Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[1. Call to order.]

[00:00:07]

HEY, EVERYONE! THE TIME IS 7 P.M. TODAY'S DATE IS JANUARY THE 13TH, AND I HEREBY CALL TO ORDER THE DUNCANVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING. ITEM NUMBER. OOPS. I ACTUALLY MISPLACED MY AGENDA. OH. THANK YOU. SO AT THIS TIME, WE WILL ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER TWO ON THE AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER TWO IS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AND ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA. AND WE WILL OPEN THE FLOOR FOR ANY INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE ITEMS THAT ARE NOT LISTED ON THIS EVENING'S AGENDA. IS THERE ANYONE. SORRY. EXCUSE ME. IF YOU DON'T MIND, BEFORE WE GO INTO THAT ITEM, CAN WE DO ROLL CALL TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WHO'S HERE AND THAT WE HAVE WE HAVE A QUORUM TO HAVE TO HAVE A MEETING. THEN WE CAN PROCEED WITH THE NEXT ITEM. SO I'D ASK THE RECORDING SECRETARY TO CALL THE ATTENDANCE. ONCE WE'VE DETERMINED THAT WE HAVE A QUORUM, THEN PROCEED ON CONDUCTING THE OTHER MATTERS ON THE AGENDA. OKAY. YEAH. AND JUST A FRIENDLY REMINDER. PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU HAVE YOUR YOUR MICS TURNED ON, BECAUSE THIS MEETING IS BEING RECORDED. AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HEAR EVERYONE'S CAPTURED ON THE RECORDING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

MR. PRESIDENT. EVERYONE PRESENT. NO LONGER COLUMBUS. PRESENT. PRESENT. HERE. BRENDA O'BRIEN.

SORRY. WE DO HAVE A QUORUM. WE ARE ABLE TO PROCEED WITH TONIGHT'S MEETING, AND WE WILL GO ON TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA. THANK YOU. ALL. THANK YOU. NOW, PROCEED. AT THIS TIME, WE WILL ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER TWO ON THE AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER TWO IS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ANY ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA. OPENING THE FLOOR FOR ANY INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE ITEMS THAT ARE NOT LISTED. DO WE HAVE ANY? SON? HEARING NONE, WE WILL NOW MOVE

[3. Approve minutes for the Planning and Zoning Commission special meeting on December 30, 2024.]

ON TO ITEM NUMBER THREE. ITEM NUMBER THREE ON THE AGENDA IS TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING THAT WAS HELD ON DECEMBER 30TH. IN REVIEWING THE MEETING OR REVIEWING THE MINUTES, THERE HAS BEEN A NOTE THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE A CORRECTION ON PAGES. A REGARDING THE NAME OF ONE OF OUR COMMISSIONERS, ERICA BROWNING.

COMMISSIONER BROWNING, COULD YOU INDICATE WHICH PAGE THAT IS ON, PLEASE? IT'S ON THE SECOND PAGE OF THE MINUTES. ITEM NUMBER FIVE. IT STATES. VICE CHAIR BROWN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION. AND IT SHOULD BE VICE CHAIR BROWNING. AND ON ITEM NUMBER SIX, IT SAYS VICE CHAIR BROWNING MADE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND IT SHOULD BE VICE CHAIR BROWNING.

SO SUBJECT TO THOSE TWO CORRECTIONS AND ITEM NUMBER FIVE AND ITEM NUMBER SIX. I WOULD LIKE I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MEETING MINUTES. MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE CHANGES. A SECOND. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER BROWNING, FOR THE APPROVAL. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. CHAMPAGNE FOR THE SECOND. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? SO WE HAVE THE REQUEST THIS EVENING IS TO DO VOTES VIA ROLL CALL. SO IF. YOU. HAVE A VOTE IN FAVOR SAYING I. COMMISSIONER CHAMPAGNE, I COMMISSIONER BROWNING, I, I. I THANK YOU. MOTION CARRIES. I WILL NOW MOVE

[4. Consider a request (2024-21) for approval of a replat by Dalton and Linda Lott, applicants, to replat from T K Anderson ABST 16 PG 130, TR 17.1 & PT LTS 1 & 2, Blk A of Skyline Haven Est 1 ACS 9.4792, on the property more commonly known as 1700 Cedar Hill Road, in the City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas]

[00:05:06]

ON TO ITEM NUMBER. THREE OR ITEM NUMBER FOUR ON THE. AGENDA. AND ITEM NUMBER FOUR ON THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT AGENDA. SORRY. ITEM NUMBER FOUR ON THE AGENDA IS A REPLAT. MISS ROMERO, COULD YOU OR ARE YOU DOING THE PRESENTATION THIS EVENING? YES I AM. ITEM NUMBER FOUR IS TO CONSIDER A REQUEST. A ZONING CASE 202421 FOR APPROVAL OF A REPLAT BY DALTON AND LINDA LOT.

APPLICANTS TO REPLAT FROM TC ANDERSON. ABSTRACT 16 PG 130 TRACK 17.1 AND PART OF LOTS ONE AND TWO BLOCK A OF SKYLINE HAVEN ESTATES, ONE ACRES, 9.4792 ON THE PROPERTY, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1700 CEDAR HILL ROAD IN THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 1700 CEDAR HILL ROAD. THE REQUEST IS TO REPLAT THE PETITION PROPERTY.

CURRENTLY, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT PLATTED. THIS PROPERTY IS ONE PARCEL MADE UP OF TRACTS AND PARTS OF LOTS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST IS TO REPLAT THE EXISTING LOT IN ORDER TO INCLUDE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND THAT WAS PURCHASED THROUGH METES, AND BOUNDS. THE AREA TO BE REPLANTED IS APPROXIMATELY 9.479 ACRES. THIS IS AN AERIAL SHOWING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND IT ALSO SHOWS THE NORTHEAST CORNER TO BE ADDED TO THAT PROPERTY TO MAKE ONE LOT OF RECORD. THIS IS A ZONING MAP THAT SHOWS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. SF SEVEN, SF TEN, SF 13 AND SF 43. AND THIS IS THE PROPOSED REPLAT THAT SHOWS THE NEW PROPERTY LINES THAT ALSO INCLUDE THAT NORTHEAST CORNER. THE ZONING FOR THIS PROPERTY IS SF 43 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. THIS CHART SHOWS THE MINIMUM DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS AND ALSO THE EXISTING DIMENSIONS OF THAT LOT. THE MINIMUM LOT AREA IS ONE ACRE, WHICH IS ABOUT 43,560FT■!. THE LOT CURRENTLY MEASURES 412,905.24FT■!S. THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH IS 200FT, AND THE EXISTING DIMENSIONS FOR THAT LOT IS. LOT WIDTH IS 628.68FT. THE LOT DEPTH MINIMUM REQUIREMENT IS 100FT. THE EXISTING LOT MEASURES 567.9FT ON THE NORTH SIDE, AND 482.89FT ON THE SOUTH SIDE. SO IT DOES MEET THE MINIMUM DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PLAT AND IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST. THE STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS. MR. ROMERO IS I'M LOOKING AT THE PROPOSED PLAT. I'M ASSUMING THIS IS A SF PROPOSED SF 43 THAT EVENTUALLY LOOKS LIKE THEY MAY BREAK IT UP INTO PARCELS OF LAND FOR SINGLE FAMILY CONSTRUCTION. IS THAT THE GOAL I'M ASSUMING? NO, NO, THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT. IF YOU'D LIKE HIM TO COME UP HERE AND ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS. AS FAR AS I KNOW, THAT IS NOT THE INTENTION OF THE APPLICANT. THE APPLICANT IS REPLATTING THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO ADD AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ON THAT NORTHEAST CORNER. THAT'S CORRECT. YEAH. THAT'S FINE. THAT'S THE ONLY QUESTION I HAD REGARDING THAT. COMMISSIONER. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I WOULD JUST LIKE TO NOTE THAT ON PAGE TWO OF THE PLAT APPLICATION, THE NOTARY INFORMATION ISN'T COMPLETED. AND SO ANY MOTION I

[00:10:02]

FEEL LIKE SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO THAT BEING. COMPLETED. RE NOTARIZED. WE CAN GET WITH THE APPLICANT TO SEE ABOUT REDOING THAT PAGE OF THE APPLICATION. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE. IT IT IS NOW SEVEN 711. I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM NUMBER FOUR AS READ INTO THE RECORD. ARE THERE ANY INDIVIDUALS HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST ITEM NUMBER FOUR? SORRY, CHAIR FOR THE REPLAT IS ACTUALLY NOT A PUBLIC HEARING, SO WE DON'T HAVE TO OPEN IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR THAT. YOU'RE WELCOME. JUST FOR YOUR INFORMATION, I DID SEND OUT A COURTESY NOTICES, THOUGH THERE WAS A TOTAL OF 29 I BELIEVE THAT I SENT OUT, BUT I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY RESPONSES IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION. COMMISSIONERS. I WILL NOW ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR ITEM NUMBER FOUR. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PLAT. ITEM NUMBER FOUR. I SECOND IT, I BELIEVE IT SHOULD INCLUDE HAVING THAT. NOTARY PAGE REDONE. SO WHAT COMMISSIONER BROWNING? CORRECT ME PROCEDURALLY IF I'M ON OR IF YOU CAN GIVE ME SOME.

SO WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR IS A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE THE REPLAT WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE APPLICATION BE EITHER REDONE OR RE COMPLETED TO ENSURE THAT THE NOTARY BLOCK IS FULLY COMPLETE AND SATISFIED. REQUIREMENTS. SO WE. KNOW IT'S ALREADY BEEN MADE. WHAT THE MOTION THAT WAS, WE MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE. AND NOW YOU WANT TO AMEND THAT MOTION TO INCLUDE THAT NOTARY BLOCK THAT SHE WANTS TO INCLUDE ON HERE. ALL RIGHT. SO I YES, I, I WOULD MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE NOTARY BLOCK BE RE REDONE. RE NOTARIZED. OKAY. SO WE'RE FINE WITH IT. I'M IN I'M FINE WITH IT. OKAY. SO WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. RODRIGUEZ, A SECOND BY MISS BROWNING WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE NOTARY BLOCK GET CORRECTED ON THE APPLICATION. SO I WOULD JUST ASK AT THIS POINT, MADAM SECRETARY, TO DO THE ROLL CALL FOR THE VOTE. THANK YOU. STEPHANIE. CHAMPAGNE? APPROVE? YOLANDA. COLUMBUS APPROVED. BY LEE NGUYEN. APPROVE. ERICA BROWNING APPROVE. AND ELIAS RODRIGUEZ APPROVE. CARRIES.

[5. Conduct a public hearing (2025-01) and consider approving the request of Edward Chadwick of Baird, Hampton and Brown Inc., applicant, representing Duncanville Independent School District, property owner, for a Specific Use Permit to allow for the use of “Primary or Secondary School (Public)” on Duncanville High School, Blk 1, lot 1, ACS 61.795, more commonly known as 900 West Camp Wisdom Road, in the City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas.]

MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER FIVE ON THE AGENDA. MISS LAURA. YES, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS ITEM IS A PUBLIC A PUBLIC HEARING. SO I WOULD ASK THAT BEFORE WE GO INTO ANY OF THE PRESENTATION THAT WE GET A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO LOOKING FOR A FIRST AND A SECOND AND WE'LL DO A ROLL CALL AND WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND PROCEED WITH THIS. WITH THIS PETITION. IT IS NOW 715. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM NUMBER FIVE.

I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION. ROLL CALL. ROLL CALL PLEASE. CALL. ROLL CALL. STEPHANIE. CHAMPAGNE? APPROVE. I MEAN, YES, TO OPEN THE MOTION. YES. ERICA BROWNING. APPROVE. YOLANDA. COLUMBUS. YES.

[00:15:01]

ELIAS RODRIGUEZ. YES. D BAILEY NGUYEN. YES. RIGHT. YES. HEARING IS NOW OPEN. YES. THANK YOU. NOW WE ARE NOW PROCEED WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS MATTER. SO THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. THIS EVENING WE HAVE WE'RE LOOKING TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CASE 20 5-01 AND CONSIDER APPROVING THE REQUEST OF AN EDWARD CHADWICK OF BAYARD HAMPTON AND BROWNING, INC, APPLICANT REPRESENTING DUNCANVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY OWNER, FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE USE OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL PUBLIC ON DUNCANVILLE HIGH SCHOOL BLOCK ONE, LOT ONE ACRES, 61.795, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 900 WEST CAMP WISDOM ROAD IN THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, DALLAS, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. SO AGAIN THIS EVENING, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 900 WEST CAMP WISDOM. THE REQUEST IS FOR THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC, EXCUSE ME, A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL PUBLIC. THE LAND USE RECOMMENDATION IN OUR COMPREHENSIVE. IN OUR CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED SF TEN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST, DUNCANVILLE ISD INTENDS TO EXPAND THEIR CAMPUS BY CONSTRUCTING A NEW CAREER TECHNOLOGY BUILDING. THE CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE WAS ADOPTED ON MARCH 2ND, 2021 PER SECTION 3.03 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE. A PRIMARY OR SECONDARY SCHOOL PUBLIC REQUIRES A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT WITHIN THE SF TEN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE PROJECT SCOPE. THE SCHOOL WAS BUILT IN 1967 AND SINCE HAS UNDERGONE APPROXIMATELY TEN ADDITIONS AND MULTIPLE RENOVATIONS. THE CURRENT CAMPUS IS COMPRISED OF SEVEN BUILDINGS, INCLUDING A SCHOOL MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, SPORTS PRESS BOXES AND RESTROOMS, AND SEPARATE RESTROOM FACILITIES. THERE ARE SEVEN ATHLETIC FIELDS, 12 TENNIS COURTS, AND EIGHT PARKING LOTS. A TRAFFIC STUDY HAS BEEN CONDUCTED AND SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED BY STAFF, DEMONSTRATING THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. THE ANALYSIS ADDITIONALLY CONFIRMS THAT THE CAMPUS CURRENTLY HAS MORE THAN ENOUGH PARKING TO MEET THEIR NEEDS AND DEMANDS. AS PART OF THIS PROCESS, THE SCHOOL INTENDS TO REPLAT THE PROPERTY AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION WAS EXPECTED TO TAKE APPROXIMATELY 18 MONTHS.

IN THIS, YOU WILL SEE THERE'S A DEPICTION OF THE ADDITION, THE PROPOSED ADDITION, IF YOU WILL, AND USE THE MOUSE HERE IS ON THE NORTH END OF THE BUILDING OF THE CAMPUS WHICH YOU HAVE HERE.

THESE PROPOSED TEMPORARY CLASSROOMS THAT WILL BE PUT IN PLACE AND IN THE EXISTING PARKING LOT AND THE PARKING STALLS. SO THIS AREA WILL BE CLOSED OFF AND THE STUDENTS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THIS, AND THESE WILL ONLY BE UP FOR THE DURATION OR DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS BUILDING ADDITION. ONCE THE ADDITION IS COMPLETED, THESE TEMPORARY STRUCTURES WILL BE WILL BE REMOVED. AND THIS IS JUST A FLOOR PLAN OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION. AND HERE YOU HAVE THE EXISTING ZONING AND THE BUFFER AREA, THE ITEMS OR THE PROPERTIES IN THE YELLOW ARE THOSE THAT RECEIVED A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS EVENING'S MEETING. THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 27 MAILINGS THAT WERE SENT OUT. WE RECEIVED ZERO AND THAT REPLIED IN FAVOR AND ZERO IN OPPOSITION. I DID SPEAK WITH WITH ONE OWNER THAT RECEIVED A NOTICE THAT LIVED ON CEDAR RIDGE DRIVE, AND SHE WAS INQUIRING ABOUT THE NATURE OF THE REQUEST. ONCE I EXPLAINED TO HER THE NATURE OF THE REQUEST, SHE HAD NO ISSUE WITH THE PROPOSED ADDITION. THIS EVENING, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS FOR APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ONE. THAT THE REPLAT TO THE PROPERTY BE COMPLETED SHORTLY AFTER THE EXPANSION IS COMPLETED AND RECORDED TWO TO ABSTAIN TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR AND RECORD THE FINAL PLAT BEFORE THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, AND THREE TO RESTORE THE SITE BY REMOVING TEMPORARY CLASSROOMS AND PORTABLE BATHROOMS. WITHIN 12 MONTHS OF THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT THIS EVENING, WE HAVE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE SCHOOL, THE PROJECT TEAM THAT IS AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE REGARDING THIS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT TO THE CAMPUS. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I DO WELL, I HAVE I HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACTUAL PROJECT. I DON'T KNOW IF STAFF

[00:20:08]

WOULD ANSWER THAT. THE TEMPORARY THE TEMPORARY BUILDINGS, WHAT BUILDING IS CAUSING STUDENTS TO BE DISPLACED? IF YOU DON'T IF YOU DON'T MIND, I'D. I'D INVITE THE PROJECT APPLICANT TEAM AND THE TEAM MANAGER TO COME UP, AND THEY'LL PROBABLY BE ABLE TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS AND OTHERS RELATING TO THE TO THE ADDITION. SO GIVE ME A SECOND FOR YOU GUYS. LET'S JUST MAKE SURE THERE'S NOT ANY QUESTIONS FOR SPECIFICALLY FOR STAFF COMMISSIONER AT. WERE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. YES I HAVE QUESTIONS I NOTICED ON HERE WHERE YOU MENTIONED ABOUT THAT THEY HAD TO REMOVE THE TEMPORARY BUILDINGS WITHIN 12 MONTHS. IS THERE A REASON, SINCE IT SAYS THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED IN 18 MONTHS, THAT YOU THEN SAY ADD AN ADDITION? THEY CAN HAVE AN ADDITIONAL 12 MONTHS IF NECESSARY TO REMOVE THAT. IS THAT. YEAH, WE JUST PUT THAT PUT THAT OUT THERE. WE WANTED TO GIVE THEM AMPLE TIME TO REMOVE THEM AND NOT BE IN A SITUATION WHERE WE'RE PROVIDING THEM TOO LITTLE TIME AFTER THE COMPLETION, BUT THAT'S SOMETHING THAT CAN BE DISCUSSED, AND WE COULD CHANGE THAT CONDITION OF APPROVAL AND, AND BRING THAT DOWN TO AN AMOUNT LESS THAN 12 MONTHS. WE JUST PUT THAT OUT THERE TO PROVIDE THEM ENOUGH TIME AND NOT REALLY PUT THEMSELVES IN A SITUATION WHERE, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU GIVE THEM THREE MONTHS AND THEN THREE MONTHS INTO IT, THEY FIND THEMSELVES NEEDING FOUR OR AN ADDITIONAL MONTH OR TWO, BUT AT LEAST THEY HAVE THAT A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME. AND IF THEY HAPPEN TO REMOVE THEM WITH UNDER THAT TIME, THEN THEN EVEN BETTER, BUT NOT IN A POSITION WHERE THEY HAVE TO COME BACK AND ASK FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE TIME. BUT DEFINITELY WANT TO MAKE NOTE.

AND FOR THE RECORD, THAT THOSE TEMPORARY STRUCTURES DO INDEED GET REMOVED AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. AND THEN SECONDLY, ALSO, HOW IS THIS IN LINE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? SO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS I, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, HAS A RECOMMENDED LAND USE, A FUTURE LAND USE OF LOW, LOW RESIDENTIAL, EXCUSE ME, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. IN THIS INSTANCE, WHAT WE HAVE IS WE HAVE A SECONDARY SCHOOL THAT'S BEEN ON THE PROPERTY FOR SEVERAL YEARS. IF MY UNDERSTANDING IS CORRECT, IT GOES BACK TO ALL THE WAY TO 1967. SO THE IMPACT IS ALREADY BEEN THERE, EVEN AFTER WHAT I WOULD IMAGINE. THERE HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE CHANGES TO THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, ZONING MAP, AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. IN THIS INSTANCE, WHAT WE HAVE IS WE HAVE A CONTINUANCE OF THE USE OF THE PROPERTY FOR EDUCATION PURPOSES.

SO THE USE ISN'T IN NECESSARILY CHANGING. WHAT IS CHANGING IS JUST AN ADDITIONAL BUILDING. AND THE FOOTPRINT OF THE OF THE CAMPUS. SO HENCE WHY THE CURRENT THE CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE, WHICH WAS ADOPTED IN 2021, REQUIRES THAT A FACILITY OF THIS NATURE OBTAIN APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, WHEREAS PRIOR TO THAT IT IT WAS NOT REQUIRED. THANK YOU. YEAH.

YOU'RE WELCOME. GO AHEAD. MR. MR. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE MAP, PLEASE? YEAH. SO THIS ONE OR THE. YEAH. NO, THAT'S FINE. WE CAN WE CAN LOOK AT THAT ONE. YEAH THAT'S FINE. SO IN IN REALITY THE PROPOSED TRACK OF LAND IS REALLY PART OF THE SCHOOL ALREADY. IT'S PART OF THE SCHOOL RIGHT NOW. IF YOU COULD SEE UNDERNEATH, UNDERNEATH THIS ORANGE HIGHLIGHTED AREA THAT IT'S THAT IT'S GREEN SPACE. SO THEY'RE JUST ADDING ON TO THAT. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS AREA BACK HERE IS NOT INTENDED FOR PARENT DROP OFF OR PICKUP. THIS IS WHERE THE BUSSES ACTUALLY CIRCULATE AND DROP OFF AND PICK UP, PICK UP THE KIDS. AND THIS PARKING LOT IS FOR FACULTY AND STAFF. BUT THOSE THAT THAT STAFF WILL BE REDIRECTED TO ANOTHER AREA WITHIN THE CAMPUS, AND THIS AREA WILL BE BLOCKED OFF FOR THE PROTECTION OF FACULTY, STAFF AND STUDENTS. YEAH. THAT'S FINE. THAT'S THAT'S THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE. I THINK THE OTHER ONES I CAN HOLD OFF FOR THE APPLICANT. I HAD A QUESTION. IT SAYS LETTERS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4TH. SO WE'RE WE'RE WE'RE VOTING, YOU KNOW, VOTING ON SOMETHING THAT WE HAVEN'T HAD FULL. CITIZEN FEEDBACK YET. AND SO I'M JUST WONDERING WHY THE WHY THE DELAY IN AND I'M SORRY, COULD YOU HELP ME WITH WHAT WHAT PAGE ON THAT THE REPORT IS I BELIEVE IT'S JUST THE SECOND PAGE OF ITEM NUMBER FIVE ON THE AGENDA. IT'S UNDER NOTIFICATION. THE VERY LAST SENTENCE LETTERS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4TH TO FULFILL LEGAL

[00:25:06]

REQUIREMENTS FOR A WRITTEN FORMAL PROTEST TO CITY COUNCIL. I JUST WONDERED WHY WE'RE WHY WE'RE HEARING THIS IF WE HAVEN'T FULFILLED THE SATISFIED, THE TIME REQUIRED FOR CITIZEN FEEDBACK. SO THIS IS YES, THIS IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE WILL BE ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING THAT WILL BE CONDUCTED ON FEBRUARY THE 4TH FOR THIS SAME MATTER, THAT ANY INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE WILLING TO PROVIDE A COMMENT, EITHER IN FAVOR OR OPPOSE, ARE ABLE TO DO IT UP UNTIL THE TIME THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONDUCTS THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY THE 4TH. I HAD A QUESTION AS WELL. HOW IS THE HOW IS STAFF DEFINING PROJECT COMPLETION? IS THAT BASED ON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY? IS THAT BASED ON A NUMBER OF FACTORS? BUT THE LANGUAGE SAYS 12 MONTHS AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION, HOW IS THAT BEING DEFINED? I WOULD INTERPRET AS THE ISSUANCE OF THE FULL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. FROM TIME TO TIME, YOU HAVE INSTANCES WHERE WE ISSUE A TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BECAUSE OTHER MATTERS STILL HAVE TO BE COMPLETED, OTHER IMPROVEMENTS HAVE TO BE COMPLETED, BUT THE MAIN LIFE SAFETY ITEMS ARE ADDRESSED AND YOU'RE ABLE TO OCCUPY THE BUILDING. HENCE WHY WE SAY A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. BECAUSE SOMETIMES YOU HAVE A SITUATION WHERE THE LANDSCAPING MAY NOT BE INSTALLED, BUT THE BUILDING IS READY TO GO. SO WE ISSUE A TEMPORARY TO PROVIDE THE PROJECT MANAGER TIME TO COMPLETE THE LANDSCAPING. BUT IT DOESN'T, YOU KNOW, THE BUILDING ITSELF DOESN'T IMPEDE ON THE SAFETY OR THE WELL-BEING OR THE ENJOYMENT OF THE BUILDING AND THE PROPERTY. BUT, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES YOU HAVE SITUATIONS WHERE IT'S WEATHER PERMITTING, YOU DON'T HAVE THE LANDSCAPING THAT COMES IN ON TIME. IT'S BACK ORDERED, BUT YOU WANT TO HELP THEM. BUT I WOULD DEFINE IT AS THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE FULL CERTIFICATE, WHEN IT'S ALL COMPLETED, AND A SECOND QUESTION, I BELIEVE IN THE IN YOUR PRESENTATION, YOU MENTIONED THAT PARKING SPACES AND THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES HAD BEEN EVALUATED AND ASSESSED. WAS THERE ANY REQUIREMENT FOR GREEN SPACE WITH THIS LOCATION? AND HAD THAT BEEN ASSESSED OR CONSIDERED AS WELL, SINCE THEY ARE TAKING PART OF THE GREEN SPACE FOR THIS BUILDING? YES. IF AND I'M GOING TO ASK FOR MISS ROMERO FOR SOME ASSISTANCE HERE, BUT MY RECOLLECTION IS THAT THE TEAM, THE CITY TEAM, LOOKED AT THE LANDSCAPING AND THE PROPOSAL AND FELT THAT THAT WAS IN COMPLIANCE, AND NO ADDITIONAL VARIANCE OR RELIEF WAS NEEDED FOR THIS THIS PROJECT, AS A RESULT OF THIS TAKEOVER OR BUILD OVER THE LANDSCAPING, AS FAR.

EXCUSE ME, AS FAR AS PARKING IS CONCERNED, WE DID HAVE THEM CONDUCT AN ANALYSIS OF HOW MUCH PARKING IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE, AND WE FOUND OUT THAT THEY'RE ACTUALLY IN A SITUATION WHERE THEY HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH PARKING AND BE ABOVE AND BEYOND THE PARKING, CURRENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS. EVEN WITH THIS PROPOSED BUILDING. THANK YOU. YES, I HAD ANOTHER QUESTION THAT KIND OF GOES ALONG WITH THE COMMISSIONER'S QUESTION ABOUT THE GREEN SPACE. THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES THAT WILL BE REMOVED, AND I WONDERED IF THERE ARE PLANS TO REPLANT TREES ELSEWHERE CONSIDERING OUR DESIGNATION AS A TREE CITY. YES, THAT WAS REVIEWED BY OUR TEAM.

THAT DID COME UP. AND I ASKED FOR MISS ROMERO FOR SOME ASSISTANCE. I THINK THAT IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THOSE TREES WOULD BE RELOCATED IN OTHER AREAS THROUGHOUT THE CAMPUS. IS MY RECOLLECTION CORRECT? SIR, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GET GET BACK TO YOU ON THAT. BUT IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT NO, THAT WAS MET AND NO ADDITIONAL REQUESTS OR RELIEF WAS REQUIRED. ASIDE FROM THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THIS ADDITION. AND ONE OTHER THING, THE SAME ISSUE AS WITH THE LAST APPLICANT, PAGE TWO AND THREE OF THE ZONING APPLICATION, THE NOTARY INFORMATION IS COMPLETELY BLANK. OKAY. SO WE CAN HANDLE IT. IF THE COMMISSION IS COMFORTABLE, WE CAN ADD THAT AS AN ADDITIONAL CONDITION OF APPROVAL. IF THAT'S THE IF THAT'S THE DIRECTION THAT THE COMMISSION WANTS TO PROCEED WITH THIS PETITION. WE WOULD ADD IT AS A CONDITION. NUMBER FOUR, COMMISSIONER, ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? BEING THAT THERE ARE, I BELIEVE, QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT, IF AND CORRECT ME? MR. BARRERA, ON THE PROCEDURE HERE, I WOULD LIKE

[00:30:07]

FOR THE APPLICANT TO COME AND THEN TO STATE THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS, AND THEN WE PROCEED.

ROMAN NAME, ADDRESS, NAME, ADDRESS AND SERMON AND THEN PROCEED WITH THEIR TESTIMONY, NAME, ADDRESS AND SAY THAT LAST PART FOR ME. SERMON. YES. OKAY. EVERYONE THAT COMES UP TO THE PODIUM FROM THIS POINT FORWARD THAT SPEAKS ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM GETS SWORN IN BY. CHAIR.

OH. THAT'S A NEW PROCEDURE FOR ME. OH, I'M SORRY, IS IT? YOU HAVE A NUMBER? OKAY. THEN I WOULD SEEK OUR ATTORNEY GUIDANCE ON THIS, I THINK. OKAY, WELL, IF IT'S NOT BEEN THE PRACTICE OF, OF THIS COMMISSION TO SWEAR THE THOSE THAT SPEAK, WE WILL NOT DO THAT THIS EVENING. IT'S BEEN MY EXPERIENCE HANDLING OTHER ZONING THAT THAT THE APPLICANT GETS SWORN IN. BUT WE'LL WE'LL BE CONSISTENTLY CONSISTENT. WE WILL PROCEED WITH NOT SWEARING IN THOSE THAT STEP UP TO THE PODIUM, BUT ASKED FOR THE RECORD NAME AND ADDRESS. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. SO AT THIS TIME, IF THERE THE APPLICANT IS HERE, COULD YOU STEP UP TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE NAME AND ADDRESS. AND THEN WE'LL PROCEED WITH QUESTIONS.

AT THE. LISA CAMACHO IS OUR ARCHITECT. MY NAME IS KAMAR HAQUE. I'M THE PROGRAM MANAGER FOR THE DISTRICT FROM LAND COMPANY. AND WE ARE KIND OF A STEP A LITTLE CLOSER TO THE MICROPHONE. SO THE RECORDINGS PICK YOU UP. MY NAME IS KAMARUL HAQUE. MY ADDRESS IS 7523 ALDERWOOD DRIVE, GARLAND, TEXAS. I AM THE PROGRAM MANAGER FOR THE DISTRICT. LISA CAMACHO. I'M THE ARCHITECT FOR THE DISTRICT. WITH THE HUCKABEE ARCHITECTS. QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. I GOT PLENTY OF QUESTIONS. LOOKING AT THE SUPP APPLICATION. IT'S, YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE ONE OF THE BIGGEST CONCERNS THAT I HAVE WOULD BE THE PARKING LOAD CALCULATION, THE GREEN SPACE, THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, WHO CREATED IT, WHEN WAS IT CREATED IT? I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA, AND I CAN TELL YOU I'VE BEEN HERE IN DUNCANVILLE FOR 30 YEARS AND THAT AREA GETS REALLY CONGESTED DURING SPECIFIC TARGET TIMES IN THE MORNING FROM SEVEN TILL ABOUT NINE. AND THEN IT JUST KIND OF DWINDLES AWAY. BUT I NOTICED THAT ON YOUR PROPOSAL FOR THE SUPP PLAN, IN LISTENING TO STAFF'S COMMENTS THAT YOU MADE A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BASED UPON, WAS IT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BASED UPON YOUR SUPP PLAN, OR WAS IT BASED UPON WHAT'S THERE NOW? AND YOU CREATED PROJECTIONS ON HOW IT WAS GOING TO IMPACT THAT AREA? BECAUSE THE AREA WHERE YOU'RE PUT THIS, THIS BUILDINGS ARE, IS CURRENTLY FOR STAFF PARKING. A LOT OF THE TEACHERS PARKED THERE AND MAYBE EVEN SOME OF THE SENIOR KIDS PARKED THERE. SO NOW YOU'RE TAKING AWAY THAT ENTIRE STRIP OF LAND, AND I KNOW THERE'S PARKING BEHIND THE STADIUM. THERE'S PARKING ON THE SIDE BY THE BAND AREA AND ALL THAT. I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE FACILITY, BUT I'M JUST CURIOUS HOW YOU GOT TO THAT POINT TO DETERMINE THAT COMPLIANCE WAS MADE BASED UPON YOUR PROPOSED SUPP APPLICATION AND THE BUILDINGS DURING THAT TIME FRAME? YOU KNOW, I KNOW THE DISTRICT HAS SECURITY WHERE THEY DIRECT TRAFFIC AND PUT CONES OUT. AND I THINK EVEN DUNCANVILLE, DUNCANVILLE ISD PROVIDES SOME TRAFFIC CONTROL POINTS DURING THOSE HIGH POINTS.

SO THAT WAS A QUESTION. AND I'M SURE I'M NOT THE ONLY ONE WORRIED ABOUT THAT, BECAUSE YOU'RE TAKING AN ENTIRE STRIP. THAT'S QUITE A BIT OF PARKING. IF I GUESS THERE'S GOT TO BE AT LEAST 100 PARKING SPACES THAT YOU'RE YOU'RE TAKING AWAY. WE'RE PUTTING UP THESE TEMPORARY BUILDINGS. AND I WAS JUST CURIOUS HOW YOU GOT TO THAT CONCLUSION. WE ALSO HAVE OUR CIVIL ENGINEER. HAMPTON BROWN. LET THEM ADDRESS THE TECHNICAL ASPECT. YES, SIR. WE'LL GET TO THE TEMPORARY BUILDINGS. SURE. HI. EDWARD CHADWICK, BAIRD, HAMPTON AND BROWN, 949 HILLTOP

[00:35:04]

DRIVE, WEATHERFORD, TEXAS, 76086. THE PARKING STUDY, OR THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, WAS BASED ON TWO FACTORS. ONE, IT WAS BASED ON WHAT THE CITY'S REQUIREMENT FOR PARKING IS, AND THE CITY'S REQUIREMENT WAS BASED ON NUMBER OF STUDENTS. SORRY, I'M PULLING IT UP. NO, NO. IT'S FINE. TAKE YOUR TIME AND WE SEE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STUDENTS. PRE-PROJECT IS 1240 PARKING SPACES. THE CAMPUS CURRENTLY HAS 1765 1765 PARKING SPACES. SO? SO THE CALCULATION JUST JUST REAL QUICK ON THE CALCULATION FOR THE FOR THE FOR THE PARKING WAS BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS ENROLLED IN THE SCHOOL. YES, SIR. WHICH IS SORRY. I'M SORRY. I'M ACTUALLY GOING TO THROW THIS. IT'S THE NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS WE HAVE 155 CLASSROOMS AND EIGHT PARKING SPACES PER CLASSROOM. BROUGHT THE REQUIREMENT PRE-PROJECT TO 1240 SPACES. IF I IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, I THINK THERE'S OVER 4000 KIDS AT THAT HIGH SCHOOL. THAT'S WHY I WAS JUST CURIOUS HOW THAT'S GOING TO BALANCE OUT. AND I APPLAUD YOU FOR WHAT YOU'RE DOING. I'M NOT TRYING TO CONTRADICT ANY OF THAT STUFF. I JUST HAD SOME QUESTIONS ON HOW YOU'RE GOING TO HANDLE THAT PARKING LOAD, BECAUSE IF YOU GO DOWN AND DURING THESE TIME FRAMES AND GO OUT THERE AND TAKE A DRIVE, JUST LOOK, YOU CAN SEE WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT EVEN IN THE MORNINGS. IT'S A, IT'S A, IT'S A MESS. YOUR OBSERVATION IS CORRECT. THERE ARE 19 BUSSES WHICH COME IN THIS CAMPUS.

ABSOLUTELY NOT. EVERYBODY IS DRIVING. YEAH. SO 19 BUSSES. YOU KNOW THE AREA YOU SAW WHERE WE ARE, THE BUSSES ARE DROPPING, PICKING UP, AND THEY ARE GONE IN 23 MINUTES EVERY DAY. YES, IT IS A CONGESTED, BUT IT IS VERY CONTROLLED AND VERY ORGANIZED. AND THE DISTRICT HANDLES THAT.

AND THEN THERE ARE PEOPLE IN THE MORNING THEY COME AND GO, SO THERE'S HARDLY ANY TRAFFIC. BUT IN THE AFTERNOON, YES, THERE IS THAT CAMP WISDOM. THAT INTERSECTION IS VERY CHALLENGING. AND FOR 25 MINUTES YOU MAY GET STUCK, BUT IT'S MOVES AND THE BUSSES. SO THERE IS, THERE IS STUDENTS WHO ARE TAKING BUS, AND THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE DRIVING AND THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE PICKING. SO THERE IS MULTIPLE AVENUES FOR STUDENTS TO EXIT THE CAMPUS. YEAH. SO, SO BASED ON THE PROXIMITY OF WHERE THESE BUILDINGS ARE GOING TO BE AT ON CAMP WISDOM, I THINK WHAT I'M LISTENING IS THAT YOU'VE KIND OF TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION THAT YOU'RE GOING TO OCCUPY THAT ENTIRE SPACE FACING THE CAMP. WISDOM. YEAH. TEMPORARY BUILDINGS ARE THE NINTH GRADE STUDENTS. YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, WE'RE MOVING THEM IN ORDER TO DO THE MODIFICATION TO THE EXISTING CAMPUS. WE DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER CHOICE IS TO GET THEM. THESE ARE EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT WE'RE MOVING FROM THE EXISTING CAMPUSES. AND THE AS SOON AS THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE, WITHIN 12 MONTHS, OR EVEN A LOT LESS THAN THAT, THESE BUILDINGS WILL GO AWAY. YEAH. WE THERE'S NO NEED FOR THESE BUILDINGS ANYMORE AT ANY OTHER CAMPUSES BECAUSE WE ARE REALIGNING.

REMEMBER ALL THE REALIGNMENT IS GOING ON. SO ALL THESE TEMPORARY BUILDINGS ARE GONE FOREVER AND NOT HERE IN DUNCANVILLE ANYMORE. ON AS FAR AS THE LANDSCAPE IS CONCERNED IN GREEN SPACE. I DON'T WANT TO GET OFF INTO THAT BECAUSE I THINK ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES WOULD WANT TO TOUCH THAT BASIS. BUT THE CALCULATIONS WERE BASED UPON OUR STANDARDS FOR THE CITY. I THINK WE'VE GOT SOME LANDSCAPE STANDARDS NOW THAT WE ADAPT THOSE ALREADY. YEAH. I WAS JUST CURIOUS ON.

SURE. YOU KNOW, SO THERE ARE SOME REQUIREMENTS THAT THEY COME WITH LIKE PARKING SPACES AND SUCH. AND WITH THIS LIKE ADDITION, THERE IS NO INCREASE IN PARKING. SO A LOT OF THE REQUIREMENTS WITH LIKE TREES AND SUCH DO COME FROM WHEN YOU ADD A NEW PARKING LOT, ADD MORE SPACE IN LIKE PARKING AREAS. SO THIS BUILDING DID NOT TRIGGER, YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW LIKE ADDITIONAL TREES. YEAH. SO AS FAR AS ADDITIONAL PAVING AND THE FORECAST, WE'RE LOOKING AT BASICALLY THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT THAT'S GOING TO BE ADDED ON. THERE'S NO PAVING BEING DONE IN THE AREA WHERE THE PORTABLE BUILDINGS ARE GOING TO BE AT. WE'RE JUST YOU'RE JUST GOING TO UTILIZE THAT AND MAYBE SET IT ON ON PIERS OR SOMETHING OR SOME KIND OF CONCRETE NOTHING, NONE

[00:40:05]

OF THAT. THESE ARE VERY, VERY TEMPORARY IN NATURE. THEY'LL BE SECURED PROPERLY AND CONNECTED, YOU KNOW, JUST LIKE THEY'RE SITTING ON, BUT NO FOUNDATION, NO DRILLING, NONE OF THAT. WE'RE KEEPING THEM VERY SAFE AND QUIET. FENCED CAMERAS, EVERYTHING SAFE AND SOUND FOR TEMPORARILY FOR THE STUDENTS. AS SOON AS THE NINTH GRADE IS DONE, THE STUDENTS COME BACK TO THE BUILDING AND THAT'S IT. I MEAN, THEY THE NINTH GRADERS ARE GOING TO MOVE IN THE EXISTING CTE IN THE BACK SIDE OF THE BUILDING. SO THIS AND THIS NEW ADDITION IS THE CAREER TECHNOLOGY ENHANCEMENT OF COSMETOLOGY AND THE FOOD SERVICE AREA, SO THAT THOSE ARE THE TWO MAIN COMPONENTS ARE COMING IN THE FRONT. AND HOW RECENT IS YOUR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY? SIR, WE DID THIS REPORT THIS PAST YEAR. OKAY. LET ME ALSO SAY, YOU KNOW, WE DID LIKE CALCULATE WHAT THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS ARE, YOU KNOW, BUT BUT BUT THEN ON A, ON A MORE REAL WORLD LEVEL AS FAR AS, LIKE PARKING SPACES GO, WE ASKED THE LIKE DISTRICT WHAT WHAT THE NUMBER OF PARKING PERMITS IS. AND THAT FOR LAST YEAR WAS 392 FOR THE WHOLE ENTIRE CAMPUS. AND THEN WITH STAFF COUNT BEING AT 391, WE GOT 383 WOULD BE FOR EVERY LIKE, LIKE PARKING PERMIT PLUS EVERY STAFF MEMBER, YOU KNOW, AND WE'VE TAKEN AWAY THOSE FRONT PARKING SPACES, WHICH I BELIEVE IS CLOSE TO 100, 159. THE REMAINING ON SITE CAMPUS HAD WAY MORE THAN THE 700 FOR LIKE STUDENTS PLUS STAFF. SO WE KIND OF TOOK A REAL WORLD. WHAT'S THE WHAT'S THE REAL NUMBER? THE PARKING LOT, WHICH IS ON THE SOUTH SIDE. YES. THAT IT WILL BE COMPLETELY UTILIZED FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF. WE'RE NOT TOUCHING THAT AREA AT ALL. IT'S USUALLY ONLY 30% FULL. WE'VE BEEN HERE WITH THE DISTRICT FOR ALMOST A YEAR. I'VE BEEN TO THE HIGH SCHOOL SITE 50 TIMES AND IT'S NEVER, EVER FULL. SO NOW WITH THE STAFF TEMPORARILY MOVED TO THAT SITE, WILL UTILIZE THAT.

AND WE FEEL THAT THEY'RE VERY THEY'RE ADEQUATE SPACES. ALL RIGHT. THAT'S THE ONLY QUESTION I HAD. I WAS JUST CURIOUS ON HOW YOU ACHIEVED ALL THAT. BUT I THINK MY COLLEAGUES HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR YOU. THANK YOU SIR. ANY COMMISSIONERS, ANY APPLICANT I THINK I JUST WANTED A LITTLE BIT MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE REPLANTING OF THE TREES. I MEAN, YOU'RE REMOVING 12 TREES AND ALONG CAMP WISDOM, THAT'S THE ONLY GREEN SPACE THAT'S VISIBLE. AND SO I THINK I WOULD JUST LIKE TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THAT. SURE. WE ARE REMOVING SOME TREES. WE'VE WORKED WITH STAFF ON WHAT'S REQUIRED PER LIKE ORDINANCE TO, YOU KNOW, PUT YOU KNOW, PUT BACK. AND WE'RE WE'RE WORKING WITH STAFF TO MEET THE CITY LIKE REQUIREMENT. OKAY. IS THERE AN ADDITIONAL QUESTION. NO THAT'S FINE I DID HAVE A QUESTION. HOW MANY CLASSROOMS ARE BEING ADDED WITH THE NEW BUILDING. SO WE'RE WE'RE ADDING. EIGHT CLASSROOMS. BUT BASICALLY WE ARE RELOCATING THE STUDENTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY UNDER THE EXISTING CITY FACILITY TO THIS NEW FACILITY. SO WE'RE NOT ADDING NEW OCCUPANTS TO THE HIGH SCHOOL. IT'S BASICALLY ENHANCING THE CTE FACILITY INTO NEW SPACES. SO IT'S BASICALLY A SHUFFLE. THE OLD CTE IS BECOMING NEW ADDITIONS AND THE WHERE THE NINTH GRADE STUDENTS ARE, THEY GO BACK TO THE OLD CTE. THAT'S CORRECT. SO THEY'RE JUST DOING THE THING. WE'RE NOT MOVING. WE'RE NOT ADDING ANY ADDITIONAL CLASSROOM, RELOCATING THE COSMETOLOGY AND THE CULINARY NEEDED MORE ENHANCEMENT AND MORE EXPANSION IN THEIR PROGRAM BECAUSE OF THE DEMAND. SO THEY'RE JUST GETTING A BIGGER SPACE, A NICE BISTRO, A NICE SALON, FACING THE CAMP WISDOM TO HAVE SOME PUBLIC ACCESS AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AND THINGS LIKE THAT, SO THAT THE REASON FOR THE QUESTION WAS, IT WAS PREVIOUSLY STATED THAT THERE WERE 155 CLASSROOMS AND IT'S EIGHT PARKING SPOTS PER CLASSROOM, AND IF YOU'RE INCREASING IT BY EIGHT, THEN THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS GO INCREASE. AND SO I WAS THE CALCULATIONS THERE IS WHY I ASKED THE QUESTION OKAY. SO WHEN

[00:45:07]

FULL LIKE BUILD OUT WHEN THE BUILDING IS COMPLETE, GET TO THE PARKING STUDY. WE DID CALCULATE THE INCREASE OF REQUIRED PARKING DOES AND IN FACT GO UP. IT INCREASES POST-PROJECT REQUIRED PARKING SPACES WILL BE 1296 PARKING SPACES, AND THE CAMPUS WILL HAVE OVERALL 1759, WHICH IS, YOU KNOW, APPROXIMATELY CLOSE TO 200. FIND MY NUMBERS 1296, 13, 14, 50, 400 AND LIKE 60 SPACES OVER OVER. SECOND QUESTION IS WITH THE TEMPORARY REMOVAL OF THE 159 LOTS WHERE THE TEMPORARY BUILDINGS ARE GOING TO BE, WHERE THAT TRAFFIC, HAS IT BEEN CONSIDERED HOW THAT WILL SHIFT TRAFFIC AND WHAT'S IN PLAN? WHAT'S THE PLANS FOR THAT SHIFT TO THAT SOUTH PARKING LOT? JUST THE REDIRECT TO THE STUDENTS AND STAFF TO GO TO THIS PARKING LOT TO THE SOUTH INSTEAD OF THE NORTH. THERE WAS THAT WAS USUALLY THE FRONT WAS DEDICATED FOR THE STAFF. SO STAFF JUST MOVED ON THIS SIDE. AND THAT WAS PREDOMINANTLY THAT STAFF WAS THE NINTH GRADE OR THE PEOPLE WHO WERE AT THE ADMIN WHO WHO WORKED ON THE ON THE NORTH SIDE, PEOPLE WHO WORK ON THE SOUTH SIDE OR THE, THE THEY WERE ALWAYS PARKING ON THAT SIDE ON THE MAIN, YOU KNOW, BUILDING THE MAIN PARKING LOT AT THE CORNER OF CAMPUS AND. CEDAR, CEDAR, AND THEN THE PEOPLE ON THE SOUTH CTE STADIUM, ALL THE ATHLETICS PEOPLE PARKED ON THE SOUTH SIDE, YOU KNOW, IN THE NEW PARKING LOT. THEIR NATATORIUM WAS ALWAYS PARKING ON THE OTHER SIDE. SO EVERYBODY WAS PARKING THERE.

THIS WAS REALLY DESIGNATED FOR NINTH GRADE. SO THEY JUST MOVED, SHIFTING FROM THE NORTH TO THE SOUTH. THAT'S ALL. SO MY, MY THE THOUGHT WAS THAT AT THAT INTERSECTION WITH CAMP WISDOM AND CEDAR RIDGE, THOSE ARE MAIN THOROUGHFARES. THERE'S A AND SO THERE WAS ALREADY CONGESTION THERE. AND NOW THAT PARKING IS BEING SHIFTED TO DIFFERENT STREETS WHICH ARE NOT MAIN THOROUGHFARES. AND SO MY THE QUESTION IS WHAT'S THE PLAN FOR MANAGING THE TRAFFIC THAT'S NOW BEING SHIFTED TO THOSE OTHER STREETS? THE WE DIDN'T CHANGE THE NUMBER OF CARS. IT IS STILL THE SAME. THE CARS JUST SHIFTED ON THAT SIDE. SO THERE WILL BE MORE. THEY STILL HAVE A STAFF AND A POLICE OFFICER MANAGING THAT IN THE EVENING, IN THE AFTERNOONS. SO THAT IS STILL BEING MANAGED. THE QUANTITY HASN'T BEEN CHANGED. THE BUSSES ARE STILL COMING FROM THE SAME THAT WE DIDN'T DISTURB THE BUS DRIVE AND ALL THE FRONT AND THE CAMPUS OF THIS AREA, ONE TO THE EAST SIDE, THAT IS STILL THE SAME. THE DROP OFF AND THE STUDENT PARKING STAYS STAYS AS IT IS. IT USED TO BE AGAIN, THAT PARKING LOT WAS NEVER FULL. IT WAS 60%. NOW IT WILL BE 80%. SO THE TRAFFIC IS STILL THE QUANTITY IS NOT CHANGED. WE'RE JUST GOING TO MONITOR IT MORE EFFECTIVELY. NOW. THE CAMPUS HAS AGREED. THE DISTRICT HAS AGREED TO MONITOR IT MORE CLOSELY FOR THE NEXT 12 MONTHS WHILE WE ARE IN CONSTRUCTION. THE. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YOU KNOW, I HAVE ONE MORE. I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS FOR THE ARCHITECT, THE ENGINEER, THE ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT'S BEING BUILT. WHAT IS IT EXACTLY? I MEAN, WHAT'S THE TOTAL? ANYBODY KNOW? 37,000 SQUARE, 37,000FT■!S. IS. GO AHE. I'M SORRY. THE PROGRAM THAT WE HAVE PROPOSED FOR THAT NEW PORTION OF THE CTE IS MOSTLY THE BISTRO KITCHEN AREA. SO IT'S THERE ARE LIKE PROGRAM WITH THAT REQUIRES BIGGER SPACES. AND ALSO THE COSMETOLOGY LAB. YEAH. THE REST OF THE PROGRAM FOR THE CTE ARE ACTUALLY RELOCATED TO AN EXISTING BUILDING. THE BUILDING RIGHT BEHIND. RIGHT BEHIND. YEAH. YEAH, YEAH, I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH. SO YOU'RE ADDING THIS JUST A QUICK QUESTION TO THROW IT OUT THERE. I WAS THINKING ABOUT IT WHILE MY COLLEAGUE WAS SPEAKING. WAS THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT THAT THERE'S NO YOU'RE INCREASING THAT ARE YOU IS THAT GOING TO STILL BE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF COVERAGE OF ARE WE GOING TO BE OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE GREEN SPACE OR ARE WE GOING TO BECAUSE YOU'RE AT 60, 80%, WE GOT 20% OF GREEN

[00:50:07]

SPACE OR YOU GUYS TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. WE'RE NOT WE'RE NOT CHANGING THE DRIVES. WE'RE IN THE GREEN AREA JUST THE WAY IT IS. THE SIDEWALK WILL BE MODIFIED A LITTLE BIT TO MEET ADA, BUT YEAH, SOME OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT DID HAVE COVERED LIKE WALKWAYS NOW. YES, THEY THEY HAD MULTIPLE COVERED WALKWAY, THE BUS SIDEWALK ACROSS THE FRONT FOR, FOR THE BUS LOOP IS, YOU KNOW, LIKE STAYING. SO JUST SAYING NOT ALL OF THE SPACE IS A PURE GREEN TUB. YEAH, YEAH.

YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, LIKE PAVEMENT. SO BUT WE HAVE WORKED WITH STAFF TO SAY THAT WE MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. YEAH. THAT GREEN SPACE. YEAH. THAT THAT WAS THE ONLY QUESTION I HAD BECAUSE I, YOU KNOW, I'M THE GREEN GUY. I'M THINKING HEAT ISLAND MITIGATION AND WATER CONSERVATION ENERGY AND ALL THIS OTHER MESS. AND ALSO LOOKING AT IF YOU'RE INCREASING THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, ATTACHING ON THE EXISTING, MAKE SURE YOU FALL WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING OR THE ZONING PLAN FOR THAT BUILDING. SO YOU END UP WITH A 99% CONCRETE, NO GREEN SPACE. WE ARE FULLY COMPLYING WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE, WITH THE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE. YEAH. WHAT IS REQUIRED TO RELOCATE? 510, NINE TREES, TEN TREES WERE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE WHAT'S THE STAFF REQUIRES WHATEVER THE CITY REQUIRES. YEAH THAT'S THAT'S THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE. THANK YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION AS A SORT OF FOLLOW UP. YOU WERE SAYING SOMETHING ABOUT THE AMOUNT, THE SQUARE FOOT FEE THAT WAS GOING TO BE ADDED. IT WAS 37,000. ARE YOU SAYING THAT IS THAT ALL NEW, OR ARE WE SAYING THAT WE ARE ACTUALLY RENOVATING SOME OF WHAT'S ALREADY THERE AND ADDING SPACE? 37,000 IS THE NEW ADDITION? IS THE NEW PORTION THAT IT'S BEEN ADDED AS A NEW CONSTRUCTION? YES. WE'RE RENOVATING ALSO THE BUILDING M AS PART OF THIS PROJECT, BUT THE 37,000 IS THE PART THAT IS GOING TO BE COMPLETELY NEW. EXISTING NINTH GRADE BUILDING WHERE WE ARE ATTACHING THE NEW BUILDING THAT'S BEING RENOVATED TO CTE, DIFFERENT DIFFERENT PROGRAMS BRINGING FROM THE EXISTING BUILDING TO THIS BUILDING. AND THE NINTH GRADE GOES BACK TO&THE OLD CTE, WHERE THAT THING AND INCORPORATED IN THE BUILDING, AND IT WAS A REQUIREMENT FROM THE DISTRICT TO KEEP THE NINTH GRADE SEPARATE FROM THE REST OF THE BECAUSE THEY HAVE A SEPARATE GYM, THEY HAVE A SEPARATE CAFETERIA THERE. THEY'RE REALLY LIKE A SCHOOL WITHIN A SCHOOL. THEY'RE VERY, VERY THEY'RE TOTALLY INDEPENDENT. THEIR CLASSES ARE DIFFERENT. SO I GUESS THAT'S MY THANK YOU. THAT'S THE QUESTION I HAD EARLIER THAT WHO'S GOING TO ACTUALLY BE OCCUPYING THOSE TEMPORARY BUILDINGS NINTH GRADE ONLY. OKAY. SO THAT'S BECAUSE THEIR AREA IS BEING RENOVATED. YES. OKAY. YES. THEY'RE VERY STRICTLY THEY'RE THEY'RE THEY'RE STAFF IS THEY'RE ALL THE TEACHERS ARE THERE 29. NOBODY ELSE IS COMING THERE. COUNSELOR IS THEIR THEIR RECEPTIONIST IS THEIR, THEIR ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL. THEY HAVE FOUR OF THEM. SO THEY'RE ALL THERE. THEY'RE ALL STATIONED IN THIS AREA VERY, VERY INDEPENDENT. AND THE LOCATION OF THOSE PORTABLES ARE THE CLOSEST, YOU KNOW, TO THE EXISTING BUILDING. ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? THANK YOU. THANK YOU GUYS.

HEARING NO MORE QUESTIONS. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION REGARDING ITEM NUMBER. OH THAT'S RIGHT I HAVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. WERE YOU MR. BARRERA? DID YOU KNOW IF YOU'RE NOT GOING TO ENTERTAIN ANY MORE PUBLIC COMMENT OR TESTIMONY, YOU CAN CLOSE IT. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO OPEN IT UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. IF THERE'S ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC THAT HAS LIKE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS MATTER, EITHER FOR OR AGAINST IT, TO OPEN IT UP AT THIS TIME BEFORE CLOSING THE HEARING, AND THEN YOU CAN DELIBERATE A LITTLE BIT MORE AND THEN REACH A DECISION ON WHAT YOU WANT TO DO WITH AS FAR AS ACTION, ARE THERE ANY INDIVIDUALS HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THE ITEM NUMBER FIVE? HEARING OR SEEING NONE, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM NUMBER FIVE. SO MOVED. THANK YOU. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. THANK YOU. ANY DISCUSSION ON ITEM NUMBER FIVE? NOPE. ALL THOSE VOTING IN FAVOR? OH. I'M SORRY. WE'RE DOING A ROLL CALL. MADAM SECRETARY GETS TO DO THE ROLL CALL ON APPROVING THE CLOSING OF THE HEARING. YES, WE DO A ROLL CALL TO. YES. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CORRECT.

[00:55:08]

STEPHANIE. CHAMPAGNE THROUGH YOLANDA COLUMBUS APPROVED. ELIAS RODRIGUEZ APPROVED. ERICA BROWNING APPROVED. E BAILEY NGUYEN APPROVED. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED AT THIS TIME, AND THE TIME IS 756. COMMISSIONERS, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION REGARDING ITEM NUMBER FIVE AS IT WAS READ INTO THE RECORD. I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD AND APPROVE, REQUEST A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SUP FOR THE DUNCANVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL. I BELIEVE MR. BARRERA HAS A. OH, SORRY. SORRY. NO, NO. AND THAT'S FINE. IF I MAY, I. DURING THE COURSE OF THE HEARING, I HEARD SOME QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS ABOUT THE LANDSCAPING TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND WHETHER OR NOT THAT WAS BEING MET OR IS BEING MET. SO IF THE COMMISSION IS COMFORTABLE ENOUGH, YOU CAN ADD THAT AS AN ADDITIONAL CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION, STAFF VERIFICATION THAT THE CITY'S TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE IS ADHERED TO, AS WELL AS THE LANDSCAPING. AND WE CAN CERTAINLY MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S CONFIRMED AND ADDRESSED BEFORE THE PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL. ALSO, THERE WAS A CONCERN ABOUT THE NOTARY ON THE APPLICATION, AND WE CAN MAKE ALSO THAT AS A AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL, IF THAT'S THE DESIRE OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. SO THERE IN ESSENCE WOULD BE FOR FIVE CONDITIONS TACKED ON TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. THE THREE THAT ARE LISTED ON THE ON THE PRESENTATION THAT YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU. AND THEN THE 2 OR 3, IF REALLY IF YOU WANTED TO BREAK IT DOWN THE LANDSCAPING, YOU KNOW, INTO TWO COMPONENTS THE TREE PRESERVATION AND THEN THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. I JUST PUT THAT OUT THERE FOR THE COMMISSION'S TO CONSIDER AFTER THAT. YEAH, THE MOTION IS I THINK THE APPLICANT HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO FOLLOW THE BUILDING CODES ANYWAY, AND IT'S GOING TO GO IN FOR STAFF REVIEW FOR THE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS THAT WE HAVE IN PLACE, BECAUSE WE DO HAVE STANDARDS NOW THAT I'M SURE THEY'RE GOING TO FOLLOW. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S THE CASE, THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS THAT AS PART OF THIS. UNLESS, COMMISSIONER, UNLESS YOU WANT TO PUT THAT IN THERE, IT'S UP TO YOU. WELL, I MEAN, SINCE THEY HAVE TO ANYWAY, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE A PROBLEM TO ADD IT. THE OTHER THING THAT I WOULD I WANTED TO DISCUSS THE 12 MONTHS FROM PROJECT COMPLETION, THAT SEEMS A LITTLE BIT EXCESSIVE TO ME. IS THAT AT ALL? AND THESE ARE JUST THE SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. CERTAINLY YOU CAN FEEL FREE TO ADD OR MODIFY ANY OF THESE THAT WE HAVE BEFORE YOU, SO YOU PLEASE DO NOT FEEL LIKE YOU HAVE TO TAKE THEM AS PRESENTED. NO THOUGHTS ON THAT. THAT WAS 12 MONTHS TO GET THERE. SO IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT OR FROM THE CEO? IT'S 12. AND CORRECT AS MR. MR. BARRERA THE 12 MONTHS OF PROJECT COMPLETION. THAT'S 12 MONTHS AFTER THE FULL CEO HAS BEEN ISSUED. IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT. YEAH, I THINK THAT I DON'T KNOW IF MR. BURNS DID WE ADAPT THE 2021 IBC? DO YOU KNOW MR. ROMERO? NO. YEAH, I THINK IN THE IBC INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, THERE'S SOMETHING I DON'T RECALL THE EXACT CHAPTER, BUT I THINK THAT IT I THINK IF WE ADAPTED THE, THE 2015 OR I THINK WE'RE LOOKING 2018, I DON'T REMEMBER THAT THEY DO HAVE 12 MONTHS TO FINISH THIS UP, THAT IT'S RECOMMENDED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL. I'M NOT SAYING WE HAVE TO FOLLOW THAT RULE, BUT, YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK THAT THEY'RE GOING TO OPEN UP THAT SCHOOL WITHOUT A CODE. YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK THE CITY IS GOING TO GIVE THEM A TEMPORARY CODE EITHER. I THINK WE HAVEN'T IN THE PAST, AND I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO START NOW. THAT IS A GOOD POINT. BUT BECAUSE THIS IS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, CERTAINLY THE CITY CAN ADD ON ANY CONDITIONS ABOVE AND BEYOND THAT THEY FEEL ARE NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT THE AREA GETS RESTORED AND THAT THE THOSE TEMPORARY STRUCTURES ARE REMOVED SO THAT YOU CAN FEEL FREE TO RECOMMEND A TIME PERIOD LESS THAN 12 MONTHS. BECAUSE, AGAIN, THIS IS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. YEAH. I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT THEY CAN PROBABLY HAVE HAVE THAT ACCOMPLISHED WITHIN SIX MONTHS IF THAT'S SO,

[01:00:06]

WHAT WOULD COMMISSIONER BROWNING, COULD YOU STATE YOUR MOTION AND WITH THE AMENDMENT THAT YOU'RE. I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ACCEPT THIS APPLICATION. WITH A CHANGE FROM REMOVING THE TEMPORARY CLASSROOMS AND PORTABLE BATHROOMS TO WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF PROJECT COMPLETION, AND ALSO THAT THE NOTARY INFORMATION ON THE ZONING APPLICATION BE COMPLETED. SO BEFORE WE GET THE SECOND, THE MOTION THAT WE'RE ENTERTAINING IS A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NINE, NUMBER FIVE, WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AS LISTED FOR NUMBER ONE AND TWO, AND WITH SIX MONTHS RATHER THAN 12 MONTHS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION NUMBER THREE, AND ADDING ITEM NUMBER FOUR WITH A COMPLETION OF THE NOTARIZED BLOCK ON THE APPLICATION. THAT'S THE MOTION THAT WE'RE ENTERTAINING. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL. I'LL SECOND THE COMMISSIONERS MOTION.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS, FOR THE SECOND. MADAM SECRETARY, DO THE ROLL CALL, PLEASE. THANK YOU. APPROVE. THE APPROVED. YOLANDA COLUMBUS. APPROVED. ELIAS RODRIGUEZ. APPROVE. MISS BROWNING. OH, SORRY. SORRY. ERICA BROWNING. APPROVE. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK.

[6. Discuss the Comprehensive Plan Update.]

YOU. ON TO ITEM NUMBER. I BELIEVE. YES. WHICH IS THE DISCUSSION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE AND A VOTE. YES. I'M SORRY. WERE YOU TAKING A VOTE ON THAT LAST APPROVAL? NO, WE JUST DID. OKAY. I'M SORRY. YES, IT WAS FIRST AND SECOND. AND WITH FOUR CONDITIONS, AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. THEY CALL YOU OUT TO. YEAH. OKAY. OKAY. THANK YOU. NO, I APPRECIATE YOU CHECKING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SO I JUST WANTED TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE WITH YOU THAT NEXT WEEK THERE WILL BE A JOINT MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMP, EXCUSE ME, OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE AND THE CITY COUNCIL. IN THAT MEETING, THE CONSULTANT WILL WILL PRESENT THE VISION, THE MISSION STATEMENT FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND OTHER ITEMS. OTHER COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN. THIS MEETING IS EXPECTED TO TAKE PLACE AT 4:00. YOU ARE WELCOME TO ATTEND IF YOU'D LIKE. ALSO, WE'RE LOOKING AT WE'RE. THE GOAL IS TO WRAP UP THE SURVEY COMMUNITY SURVEY AT THE END OF THE MONTH. THE CONSULTANT SHARED WITH ME THAT THUS FAR THEY'VE RECEIVED APPROXIMATELY 100 SURVEY RESPONSES. WE WANT TO GET MORE RESPONSES. SO WE'RE GOING TO INCREASE OUR SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN AND PUTTING THIS OUT THERE. SO I WOULD REACH OUT TO YOU AND SEEK YOUR ASSISTANCE IN SPREADING THE WORD AND GETTING OUR RESIDENTS, OUR BUSINESS OWNERS, ETCETERA, TO PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO FILL OUT THE SURVEY AS WE ARE PUTTING TOGETHER THE VISION FOR THE COMMUNITY FOR THE NEXT 20 YEARS. SO THE MORE PARTICIPATION, THE BETTER. IT'S ALSO MY UNDERSTANDING THAT AT THE LAST, FOR THE LAST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WE RECEIVED ABOUT 350 SURVEY RESPONSES. SO WE'RE A LITTLE BIT OFF THIS TIME AROUND, AND WE DEFINITELY WANT TO GET AS MANY THE FEEDBACK FROM AS MANY INDIVIDUALS AS POSSIBLE. SO PLEASE, IF YOU KNOW ANYONE, PLEASE HELP SPREAD THE WORD. AND COMPLETING THE SURVEY. THAT IS ALL REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE? COMPREHENSIVE. WHAT DATE IS THAT, MR. BARRETT? NEXT TUESDAY. WHICH IS THAT MAKES IT THE 21ST. YEAH. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. SO MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER. OH, NOPE. MOVING ON TO WE'RE COMPLETED. MOVING ON TO THE ADJOURNMENT OF TONIGHT'S MEETING. TIME IS CURRENTLY 805. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN. SO MOVED SECOND. I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. THANK YOU. DO DO WE HAVE TO DO A ROLL CALL FOR THAT TOO? I WOULD ASK FOR A QUICK ROLL CALL TO ADJOURN, PLEASE. COULD I ROLL? CALL TO ADJOURN, PLEASE? THANK YOU,

[01:05:05]

ERICA BROWN. APPROVED. APPROVED AND APPROVED ARE NOW ADJOURNED AT 805 AND 50S.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.