOU GUYS KNOW THAT WE DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM. AND WE'RE LITERALLY LIKE SO MANY FEETS AWAY. AND YOU HAVE A BUSINESS THERE. YES. OKAY. YES. AT 620 CREDITS ITEM HE HAS, HE'S LEASING THE BUILDING AND I'M THE PROPERTY MANAGER. YES, MA'AM. MADAM CHAIR. BUT MISS HOLBROOK.
YEAH. I'M SORRY, MISS HOLBROOK, I, I WHEN THEY FIRST CAME IN, DID Y'ALL NOT SHARE A DRIVE APPROACH OR SOMETHING ABOUT A FIRE LANE? YES, SIR. YEAH. BECAUSE IT WAS BETWEEN BOTH OF THOSE PROPERTIES. YES. THE INGRESS AND EGRESS WITH THE FIRE MARSHAL WAS WAS AN ISSUE THAT Y'ALL HAD TO WORK OUT WITH THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE CONCRETE, RIGHT? YES, SIR. I MAY BE CRAZY, BUT I'M NOT FORGETFUL. THANK YOU. YES, YES, THAT'S WHY I WAS MENTIONED EARLIER. WE WORKED EVERYTHING OUT. YEAH. OKAY. I HAVE A QUESTION. SO YOU DO NOT ACTUALLY LIVE ON THAT STREET? YOU JUST HAVE A BUSINESS? YES. I'VE BEEN MANAGING THAT PROPERTY FOR 15 YEARS PLUS. AND WHAT ARE THE TIMES THAT Y'ALL ARE AT THAT BUILDING? ME AS A PROPERTY MANAGER? YES. OR HIM AS RUNNING THE BUSINESS? WELL, I'M JUST WONDERING THE TIMES THAT SOMEONE IS ACTUALLY THERE WHEN MORE IS OPEN OR WHEN THEY'RE CLOSED. ARE Y'ALL EVER THERE? WHEN THEY'RE CLOSED, THEY GO AHEAD. GOOD EVENING. HOW Y'ALL DOING TODAY? MY NAME IS ADRIAN JACKSON. I'M THE TENANT AT 620 CREST DRIVE.
AND CAN I LIFT THIS UP? MY BACK WAS HURTING. WE'RE THERE. MY ESTABLISHMENT IS ACTUALLY 24 HOURS, BUT WE DON'T OPERATE 24 HOURS. BUT THE PUBLIC HAS 24 HOUR ACCESS. IF YOU WERE TO SAY YOU WORKED THIRD SHIFT AND YOU WANT TO GET A TATTOO OR A PIERCING OR SOMETHING, THEN YOU CAN BOOK WITH AN ARTIST WHO YOU'LL HAVE ACCESS TO THE BUILDING TO GET THAT SERVICE.
WE'VE BEEN THERE, USUALLY PRETTY MUCH THE WHOLE TIME THEY THERE, WE THERE. AND IT'S A LOT OF COMPLAINING, BUT CAN I DON'T KNOW HOW I SUPPOSED TO TALK WITH HER. CAN I JUST STOP THE PERSON THAT'S DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM ME IS THE ONE WHO HAS BEEN SINCE I'VE BEEN THERE, GOING ON FOUR YEARS. IT'S BEEN NONSTOP. THAT AND IT WAS ALSO WHEN I FIRST MOVED IN. SHE WOULD I WAS A FRIENDLY NEIGHBOR AND IT WAS, HEY, LET ME TELL YOU HOW I DID THE PERSON BEFORE YOU. SO IT'S A HISTORY THERE WITH THE PERSON, NOT THE YOUNG LADY WHO WAS SPEAKING. SO I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THAT, BUT THE ONE WHO MADE THE COMPLAINT, THAT'S WHAT IT IS CONSISTENTLY NONSTOP. AND THAT'S WHY I CAME HERE TODAY, BECAUSE IT WAS LIKE, OKAY, WELL, IT'S KIND OF LIKE SOME BULLYING. AND NOW I SEE SOMEBODY ELSE AND HE DOESN'T GIVE ANYBODY NO PROBLEMS. WE ARE LITERALLY TWO INCHES FROM EACH OTHER. IF I TAKE A STEP TO THE LEFT, I'M ON HIS PROPERTY AND IT'S REAL POLITE, IT'S RESPECTFUL, IT'S NOT NOTHING BAD OR I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY WHAT SHE WAS SPEAKING ON. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE WATER SITUATION, BUT THAT'S DIFFERENT. BUT I'M JUST HERE TO SPEAK AND SAY THAT WE HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THEM AT MOORE'S, AND WE'RE IN SUPPORT OF IT. I HAVE A QUESTION. SO WHAT ARE THE COMPLAINTS THAT YOU'RE RECEIVING FROM THE PERSON IN FRONT OF YOU? THE PERSON IN FRONT OF ME WOULD SAYING. THE POLICE TO MY PROPERTY AND SAY THAT THERE WERE PEOPLE PARKED IN MY HANDICAP WITHOUT A HANDICAP STICKER, OKAY. AND THEN THEY WOULD COME AND THEN I WOULD SAY IT'S OKAY. THEN THEY WOULD LEAVE, AND THEN THEY WOULD COME BACK AND SAY, HEY, SHE CALLED AGAIN. THEN I WOULD SAY, DO Y'ALL GOT TO COME OUT EVERY SINGLE TIME SHE CALLED
[02:25:05]
AND SAY, YEAH, YOU KNOW. AND IT WOULD BE STUFF LIKE THAT. NOT ABOUT TRUCKS THOUGH. SO THIS IS MY FIRST TIME HEARING THIS, SO I DON'T REALLY KNOW ABOUT THE ISSUE THAT SHE WAS HAVING WITH HIM. AGAIN, I'M JUST HERE BECAUSE I KNOW HE'S A GOOD NEIGHBOR AND I DON'T WANT TO SEE NOTHING. YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? YEAH, THIS IS MY FIRST TIME DOING THIS, SO I DON'T KNOW. I'M JUST HERE TO SAY MAWMAW'S SUPPLY IS GOOD NEIGHBORS AND IT'S NOT TOO LOUD. AND ANOTHER THING, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA, BUT IT'S ALL BUSINESSES, RIGHT? THERE'S ONLY I HEARD SOMEONE ASKING A QUESTION ABOUT. I THINK IT WAS YOU. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT WAS ASKING A QUESTION ABOUT THE MAP, AND IF SOME OF Y'ALL WERE SURE EVERYBODY GOT A NOTICE TO COME TO MY LEFT, TO MY RIGHT, TO THAT RIGHT, TO THAT LEFT, IT'S ALL BUSINESSES. THERE WAS ONLY MAYBE THREE HOUSES ON THE ENTIRE STREET. AND THOSE THREE HOUSES, ONE OF THEM WAS TORE DOWN AND TURNED INTO ANOTHER BUSINESS. AND THEN THERE WAS THE ONE THAT I BELIEVE HAS MADE THE COMPLAINT. SHE WAS THERE. AND THEN NEXT DOOR TO HER WAS THE YOUNG LADY THAT CAME IN HERE A MINUTE AGO THAT WAS IN HERE. SO THAT'S THE REASON WHY SHE'S SAYING SHE'S THE ONLY ONE LEFT.BECAUSE EVEN SINCE I'VE BEEN THERE, THERE'S ONLY BEEN THREE HOUSES AND ONLY TWO OF THEM HAVE BEEN OCCUPIED. IF THAT GIVES IT ANY KIND OF LIGHT AT ALL. SO THE ONLY TWO RESIDENCES ON THE STREET ARE THE ONLY PEOPLE COMPLAINING, AND THEY'RE AT YOUTUBE. THE NEIGHBORS, THEY'RE GOING TO SAY THEY HAD YOUTUBE BECAUSE MY I DIDN'T THEY DIDN'T CALL ME TO COME HERE. HE ASKED, HE JUST GOT A PAPER SIGN. WHEN HE TOLD ME WHAT WAS GOING ON, I HAD A LETTER. SO SHE SAID THAT WE SHOULD COME UP HERE AND I WANT TO SAY MY PIECE SINCE I'M A PART OF THE COMMUNITY, OKAY. BUT I DON'T KNOW WHO I'LL GET COMPLAINED ABOUT. BUT ACROSS THE STREET THERE'S ONLY TWO HOUSES AND ONE. THE LADY WHO'S COMPLAINING HASN'T LIVED THERE IN A YEAR, AND SHE MADE US, SHE TOLD. SHE SAID THAT SHE JUST WANTED TO KEEP THIS GOING EVEN THOUGH SHE DOESN'T LIVE THERE.
IF THAT SHED ANY LIGHT ON EVERYTHING, I'M JUST. OKAY. THANK YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION.
YES, MA'AM. HAVE YOU EVER WITNESSED ANY SEMI TRUCKS PARKING ON THE BLOCK? PARKING ON THE BLOCK WHERE SHE LIVES? MAYBE NOT IN FRONT OF HER HOUSE, BUT IN THAT AREA. THE STREET IS A NARROW STREET. AND WHEN YOU COME FROM EITHER END, IF I'M BEING HONEST, IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE A SEMI TRUCK. IF THERE IS A ANY CAR, IT COULD BE A SLUG BUG BEETLE PARKED RIGHT THERE. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE ENOUGH ROOM FOR TWO PEOPLE TO DO THAT REGARDLESS. SO IN HIS DEFENSE, THE WAY HIS BUILDING SITS, HIS DRIVEWAY AND HER DRIVEWAY IS KIND OF LIKE THIS. SO EVEN IF THAT TRUCK DOES NOT SIT ON THE SIDE, IF THEY'RE JUST COMING, SOMEONE'S GOING TO HAVE TO WAIT.
WHEN I'M COMING DOWN THE STREET, I HAVE TO KIND OF SCOOT OVER TO LET SOMEONE PASS, WHICH I DON'T MIND DOING. IT'S NOT A PROBLEM, YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? BUT THAT'S JUST THE WAY THAT THAT STREET IS. SO I DON'T THINK IT'S I'M NOT. AGAIN, I'M NOT HERE TO SPEAK ON HERS, BUT IT'S THE STREET IS BUILT THAT WAY. IT'S KIND OF VERY NARROW. OKAY. THANK YOU. VERY GOOD. ALSO, A ROOFING COMPANY THAT HAULS SUPPLIES AS WELL. THAT'S KIND OF ADJACENT TO MORE SUPPLIES. SO THEY HAVE 18 WHEELER FLATBEDS GOING UP AND DOWN THE STREET AS WELL. AND I ALSO WANT TO ADDRESS WE DID THE OWNER DID GET A 518 NORTH BRITTON ROAD. WE RECEIVED THE PAPERWORK AND I KNOW YOU WERE QUESTIONING ABOUT THAT. SO WE DID ACTUALLY RECEIVE THAT INFORMATION OKAY. FURTHER. OKAY.
THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS. THEN I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND. YES. OH, SORRY. YES. SO THERE'S NOTHING FOR US TO DELIBERATE OR. MARK, JUST CONFIRM A COUPLE OF THINGS HERE IN DIRECTION. OKAY. THANK YOU. BRENNAN. GOOD EVENING.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEMBERS. MARK RAUSCHER, CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE. BASICALLY TONIGHT, THE PURPOSE WAS TO ESSENTIALLY HOST A PUBLIC HEARING, WHICH WHICH YOU ALL HAVE DONE JUST SO THAT WE COULD GET ON THE ON THE RECORD. YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT
[02:30:05]
THAT STAFF HAS BEEN HEARING ABOUT AS WELL ABOUT THIS, ABOUT THIS AREA. AND OF COURSE, THERE WAS NO. YOU KNOW, RECOMMENDATION NECESSARY TONIGHT. THERE, THERE, YOU KNOW, IF YOU DID WANT TO, YOU KNOW, AT A FUTURE DATE, REOPEN THE SCP AND EXPLORE OTHER SOLUTIONS. YOU KNOW, THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S YOUR PURVIEW. BUT, YOU KNOW, TONIGHT WE JUST WANTED TO, YOU KNOW, PER OUR CITY COUNCIL, WE WANTED TO GO AHEAD AND HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING TONIGHT JUST TO BE ABLE TO GET, YOU KNOW, ON THE RECORD SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAD BEEN HEARING ABOUT. AND I THINK WE WERE SUCCESSFUL IN THAT EFFORT TONIGHT. SO HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. YES, SIR. JUST REALLY QUICK. THE FIRST QUESTION I HAVE, AND I REALLY HATE TO BELABOR THE HOUR, BUT I GUESS MY FIRST QUESTION TO YOU IS BASED ON THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND I ASSUME THAT YOU WILL GIVE A FEEDBACK. YOU WILL GIVE FEEDBACK ON WHAT THIS PUBLIC HEARING DISCOVERED TO THOSE TO THAT MEMBER OR THOSE MEMBERS OF COUNCIL WHO ASK THAT WE DO THIS, IF FOR SOME REASON, THEY HAD ANY TYPE OF CONCERN ABOUT WHAT YOU WERE ABLE TO CONFIRM BY WAY OF DISCOVERY, WHAT WAS FOUND IN DISCOVERY TONIGHT, COULD THIS FEASIBLY COME BACK BEFORE US? I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE ORDER OF OPERATION. SURE. IT VERY WELL COULD. ONE THING WE'VE TALKED ABOUT ON OUR SIDE IS TO IS TO LOOK AT ADDITIONAL POLICE ENFORCEMENT OF, YOU KNOW, THE PARKING SITUATION. AND I MEAN, IF YOU GO OUT THERE, YOU CAN SEE WHERE, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE POSTED, YOU KNOW, NO PARKING SIGNS IN FRONT OF THEIR HOMES, FOR EXAMPLE. BUT WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THE NEED AND HAVE ALREADY HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT ABOUT JUST STEPPING UP ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY THERE. BUT NOW, JUST AS A PRACTICAL MATTER THAT'S RELATED TO SOME OTHER THINGS THAT I HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE INTEREST IN, HOW DOES THIS BODY GO ABOUT IF THERE IS AN SUP THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON, TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE CONDITIONS AND ALL THAT STUFF AND HOW IT'S OPERATING, WHAT WOULD BE THAT PROCESS? WELL, IT WOULD IT WOULD BE COMING BACK HERE, YOU KNOW, REOPENING THE SUP TO SEE IF THERE ARE ANY ADDITIONAL, YOU KNOW, TREATMENTS THAT NEED TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON, ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT THAT HAD THE SUP.OF COURSE, IT'S ACROSS THE STREET FROM, YOU KNOW, THE HOMEOWNERS. I'M JUST TALKING GENERALLY. RIGHT. SURE. SO WOULD THAT JUST BE ONE OF US ASKING THAT QUESTION OF STAFF THAT WE HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PARTICULAR SUP. YES YOU CAN. OKAY. ALL RIGHT, I JUST
[6.A. Request of Centro Familiar Cristiano De Dallas, Owner and Applicant, for approval of a preliminary plat. Lots 7A, 7B, and 7C, Block 5/6948 Centro Familiar Cristiano Addition, more commonly known as 718 Cavan Street, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas]
WONDERED. THANK YOU. SURE. THANK YOU. OKAY, SO THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS A SERIES OF PLATS.SIX A DOES STAFF HAVE A PRESENTATION? ALL RIGHT. WELL, THAT CONCLUDES ALL THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. ALL RIGHT. HOPEFULLY WE CAN MOVE THROUGH THIS PRETTY QUICK FIRST PLAT FOR YOU THIS EVENING IS LOCATED AT 718 CAVEN ROAD. THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OR SF TEN. ON YOUR SCREEN IS THE MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR SF TEN DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY THAT'S HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE IS THE PROPERTY THAT'S IN QUESTION. FOR CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT, IT IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT. THE APPLICANT IS LOOKING TO CREATE THREE LOTS. SO IT DOES TRIGGER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT PROCESS. IT IS CURRENTLY VACANT AND IS OWNED BY THE CHURCH THAT IS LOCATED TO THE EAST OF THE PROPERTY. THEY ARE LOOKING TO CREATE THREE RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AS YOU CAN SEE ON YOUR MAP HERE FOR CONSIDERATION. WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL. QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. IF YOU GO BACK TO THE. YEAH.
THIS AREA IS ALL RESIDENTIAL, CORRECT? YES. OKAY. THE ALL THE SURROUNDING AREA, INCLUDING THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, IS ALL RESIDENTIAL. THERE ARE SOME PROPERTIES ALONG, AS YOU CAN SEE, ALONG COCKRELL HILL ROAD THAT ARE MORE OF A COMMERCIAL NATURE. BUT THIS PROPERTY SPECIFICALLY IS RESIDENTIAL. AND. THEN REGARDING THIS OR I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. THERE'S NO PUBLIC HEARING. NO. I SECOND OKAY, MOTION IS APPROVED. THERE'S BEEN A MOTION AND A
[02:35:17]
SECOND. SO LET'S VOTE. OH YEAH. YES, YES. THANK YOU. MOTION IS A THE PLAT IS APPROVED. ITEM SIX B[6.B. Request of Pascal Mike Aghyarian, Applicant, for approval of a replat of Lot 13, and portions of Lot 14 and 15, Block 3 of Woodhaven Addition to Lot 13R, Block 3 of Woodhaven Addition, more commonly known as 214 E. Red Bird Lane, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas.]
THE SECOND PLAT THAT'S IN FRONT OF YOU IS A REPLAT FOR 214 EAST REDBIRD LANE WITHIN THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. THE CURRENT ZONING ON THE PROPERTY IS RETAIL OR COMMERCIAL LAND USE. EXCUSE ME, THE LAND USE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. LAND USE DESIGNATION IS RETAIL COMMERCIAL. THE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT IS COMMERCIAL ON THE PROPERTY. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS THAT ARE LISTED ON THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR THE PROPERTY. WE'VE HIGHLIGHTED THE TWO PROPERTIES IN QUESTION. THIS IS A REPLAT TO JOIN TWO EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES INTO ONE INTO ONE PARCEL OF LAND. I BELIEVE THERE THIS IS A, I'LL SAY, AN OUTSTANDING ONE. THERE'S AN EXISTING BUSINESS THAT OPERATES OUT THERE, I BELIEVE I BELIEVE THEY'RE LOOKING TO IMPROVE THE PROPERTY AND CLEAN UP. THERE'S A BUNCH OF CARS AND STRIPING, SO THEY ARE LOOKING TO ENHANCE THE PROPERTY THAT IS CURRENTLY OUT THERE RIGHT NOW ALONG ALONG THE PROPERTY. BUT IN ORDER TO MEET THE FIRE DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS AND ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY, THEY NEED TO MERGE OR REPLAT THE PROPERTY INTO ONE. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THERE IS A CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT THAT IS BEING PROPOSED ON THE PROPERTY FOR FIRE SAFETY PURPOSES. OUR RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE REPLAT. I'M JUST CURIOUS, WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THE BUSINESS? IT IS AN AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS THAT'S OUT THERE RIGHT NOW. I DON'T KNOW THE SPECIFIC ON THE CURRENT USE OUT THERE. BUT I KNOW IT'S AUTOMOTIVE IN NATURE. QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION? WANT TO SEE A MOTION TO APPROVE? BECCA.OH, YES YES YES. AND LAST LAST REPLIED ON YOUR AGENDA THIS EVENING IS FOR 623 JEFFERSON
[6.C. Request of April Ross with Burns Surveying, Applicant and James and Alfreda Coffey, Owner for approval of a replat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 35 of Irwin Keasler Development, Red Bird Addition, Unit No. 5, Plat Book 19, Page 257 to Lot 1-A, Block 25, Irwin Keasler Development, Red Bird Addition, Unit No. 5 , more commonly known as 623 Jellison Boulevard & 627 Jungle Road, City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas. ]
BOULEVARD AND 627 JUNGLE ROAD. THIS IS THE PROPERTY IS FUTURE LAND USE. LAND USE DESIGNATION IS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED SF TEN FOR SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT.MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS ARE LOCATED ON THE BOTTOM OF THE OF THE PAGE. FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. THE APPLICANT, CURRENTLY SIMILAR TO THE LAST APPLICATION IN FRONT OF YOU, THE. THERE IS TWO SEPARATE PARCELS THAT ARE OUT THERE TO DATE, ONE THAT HAS A HOME ON IT WHICH IS ON THE EAST OR ON THE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. THEY'RE LOOKING TO JOIN THE PROPERTY THAT IS ON THE CORNER OF JUNGLE DRIVE AND JELLISON BOULEVARD INTO ONE HOLISTIC PARCEL OF LAND, AND WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR THE FOR THE REPLAT. QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION. WHAT WAS THE NATURE OF THE REQUEST FOR REPLAT? AGAIN, THEY ARE LOOKING THEY OWN THE PROPERTY, OWNS BOTH PROPERTIES. THEY'RE LOOKING TO JOIN THE PROPERTIES TOGETHER. DO YOU KNOW IF THEY'RE PLANNING TO USE IT FOR BUILDING ANOTHER RESIDENT? I BELIEVE IT'S JUST AN EXPANSION OF THEIR EXISTING PROPERTY ON THE SITE. ORDINANCES ONLY ALLOW ONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT PER PROPERTY. CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT'S THE SIZE OF THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY? WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? THE SIZE. THAT SIZE IS ABOUT 35,000FT■!S, I BELIEVE. ALMOST PROBABLY ABOUT THREE QUARTERS OF AN ACRE. APPROXIMATE. WOULD YOU GO BACK? SORRY. COULD YOU GO BACK ONE? YEAH. OKAY. OKAY.
THAT'S HELPFUL. THANK YOU. THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO SAY. THANK YOU. I MOVE TO APPROVE. SO MOVED. OKAY. NOW WE WILL GO BACK TO THE. TOPIC OF. GO BACK TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. I'M GOING
[4. Draft Comprehensive Plan Update (Part 2 of 2)]
[02:40:04]
TO. MATT, ARE YOU THERE? THIS IS FROZEN IN TIME. I SEE A FACE. I SEE A FACE. MATT, CAN YOU SPEAK? YES. OKAY, THERE WE GO. I JUST WANT TO. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE CAN HEAR YOU. THANK YOU.OKAY, WELL, WE CAN REALLY WORK THROUGH THIS IN A NUMBER OF WAYS, BUT I KNOW THE COMMISSION HAS HAD THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR A MONTH OR SO NOW, AND, AND I ANTICIPATE THAT YOU'VE REVIEWED IT AND, AND HAVE EITHER QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATIONS OR, OR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER AS WE MOVE FORWARD. SO HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN ANY QUESTIONS AND PROVIDE ANY INSIGHT WE CAN OFFER IN TERMS OF HOW THE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS CAME TOGETHER. I'M SORRY MATT, WE'RE TRYING TO INCREASE THE VOLUME. CAN YOU HEAR ME BETTER NOW THAT SAME ABOUT THE SAME SAME. OKAY. AWESOME. OKAY. I'M SCARED TO TOUCH ANYTHING. I DON'T WANT TO TOUCH. THERE'S A CONTROL THING RIGHT HERE. YEAH, YEAH, I THINK WHEN I CAME OUT EARLIER. WHEN I PUT IT IN MY.
NO, I DON'T HAVE IT ON TWO. OUT HERE ON MY DESK. I'LL BE RIGHT BACK. OKAY? GOOD. GUYS, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL ASK ANGEL. YOU DON'T HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? I DO HAVE A QUESTION. THERE WERE SEVERAL PEOPLE. THERE WERE SEVERAL PEOPLE AT THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THE FIELDHOUSE WHO HAD COMMENTS. AND I JUST WONDERED IF THOSE HAD BEEN ADDRESSED AND INCORPORATED IN SOME WAY OR ADDRESSED AT ALL. SO WE'VE WE'VE NOT MADE CHANGES BASED ON THOSE COMMENTS. WE HAVE COMPILED THEM AND ARE PREPARED TO DISCUSS THEM WITH CITY COUNCIL. THE, THE, THE PURPOSE OF THAT HEARING WAS FOR, FOR CITY COUNCIL TO END THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION TO TAKE IN FEEDBACK. IT WOULD BE AT, AT YOUR DISCRETION, TO RECOMMEND CHANGES BASED ON THAT, BASED ON THOSE COMMENTS AND THEN AT CITY COUNCIL'S DISCRETION TO INCORPORATE ANY CHANGES IN THE PLAN. BUT BASICALLY THE PURPOSE OF THAT, OF THAT PUBLIC HEARING WAS TO JUST RECEIVE THAT FEEDBACK. SO WE'VE NOT RECEIVED ANY OTHER DIRECTION FROM CITY COUNCIL AT THIS TIME? NO, MADAM CHAIR, AND IF I IF I MAY, ALONG THOSE LINES, I HEARD MANY OF THOSE COMMENTS, AND I THINK SOME OF THOSE COMMENTS, IN MY OPINION, WERE GERMANE TO THE ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN. BUT I KNOW THAT WE HEARD WITHOUT KEEPING A FULL ACCOUNT. I KNOW THAT WE HEARD A LOT OF COMMENTS RELATED TO, YOU KNOW, WHAT WILL THIS PLAN DO TO ENSURE THE EMPLOYABILITY AND THE WORKFORCE AND SOME OF THOSE OTHER THINGS THAT I REALLY DO BELIEVE ARE OUTSIDE OF THE PURVIEW AND THE CONTEMPLATION OF THIS PLAN. BUT DEFINITELY, I THINK OTHER COMMENTS AROUND THAT ARE REALLY WORTHWHILE FOR US TO THINK ABOUT, I THINK AS A COMMUNITY. BUT. MR. HORN DID NOT SAY THIS, BUT MANY OF THE COMMENTS RELATED ABOUT, YOU KNOW, WHAT ARE WE DOING ABOUT TO ENSURE THAT WE'RE CREATING THE NEXT GENERATION OF PEOPLE WHO CAN AFFORD TO LIVE IN THE CITY. AND I AGREE WITH ALL OF THAT PHILOSOPHICALLY. BUT PRACTICALLY, THIS THIS PLAN IS ABOUT FUTURE LAND USE AND HOW BEST WHAT'S THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE FOR LAND USE. AND I THINK THAT MR. HORN'S PERSUASIVE ARGUMENT ABOUT THE AFFORDABILITY AND WHERE INDIVIDUALS WERE FROM AN INCOME PERSPECTIVE FURTHER DROVE THAT DISCUSSION, AND I THINK THOSE ARE WORTHWHILE AND VERY TRUE CONSIDERATIONS. BUT I'M NOT REAL SURE HOW MANY OF THOSE COMMENTS WE HEARD AS IT RELATED TO THOSE ITEMS COULD BE ADEQUATELY AND OR APPROPRIATELY ACCOUNTED FOR WITHIN THE 2024, WITHIN THE 2040 COMP PLAN. THAT THAT WAS JUST MY REACTION TO, I THINK A LOT OF WHAT I HEARD THAT EVENING AT THE COMMUNITY
[02:45:02]
MEETING. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? MATT, CAN YOU SPEAK AGAIN? SURE. CAN YOU KEEP GOING FOR A SECOND? YEAH, I, I WOULD SAY PARTICULARLY RELATIVE TO, TO THAT OBSERVATION, YOU KNOW, WE'LL HAVE ADDITIONAL CONVERSATION WITH THE EDC IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS. WE'RE MEETING WITH THAT GROUP WHO WHO ALSO HAS A VESTED INTEREST IN EMPLOYABILITY AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, AND SOME OF THE KIND OF ASSOCIATED SIDE CONVERSATIONS THAT HAVE HAPPENED SINCE THAT LAST PUBLIC HEARING HAVE CENTERED ON, HEY, ARE THERE PARTNERS IN THE COMMUNITY THAT WE COULD ENGAGE IN IN WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CONVERSATIONS AND TRAINING? BECAUSE CERTAINLY, AS HAS BEEN NOTED, THOSE ARE CRITICAL AREAS THAT THE CITY MAY TAKE AN ADVOCACY ROLE IN, AND THE EDC IS LIKELY TO TAKE AN ADVOCACY ROLE IN PARTNERING WITH K-12, HIGHER ED PARTNERS, COUNTY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS. AND SO IT MAY BE THAT CITY COUNCIL IS INSTRUCTIVE IN THE PLAN TO SAY, HEY, WE'RE ASKING THAT THE EDC AND THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOLKS ENGAGE AT THAT LEVEL WITH WITH PARTNERS AS ADVOCATES FOR, FOR EMPLOYABILITY AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, THAT TYPE OF THING. THANK YOU. THERE FURTHER DISCUSSION. ARE WE READY TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION? I HAVE A QUERY IN THE ECONOMIC PLAN. WE TALK ABOUT WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT A LOT. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I HADN'T SEEN MUCH OF IS WORKFORCE. REGARDING OUR SAFETY WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND KEEPING THAT WORKFORCE STABLE, BECAUSE WE HAVE A REAL ISSUE WITH MAKING SURE THAT WE CAN MAINTAIN THE PROPER WORK POLICE FORCE IN ORDER TO KEEP OUR COMMUNITY SAFE. AND THAT'S BEEN AN ONGOING ISSUE. I THINK THAT'S A FAIR ASSESSMENT. AND WE DID, THROUGH THIS PROCESS, MEET WITH THE CHIEF OF POLICE AND THE FIRE CHIEF AND THEIR LEADERSHIP TEAMS. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THE STEERING COMMITTEE GUIDED US TO AND PRIORITY POLICY AREAS IS THIS THIS CONCEPT OF FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND LOOKING FOR WAYS TO ENSURE RESILIENCE IN THE IN ALL AREAS OF CITY OPERATION. BUT BUT CERTAINLY AS IT AS IT AS IN REGARDS TO PROVIDING, YOU KNOW ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICE SO SIMILAR TO THE PRIOR DISCUSSION, NOT NOT ALWAYS POSSIBLE FOR US TO LIST EVERY SINGLE ACTION ITEM. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE THAT WE ACTUALLY SAY IN THE, IN THE PLAN ITSELF AND THAT WE'VE SAID IN PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS, IS WE REALLY HOPE PEOPLE WILL TAKE TO HEART THE PRIORITY POLICY AREAS THEMSELVES, THE DESCRIPTION OF THOSE AND THE PLANNING PRINCIPLES WHICH CHARGE CITY COUNCIL WHEN MAKING A POLICY DECISION, LIKE HOW DO WE ATTRACT AND RETAIN A GOOD WORKFORCE FOR OURSELVES TO PROVIDE CITY SERVICES, INCLUDING POLICE AND FIRE? ARE WE BEING FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE IN ATTRACTING AND RETAINING THOSE FOLKS? WHERE ARE WE BEING INNOVATIVE AND CREATIVE IN THE WAYS THAT WE DO THAT? SO WHILE THE PLAN DOESN'T GIVE STRICT DIRECTION IN THAT REGARD, IT CERTAINLY CHALLENGES CITY LEADERSHIP TO THINK ALONG THOSE LINES. HI. AND I WAS I WAS JUST GOING TO ADD REAL QUICK THAT, YOU KNOW, FROM CITY MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE ALWAYS LOOKING TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE SURE THAT DUNCANVILLE IS STAYING COMPETITIVE WITH WITH PAY FOR ALL OF OUR EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING POLICE AND FIRE. WE DO THAT BY, YOU KNOW, CONDUCTING MARKET STUDIES, LOOKING AT PAYMENT PLANS FROM OTHER JURISDICTIONS WITHIN THE DFW AREA THAT WE COMPETE AGAINST. AND SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ABLE TO RETAIN, YOU KNOW, OUR WORKFORCE, ESPECIALLY OUR POLICE OFFICERS AND FIREFIGHTERS, BECAUSE WHEN YOU WHEN YOU BRING THEM ON BOARD AND YOU TRAIN THEM, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A LOT OF INVESTMENT THAT GOES INTO THAT. SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, ONCE WE TRAIN THEM, WE KEEP THEM FOR THE LONG TERM IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ALSO LOOKING AT THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE VISION AND THE PROGRESS AND UPDATING OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT TO REFLECT THE TECHNOLOGY AND THE IDEA OF TODAY THAT WE HAVE WE'RE OPERATING WITH VERY ANTIQUATED. BUILDINGS THAT HOUSE[02:50:01]
OUR POLICE FORCE. AND SO TO BRING THAT UP, TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE DUNCANVILLE IS MOVING FORWARD AND DUNCANVILLE IS KEEPING UP TO DATE WITH WHAT WE NEED TO REPRESENT OURSELVES FOR THE FUTURE. YES, CORRECT. AND I'M GLAD YOU TOUCHED ON THAT. WE HAVE DEVELOPED A BOND PROGRAM THAT HOPEFULLY WILL GO TO THE VOTERS IN NOVEMBER. WE ARE ACTUALLY ASKING CITY COUNCIL TOMORROW TO CALL FOR A BOND ELECTION THAT WILL INCLUDE TWO PROPOSITIONS, ONE OF WHICH IS A UPGRADED POLICE FACILITY. AND, YOU KNOW, ASSUMING THAT CALL FOR ELECTION HAPPENS AND, AND, AND THE VOTERS VOTE IN NOVEMBER TO SUPPORT THAT, THEN WE WILL BE ABLE TO SIGNIFICANTLY UPGRADE OUR POLICE FACILITIES AND ENSURE THEY HAVE, YOU KNOW, FACILITIES THAT WE CAN ALL BE PROUD OF AND THAT OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT ENJOYS WORKING IN. WELL, I WILL SAY THAT ONE OF I MEAN, EVERYBODY SAW MY COMMENTS LAST TIME. ONE OF MY BIGGEST CONCERNS IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD SECTION, AND I JUST ESPECIALLY AFTER HEARING. ONE OF THE CASES THAT WE DID TODAY ON EAST CENTER STREET, I GUESS I JUST WOULD LIKE SOME UNDERSTANDING OF HOW HOW THIS HOW THIS BODY, THIS COMMISSION WILL BE EXPECTED TO. TO RETHINK SOME OF THE ZONING ISSUES IN ORDER TO MAKE THIS COMP PLAN HAPPEN, BECAUSE AS IT AS IT IS NOW, OUR NEIGHBORHOODS CAN'T UTILIZE SOME OF THESE IDEAS.YEAH, I THINK THAT WAS REALLY IT WAS A CHARGE WE I THINK AT THE, AT THE NEAR THE VERY END OF THE PLANNING PROCESS, AS THE STEERING COMMITTEE WAS KIND OF REFINING ITS RECOMMENDATIONS, YOUR, YOUR PNC REPRESENTATIVE ACTUALLY RAISED THAT PRETTY STRONGLY AND HAD US TITAN TITAN LANGUAGE AROUND THAT, TO BE SURE THAT I MEAN, YOU ALL KNOW THIS, BUT BUT MAYBE THERE'S FOLKS IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WHO DON'T, YOU KNOW, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS THE BEGINNING OF THE IS THE BEGINNING OF THE LAND USE RECONCILIATION PROCESS OR THE REVISIONS TO LAND USE REGULATIONS. SO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TALKS IN VERY BROAD TERMS ABOUT HOW HOW THE COMMUNITY, HOW THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM SHOULD ROLL OUT MOVING FORWARD, HOW LAND USE REGULATION SHOULD ROLL OUT MOVING FORWARD. WE TAKE THIS FUTURE LAND USE MAP THAT'S IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND WE TURN IT OVER TO A. A SIMILAR COMMITTEE TO ENGAGE IN, IN ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION UPDATE. AND THAT'S A RECOMMENDATION IN THE PLAN THAT THAT SHOWS UP IN MULTIPLE PLACES. AND IT IT CHALLENGES THE LEADERSHIP IN THE, IN THE CITY TO LOOK AT THE LOOK AT THE HIGHER LEVEL RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLAN, THE PLANNING PRINCIPLES, THE VISION, LOOK AT THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, AND THEN LOOK AT THE DISPARITY BETWEEN WHAT THAT FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND WHAT THAT VISION SAYS AND WHAT THE CURRENT ZONING SAYS. AND, YOU KNOW, I ENJOYED LISTENING TO A COUPLE OF THE CASES TONIGHT WHERE, YOU KNOW, THERE'S CLEAR DISPARITY THERE, WHERE HERE'S HERE'S WHAT THE LAND USE REGULATION SAYS TODAY.
AND HERE'S WHAT THE VISION, YOU KNOW, AS STATED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS. AND SO THAT'S ANOTHER VERY COMPLEX, ACTUALLY MORE COMPLEX AND MORE DETAILED PLANNING PROCESS THAT THAT HAS TO COME OUT OF THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO WE'RE ENCOURAGING THE BY VIRTUE OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLAN, WE'RE ENCOURAGING THE CITY TO INVEST IN WHAT EFFECTIVELY AMOUNTS TO A TOTAL OVERHAUL OF THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE CLARITY.
THIS IS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR. AND SOMETHING THAT'S READABLE AND UNDERSTANDABLE TO ALL LEVELS OF INVESTORS. AND THEN TO BE PRODUCTIVE IN THAT IT IT GENERATES THE TYPE OF PRODUCT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR. SO YES, I THINK THAT'S A CRITICAL NEXT STEP AND ONE THAT WE'VE ENCOURAGED THE CITY TO INVEST IN. AND I WANT TO SAY REALLY TO TAG ON THAT BECAUSE ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S FOR ME IS, IS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT FOR THAT PLAN IS BECAUSE ONE OF THE THINGS THAT HAS BEEN IMPRESSED TO ME IS THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CAN IS ONLY REALLY JUST APPROVING THINGS BASED ON WHAT THE LAWS AND THINGS ARE OUT THERE. AND WHEN YOU HAVE PEOPLE COME AND THEY'RE LOOKING FOR SOME CHANGES, AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SAYS ONE
[02:55:04]
THING, AND THEN WE SORT OF SWITCH AND SAY, OH, I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU. MAYBE YOU DIDN'T KNOW THAT YOU BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY AND NOW IT'S SOMETHING ELSE, AND, YOU KNOW, IT'S BEING ABLE TO STICK TO THE PLAN AND THAT IS REALLY GOING TO BE IMPORTANT. IT'S ONE THING TO HAVE A GREAT PLAN, BUT IF PEOPLE ARE ABLE TO CIRCUMVENT THAT PLAN BECAUSE OF HOW THEY FEEL OR THEIR NEIGHBORS, THIS WILL BE A DISASTER. YEAH, IT'S A GREAT POINT. AND, YOU KNOW, WE TALK ABOUT PLANS, BEING LIVING DOCUMENTS THAT THAT SHOULD EVOLVE OVER TIME. YOU KNOW, THE SECOND THAT YOU ADOPT A ZONING ORDINANCE, IT'S LIKE IT'S LIKE BUILDING A BUILDING, RIGHT? YOU BUILD A NEW HOME OR A NEW COMMERCIAL SPACE AND WHICH ARE CODE ENFORCEMENT FOLKS OR BUILDING OFFICIAL WILL TELL YOU, IS IT STARTS TO STALE ON DAY ONE, THE DAY YOU GET THAT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, A WALL GETS SCUFFED, A PIECE OF HARDWARE COMES LOOSE, AND OVER TIME IT JUST DEGRADES A BIT AT A TIME. ZONING IS THE SAME WAY. YOU'RE GOING TO YOU'RE GOING TO WE HAVE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WE'RE GOING TO ADOPT THAT SOON. THE PLANNING PRINCIPLES WILL HOPEFULLY HOLD. WE'LL CHECK OFF SOME TO DO'S, SOME MORE WILL APPEAR. WE'LL HAVE TO HAVE A WAY TO EVALUATE THOSE. SO WHEN YOU ADOPT ZONING, NEW USES ARE GOING TO COME INTO PLAY. NEW MARKET FORCES ARE GOING TO COME TO PLAY. AND YOU HAVE TO BE READY TO CONTINUE TO INVEST. IF YOU ADOPT THAT ZONING AND LEAVE IT AS IT IS FOR ANOTHER TEN YEARS, YOU'RE GOING TO FIND YOURSELF RUNNING INTO MORE WALLS AND HEARING MORE SAD STORIES ABOUT THINGS THAT JUST DON'T SEEM TO LINE UP. SO WE'RE ENCOURAGING YOU ADOPT, ADOPT, CREATE AN UPDATE TO THE ZONING OR REALLY AN OVERHAUL TO THE ZONING REGULATIONS, AND THEN CREATE A PROGRAM OF CONSTANT MAINTENANCE OF THAT ZONING CODE SO THAT IT'S ALIVE AND WORKING AND RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF DUNCANVILLE. IT DOESN'T MEAN CHANGING DIRECTION EVERY TEN MINUTES, BUT WHAT IT MEANS IS EVOLVING IT AS AS THE TYPES OF BUILDINGS AND TYPES OF USES EVOLVES. JUST SO YOU'RE READY. OKAY, SO, MR. CAIN, WHAT ARE OUR OPTIONS FOR THIS TONIGHT? YOUR OPTIONS TO CONSIDER THIS EVENING ARE TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND MOVE IT TOWARDS CITY COUNCIL. YOU CAN. APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR OR RECOMMENDED CHANGES. IF THERE ARE THINGS THAT YOU SEE OR DESIRE TO HAVE UPDATED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, OR YOU CAN TABLE IT TO A FUTURE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. IF YOU ARE NOT READY TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION THIS EVENING. DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR A RECOMMENDATION? WELL, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT IT BE TABLED PRIMARILY BECAUSE OF THE HOW WE HAD TO SORT OF STOP IT AND START OVER. AND I DON'T HAVE THE NEW COPY, SO I'M NOT PREPARED TO ACTUALLY. MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OTHER THAN TO TABLE. IS THERE A ARE THERE IS THERE MORE THAN ONE COPY? WAS THAT. OH, THERE'S AN UPDATED VERSION. NO I MEAN THE VERSION THAT SORRY. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. THE VERSION THAT WAS PROVIDED IN THE PACKET IS THE ONE THAT IS ONLINE RIGHT NOW IN DRAFT FORM. BUT I BELIEVE, MATT, YOU MENTIONED EARLIER THAT UPDATES FROM THE PUBLIC MEETING A COUPLE WEEKS AGO HAVE NOT BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THAT NEW DRAFT. NO, THERE IS NO NEW DRAFT. THE DRAFT THAT'S BEEN PROVIDED TO THE PUBLIC AND TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND TO CITY COUNCIL IS THE DRAFT THAT THAT IS UP FOR CONSIDERATION TONIGHT? SO I THINK IT JUST GOT LEFT OUT. WE HAD PROVIDED A DIRECT LINK TO THE DOWNLOAD BECAUSE IN LIEU OF PRINTING ALL COPIES OUT FOR EVERYONE TONIGHT. I THINK I'M GOING TO PICK THIS UP. BUT IT'S THE SAME THING THAT WE HAD ACCESS TO FOR THE WHEN WE MET JOINTLY WITH THE COMMISSION. IS THAT CORRECT? IS THAT THE SAME? YES, MA'AM. THAT'S CORRECT. YES IT IS. OKAY. HEY, MATT, I DO HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY ABOUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HERE. THERE WAS A SECTION ABOUT SOME OF THE CORRIDORS OF DUNCANVILLE. I AM I UNDERSTAND THAT THOSE ARE LIKE THE MAIN STREETS THAT PEOPLE WHO PASS THROUGH DUNCANVILLE USE.AND, YOU KNOW, LIKE MAIN STREET, YOU KNOW, GOING THROUGH CEDAR RIDGE. IS THAT WHAT I'M UNDERSTANDING? YES. IN THE FUTURE, IN THE FUTURE LAND USE SECTION, THERE'S A. A SERIES OF
[03:00:12]
CORRIDORS, OVERVIEWED AND EFFECTIVELY CHARACTER AREA DESIGNATION FOR CORRIDORS. AND SO THOSE ARE, THOSE ARE REFLECTED ON THAT FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE REASON WHY I BRING THAT UP IS I DIDN'T REALLY SEE ANYTHING ABOUT FOCUSING. MAYBE NOT INITIALLY, BUT SOME SORT OF FOCUS ON LIKE OUR MAJOR ROADS SO THAT WE CAN FIX THOSE UP, MAKE THEM LOOK NICER, SO THAT WHEN PEOPLE DO VISIT THE CITY HALL OR WHEN THEY DO VISIT THE HIGH SCHOOL, OR WHEN THEY DO VISIT, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE MAJOR PLACES WHERE WE HAVE MORE TRAFFIC, THEY SEE A BETTER SIDE OF DUNCANVILLE, YOU KNOW, SO IN THE, IN THE, IN SEVERAL SECTIONS, STARTING WITH FUTURE, FUTURE LAND USE OF COURSE LAYS OUT KIND OF WHAT THOSE IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD LOOK LIKE, WHICH IS TO SAY EFFECTIVELY, YOU KNOW, SOLID OR WE SAY STRONG URBAN DESIGN. AND WITH RESPECT TO, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE URBAN DESIGN ELEMENTS WE SHARED TONIGHT, IT GOES IT GOES FURTHER TO BREAK THAT DOWN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT, WHICH WHICH WOULD, YOU KNOW, INCLUDE CORE DOWNTOWN TALKS ABOUT MAIN STREET CORRIDORS. AND THEN IT TALKS ABOUT THE CORRIDORS IN THE OUTLYING AREAS SO THAT THAT'S THE FUTURE LAND USE SECTION ITSELF UNDER THE UNDER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, THE RESILIENT COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES YOU TO FOCUS ON THOSE KEY ENTRY CORRIDORS. THE TRICK RIGHT IS, IS WE HAVE TO BALANCE OR I'M SORRY, WE HAVE TO PRIORITIZE JUST BECAUSE DUNCANVILLE IS NO. NOR DOES ANYONE HAVE LIMITLESS, LIMITLESS RESOURCES TO FOCUS. SO WHAT WE'VE CHALLENGED, WHAT THE PLAN CHALLENGES THE COMMUNITY TO DO IS FOCUS PRIMARILY ON DOWNTOWN AND THEN ON THOSE ON THOSE CORRIDORS. AND IT LAYS OUT WHICH CORRIDORS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. AND THEN IN THE EQUITABLE TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY SECTION, TALKS ABOUT KIND OF STREET DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE, INCLUDING THOSE CORRIDORS. SO IF YOU LAYER THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS, I THINK WHAT YOU'LL FIND IS THERE'S SOME SPECIFIC, VERY SPECIFIC TARGETED INVESTMENTS AROUND, FOR EXAMPLE, THE TIF DISTRICT, WHICH IS A KEY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR AND A KEY FRONT DOOR, AND WITH THE WITH THE PLAN CALLS FOR THERE IS A MASTER PLANNING OF THE TIF DISTRICT. THE ROUTE 67 CORRIDOR AND ENTRANCES AT I-20 AND OTHER KEY LOCATIONS. SO IT DOESN'T GET DEEP IN THIS PLAN. FIRST DO THIS, THEN DO THAT, THEN DO THIS. BUT WHAT IT SAYS IS YOU NEED INDIVIDUAL SMALL AREA MASTER PLANS FOR EACH OF THOSE CORRIDOR AREAS. CRITICAL PIECE, REAL CRITICAL RIGHT. AND DOES THAT MOSTLY JUST TOUCH ON LIKE ARTICULATION, YOU KNOW, MATERIAL USES. BUT WHAT ABOUT LIKE THE BRANDING OF THE CITY ITSELF? LIKE I FEEL LIKE MAYBE WE DO NEED TO GO DO SOME REBRANDING FOR OURSELVES. LIKE, YOU LOOK AROUND TO DESOTO AND CEDAR HILL AND THEIR BRANDING IS REALLY NICE AND IT'S COHESIVE WITH THEIR ARCHITECTURE AND WHAT THEY'RE DEVELOPING IN THEIR PARKS. YES. AND I'M PULLING THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SECTION UP NOW BECAUSE WE DO REFERENCE IN IN THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SESSION, YOU KNOW, DC, EDC INVESTMENTS, CREATION OF A OF KIND OF THIS BUSINESS FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT, WORKING WITH THE EDC ON THESE THESE TIF MASTER PLANS ARE MORE THAN PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS. IT'S MARKET ANALYSIS. WHAT BELONGS THERE. WHAT'S THE MESSAGING REGARDING THESE SPACES. SO WE I AGREE I MEAN THE BRANDING AND MESSAGING AND MARKETING IS CRITICAL. THE PLAN TENDS TO DOES TEND TO FOCUS ON PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS. RIGHT. SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT THERE ISN'T REALLY ANYTHING ABOUT THE MARKETING ASPECT OF THE CITY. LOOK, I HAVE A I'M A I HAD A REFERENCE MARKED TARGETED MARKETING. NOW I'M SORRY FOR SPECIFIC TO THE TO THE TIF DISTRICT ITSELF. WE TALKED ABOUT TARGETED MARKET ANALYSIS AND ENGAGEMENT WITH KEY PROPERTY OWNERS, ENGAGEMENT WITH THE EDC FOR A MARKETING AND INCENTIVE STRATEGY, AND DEVELOPMENT OF MARKETING MATERIALS SPECIFIC TO REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES SO THAT THAT WOULD BE I MEAN, WE'D[03:05:03]
RECOMMEND THAT THAT BE INCLUSIVE OF BRANDING AND MARKETING INITIATIVES. IT'S NOT EXPLICITLY STATED THERE, BUT IT DOES TALK ABOUT DEVELOPMENT OF MARKETING MATERIALS FOR PARTICULARLY FOR THESE REDEVELOPMENT AREAS. GO AHEAD. THANK YOU. CHAIR BROWNING. THE CITY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOES HAVE A WAYFINDING PROJECT THAT IS SUPPOSED TO ESSENTIALLY WORK IN TANDEM WITH THE BRANDING STRATEGY THAT THAT'S REFERENCED IN THE IN THE COMP PLAN, AND THAT'S A PROJECT THAT OBVIOUSLY WILL WORK CLOSELY WITH THE DC EDC FOR IMPLEMENTATION DURING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026. OKAY. AND THEN THE LAST THING IS, ALL OF THIS STUFF REALLY APPLIES TO A LOT OF REDEVELOPMENTS AND NEW DEVELOPERS COMING INTO THE CITY. WHAT ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE LIVING HERE WHO DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO, YOU KNOW, FIX THEIR FENCES, FOR INSTANCE? LIKE WE HAVE A LOT OF FENCES FACING MAJOR ROADS AND THEY LOOK PRETTY HIDEOUS, YOU KNOW? SO WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT THAT? OR ABOUT SOMEBODY, YOU KNOW, CURB APPEAL. SO AGAIN, JUST JUST SPEAKING ABOUT THE CITY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, THEY DO HAVE A GRANT PROGRAM WHERE THEY CAN PROVIDE GRANTS TO PROPERTY OWNERS FOR THINGS LIKE FENCING OR, OR PAINT OR SIGNAGE AND THAT SORT OF THING. BUT I IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE KIND OF TALKING MORE MACRO SCALE, I GUESS, ALONG AN ENTIRE CORRIDOR. YEAH. IS THAT CORRECT? OKAY. I THINK I THINK THE PLAN ITSELF IS BROAD ENOUGH THAT IT ENCOMPASSES A LOT OF THOSE CONCERNS. WE HAVE A MOTION TO TABLE. WE EITHER NEED SOMEONE TO SECOND THAT OR IF NOBODY WILL, THEN A NEW SECOND. ALL RIGHT. SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO TABLE. CAN WE PLEASE VOTE OKAY MR. SALAZAR. YES. THANK YOU FOR VOTING. OH SORRY I MISSED IT. SO FOR ONE. OKAY OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO WE WILL BE TABLING THIS. AND AS FAR AS I THINK, I THINK YOUR TIME HAS CONCLUDED HERE THIS EVENING, SIR. OKAY. THANKS, EVERYBODY.THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. HORN. SO WE ARE NOW ADJOURNING. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT.
NOTHING ELSE ON THE AGENDA THIS EVENING. OKA
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.