3.a. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2025-7-24 APPROVING A POLICE DEPARTMENT FUNDING REQUEST TO THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE AND AUTHORIZE THE PRESIDENT TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. (Part 1 of 2)

[3.a. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2025-7-24 APPROVING A POLICE DEPARTMENT FUNDING REQUEST TO THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE AND AUTHORIZE THE PRESIDENT TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. (Part 1 of 2)]

ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? SO LET'S SEE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA. SAYS PUBLIC HEARINGS.

AND LET'S SEE THREE A CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION

[00:20:10]

2025. DASH SEVEN DASH 24 APPROVING A POLICE DEPARTMENT FUNDING REQUEST TO THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE AND AUTHORIZE THE PRESIDENT TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. MR. HARVEY, I'LL START BY JUST A QUICK INTRODUCTION TO THIS ITEM. WE HEARD FROM RICHARD JACKSON EARLIER. THAT IT'S OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SIX, 2017. AND WELCOME, MR. DIRK. WELCOME, MR. DURHAM. RIGHT IN THAT CITY TRAFFIC. OKAY. THANK YOU AGAIN, MR. HARVEY, FOR SO TONIGHT JOINING US ON THE CALL, WE HAVE BOTH OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, MR. RICHARD JACKSON, ALSO THE CITY ATTORNEY, MR. ROBERT HAGER. RIGHT. MR. JACKSON IS GOING TO BE PRESENTING A COUPLE OF SLIDES IN SUPPORT OF THE STAFF REPORT AND THIS AGENDA ITEM TO KIND OF WALK THROUGH THE BREAKDOWN OF THE OF THE FUNDING PROPOSAL AND THE REQUEST. AND THEN OBVIOUSLY, MR. HAGER IS GOING TO BE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS RELATED TO THE LEGAL PERMISSIBILITY ELIGIBILITY OR JUST ANY, ANY GENERAL QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE ACT. SO WITH THAT, RICHARD, DO YOU WANT TO SHARE YOUR SCREEN AGAIN OR IF NOT, WE HAVE THE SLIDES LOADED. SO WHICHEVER IS EASIER FOR YOU OKAY. NO THANK YOU. I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND SHARE MY SCREEN. SO GOOD. GOOD EVENING AGAIN MR. PRESIDENT. AND BOARD MEMBERS AGAIN FOR THOSE THAT HAVE NOT MET MY NAME IS RICHARD JACKSON. I AM THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF FISCAL SERVICES AND CFO FOR THIS GREAT CITY OF DUNCANVILLE. IT'S A PLEASURE TO BE WITH YOU ALL. AND I THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY FOR JOINING YOU ALL VIRTUALLY, AS I HAD A ANOTHER COMMITMENT WHERE I COULD NOT BE THERE IN PERSON. SO I DEFINITELY WOULD HAVE BEEN THERE AT THE AT THE TABLE. BUT AGAIN, APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH YOU ALL VIRTUALLY. I AM GOING TO SHARE MY SCREEN HERE. JUST WANTED TO HAVE A COUPLE OF SLIDES TO KIND OF TALK THROUGH THE FINANCIAL IMPACT. OF WHAT WE VIEW AS A PARTNERSHIP AND PARTNERING SUPPORT BETWEEN. THE CITY AND EDC, RESPECTIVELY. CAN YOU ALL SEE SEE THE SCREEN? YES. OKAY. EXCELLENT. SO WHAT I WHAT I WANTED TO START OFF WITH WAS JUST TO HAVE A, A YEAR OVER YEAR COMPARISON IN TERMS OF THE DOLLAR REQUEST OVERALL IN TERMS OF FUNDING FROM THE EDC FUND AND THIS BODY FOR THE 2025 BUDGET, WE HAD THE INDIRECT COST BUDGETED IN AT 241,000. WE HAD BEAUTIFICATION, WHICH I KNOW DIRECTOR BART STEVENSON AND ASSISTANT DIRECTOR TYLER AGEE SPOKE AT A PREVIOUS EDC MEETING FOR THE 26 BUDGET, BUT THE NUMBER FOR 2025, AS YOU SEE HERE, WAS 242,449. THERE WAS ALSO, IF YOU RECALL, THE ANNUAL TRANSFER TO ASSIST WITH THE DEBT SERVICE FOR THE FIELDHOUSE. AND SO FOR 2025. AND THIS WAS THE LAST DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT FOR THAT DEBT OBLIGATION WAS DURING THIS FISCAL YEAR. AND SO THAT AMOUNT WAS BUDGETED AT 537,950.

SO THE GRAND TOTAL FOR THE 25 BUDGET WAS A LITTLE MORE THAN $1 MILLION. CARRYING THAT DISCUSSION FORWARD INTO 2026. AND I KNOW CERTAINLY FROM THE INDIRECT COST, THAT IS ANOTHER ITEM HERE ON THE AGENDA. BUT AGAIN, WE WERE. INITIALLY LOOKING AT A FLAT NUMBER VERSUS THE PREVIOUS YEAR. AGAIN, THE REQUEST THAT IS BEFORE YOU NOW FOR ADDITIONAL SUPPORT AND PARTNERSHIP FOR POLICE OF 359,000 AND THE BEAUTIFICATION WHICH WAS DISCUSSED BEFORE JUST TO SHOW WHAT THAT INCREASE YEAR OVER YEAR WOULD SHOW. SO FOR 2026, THAT NUMBER WOULD BE

[00:25:08]

349,582. SO OUR TOTAL WHEN COMPARING YEAR OVER THE YEAR IS SLIGHTLY UNDER WHAT THE TOTAL COMMITMENT FOR THESE VARYING ACTIVITIES THAT COME OUT FROM THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND THIS YEAR. SO WANTED TO AT LEAST START WITH THAT SLIDE AND THEN PROGRESS TO THIS NEXT SLIDE IF I CAN HEAR. SO AGAIN, COUPLED WITH THE EARLIER CONVERSATION IN TERMS OF WHERE THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND IS YEAR TO DATE, FROM A BUDGET TO ACTUAL STANDPOINT. SO LOOKING AT THE REVENUE, REVENUE IS ABOUT 58% OF THE BUDGET THROUGH JUNE. IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE, PARTICULARLY WITH THE FIRST LINE, THE SALES AND OTHER TAXES, THAT WHILE OUR REPORT IS THROUGH JUNE OR THROUGH THE NINTH MONTH, OUR SALES TAX COLLECTIONS ARE ONLY THROUGH THE SEVENTH MONTH. SO WE ANTICIPATE THAT WE WILL MEET WITH OUR REVISED BUDGET NUMBER THAT YOU SEE HERE. OF THE 3.2, ALMOST 3.3 MILLION, AND POTENTIALLY EXCEED THAT NUMBER BASED ON THE TRENDS THAT WE'RE SEEING RIGHT NOW. BUT OVERALL, WE'RE AT ABOUT 58% OF THE BUDGET IN TERMS OF REVENUE COLLECTIONS.

SO HOW WE PROJECT FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE YEAR IS WE SEE OURSELVES FINISHING ABOUT IN LINE WITH OUR OVERALL REVENUE TOTAL. ON THE EXPENDITURE SIDE, AS YOU CAN SEE, WE HAVE SPENT A LITTLE MORE THAN $3.1 MILLION THROUGH THE MONTH OF JUNE FROM THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND.

THE REVISED BUDGET HAS THE EXPENDITURE TOTALING A LITTLE MORE THAN 4.8 MILLION, SO THROUGH 75% OF THE BUDGET YEAR, OUR EXPENDITURE TOTAL IS AT 6,065%. SO WE'RE RUNNING AHEAD OF BUDGET PACE IN TERMS OF WHERE EXPENDITURES ARE RELATIVE TO THE TIME OF YEAR. AGAIN, THROUGH MONTH 9 OR 75% OF THE BUDGET YEAR. SO BASED ON THIS, THE TREND WOULD SUGGEST THAT WE WOULD FINISH AT OR BELOW BUDGET IN THE EXPENDITURE LINE. AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS SLIDE. WANTED TO TALK THROUGH A LITTLE BIT ON THE FUND BALANCE. SO THE BOTTOM LEFT IS SHOWING WHAT THE PROJECTED FUND BALANCES WOULD BE FOR FISCAL YEAR END OF 2025 AND 2026, RESPECTIVELY. SO WHEN WE LOOK AT WHAT OUR PROJECTED. NET INCOME LOSS OF $1.2 MILLION, PER THE SECOND COLUMN YOU SEE FOR THE 25 BUDGET. SO WE'RE PROJECTING BASED ON THAT, THAT THE ENDING FUND BALANCE FOR THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND AT THE END OF THE YEAR OF THIS YEAR, FISCAL YEAR WOULD BE JUST OVER $6 MILLION. IF YOU ADD IN THE BALANCED BUDGET OR JUST JUST OVER IN TERMS OF THE REVENUE BEING JUST OVER EXPENDITURE PROJECTION FOR THE 2026 BUDGET THAT PROJECTS THE FUND BALANCE TO RAISE SLIGHTLY FROM JUST OVER 6 MILLION TO A LITTLE MORE THAN 6.1 MILLION, THE BOTTOM RIGHT CORNER OF THAT SLIDE JUST KIND OF EXPLAINS, IF WE TOOK LIKE A BEST PRACTICE OF HAVING AT LEAST 90 DAYS OF RESERVE FOR WORKING CAPITAL IN THE FUND BASED ON THE EXPENDITURE TOTAL IN 2026, OF THE ALMOST 3.4 MILLION 90 DAY RESERVE WOULD BE ALMOST $850,000, BASED ON WHERE WE PROJECTED. AND I PUT DOWN LIKE A LIKE A WORST CASE SCENARIO OF BEING THE 5.8 MILLION. THAT WOULD BE AT 620 DAYS, 628 DAYS OF WORKING CAPITAL THAT WE PROJECT TO BE AT. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THAT WOULD BE A CONSERVATIVE NUMBER, BECAUSE CURRENTLY WE'RE PROJECTING THE ENDING FUND BALANCE TO BE A LITTLE MORE THAN 6.1. SO THAT WOULD CONSEQUENTLY BE MORE LIKE

[00:30:06]

640 SOME ODD DAYS OF WORKING CAPITAL. SO I WANTED TO PRESENT THIS FOR THE BOARD JUST TO SHOW THAT WITH THE REQUEST THAT ARE BEING MADE, THAT THE FUND IS IN A HEALTHY POSITION. FINALLY, SPECIFICALLY, THE REQUESTED AMOUNT THAT WE HAVE WAS 359,000 TO HELP SUPPORT VARIOUS PUBLIC SAFETY OPERATIONS. AND AGAIN, I KNOW CHIEF STOGNER HAD PRESENTED TO THIS BODY PREVIOUSLY. AND SO WHILE WE HAD CERTAIN PROGRAMS THAT CAME THROUGH, OF COURSE, IN THE PACKET WE HAVE THE ANALYSIS REPORT TYPE OF BEING ABLE TO LAY OUT WHERE A LOT OF SOME OF THESE. INCIDENCES ARE OCCURRING.

WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT FOR THE SUPPORT FOR POLICE, WE'RE LOOKING FOR A TOTAL OF 359,000.

AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE THIS ITEMIZED LIST. THESE ARE NUMBERS THAT WERE TAKEN FROM OUR PROPOSED BUDGET IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET RESPECTIVELY. THE FLEET REPLACEMENT BOTH IN THE PATROL AND CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION UNITS. AGAIN, LOOKING AT THE VEHICLE USAGE, HELPING ADDRESS THE MAINTENANCE WEAR AND TEAR AND OUR PREPARATION FOR ULTIMATELY REPLACING THE POLICE VEHICLES. CERTAINLY WHAT YOU SEE IN THE CONTRACT SERVICES SECTION IS ALL RELATED TO THE RADIOS IN THAT COMMUNICATION. SO OUR CHARGE FROM THE CITY OF DALLAS, OUR SERVICES WITH MOTOROLA, WHO THAT'S THE BRAND OF RADIOS THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT USES IN THE PROJECT. 25 IS AN INFRASTRUCTURE THAT HELPS THE DUNCANVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THEIR ABILITY TO BE SYNCED AND BE ABLE TO TALK WITH OTHER RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS. AND, OF COURSE, THE FLY CAMERAS TO AGAIN ASSIST WITH IDENTIFICATION AND TO HELP THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THEIR EFFORTS TO CONTINUE TO REDUCE AND SUPPRESS CRIME. SO THOSE TOTALS AND THOSE COME STRAIGHT FROM THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR NEXT YEAR, TOTAL ALMOST 364,000. AND SO, AGAIN, OF OUR REQUEST, WE'RE REQUESTING AGAIN AS A PARTNERSHIP. WITH THE CITY AND THE EDC THAT THE REQUESTED FUNDS WOULD GO FOR THESE PURPOSES. HERE ON THE SCREEN. I WILL LEAVE MY SCREEN UP, BUT CERTAINLY I WILL STOP AND PAUSE FOR ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE GROUP. I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION. JUST CURIOSITY.

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. THE FLEET REPLACEMENT. WHAT IS THAT? SO WHAT? WHAT WE DO IN FOR FLEET REPLACEMENT IS WE TYPICALLY BREAK IT OUT BY DIVISIONS WITHIN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. SO THE MAJORITY OF THE VEHICLES ARE TIED INTO OUR PATROL DIVISION. BUT WE DO HAVE VEHICLES THAT ARE TIED INTO OUR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION UNIT AS WELL. SO AGAIN, FROM THE PATROLLING AS WELL AS ANY ISSUES THAT WE COULD SEE POTENTIALLY HAPPENING AT OUR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, IS WHY WE INCLUDED THOSE THOSE TWO ITEMS RESPECTIVELY IN OUR REQUEST. OKAY. THANK YOU. I MADE A LEAP LIKE WAS IT DAMAGED IN A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. SO THANK YOU. JUST SO AS WE AS WE PURCHASE VEHICLES. SO NO IT'S NOT DEALING WITH ANY DAMAGES. BUT AS WE'RE PURCHASING VEHICLES WE ARE HAVING CONTRIBUTION INTO OUR FLEET REPLACEMENT THAT ADDRESSES IF THERE IS DAMAGE WHERE THINGS NEED TO BE REPLACED OR IF IT'S JUST THE NATURAL REPLACEMENT OF VEHICLES THAT ARE NECESSARY. WHAT I WILL TELL YOU SPECIFICALLY IN THE POLICE FLEET IS BASED ON OUR FLEET SIZE AND STRENGTH THAT THESE VEHICLES ARE ESSENTIALLY RUNNING 24 HOURS A DAY BETWEEN THE VARIOUS SHIFTS.

SO THE NECESSITY TO BE POSITIONED TO REPLACE VEHICLES AS NECESSARY FOR POLICE

[00:35:06]

SPECIFICALLY IS DEFINITELY AN IMPORTANT. THANK YOU. SO, RICHARD, I HAVE A COMMENT THAT I WANT TO MAKE ABOUT WHAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT. AND YOU YOU CAN LEAVE THAT INFORMATION UP THERE, OKAY. BECAUSE IT'S ACTUALLY ABOUT THAT INFORMATION OKAY. SORRY ABOUT THAT. THAT'S ALL RIGHT. ALSO I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT IT LOOKS LIKE MR. HAGER HAS GOT HIS HAND UP AND MIGHT HAVE A QUESTION. OH, YEAH. LET'S LET'S HEAR FROM OUR ATTORNEY REAL QUICK. REAL QUICK. MR. PRESIDENT, IN RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION, THE CID, FOR EXAMPLE, IF THERE WAS A CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AT ONE OF OUR BUSINESSES THAT WAS RESPONDED TO BY THE POLICE, THE CID ACTUALLY DOES THAT INVESTIGATION. THEIR ASSIGNED VEHICLES THAT ARE NOT PATROL VEHICLES, THEY'RE MORE LIKE, YOU KNOW, A NORMAL CAR OR VEHICLE. THEY DON'T HAVE LIGHTS AND SIRENS, BUT THEY'RE STILL CARS IN THOSE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. AND DETECTIVES WILL USE THOSE CARS TO CONDUCT THEIR NORMAL ACTIVITY. WE WOULD GO OUT TO THE BUSINESS THE NEXT DAY TO INTERVIEW THE BUSINESS OWNER, AND WOULD INTERVIEW ANY OTHER WITNESSES AND GATHER INFORMATION TO PROSECUTE FOR INVESTIGATION. SO THEY HAVE VEHICLES JUST LIKE PATROL DOES. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THOSE ARE NOT AS EXPENSIVE AS PATROL VEHICLES. TO ANSWER THAT, HELP ANSWER THAT QUESTION. THANK YOU.

OKAY. THANK YOU. SO. THE STAFF REPORT THE BACKGROUND. IT HAS A BULLET POINT AND IT SAYS TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 505. 158A ALLOWS FOR B FUNDS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES AND SERVICES. AND SO I WENT BACK TO THAT SECTION AND IT SAYS SECTION 505.158. THE LOCAL THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT. SO WHAT I'M PASSING OUT IS THE IS THE SECTION THAT'S REFERENCED IN IN THE STAFF REPORT. SO YOU CAN FOLLOW ALONG. AS A REFERENCE TO THE STAFF REPORT. YEAH. I'LL TAKE ONE UP TO. KIND OF ELECTRONIC, BUT I'LL. USE THE OKAY. YEAH IT SHOWS. THAT'S WHAT IT. HOWEVER YOU. SEE. IT.

OKAY. SO THIS IS THE INFORMATION THAT I HAVE PRINTED OFF SECTION 505.158 PROJECTS RELATED TO BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND CERTAIN SMALL MUNICIPALITIES. PAY FOR A TYPE B CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO BE CREATED BY A MUNICIPALITY WITH A POPULATION OF 20,000 OR LESS. PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES THE LAND, BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT, FACILITIES, EXPENDITURES, TARGETED INFRASTRUCTURE AND IMPROVEMENTS FOUND BY THE CORPORATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO PROMOTE NEW OR EXPANDED BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT. I WANT TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY HAS THE SAME THING. YES. OKAY, SO LAST TIME I

[00:40:01]

CHECKED THE POPULATION, DUNCANVILLE WAS ALMOST 40,000. SO THIS SECTION. THE WAY IT IS WORDED, THE WAY I READ IT DOES NOT APPLY. SO HOWEVER, THERE IS ANOTHER SECTION. AND IT IS SECTION 505.155. IT SAYS PROJECTS RELATED TO BUSINESS ENTERPRISES THAT CREATE OR RETAIN PRIMARY JOBS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS CHAPTER, PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT, FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS FOUND BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO PROMOTE.

AND DEVELOP NEW OR EXPANDED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES. THAT CREATE OR RETAIN PRIMARY JOBS.

SO IN LOOKING AT THAT LIST THAT'S ON THE SCREEN. IT APPEARS TO ALL BE EQUIVALENT. AND SECTION 505.155. DOES INCLUDE EQUIPMENT IN ITS LISTING. SO THAT'S PART ONE OF THE TEST.

THIS IS ALMOST LIKE DOING HOTEL MOTEL OR TWO PART TEST FOR ME. THAT'S ONE PART OF THE TEST. THE OTHER PART IS FOUND BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO PROMOTE OR DEVELOP NEW OR EXPANDED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE. SO I AM CURIOUS, AS I WAS THE LAST MEETING, HOW IS IT THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO MEASURE IN EXCHANGE FOR THE 600,000? HOW WILL WE BE ABLE TO MEASURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW OR EXPANDED BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES? DO YOU WANT ME TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION FOR YOU? IF HEY, IF YOU IF YOU GOT AN ANSWER, I'D LIKE TO HEAR IT. YES. ALRIGHT. SO THAT'S PART OF WHAT WE ARE. YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE THAT FINDING. OKAY. BY MAKING THAT FUNDING. SO IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT OUR POLICE CHIEF HAS TOLD US THAT ALMOST 80% OF OUR RESOURCES IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT SUPPORT THE PUBLIC SAFETY WITH REGARD TO BUSINESS. AND THIS IS THE FIRST AND ONLY TIME THEY HAVE MADE THIS REQUEST OF THE EDC. AND SO AT THIS POINT, THERE IS NO HISTORY, MR. PRESIDENT, WHICH WOULD INDICATE THAT THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY IS APPROPRIATE TO BE SPENT TOWARDS THAT ACTIVITY. AND SO WHAT THEY'RE ASKING YOU IS TO MAKE THE FINDING THAT SINCE 80% OF OUR POLICE RESOURCES ARE USED FOR THIS PURPOSE. THAT IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE THAT IN ORDER TO PROMOTE AND DEVELOP NEW AND EXPANDED, BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THE PUBLIC SAFETY FOR BUSINESS, THEY THEY WANT TO OPEN IN A PLACE FOR THE SAFE ENVIRONMENT, JUST LIKE OUR CITIZENS WANT TO LIVE IN A PLACE WHERE THERE'S A SAFE ENVIRONMENT. SO THE MEASURABLES WILL BE IN TERMS OF HOW MUCH OF OUR PATROL ACTIVITY. NOW, I THINK WHAT THE FINANCE DIRECTOR HAS DONE IS IDENTIFY THOSE THINGS THAT. WHERE THAT 80% IS FOCUSED. NOW, THEY'VE MADE A REQUEST. YOU ARE NOT LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO FUND ALL OF THAT MONEY. IF YOU CHOSE OR FEEL THAT PORTION OF THAT MONEY IS NOT IN YOUR YOU AND THE BOARD'S DETERMINATION. THE WORD I'M SEARCHING FOR ARE REFLECTIVE OF PROTECTING THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY TO THAT EXTENT, WHAT MR. JACKSON HAS DONE IS PROVIDE YOU WITH THE CONTRACT SERVICES THAT THE CITY HAS WITH REGARD TO RADIOS, THE BUNDLE SERVICE, THE

[00:45:07]

MAINTENANCE PROJECT 25 AND THE MOTOROLA MAINTENANCE AND THE FLOCK CAMERAS. BECAUSE THE FLOCK CAMERAS ARE. UTILIZED PRIMARILY IN THE DIVULGING THEIR. ENFORCEMENT TACTICS ARE HEAVILY USED IN THE COMMERCIAL AREAS TO CHECK VEHICLES. AND ARE YOU BEING INVESTIGATED FOR PURPOSES OF VEHICLES THAT ARE IN OUR COMMERCIAL AREAS? AND SO WHAT MR. JACKSON AND THE CITY HAS DONE IS COME TO YOU TO REQUEST SOME FUNDING FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT SO THAT THE CITIZENS THEMSELVES, AT LEAST ARE NOT OUR RESIDENTIAL CITIZENS ARE NOT 100% UNDERWRITING AND ACTIVITY OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT THAT IS FOCUSED ON OUR COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL AREAS AND THE SAFETY OF BOTH THE PATRONS THAT GO TO THE BUSINESSES AND THE BUSINESSES AND THEMSELVES, WOULD JUSTIFY POTENTIALLY, IF THE BOARD IS OF THE MIND, TO. TO FUND PART OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S PUBLIC SAFETY MISSION WITH MONEY THAT'S GENERATED FROM OUR COMMERCIAL AREA. AND SO ULTIMATELY, IT IS UP TO YOU TO FACILITATE THAT IN YOUR DISCRETION. IF YOUR DISCRETION IS TO FUND THIS ACTIVITY, I BELIEVE IT UNDER 155. I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU THAT THAT'S THE LEGAL CONDUIT FOR FUNDING THE POLICE ACTIVITY IN DUNCANVILLE. UNDER THIS SECTION OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE AND THE PRESENTATION OF MR. IS MR. YOUR QUESTION? WELL, A STATEMENT AND A QUESTION. THERE WAS A REQUEST JUST FOR CLARIFICATION. THERE WAS A REQUEST FROM THE POLICE 2 TO 3 YEARS AGO, AND MAYBE MORE THAN THAT, NOT TO THIS MAGNITUDE, BUT FOR EQUIPMENT. IT WAS FOR THE TRAIL OF MONEY CAMERA EQUIPMENT THAT CAME FROM THE EDC. SO I JUST WANT TO LET THE BOARD KNOW THERE WAS A PRECEDENCE FOR THIS. THIS OCCURRED IN THE PAST, IN THE PAST 3 TO 5 YEARS. AND WE DID FUND THAT BECAUSE OF A SERIES OF BREAK INS TO CARS AT SOME OF OUR HOTELS AND SOME OF OUR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR SHARING. JUST ANSWER A QUESTION AS FAR AS TRACKING IT, AS MR. HAGER SAID, AND THE CHIEF TALKED ABOUT IT A LITTLE BIT IN HIS PRESENTATION, WE MORE MORE OVERALL THE NUMBERS. BUT WE'RE ROLLING OUT A KPI PROGRAM NEXT FISCAL YEAR, KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND TALKING WITH THE CHIEF. AND INTERNALLY WE ARE GOING TO DEVELOP A KPI TO TRACK THIS PROGRAM THAT WE CAN OUR OUR ULTIMATE GOAL IS TO MAKE SURE WE START PROVIDING THIS INFORMATION TO COUNCIL. BUT WE COULD ALSO PROVIDE THIS TO THE BOARD. AND AGAIN IT COULD BE A PERFORMANCE THING IF THE BOARD DOESN'T FEEL LIKE IT'S A SUCCESSFUL PROGRAM BASED ON THOSE KPIS, THEN HEY, WE DISCONTINUE OR OR WE RENEW, WE KEEP THIS PARTNERSHIP GOING AND MAYBE THERE'S SOME OPPORTUNITIES TO DO SOME OTHER THINGS IF IT'S SUCCESSFUL. BUT THAT WAS OUR PLAN WAS TO DEVELOP A KPI FOR THIS AND TRACK IT AND REPORT THAT BACK. THAT WAS THAT'S OVERALL WHERE OUR THOUGHT PROCESS WAS BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, WE OBVIOUSLY WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT MONEY IS BEING USED AND TO ADDRESS THE BUSINESS. WE DO REALIZE THAT WE IN OUR THOUGHT PROCESS, AND I THINK WE TALKED ABOUT IT LAST TIME, YOU KNOW, IT ONLY HELPS BUSINESSES TO REDUCE THOSE BREAK INS AND THOSE PARKING LOTS AND THAT OTHER CRIMINAL ACTIVITY THAT'S GOING ON. I MEAN, THAT THAT'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ITSELF RIGHT THERE. I MEAN, IF YOU HAVE LESS CRIME, YOU'RE MORE LIKELY TO GO TO THOSE BUSINESSES. AND SO THAT WAS THE THOUGHT PROCESS AND GENESIS BEHIND THIS. BUT THAT WOULD BE OUR APPROACH. SO I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT. ALL RIGHT. SO I WOULD JUST I GUESS LIKE TO ASK MR. BROUGHTON ABOUT BECAUSE IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU WERE HERE, YOU KNOW, WHEN, WHEN THAT TOOK PLACE. AND ONE OF THE, ONE OF THE AREAS THAT WE'VE BEEN HAVING A LOT OF, A LOT OF CRIME AND IT'S IN THE, IT'S IN THE DATA THAT'S IN THE PACKET IS, IS, IS OUR HOTEL AREAS, YOU KNOW THE AND SOME RETAIL AREAS TOO RIGHT OFF 67. SO WHEN, WHEN THAT CAMERA SYSTEM WAS FUNDED YEARS AGO, WHAT DID THE EDC BOARD AT THE TIME ALSO REQUIRE LIKE A KPI APPROACH OR, YOU KNOW, KIND OF A FEEDBACK LOOP TO ILLUSTRATE HOW HOW WELL THAT WAS PERFORMING? NOT AT THAT TIME. IT WAS IN DIRECT RESPONSE TO THAT PARTICULAR ACTIVITY, AND MORE SPECIFICALLY, WAS LIKE A LOT OF BREAK INS AT THE LA QUINTA. THE NEW LA QUINTA WAS ALONG 67 WAS THE ONE OF THE BIGGEST CULPRITS. OKAY. YEAH. OKAY. THAT'S GOOD TO KNOW THAT HISTORY. YEAH. SO

[00:50:02]

THANK YOU. OKAY. ARE THERE ANY OTHER PRESENTATIONS BY STAFF IN CONNECTION WITH THIS ITEM.

BECAUSE I THINK I KIND OF JUMPED IN. WAS THERE WAS THERE MORE TO BE PRESENTED? NO SIR. THAT THAT WILL CONCLUDE MY PRESENTATION, MR. PRESIDENT. OKAY. YES, MA'AM. I HAD A QUESTION ABOUT THE PRESENTATION THAT WAS UP ON THE FIRST SLIDE. IS THE IS IT OLSON? WAS THAT THE GROUP, THE PLANNING REQUEST? YEAH. THAT THAT PART IS NOT PART OF THIS APPLICATION. NO. IS IT THAT THAT MR. JACKSON'S MEMO THAT YOU'VE SEEN COVERED SEVERAL OF THE ITEMS THAT ARE ON THE AGENDA? SO THE OLSON PART OF THAT IS ACTUALLY, I BELIEVE, EITHER B OR C, I GUESS IT'S B, IT'LL BE THE NEXT PRESENTATION. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE FIRST SLIDE THAT HE PUT UP? YES, MA'AM.

SO MY QUESTION IS THESE ARE PREVIOUS REQUESTS. FROM THE EDC. NO. OR FUNDING WAYS. YEAH. THESE THESE ARE PREVIOUS REQUESTS FROM LAST YEAR'S BUDGET TO THIS YEAR'S BUDGET. SO WHAT MR. JACKSON PRESENTED WAS THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, WHICH IS THE INDIRECT COST. THAT'S ANOTHER ITEM ON YOUR AGENDA. THIS POLICE SUPPORT REQUEST IS NEW FOR THIS YEAR, WHICH IS THE 359. THEY MADE NO REQUEST LAST YEAR. THE BEAUTIFICATION IS THE REQUEST AND THE FUNDING TO THE PARKS DEPARTMENT FROM LAST YEAR AND THEN VERSUS THE BUDGETED REQUEST FOR THIS YEAR AND THEN THE FIELD HOUSE, THE PDC FUNDED TO MAKE THE PAYMENT OR ANNUAL PAYMENT ON THE DEBT. AND THAT HAS GONE OFF BECAUSE THE FIELD HOUSE IS PAID FOR. SO YOU CAN SEE LIKE THE 200,000 TO OLSON.

SO THAT WOULDN'T BE REFLECTED HERE AS A IT'S NOT IN. NO NO MA'AM. THAT'S THE QUESTION OKAY.

ON THE SAME SLIDE. JUST A CLARIFICATION ON THE BEAUTIFICATION 177 $107,133 INCREASE FOR PURIFICATION. THERE'S A NOTE IN THE ACTUAL SPREADSHEET HERE ABOUT ADDITIONAL MOWING. I THINK YOU JUST MENTIONED THAT, MR. HAGER. SO IS THAT ADDITIONAL SCOPE? I KNOW BEFORE WE WERE PRIMARILY JUST DOING THE RIGHT OF WAYS AND SOME OTHER AREAS. ARE WE EXPANDING THAT TO PARKS? IS THAT BECAUSE OF EXPANSION SCOPE THAT WAS COVERED AT YOUR LAST MEETING, SIR? YEAH. AND I'M SORRY I WAS ABSENT THAT MEETING. SO A LOT OF IT PERTAINS TO OUR OUTSIDE VENDORS THAT ARE THAT HAVE MOWING CONTRACTS WITH THE CITY. THEIR THEIR COSTS HAVE INCREASED FAIRLY SIGNIFICANTLY. AND SO THAT'S THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE SEEING THERE. AND ALSO A LOT OF MOWING ACTIVITIES INCLUDE, YOU KNOW, CITY OWNED LOTS AND EDC OWNED LOTS AS WELL. THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARIFICATION. YES, SIR. SORRY I HAD TO REPEAT IT. IT'S OKAY. IT'S A GOOD QUESTION.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH. YES, SIR. MR. JACKSON, CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE ■POLICE SUMMARY SLIDE? SO IN THE ASKED THE IN OUR PACKET THAT SAID THE TOTAL AMOUNT REQUESTED IS $358,000. BUT I DON'T SEE THAT NUMBER UP THERE. WHY IS WHY IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE. IS IT. IS IT THE 359 AND IT'S THE THREE. IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE THREE. YEAH. SIR. THE REQUESTED AMOUNT WAS THE 358. SO THAT THAT WAS AN ERROR BY ME. THE REQUESTED AMOUNT THAT IS IN YOUR PACKET IS THE CORRECT AMOUNT. OKAY. SO IT WAS A COMBINATION OF THE. THE ITEMS THAT YOU SEE HERE ON THE SCREEN I'M SORRY. TOGGLING OFF TO SEE YOU ALL ON CAMERA AS WELL. BUT NO, THAT THAT 358,000 IS THE. IS THE CORRECT NUMBER OKAY. BECAUSE

[00:55:01]

THE ASK SHOWS 363 800. WELL, NO. WHAT I WANTED, WHAT I WANTED TO SHOW THERE WAS WE TOOK THOSE NUMBERS DIRECTLY OFF OF THE BUDGET. OKAY. SO THE TOTAL OF THOSE BUDGETED ITEMS THAT YOU SEE ON THAT SLIDE TOTAL THE 363. AND SO OUR ASK WOULD ESSENTIALLY HELP WITH MOST OF THOSE EXPENDITURES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THAT HELPS ME. THANK YOU. AND THEN. SINCE YOUR NAME IS TIED TO IT BY THE APPLICANT REP. THERE ARE FOUR PROPOSALS. VEHICLE VEHICLE CRIME SUPPRESSION UNIT, REAL TIME CRIME CENTER DATA, INCREASED CRIMINAL OR COMMERCIAL PATROLS, AND CRIME PREVENTION TECHNOLOGY ON THOSE FOUR ITEMS. I FOLLOW A LOT OF IT. VEHICLE CRIME SUPPRESSION UNIT, WHICH I GUESS ARE THE ACTUAL PATROL CARS. CORRECT? YES. THE BOTTOM ONE, NUMBER FOUR, CRIME PREVENTION TECHNOLOGY. I'M NOT SEEING THAT HOW THAT'S TIED INTO THESE ASKS MAYBE THE FLOCK. IT'S THE FLOCK. IT'S THE CAMERAS. FLOCK. OKAY. AND THEN TWO AND THREE. WHAT ARE WHAT ARE THOSE IN OUR ASK? SO THREE. GO AHEAD. RICHARD I'M SORRY. WELL I'M SORRY I WAS GOING TO SAY NUMBER THREE IS TIED TO THE, THE PATROL WITH THE, THE VEHICLES. AND THEN, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE A LOT OF, A LOT OF THE WEAR AND TEAR ON THE POLICE VEHICLES IS COMING FROM THEM PATROLLING THE COMMERCIAL AREAS OF THE CITY, INCLUDING, YOU KNOW, 67 AND 20 AND, AND, YOU KNOW, CAMP WISDOM AND SO FORTH. AND THEN THE, THE REAL TIME CRIME CENTER, YOU KNOW, THAT'S A THAT'S A THAT'S A PROJECT THAT WE'RE REALLY LOOKING TO GET OFF THE GROUND SOON. IT INVOLVES, YOU KNOW, TAKING ADVANTAGE OF A LOT OF THOSE CAMERAS THAT YOU SEE HERE IN THIS LINE ITEM, THE FLOCK CAMERAS AND HAVING A CENTRAL LOCATION WHERE YOU'RE ABLE, YOU KNOW, IN REAL TIME TO BE ABLE TO MONITOR CAMERA LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY, YOU KNOW, TO BE ABLE TO TRACK CRIME AS IT HAPPENS, IT ALSO HELPS WITH SIZING UP SITUATIONS. YOU KNOW, IF WE GET A PD CALL, THEY CAN THEY CAN GO TO THESE CAMERAS AND THEY CAN KIND OF SEE WHAT WHAT'S HAPPENING, WHAT THE VEHICLES INVOLVED LOOK LIKE, HOW MANY, HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE INVOLVED AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. SO THAT'S WHAT THAT ITEM NUMBER TWO IS PERTAINING TO. OKAY. AND I GUESS GOING BACK TO OUR CITY BUDGET OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND, WHICH MOST OF THESE THINGS WOULD HAVE BEEN COMING OUT OF, WHEN IS THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET GOING TO BE FORMALIZED AND IS THIS ASK TOO SOON? SO. I GUESS IF I COULD ANSWER THOSE IN REVERSE ORDER? NO, THE ASK IS NOT TOO SOON. IT ACTUALLY HELPS IN OUR FINALIZATION. FOR OUR DISCUSSION WITH COUNCIL ON THE BUDGET. SO CERTAINLY IN TERMS OF WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING AND THE FINAL DECISION FROM THIS BODY OF WHETHER OR NOT THEY WILL BE IN SUPPORT OF IT OR NOT HELPS DETERMINE OUR ULTIMATE PRESENTATION OF THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET AS PART OF OUR GLOBAL BUDGET PRESENTATION THAT WE'LL BE MAKING TO COUNCIL THIS UPCOMING TUESDAY. AND WE DID TALK TO COUNCIL LAST WEEK AND PRESENTED OUR BUDGET. WE DID. THIS QUESTION DID COME UP. AT THE END OF THE DAY. WE REALLY THINK THIS IS A GREAT PARTNERSHIP AND OPPORTUNITY.

YEAH, IT IS PART OF AN OVERALL STRATEGY FOR OUR BUDGET. BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE DO HAVE WE WILL HAVE TO PRESENT ALTERNATIVES TO THE COUNCIL ON AUGUST 12TH, WHICH WE'RE PREPARED TO DO. BUT AGAIN, WE THOUGHT THIS IS REALLY A UNIQUE AND PARTNERSHIP IDEA WITH THE ECDC. SO ABSOLUTELY, ABSOLUTELY THAT IF I COULD BOLD AND UNDERLINE THE WORD PARTNERSHIP IS CERTAINLY WHAT WE SEE THIS AS BEING. AND SO AGAIN, AS THAT WAS MY LAST SLIDE, I JUST WANT TO THANK THIS BODY AGAIN FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO AT LEAST BRING THIS UP FOR CONSIDERATION. OKAY.

I GUESS I WOULD SAY THAT THE TOTAL THE TOTAL ASK IS $600,000, WHICH IS A COMBINATION OF THE 359 AND THE AMOUNT THAT WAS ALREADY CONSIDERED INDIRECT COSTS. YEAH, IF I MAY, THE ORIGINAL THE ORIGINAL ASK WAS $600,000, BUT WHEN THE PACKAGE WAS PUT TOGETHER AND THE LETTER

[01:00:05]

WAS PUT TOGETHER, THE FUNDING REQUEST WAS ACTUALLY DECREASED TO 358. END OF 242 IS FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES WHICH WILL BE DISCUSSING LATER THIS EVENING. SO THE PD'S ASK FUNDING REQUEST IS $358,000. OKAY. THE INDIRECT COST IS A SEPARATE. THE INDIRECT COSTS IS A SEPARATE MATTER. BOTH TOTAL $600,000 AND THEN THE ORIGINAL S STARTED AT $600,000 AND IS NOW 358,000.

NOW, THE INDIRECT COST HAS BEEN A YOU KNOW THAT THAT WAS IN THE BUDGET LAST YEAR AS WELL. BUT YES, THIS YEAR, THIS YEAR, 2025. SORRY, BUT YES, IT'S A PREVIOUS COST. SO YEAH, THE THREE DAYS OF SEPARATE. RIGHT. OKAY. SO. WE'RE STILL IN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM. IS THERE ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD PLEASE. YES. GOOD EVENING, PATRICIA EBERT 115 SOUTH GREENSTONE. SO MY FIRST QUESTION IS, IS DOES THIS SUPERSEDE THE ATOMIZATION OF THE REQUESTS THAT YOU RECEIVED? JULY THE 28TH, IT WAS 358 PLUS THE 241 FOR INDIRECT COSTS. BUT WHAT I SAW IN THE SLIDES WAS IT WAS OVERTIME FOR THE POLICE TO. BEEF UP THEIR PATROL FOR OUR HIGH CRIME CRIMINAL COMMERCIAL AREAS.

SO I'M NOT SURE. I JUST AM QUESTIONING THIS. THIS THE NEW ITEMIZATION FOR THE 358. THE 359 IS A MISTAKE. THE 358 AND THEN ALSO TO MR. BROUGHTON, CHAIRMAN, I MEAN BOARD MEMBER BROUGHTON'S COMMENT I WAS AT THE MEETING WHEN JESSICA JAMES WAS AT THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THAT HE'S REFERRING, AND THEY TALKED ABOUT IT WAS SPECIFICALLY LAQUINTA AT THAT TIME. IT WAS A NEW HOTEL AND THEY WERE HAVING NUMEROUS BREAK INS. AND IT WASN'T JUST, YOU KNOW, TAP THE WINDOW AND TAKE THE PHONE OR WHATEVER. IT WAS MAJOR DAMAGE. AND ACCORDING TO SOME OF THE REPORTS THAT CAME TO THE CITY, THERE WERE GUESTS WHO WERE SO ANGRY THEY WERE BROADCASTING, DON'T EVER COME TO DUNCANVILLE. OKAY? THANK YOU. SO THAT THAT TAKEAWAY FROM ME IS THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO START THIS EFFORT, WE NEED TO STAY WITH IT AND NOT START IT AND STOP IT.

THAT'S JUST MY OWN COMMENT. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? NO OTHER COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. SO ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS IN ADDITION TO MY OWN FROM THE BOARD. ALL RIGHT THEN WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 710. AND THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS GOING TO BE REMOVED, RIGHT? YES. BUT FOR THIS ITEM FOR ITEM THREE, A WOULD LIKE TO TAKE ACTION ON IT OR DISCUSS ALL THE ITEMS AND THEN CIRCLE BACK. I THINK WE DID THAT THE LAST TIME WE DID ALL OF THE ITEMS AND THEN WE. YEAH. OKAY. MR. CHAIRMAN OR MR. PRESIDENT, WHAT YOU WOULD DO THEN IS DEFER ACTION TO AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF ALL THE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ITEMS A, B, C, AND D. IS THAT CORRECT? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. AFTER WE'VE GONE THROUGH ALL THE ITEMS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. SO YOU CAN MOVE TO DID SOMEONE SAY THAT B IS BEING REMOVED. WE ARE ASKING STAFF IS ASKING FOR THIS ITEM TO BE TO BE TABLED OKAY. AND THAT'S FINE. DO YOU WANT TO DO YOU KNOW WHEN YOUR NEXT MEETING IS GOING TO BE. DO YOU WANT TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND CONTINUE IT WITH A DATE CERTAIN, OR JUST REMOVE IT FROM THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT AND MOVE RIGHT TO SEE MY PREFERENCE? MY REQUEST WOULD BE TO REMOVE IT FROM THE AGENDA. MR. CHAIRMAN, IS IT OKAY WITH MR. PRESIDENT? IS THAT OKAY WITH

[01:05:01]

YOU AND THE BOARD? YES IT IS. OKAY, IF YOU WILL, MR. PRESIDENT. IF YOU WILL MOVE TO ITEM THREE C THANK YOU, THANK YOU COUNSELOR. SO NOW WE'RE ON ITEM THREE C AND WE'RE GOING TO.

[3.c. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2025-8-26 APPROVING THE FY 2026 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE PRESIDENT TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. (Part 1 of 2)]